Open research Africa最新文献

筛选
英文 中文
Molecular detection of novel Anaplasma sp . and zoonotic hemopathogens in livestock and their hematophagous biting keds (genus Hippobosca) from Laisamis, northern Kenya. 新型无形体的分子检测。以及来自肯尼亚北部Laisamis的牲畜及其吸血山羊(Hippobosca属)中的人畜共患血液病。
Open research Africa Pub Date : 2022-01-01 DOI: 10.12688/openresafrica.13404.1
Daniel M Mwaki, Kevin O Kidambasi, Johnson Kinyua, Kenneth Ogila, Collins Kigen, Dennis Getange, Jandouwe Villinger, Daniel K Masiga, Mark Carrington, Joel L Bargul
{"title":"Molecular detection of novel <i>Anaplasma</i> sp <i>.</i> and zoonotic hemopathogens in livestock and their hematophagous biting keds (genus <i>Hippobosca</i>) from Laisamis, northern Kenya.","authors":"Daniel M Mwaki,&nbsp;Kevin O Kidambasi,&nbsp;Johnson Kinyua,&nbsp;Kenneth Ogila,&nbsp;Collins Kigen,&nbsp;Dennis Getange,&nbsp;Jandouwe Villinger,&nbsp;Daniel K Masiga,&nbsp;Mark Carrington,&nbsp;Joel L Bargul","doi":"10.12688/openresafrica.13404.1","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.12688/openresafrica.13404.1","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Livestock are key sources of livelihood among pastoral communities. Livestock productivity is chiefly constrained by pests and diseases. Due to inadequate disease surveillance in northern Kenya, little is known about pathogens circulating within livestock and the role of livestock-associated biting keds (genus <i>Hippobosca</i>) in disease transmission. We aimed to identify the prevalence of selected hemopathogens in livestock and their associated blood-feeding keds. <b>Methods:</b> We randomly collected 389 blood samples from goats (245), sheep (108), and donkeys (36), as well as 235 keds from both goats and sheep (116), donkeys (11), and dogs (108) in Laisamis, Marsabit County, northern Kenya. We screened all samples for selected hemopathogens by high-resolution melting (HRM) analysis and sequencing of PCR products amplified using primers specific to the genera: <i>Anaplasma, Trypanosoma, Clostridium, Ehrlichia, Brucella, Theileria,</i> and <i>Babesia.</i> <b>Results:</b> In goats, we detected <i>Anaplasma ovis</i> (84.5%), a novel <i>Anaplasma</i> sp. (11.8%), <i>Trypanosoma vivax</i> (7.3%), <i>Ehrlichia canis</i> (66.1%), and <i>Theileria ovis</i> (0.8%). We also detected <i>A. ovis</i> (93.5%), <i>E. canis</i> (22.2%), and <i>T. ovis</i> (38.9%) in sheep. In donkeys, we detected ' <i>Candidatus</i> Anaplasma camelii' (11.1%), <i>T. vivax</i> (22.2%), <i>E. canis</i> (25%), and <i>Theileria equi</i> (13.9%). In addition, keds carried the following pathogens; goat/sheep keds - <i>T. vivax</i> (29.3%) <i>, Trypanosoma evansi</i> (0.86%), <i>Trypanosoma godfreyi</i> (0.86%), and <i>E. canis</i> (51.7%); donkey keds - <i>T. vivax</i> (18.2%) and <i>E. canis</i> (63.6%); and dog keds - <i>T. vivax</i> (15.7%), <i>T. evansi</i> (0.9%), <i>Trypanosoma simiae</i> (0.9%) <i>,</i> <i>E. canis</i> (76%), <i>Clostridium perfringens</i> (46.3%), <i>Bartonella</i> <i>schoenbuchensis</i> (76%), and <i>Brucella abortus</i> (5.6%). <b>Conclusions:</b> We found that livestock and their associated ectoparasitic biting keds carry a number of infectious hemopathogens, including the zoonotic <i>B. abortus</i>. Dog keds harbored the most pathogens, suggesting dogs, which closely interact with livestock and humans, as key reservoirs of diseases in Laisamis. These findings can guide policy makers in disease control.</p>","PeriodicalId":74358,"journal":{"name":"Open research Africa","volume":"5 ","pages":"23"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10314185/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9791675","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Preferences and Expectations of Feedback of Individual Genetic Research Results in African Genomics: Views of South African Parents of Children With Neurodevelopmental Conditions 非洲基因组学个体遗传学研究结果反馈的偏好和期望:患有神经发育疾病儿童的南非父母的观点
Open research Africa Pub Date : 2020-11-23 DOI: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-107280/v1
O. Matshabane, Cleo A Albertus, Marlyn C. Faure, D. Ralefala, K. Donald, A. Wonkam, J. D. Vries
{"title":"Preferences and Expectations of Feedback of Individual Genetic Research Results in African Genomics: Views of South African Parents of Children With Neurodevelopmental Conditions","authors":"O. Matshabane, Cleo A Albertus, Marlyn C. Faure, D. Ralefala, K. Donald, A. Wonkam, J. D. Vries","doi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-107280/v1","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-107280/v1","url":null,"abstract":"\u0000 BackgroundGenomic medicine is expanding at an exponential pace across the globe and increased access to genome analysis has led to greater generations of genetic results with specific relevance to individuals. AimThis study aims to explore preferences and expectations of feedback of individual genetic research results among parents of children with neurodevelopmental conditions. MethodsFollowing a qualitative approach, we conducted four deliberative focus group discussions with (n=27) South African parents of children involved in genomics research on neurodevelopmental conditions. ResultsMost participants expressed a strong interest in receiving individual genetic results regardless of severity, actionability and preventability. These results were viewed as valuable because they could empower or emancipate individuals, families and communities. Receiving risk information was also believed to motivate healthier lifestyle choices. However, some participants were uncertain or articulated a desire not to receive results due to fears of anxiety or psychological harm. In addition, participants expected to receive results as a demonstration of respect from researchers and articulated it as an act to build trust between researchers and participants. ConclusionsInternationally, a debate continues around whether individual genetic results should or should not be fed back to participants of research studies. In Africa, there is scant literature which has investigated this question and no policies to guide researchers. This study provides a basis of empirical data on perspectives of African participants which could inform work on the development of a consolidated approach to the feedback of incidental findings in the continent.","PeriodicalId":74358,"journal":{"name":"Open research Africa","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-11-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"41565545","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
相关产品
×
本文献相关产品
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书