Nurse author & editor最新文献

Delving into the critical components of the discussion section 深入研究讨论部分的关键部分

Nurse author & editor Pub Date : 2023-11-03 DOI: 10.1111/nae2.12056

Diane J. Angelini

{"title":"Delving into the critical components of the discussion section","authors":"Diane J. Angelini","doi":"10.1111/nae2.12056","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/nae2.12056","url":null,"abstract":"A quick outline of any general manuscript often includes an introduction in which the purpose or multiple aims are outlined. Following the introduction is the background section where it is expected that the authors would explore the comparative literature and identify where the gap exists in knowledge information. The methodology and results sections follow. Then the most critical segment of any manuscript, the discussion section, is revealed. This can be the most creative section to a manuscript, and for some, the most difficult to write. The discussion segment of any manuscript requires more thought and effort than any other manuscript component.1 As a writing consultant, I have found that writing the discussion section can be the most challenging task, for most authors, novice or otherwise. The most demanding aspect of framing a discussion section is deciding which aspects of the study are the most critical.1 The discussion section addresses the significant findings and must ensure that the manuscript's purpose has been fully accomplished.2-5 If within the initial paragraphs of the discussion it is unclear to the reader or reviewer, what the key outcomes or findings are, the purpose is then left unfulfilled, and the direction of the discussion can be further misdirected. The purpose of this manuscript is to outline for the reader the critical components needed to successfully complete the discussion section within any manuscript. Watson states that the discussion section is the heart of the entire manuscript.6 It pulls together the purpose, methods, the key results and then interprets the relevance of the key findings for the reader. One way to successfully accomplish this is to restate the purpose of the study within the first two sentences of the opening paragraph within the discussion. Then, the key findings follow which will likely complete the stated purpose of the manuscript. For any discussion section, it is helpful to build on what has already been presented in the existing literature within the background section of the manuscript.7 The background section identifies where the gap is within the literature justifying the writing and research of the present manuscript. One way in which to enhance the writing of the discussion section for novice writers (and a likely indicator of success), is to follow the style or components outlined within other published works.8 Commonly noted errors within the discussion section include the following: (a) repeating the results section over again, (b) addressing findings which were almost significant and then discussing those findings as if they were critical, and (c) documenting conclusions without supporting evidence or clear results, that is, overplaying the significance of the findings.8 Additional errors can include: the significance of the results not being fully discussed or supported, presenting unsupported conclusions, or having study limitations being inadequately covered.8 Within the discus","PeriodicalId":77290,"journal":{"name":"Nurse author & editor","volume":"55 15","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-11-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"135819554","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}