Clinical transplants最新文献

{"title":"Early De Novo Donor Specific Antibody Involvement in Delayed Graft Function After Kidney Transplantation: A Report of 2 Cases.","authors":"Lan Zhu,&nbsp;Gang Chen,&nbsp;Weijie Zhang,&nbsp;Hui Guo,&nbsp;Zhengbin Lin,&nbsp;Dunfeng Du,&nbsp;Song Chen,&nbsp;Huibo Shi,&nbsp;Shenwei Liu,&nbsp;Zhishui Chen","doi":"","DOIUrl":"","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Kidney tubular damage caused by ischemia-reperfusion injury is considered the major cause of delayed graft function (DGF) after renal transplantation. It is not clear whether early generated de novo donor specific antibodies (DSA) play a role in DGF. Here, we report 2 cases of renal transplant with DGF, which seems to be associated with de novo DSA. When the early produced de novo DSA are not potent enough to mediate acute rejection, they may cause mild intra-graft injury, which has a significant impact on the degree of DGF and its recovery. Antibody-targeted therapy seems to be beneficial to the recovery of patients with DGF.</p>","PeriodicalId":77074,"journal":{"name":"Clinical transplants","volume":" ","pages":"231-4"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2014-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"33928585","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"An Update on Cardiac Transplantation in the United States.","authors":"Matthew J Everly","doi":"","DOIUrl":"","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Heart transplantation in the United States remains an important option for those with heart failure. Survival rates over the last 25 years have improved with the advent of newer immunosuppressive agents, innovation, and a better understanding of managing risk. However, many patients continue to experience allograft failure after transplantation. Innovations in modalities to reduce acute and chronic rejection are needed to improve the long-term success of heart transplantation.</p>","PeriodicalId":77074,"journal":{"name":"Clinical transplants","volume":" ","pages":"27-32"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2014-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"34098263","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network/Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients 2014 Data Report: Intestine.","authors":"Junchao Cai,&nbsp;Guosheng Wu,&nbsp;Annie Qing,&nbsp;Matthew Everly,&nbsp;Elaine Cheng,&nbsp;Paul Terasaki","doi":"","DOIUrl":"","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>As of September 19, 2014, 2441 cases of intestinal transplantation have been performed in 46 centers (2400 deceased, 41 living). Eight centers did more than 100 transplants. Annual case numbers peaked in 2007 (N = 198) and steadily decreased to 109 cases in 2013. Short gut syndrome (68%) and functional bowel problems (15%) are two major indications for intestinal transplantation. The 3 major types of transplants involving the intestine include: isolated intestine transplant (I); simultaneous intestine, liver, and pancreas transplant (I+L+P); and, combined intestine and liver (I+L) transplant. Graft survival has significantly improved in recent years, mainly due to improved first year graft survival. The 1-, 5-, and 10-year graft survivals were: 74%, 42%,and 26%, respectively (I); 70%, 50%, and 40%, respectively (I+L+P); and 61%, 46%, and 40%, respectively (I+L). The longest graft survivals for I, l+L+P, and l+L were 19 years, 16 years, and 23 years, respectively. Steroids, Thymoglobulin, and rituximab are 3 major induction agents used in recent years. Prograf, steroids, and Cellcept are 3 major maintenance agents. Induction recipients (68% of all patients) had a significantly lower acute rejection rate than nonrecipients before discharge (60% versus 75%, p < 0.001). Most of the patients received 2 (53%) or 3 (25%) maintenance immunosuppressants. Acute rejection episodes were usually treated with one (60%) or two agents (27%). Steroids were most commonly used (50-60%). OKT3 has been replaced with antithymocyte globulin (since 1999) and rituximab (since 2006). During 1990-2000, 94% (N = 445) of patients received ABO identical intestinal transplants, while 6% (N = 29) received ABO compatible transplants. ABO identical transplant recipients had a significantly higher 5-year graft survival rate than ABO compatible recipients (39% versus 21%, p < 0.0001). In recent years (2001- 2012), more patients received ABO compatible (N = 188, 11%) than in the early decade (p < 0.01). 5-year graft survival rates of ABO compatible transplants were lower than those of ABO identical transplants. However, the difference did not reach statistical significance (46% versus 49%, p = 0.07). The effect of ABO compatibility on graft outcome was further confirmed by Cox Analysis. ABO incompatible transplants are still rarely performed (N = 4) in intestine. In conclusion, annual case numbers of intestinal transplants have been decreasing, regardless of improved graft survival. ABO compatible intestinal transplants previously had a significantly lower graft survival rate than ABO identical transplants. However, the graft survival difference became less significant in recent years, possibly due to, or at least partly due to the use of new immunosuppressive agents.</p>","PeriodicalId":77074,"journal":{"name":"Clinical transplants","volume":" ","pages":"33-47"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2014-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"34098264","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Update on Alloantibodies in Solid Organ Transplantation.","authors":"Matthew J Everly","doi":"","DOIUrl":"","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In the last few years, there have been studies published on serial testing and longitudinal analysis of anti-human leukocyte antigen (anti-HLA) antibodies. The focus of these studies was to determine specific characteristics of the impact of donor specific anti-HLA antibodies (DSA) in organ transplant dysfunction. These publications have led to an increasing concern about DSA and a growing effort to better understand DSA and to develop treatment for patients with DSA. In 2014, several reports were published that either confirm or expand upon both the understanding of the humoral theory and the clinical applications of DSA testing. This review delves into these publications and reports how their findings fit into the humoral theory of transplant.</p>","PeriodicalId":77074,"journal":{"name":"Clinical transplants","volume":" ","pages":"125-9"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2014-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"34099329","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Renal Transplant Outcomes in Waitlist Candidates with a Previous Inactive Status Due to Being Temporarily Too Sick.","authors":"Napat Leeaphorn,&nbsp;Marcelo S Sampaio,&nbsp;Naowanit Natal,&nbsp;Alireza Mehrnia,&nbsp;Mandana Kamgar,&nbsp;Edmund Huang,&nbsp;Kamyar Kalantar-Zadeh,&nbsp;Bruce Kaplan,&nbsp;Suphamai Bunnapradist","doi":"","DOIUrl":"","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In 2003, the United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) changed its policy to allow candidates with 'inactive' status to accrue time on the waitlist. In this study, we assessed the transplant outcomes among deceased donor kidney transplant (DDKT) recipients who were temporarily inactive specifically due to medical reason, i.e., being temporarily too sick (reason 7).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using the UNOS database, adult DDKT recipients were divided into two groups: those who had never been inactivated (active group) and those with a history of being inactive due to reason 7 (reason 7 group). Patient and graft survival, 3-year risk of death, and graft failure were examined and compared.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After 3 years of follow-up, patient survival in the reason 7 group was significantly lower than that of the active group (88.14% versus 91.93%, p < 0.01). The reason 7 group had a 20% increased risk of death (hazard ratio, HR 1.20, confidence interval, CI 1.04 - 1.38), a 16% increase in graft failure (HR 1.16, CI 1.06-1.28), and a 15% decrease in death-censored graft failure (HR 1.15, CI 1.01-1.31).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Recipients with a history of reason 7 have lower patient and graft survival when compared to the active group. Nonetheless, the margins of difference are minimal. Candidates with a history of reason 7 should not be discouraged from transplantation once they return to active status. Standardized criteria for placing candidates on inactive status should be developed to reduce disparities among transplant centers.</p>","PeriodicalId":77074,"journal":{"name":"Clinical transplants","volume":" ","pages":"117-24"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2014-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"34099328","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"The Virtual Crossmatch: An Essential Tool for Transplanting Sensitized Patients.","authors":"Annette M Jackson","doi":"","DOIUrl":"","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Improved virtual crossmatch assessments following the implementation of solid phase HLA antibody immunoassays has significantly impacted transplantation of sensitized candidates, using either deceased or living donor organs. In deceased donor transplants, the virtual crossmatch has reduced the number of unexpected positive crossmatch tests resulting in improved organ allocation and reduced ischemia and wait times. The virtual crossmatch has also improved access to living donor transplantation by expediting donor evaluation by impacting clinical decisions regarding desensitization, and through implementation of successful kidney paired donation programs. However, continued improvements in predicting actual crossmatch outcomes are needed to further improve access to transplantation for sensitized candidates. Improved accuracy in HLA antibody strength assessments will allow for better correlations between transplant centers and the opportunity for collaborative trials to analyze transplant strategies and outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":77074,"journal":{"name":"Clinical transplants","volume":" ","pages":"131-6"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2014-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"34099330","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"The Role of HLA Antibodies in HLA Mismatched Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation.","authors":"Xian Zhang,&nbsp;Jianling Wang,&nbsp;Zaitong Zhou,&nbsp;Yang Zhang,&nbsp;Hongxing Liu,&nbsp;Chunrong Tong,&nbsp;Caoxing Yu,&nbsp;Yue Lu,&nbsp;Yanli Zhao,&nbsp;Min Xiong,&nbsp;Jia Rui Zhou,&nbsp;Sunrui Juan,&nbsp;De Yan Liu,&nbsp;Zhijie Wei,&nbsp;Jianping Zhang,&nbsp;Tong Wu,&nbsp;Dao-Pei Lu","doi":"","DOIUrl":"","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Published reports suggest that engraftment failure after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) is closely associated with the presence of donor-specific HLA antibodies (DSA). Herein, we report a single cohort retrospective analysis of 567 cases of HLA mismatched allogeneic HSCT patients from the Lu Dao-pei Hematology Center, transplanted between September 11, 2012, and November 20, 2014. Of these cases, 306 patients underwent HLA class I and II antibody testing within one month before transplantation. For patients with HLA antibody screening resulting in an HLA antibody with a mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) > 1000, single antigen bead HLA class I and II testing was performed. Then, according to donor HLA genotype, we determined whether DSA were present. Of the 306 patients with pre-transplant HLA antibody screening (LABScreen Mixed Antigen), HLA class I antibodies were present in 51 cases (16.7%). HLA class II antibodies were present in 24 cases (7.8%). Of all antibody positive cases, 20 cases were positive for HLA antibodies on single antigen beads at an MFI > 1000. Half of these cases were DSA positive. Of the non-DSA antibody cases (n = 1 0), there was one case of primary graft failure after HSCT. In the ten DSA positive patients, the HSCT was chosen from the reactive donor. Seven of these cases were treated prior to HSCT with 1-2 times plasmapheresis or high-dose intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) therapy. The other three cases had no special treatment to decrease HLA antibodies before transplantation. All 10 DSA positive cases achieved successful engraftment. There was one case of primary graft failure in the group of 273 patients who were HLA antibody negative. Out of the group of 261 patients who did not undergo HLA antibody screening, there were 7 cases of primary engraftment failure. The incidence of engraftment failure was lower in the group of patients who had been screened for HLA antibodies prior to transplant than it was for the patients who had not been screened (2/306 versus 7/261, p = 0.054). Five of the 7 cases of engraftment failure were screened for HLA antibodies at 30 days after first transplantation. The results of five of the cases were negative for HLA antibodies and the patients underwent second transplants, all achieving successful engraftment. This cohort researched HLA antibodies and their effect on engraftment of HSCT in Chinese cases. We compared 306 patients who underwent HLA antibody screening and were given the appropriate treatment before HSCT if DSA were positive, with 261 patients who were not screened for HLA antibodies. We found that the incidence of primary graft failure significantly decreased. Although not directly determined, HLA antibodies (especially DSA) are the cause of engraftment failure and our findings reflect the importance of HLA antibody screening prior to transplantation. We suggest that patients with pre-existing DSA should be treated with plasma exchange or IVIG therapy bef","PeriodicalId":77074,"journal":{"name":"Clinical transplants","volume":" ","pages":"245-50"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2014-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"33928587","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"High-Dose Intravenous Immunoglobulin Therapy for Donor Specific Antibodies in Kidney Transplant Recipients with Acute and Chronic Graft Dysfunction: Updates on Previously Reported Cohorts.","authors":"Javier Alfonso,&nbsp;Jane Gralla,&nbsp;Patrick Klem,&nbsp;Laurence Chan,&nbsp;Alexander C Wiseman,&nbsp;James E Cooper","doi":"","DOIUrl":"","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Kidney allograft damage resulting from donor-specific anti-HLA antibody (DSA) activity has been identified as a key component of long-term graft attrition. DSA that persists following acute antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) episodes and/or DSA associated with chronic graft dysfunction have been shown to be particularly pathogenic. Despite the significantly negative effects of DSA on graft survival, there are currently no accepted treatment modalities. We have previously reported our experience using a regimen of high-dose (5 mg/kg) intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) treatment over 6 months for kidney recipients with detectable DSA either following an acute AMR episode or in association with chronic graft dysfunction. In this manuscript, we report further follow-up on this cohort of patients treated with a single regimen of high-dose IVIG. We show a continued significant lowering effect on DSA present following AMR, particularly class I DSA, while DSA associated with chronic graft dysfunction, particularly class II, remains resistant to the immunomodulatory effects of IVIG.</p>","PeriodicalId":77074,"journal":{"name":"Clinical transplants","volume":" ","pages":"161-70"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2014-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"33996229","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Early Intervention in Living Kidney Transplantation Based on Dynamic Monitoring of Donor Specific Antibodies.","authors":"Yu Chen,&nbsp;Lang-Yan Li,&nbsp;Xiao-Yan Lou,&nbsp;Hao Wang,&nbsp;Lei Zhang,&nbsp;You-Hua Zhu","doi":"","DOIUrl":"","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study aims to analyze the clinical application of HLA donor specific antibodies (DSA) detected by Luminex single antigen beads and to discuss the impact of early intervention on renal function in DSA positive kidney transplant patients. In 64 cases of living-related renal transplantation, DSA was detected using Luminex single antigen bead assays before and after transplantation. The positive recipients were given intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) and increased doses of mycophenolate mofetil (MMF). The relationship between DSA and renal function was analyzed. In all transplant recipients, DSA was negative prior to transplantation. Ten DSA positive recipients were found after HLA mismatched transplantations. With intervention, two DSA positive recipients became DSA negative. In six cases, the patients' DSA intensity decreased more than 50%. In the remaining two cases, DSA intensity did not significantly decline, and within 3-6 months, antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) appeared and renal function was impaired. From our research, we conclude that dynamic monitoring of DSA using Luminex single antigen beads may help predict future changes in renal function. In addition, early application of IVIG and increasing doses of MMF can reduce the incidence of AMR.</p>","PeriodicalId":77074,"journal":{"name":"Clinical transplants","volume":" ","pages":"205-8"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2014-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"33996234","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"The UNOS Renal Transplant Registry: Review of the Last Decade.","authors":"Mark Andre,&nbsp;Edmund Huang,&nbsp;Matthew Everly,&nbsp;Suphamai Bunnapradist","doi":"","DOIUrl":"","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Kidney transplantation has become a preferred treatment for end-stage renal disease (ESRD) as transplant recipients enjoy freedom from dialysis and improvement in both quality and quantity of life. More patients are being placed on the transplant waiting list, although the waiting list patients still only represent a very small fraction of ESRD patients. The characteristics of both waitlisted and transplanted patients have changed considerably in the last decade, as the ESRD population has aged and waiting list times have increased. Over the last 10 years, we have witnessed an increasingly severe shortage of kidney donors. Even with increasing efforts of the transplant community to expand the donor pool by including larger numbers of high risk deceased donor transplants, the overall number of kidney transplants has remained relatively stable. Those who do receive transplants, however, benefit from excellent transplant outcomes. The use of paired exchange/chain transplant donors has increased the living donor pool significantly and with outstanding results. Belatacept, a costimulation blockage drug, represents a new class of transplant immunosuppression. It has been used sparingly in the first few years of its approval. Most kidney transplant patients are still maintained on immunosuppressive agents that were approved almost two decades ago. In the next decade, we will certainly continue to deal with an organ shortage as the number of eligible and waitlisted patients is likely to increase. Effective and efficient organ allocation policies will be increasingly necessary to address this scarcity. Optimizing the transplant candidate work-up, improving maintenance of waitlisted patients, and providing optimal post-transplant medical care will be vital to the continued success of kidney transplantation.</p>","PeriodicalId":77074,"journal":{"name":"Clinical transplants","volume":" ","pages":"1-12"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2014-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"34098261","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}