Connor C Kerndt, Rajus Chopra, Paul Weber, Amy Rechenberg, Daniel Summers, Thomas Boyden, David Langholz
{"title":"Using Artificial Intelligence to Semi-Quantitate Coronary Calcium as an 'Incidentaloma' on Non-Gated, Non-Contrast CT Scans, A Single-Center Descriptive Study in West Michigan.","authors":"Connor C Kerndt, Rajus Chopra, Paul Weber, Amy Rechenberg, Daniel Summers, Thomas Boyden, David Langholz","doi":"","DOIUrl":"","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Non-gated, non-contrast computed tomography (CT) scans are commonly ordered for a variety of non-cardiac indications, but do not routinely comment on the presence of coronary artery calcium (CAC)/atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) which is known to correlate with increased cardiovascular risk. Artificial intelligence (AI) algorithms can help detect and quantify CAC/ASCVD which can lead to early treatment and improved outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using an FDA-approved algorithm (NANOX AI) to measure coronary artery calcium (CAC) on non-gated, non-contrast CT chest, 536 serial scans were evaluated in this single-center retrospective study. Scans were categorized by Agatston scores as normal-mild (<100), moderate (100-399), or severe (≥400). AI results were validated by cardiologist's overread. Patient charts were retrospectively analyzed for clinical characteristics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 527 patients included in this analysis, a total of 258 (48.96%) had moderate-severe disease; of these, 164 patients (63.57%, p< 0.001) had no previous diagnosis of CAD. Of those with moderate-severe disease 135 of 258 (52.33% p=0.006) were not on aspirin and 96 (37.21% p=0.093) were not on statin therapy. Cardiologist interpretation demonstrated 88.76% agreement with AI classification.</p><p><strong>Discussion/conclusion: </strong>Machine learning utilized in CT scans obtained for non-cardiac indications can detect and semi-quantitate CAC accurately. Artificial intelligence algorithms can accurately be applied to non-gated, non-contrast CT scans to identify CAC/ASCVD allowing for early medical intervention and improved clinical outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":74853,"journal":{"name":"Spartan medical research journal","volume":"8 1","pages":"89132"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-12-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10702149/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"138815107","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Brandon Nudelman, Brandon B Gardner, Stewart A Bryant, Drew A Lansdown, Brian T Feeley, Nirav K Pandya
{"title":"Open Fractures in National Football League Athletes: Analyzing Performance and Return to Sport.","authors":"Brandon Nudelman, Brandon B Gardner, Stewart A Bryant, Drew A Lansdown, Brian T Feeley, Nirav K Pandya","doi":"","DOIUrl":"","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Open fractures are potentially devastating injuries for the professional athlete. We sought to compare return to sports (RTS) and performance in National Football League (NFL) athletes sustaining open versus closed fractures.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>NFL athletes with surgically treated open and closed fractures of the forearm, tibial shaft, and ankle from 2009-2018 were identified through publicly available reports and records. Data including demographics, RTS, career duration, and the approximate value performance metric before and after injury were collected. Statistical analyses were performed comparing open to closed injuries. Continuous variables were compared using Mann-Whitney U or two sample t- tests while categorical variables were compared using Fisher's exact test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Ninety-five athletes met inclusion criteria (10 open and 85 closed fractures). Overall, 90% (n = 9) returned to sport after an open injury and 83.5% (n = 71) returned after closed injury with a median time missed of 48.9 (range 35.1 - 117.4) weeks and 43.0 (range 2.4 - 108.0) weeks, respectively. Athletes undergoing forearm surgery were able to return sooner, at around 20.8 weeks, and ankle fractures conferred the lowest return rate at 80% (n = 48). There were no significant differences in career duration and post-injury performance between open or closed fracture cohorts.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Although open fractures are relatively uncommon injuries seen in NFL athletes, our study suggests RTS for these players is high. Athletes undergoing surgical treatment for open fractures had similar RTS rates, performance metrics, and career durations compared to those with comparable closed fractures. This information can provide guidance for providers counseling elite athletes on postoperative expectations.</p>","PeriodicalId":74853,"journal":{"name":"Spartan medical research journal","volume":"8 1","pages":"87846"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-12-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10702152/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"138814942","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Irrigation Solutions in Total Joint Arthroplasty.","authors":"Matthew Caid, Josiah Valk, Jonathan Danoff","doi":"10.51894/001c.37502","DOIUrl":"10.51894/001c.37502","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Despite advancements in the field of adult reconstruction, prosthetic joint infection (PJI) remains a common and devastating complication of total joint arthroplasty. Eradication of these infections can often prove difficult, and they remain a source of considerable morbidity and mortality. This clinical review paper will focus on some of the more commonly used irrigation solutions; povidone-iodine (PI), chlorhexidine (CHG), acetic acid (AA), hydrogen peroxide (HP), antibiotic irrigations, taurolidine, and polyhexanide-betaine (PB).</p><p><strong>Summary of the evidence: </strong>Significant research has been performed on the prevention of PJI, including use of intraoperative joint irrigation solutions. Several solutions have been theorized to aid in infection prevention, but no evidence-based practice guidelines in this area of orthopaedics have been established. There is a paucity of prospective randomized control trials to compare the efficacy of these joint irrigation solutions.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The authors present a review regarding seven major categories of commonly used intraoperative joint irrigation solutions. The current literature fails to demonstrate a clear consensus for a preferred solution and concentration for povidone-iodine, chlorhexidine, hydrogen peroxide, acetic acid, antibiotic irrigations, taurolidine, and polyhexanide-betaine. Prospective, randomized control trials directly comparing these different irrigation solutions are needed.</p>","PeriodicalId":74853,"journal":{"name":"Spartan medical research journal","volume":"7 2","pages":"37502"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-09-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9448655/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"40373185","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Brian Fiani, Frank DeStefano, Alessandra Cathel, Marisol Soula, Taylor K Reardon
{"title":"Single Center Retrospective Analysis of Cerebral Aneurysms from a Patient Sample Data Collection at a Comprehensive Stroke Center.","authors":"Brian Fiani, Frank DeStefano, Alessandra Cathel, Marisol Soula, Taylor K Reardon","doi":"","DOIUrl":"","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Institutional self-monitoring of cerebral aneurysm data should occur regularly. The objective of this retrospective single center study was to examine the reproducibility of a data collection and analytic method to examine cerebral aneurysm characteristics and trends.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A single center retrospective analysis was performed from 2018 to 2021 of the most recent 100 patient presentations with a newly diagnosed cerebral aneurysm. Data collection included patient demographics, radiographic features, ruptured or unruptured status, location, grading scale, treatment strategy, survival, and length of stay, which were extracted and presented in tabular form and analyzed for overall trends.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the collected 100 patients meeting ICD-10 criteria, 10 (10%) patients were excluded due to having been previously diagnosed at the institution and not meeting the criteria of a new discovery of cerebral aneurysm for inclusion. The remaining 90 sample patients presented with newly diagnosed aneurysms to the authors' Emergency Department between 2018 and 2021. Most patients were between the ages of 25 and 65 with 55 (61%) patients identifying themselves as female sex. Of the 90 eligible sample patients, 59 (66%) had aneurysms that were not ruptured. Eighty-eight (97.7%) patients had cerebral aneurysms that were < 7mm in size. The most common location for aneurysms was in the anterior cerebral circulation, with identification of 27 middle cerebral artery aneurysms. Length of stay (LOS) ranged from 0-171 days with a mean of 11.97 days (SD = 19.9). Of the seven (7.7%) patients who expired, four (57%) experienced spontaneous subarachnoid hemorrhages, with two (29%) occurring in the anterior communicating artery and one (14%) in the left middle cerebral artery and basilar artery respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The typical presentation of a cerebral aneurysm is unruptured with a pre-dominance in middle-aged females. Our findings are congruent with the literature regarding the location of the aneurysm originating in the anterior circulation. However, most aneurysms in our clinical cohort were located on the MCA/ICA in contrast to the literature reported (i.e., most anterior communicating artery). Of those patients who presented unruptured, outpatient follow-up and routine monitoring were appropriate with medical management in the setting of small aneurysms. The risk of progression and subsequent rupture was relatively small in this patient cohort. Multi-year examinations of single institution comprehensive stroke centers regarding cerebral aneurysms would enable researchers to conduct regional analyses and comparisons to national and international trends.</p>","PeriodicalId":74853,"journal":{"name":"Spartan medical research journal","volume":"7 2","pages":"34494"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-09-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9448660/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"41184453","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Jared Ham-Ying, Samuel J Wisniewski, Jake Rowan, Izabela Birsanescu, Alicia Speak, Rebecca Malouin
{"title":"Exploring New Patient Understanding of Osteopathic Manipulative Medicine using a Cross-Sectional Survey and Mixed Methods Approach.","authors":"Jared Ham-Ying, Samuel J Wisniewski, Jake Rowan, Izabela Birsanescu, Alicia Speak, Rebecca Malouin","doi":"10.51894/001c.37924","DOIUrl":"10.51894/001c.37924","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Osteopathic manipulative medicine (OMM), a patient-focused approach to medical treatment utilized by doctors of osteopathic medicine (DO), continues to be an under-utilized resource in treating musculoskeletal disorders. Lack of familiarity by both referring physicians and patients of OMM can impact patient-physician communication and impede patient-centered care approaches. This 2020-2021 study was conducted to investigate new patient understanding of OMM within the Michigan State University OMM Clinic.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A set of 18 survey questions developed by the authors within their MSU OMM clinic were utilized for the study. The main purpose of the questions was to generally ascertain new patient's understanding of OMM, its role in patient care, who can place clinic referrals and the services an OMM clinic provides. Respondents were new adult patients at the MSU OMM clinic.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The convenience study sample of 83 respondents was primarily female, 60 (72.3%). Few respondents were familiar with OMM, as only eight (9.64%) reported prior experience with OMM. Of the 83 patients in this study, 69 (80.7%) reported back pain. When examining referral patterns, there were low numbers of referrals from non-PCP providers, especially from advanced practice providers (APP), including physician assistants (n = three, 3.66%) and nurse practitioners (n = eight, 7.96%). Most surveyed patients 61 (73.5%) had been referred by their primary care providers.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Results indicate that communication directed to non-DO physicians, advanced practice providers and patients about OMM services may be helpful to provide noninvasive symptomatic treatment options for musculoskeletal conditions. Further larger-scale studies examining both non-DO provider and new patient perceptions concerning OMM are clearly warranted.</p>","PeriodicalId":74853,"journal":{"name":"Spartan medical research journal","volume":" ","pages":"37924"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-09-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9448656/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"40373181","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Andrew Ross, Steven Engebretsen, Rebecca Mahoney, Samba Bathula
{"title":"Risk Factors and Management for Epistaxis in a Hospitalized Adult Sample.","authors":"Andrew Ross, Steven Engebretsen, Rebecca Mahoney, Samba Bathula","doi":"10.51894/001c.37760","DOIUrl":"10.51894/001c.37760","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Epistaxis is a common otolaryngologic problem that affects most of the general population. Common risk factors for epistaxis include nasal irritants, nasal/facial oxygen use, certain systemic conditions (e.g., hypertension and coagulopathies) and medication use (e.g., anticoagulants and intranasal medications). This study examined risk factors for and management of epistaxis in patients admitted for other medical conditions who developed an episode of epistaxis during their hospital admission.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients were included in the study if they were older than 18, admitted for medical illnesses other than epistaxis and developed an episode of epistaxis during their admission during calendar year 2020 at the authors' institution's hospitals. Electronic health record data regarding sociodemographic characteristics, common risk factors (e.g. oxygen use, anticoagulant use, history of hypertension) and treatment for epistaxis (e.g. holding anticoagulation therapy, administration of oxymetazoline, nasal cautery, nasal packing) were extracted from each chart. Patients were split into otolaryngologic treatment versus no treatment groups and risk factors were compared between sample subgroups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 143 sample patients were included, with most common reason for admission being cardiovascular related, 48 (33.6%). Most patients, 104 (72.7%), did not have a previous diagnosis of epistaxis, were positive for anticoagulant use, 106 (74.1%) and were positive for hypertension, 95 (66.4%). Oxygen use showed a significantly decreased risk for intervention (OR 0.45, 95% CI: 0.23-0.894; p = 0.028). Most patients required changes in medical management (e.g., holding anticoagulation or starting nasal saline sprays/emollients).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These results demonstrate the common risk factors for epistaxis in patients admitted for other clinical diseases. Identifying at-risk patients for epistaxis at hospital admission can help to initiate measures to prevent epistaxis episodes. Future studies are needed to study epistaxis risk factors and identify effective preventative measures for epistaxis among hospital populations.</p>","PeriodicalId":74853,"journal":{"name":"Spartan medical research journal","volume":"7 2","pages":"37760"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-09-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9448657/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"40373180","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Association Between Covid-19 Severity And Residing In High Lead Level Locations.","authors":"Vanessa Foxworth, Larry Kage, Kimberly Barber","doi":"10.51894/001c.35880","DOIUrl":"10.51894/001c.35880","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>This 2021 retrospective study explored the association between patients that resided in high lead-exposed areas and Covid-19 severity.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Adults that resided within a metropolitan area hospitalized with Covid-19 at a community hospital between January 2020 and November 2020 were included in the study. Data including patient's age, sex, length of stay, and co-morbid conditions were extracted from the hospital electronic health record. The patients were classified according to severity of disease based on a Covid Severity Index (qCSI) score, using patient's vitals upon admission. Patient locations were classified per EPA mapping for lead exposure from water pipes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The qCSI score was significantly higher in the high exposure group, with a mean of 4.6 (SD = 4.4), than the low exposure group, which had a mean of 2.1 (SD = 3.2) (p = 0.004). The median risk stratification levels differed significantly (p = 0.006). Length of stay was also significantly greater in the high exposure group, mean 11.4 (SD 10.7), then in the low exposure group, mean 6.2 (SD = 7.2) (p = 0.01).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study demonstrated an association between Covid-19 severity and patients that have had high lead level exposure. Further research is needed to explore this possible association, such as studies involving larger datasets.</p>","PeriodicalId":74853,"journal":{"name":"Spartan medical research journal","volume":"7 2","pages":"35880"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-09-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9448653/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"40373183","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Nikita Theophilus, Carlos Rios-Bedoya, Ghassan Bachuwa
{"title":"COVID-19 Vaccine Survey among Healthcare Workers. A Community Experience.","authors":"Nikita Theophilus, Carlos Rios-Bedoya, Ghassan Bachuwa","doi":"10.51894/001c.35628","DOIUrl":"10.51894/001c.35628","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>In December 2019, the coronavirus (COVID-19) caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) made its first appearance in Wuhan, China with a pandemic declared by March 2020. As the death toll continued to rise, the Centers for Diseases Control and Prevention (CDC) recommended healthcare workers to strongly encourage the general population to receive COVID-19 vaccinations. For this to be effective, it is important to understand the general perceptions of the health care workers and persons associated with the healthcare industry towards their acceptance of the vaccine.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The authors of this 2021 cross-sectional study administered a 28-item survey to a convenience sample of 1,257 (43.1%) healthcare system workers out of a total of 2,915. The survey assessed respondents' demographic information, COVID-19 vaccine status, work-related exposures to COVID-19, reasons for receiving or refusing the vaccine, and primary sources of vaccine related information. Respondents were classified as vaccine status/intention positive or negative.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Those in the youngest 18 - 35 years age group were significantly less likely to receive the vaccine (p < 0.01) and male healthcare workers were significantly more likely to receive the vaccine (p = 0.01). White respondents, 759 (77.9%) were also more likely to receive the vaccine than African-American, 127 (13%). It was more likely for persons to be vaccinated when encouraged/provided (p = 0.01) information by their respective employers. A subgroup of 277 (22.0%) respondents reported their employer as the primary source of vaccine information, causing the authors to conclude that employer information was the most influential informational factor impacting COVID-19 vaccination.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Vaccine hesitancy continues to be a major obstacle hampering the success of COVID-19 vaccination promotion programs. Results indicate that a combination of a prior COVID-19 diagnosis, information dispensed by a person's employer, persons' home living situations, and contact with persons who had an uneventful post vaccination experience increased the likelihood of vaccination.</p>","PeriodicalId":74853,"journal":{"name":"Spartan medical research journal","volume":" ","pages":"35628"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-09-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9448654/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"40373182","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Continuous positive airway pressure reduces the incidence of atrial fibrillation in patients with obstructive sleep apnea: A Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review.","authors":"Ziad Affas, Saif Affas, Kutiba Tabbaa","doi":"10.51894/001c.34521","DOIUrl":"10.51894/001c.34521","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) and atrial fibrillation (AF) are disorders that have increased in the United States during recent years. Earlier investigations have shown that underlying undiagnosed and unmanaged OSA plays a significant role in high rates and also as a trigger for newly diagnosed AF. Since the introduction of continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) as a main therapy for OSA, more studies have evaluated the effect of CPAP on the development or recurrence of AF in OSA patients. However, sample sizes in a limited number of studies have been too small to conclude whether CPAP therapy has a significant effect on the development of AF in patients with OSA. The authors report results of their systematic review and meta-analysis summarizing what is currently known about the efficacy of CPAP for mitigating AF in patients with OSA.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>The authors systematically reviewed the published reports on CPAP use and the incidence of AF from PubMed, Google Scholar, EMBASE, Web of Science, meeting abstracts, and Cochrane databases published between January 2015 and November 2021. Study data were extracted by two reviewers and a random-effects meta-analysis was performed using RevMan version 5.4.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 17 studies that met inclusion criteria were identified Studies included a total of 6,523 patients, 3,248 (49.8%) who used CPAP and 3,275 (50.2%) who did not use CPAP. In a random effects model, patients treated with CPAP showed a decrease in the incidence of AF (OR, 0.51; 95% CI; 0.27; 0.97, p = 0.04). High heterogeneity among the included studies was also observed (I2 = 97%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our results add to the increasing evidence that CPAP therapy may reduce the incidence of development of AF in patients with OSA. Prospective future studies and clinical trials are needed to refine our understanding of the relationship between OSA and AF and how CPAP may reduce cardiovascular disease development.</p>","PeriodicalId":74853,"journal":{"name":"Spartan medical research journal","volume":"7 2","pages":"34521"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-09-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9448661/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9650937","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Marvin Kajy, Devan O Higginbotham, Guy Ball, Rahul Vaidya
{"title":"\"Fantasy Points\" associated with Professional Athlete Performance after Lumbar Discectomy or Microdiscectomy.","authors":"Marvin Kajy, Devan O Higginbotham, Guy Ball, Rahul Vaidya","doi":"10.51894/001c.30766","DOIUrl":"10.51894/001c.30766","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The treatment of Lumbar Disc Herniation (LDH) in elite athletes is a debated topic that lacks consensus in the literature due to varying outcome reporting methods. The objective of this study was to quantify the overall performance of a sample of professional athletes before and after receiving a lumbar discectomy or microdiscectomy in a cohort of players in the National Football League (NFL), National Basketball Association (NBA), National Hockey League (NHL) and Major League Baseball (MLB).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The authors identified publicly accessible data from a cohort of different types of professional players who received either a lumbar discectomy or a microdiscectomy. These records were identified through newspaper archives, injury reports, player profiles and press releases between 1993 through 2015. Fantasy and Wins Above Replacement (WAR) scores were calculated for each player.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 38 professional players met study inclusion criteria. NFL players had the lowest return-to-play (RTP) at nine of 14 (64%). The RTP for NBA, NHL and MLB players were comparable with 6/7 (86%) vs 8/9 (89%) vs 7/8 (88%). NFL players had the lowest average career length after surgery at 34.8 months, while NBA players had the longest average career length at 48 months. MLB players on average required the longest time to return to presurgical level of performance (24 months) and required the longest average recovery time at 12 months.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Based on these results, the average performance of most elite athletes are likely to decrease after undergoing a lumbar discectomy. Although it appears that performance peaks in the initial years after the operation for some players, there was an overall long-term decline in this sample of elite athletes. Study limitations included small sample size, lack of controlling for possible confounding variables (e.g., age, etc.) and use of variable reporting sources. Additional studies with larger sample sizes and age-matched controls are needed to examine the effects of lumbar discectomy more comprehensively in elite athletes.</p>","PeriodicalId":74853,"journal":{"name":"Spartan medical research journal","volume":"7 1","pages":"30766"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-02-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8873437/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"41165251","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}