Journal of shoulder and elbow arthroplasty最新文献

{"title":"Anatomic and Reverse Stemless Shoulder Arthroplasty: Functional and Radiological Evaluation.","authors":"Mohamed S Galhoum,&nbsp;Ahmed A Elsheikh,&nbsp;Amanda Wood,&nbsp;Qi Yin,&nbsp;Simon P Frostick","doi":"10.1177/24715492221118765","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/24715492221118765","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Stemless shoulder arthroplasty was developed to restore the glenohumeral centre of rotation without violation of the humeral shaft. It allows the preservation of humeral bone stock. Complications related to stem malalignment and periprosthetic fractures can be avoided.</p><p><strong>Patient and methods: </strong>This is a prospective observational study that reports outcomes of 46 patients who received stemless shoulder arthroplasty \"Comprehensive Nano implant ®.\" The series includes Group (A): 30 anatomic and one hemiarthroplasty. Group (B): 15 reverse stemless replacement. Functional outcomes were assessed by visual analog score (VAS), satisfaction, range motion, Constant score, and American Shoulder and Elbow Score (ASES).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean follow-up was 40.4  ±  12 months (range, 24 months to 60 months). Group (A): VAS and satisfaction improved by 5.3 and 67.5 points respectively. Constant score significantly improved from 28.5  ±  14.5 to 62.5  ±  23 P = <0.001. The radiological assessment showed the mean centre of rotation (COR) deviation was 2.8  ±  1.9 mm. 27% of patients have COR discrepancy of more than 4 mm. In Group (B), patients reported a significant improvement in VAS, Satisfaction, and ASES P  =  0.002, 0.002, and 0.003, respectively.Complications include shoulder pain with progressive loss of movements, aseptic loosening early subscapularis rupture, glenohumeral dislocations, and humeral component migration.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Anatomic Stemless total shoulder arthroplasty offers acceptable results and improvement of overall functional outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":73942,"journal":{"name":"Journal of shoulder and elbow arthroplasty","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-08-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/ad/33/10.1177_24715492221118765.PMC9411739.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"33444969","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Iatrogenic Injury to the Suprascapular Nerve Following Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty: A Case Report.","authors":"Jason Long,&nbsp;Jordan Liles,&nbsp;Oke Anakwenze,&nbsp;Christopher Klifto","doi":"10.1177/24715492221103518","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/24715492221103518","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The location and course of the suprascapular nerve (SSN) to the glenohumeral joint places this nerve at risk when operating around the shoulder. Iatrogenic injury to the suprascapular nerve has been described in several different procedures including, rotator cuff repairs, posterior capsulorraphy, Bankart repairs, SLAP lesion repairs, Latarjet procedures, and shoulder arthroplasty. We present a case of iatrogenic suprascapular nerve injury due to superior glenoid baseplate screw placement following primary reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA), a novel approach to diagnosis of nerve injury, and treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":73942,"journal":{"name":"Journal of shoulder and elbow arthroplasty","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-08-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/fb/f6/10.1177_24715492221103518.PMC9386855.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"40716767","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Specific Design of a Press Fit Humeral Stem Provides low Stress Shielding in Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty at minimum 5 Years FU.","authors":"Geoffroy Nourissat,&nbsp;Simon Corsia,&nbsp;Howard W Harris,&nbsp;Pierre-Alban Bouché","doi":"10.1177/24715492221112543","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/24715492221112543","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Press fit fixation is becoming more popular in RSA to preserve, in theory, bone capital. Several studies report that bone resorption can be very high around humeral stems depending on their size, shape and mode of fixation. The aim of the current study is to mid-term follow-up clinical and radiological result of a press fit ovoid regular stem RSA in non acute trauma cases.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>We performed a retrospective monocentric study of patients continuously implanted with the Humeris® stem RSA for degenerative change of the shoulder. Nineteen shoulders, in eighteen patients (74.6 y.o (from 69 to 81)), were available at minimum five years follow-up.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean final adjusted Constant score was 111.9 (65 to 130), and the mean ASES score was 49.82 (10 to 60). Humeral resorption was observed in 21% of cases. We found a statistically significant (<i>p</i> = .014) lower adjusted Constant score in patients presenting with resorption on post-operative X-rays compared to those without resorption (115.6 vs. 98.25). Half cases of patients presenting a resorption underwent L'Episcopo procedure during surgery. Humeral resorption occurs the first year after surgery and do not increase even 8 years after surgery. Analysis demonstrated no correlation between the value of filling ratios and bone resorption.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The current study confirms a low rate of stress shielding around the studied stem, with rare bony resorption and no osteopenia around the humeral stem. This study highlights the importance of choosing the appropriate proximal shape and length of the humeral stem for press fit fixation in RSA.</p>","PeriodicalId":73942,"journal":{"name":"Journal of shoulder and elbow arthroplasty","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-07-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/c1/d9/10.1177_24715492221112543.PMC9272197.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"40503485","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"A Biomechanical Analysis of Shoulder Muscle Excursions During Abduction, After the Treatment of Massive Irreparable Rotator Cuff Tears Using Superior Capsular Reconstruction (SCR), Bursal Acromial Reconstruction (BAR), and SCR with BAR.","authors":"Michael Labib,&nbsp;Farid Amirouche,&nbsp;Sonia Pradhan,&nbsp;Aimee Bobko,&nbsp;Jason Koh","doi":"10.1177/24715492221109001","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/24715492221109001","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Current understanding of the biomechanical effects of treatment options for irreparable rotator cuff (RC) tears is lacking. This study examines how shoulder muscle lengths and excursions are affected by superior capsular reconstruction (SCR), bursal acromial reconstruction (BAR), and SCR with BAR, following a complete supraspinatus tear.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Six fresh-frozen cadaveric shoulders were examined. Deltoid and RC muscle lengths were measured at 0, 30, 45, 60, and 90° of shoulder abduction under six conditions: (1) intact, (2) partially torn supraspinatus, (3) completely torn supraspinatus, (4) SCR, (5) SCR with BAR, and (6) BAR. Muscle excursions from 0-90° of abduction were then calculated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Subscapularis muscle lengths after SCR, BAR, and SCR with BAR were significantly greater (post-hoc Tukey HSD test; <i>p </i>< .01) compared to the other conditions. Supraspinatus, infraspinatus, teres minor, and deltoid lengths were not significantly different (ANOVA test; <i>p </i>> .01) between the conditions. All muscle excursions remained statistically similar between the conditions (ANOVA test; <i>p </i>> .01).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These findings demonstrate that the use of SCR, BAR, or SCR with BAR for a complete supraspinatus tear, may increase subscapularis muscle length while maintaining other shoulder muscle lengths. An increase in subscapularis length can allow for more effective subscapularis muscle strengthening and increased compensatory function in the long term. Additionally, all shoulder muscle excursions are preserved after partial or complete supraspinatus tears and after SCR, BAR, or SCR with BAR. Therefore, these surgical treatments can initially normalize shoulder muscle function during 0-90° of abduction, after an irreparable supraspinatus tear.</p>","PeriodicalId":73942,"journal":{"name":"Journal of shoulder and elbow arthroplasty","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-06-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/41/e7/10.1177_24715492221109001.PMC9240589.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"40579669","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Conversion of Elbow Arthrodesis to Total Elbow Arthroplasty: A Case Report and Literature Review.","authors":"Holt S Cutler,&nbsp;Nathan Heineman,&nbsp;Aaron Hurd,&nbsp;Daniel Koehler,&nbsp;Robert Bass,&nbsp;Timothy Schacherer","doi":"10.1177/24715492221108608","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/24715492221108608","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Elbow arthrodesis is a salvage operation designed to relieve pain and enable weight bearing in young patients with painful arthritic joints who have failed all other treatment modalities. Unfortunately, elbow arthrodesis is poorly tolerated by many patients because there is no fusion position that accommodates all activities of daily living. As indications for elbow arthroplasty expand and implant design improves, patients living with elbow arthrodesis may seek conversion to arthroplasty to regain a functional range of motion. Only one case of elbow arthrodesis to elbow arthroplasty conversion has been reported in the English literature to date. We present the case of a 58 year old male, five years status post elbow arthrodesis, unable to perform his ADLs adequately, who was successfully converted to a total elbow arthroplasty. Indications, contraindications, and technical pearls are discussed.</p>","PeriodicalId":73942,"journal":{"name":"Journal of shoulder and elbow arthroplasty","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-06-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/74/18/10.1177_24715492221108608.PMC9218910.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"40401262","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Long-stemmed Hemiarthroplasty with Cerclage Wiring for the Treatment of Split-Head Fractures of the Proximal Humerus with Metaphyseal Extension: A Report of 2 Cases.","authors":"A Panagopoulos,&nbsp;K Solou,&nbsp;A Kouzelis,&nbsp;S Papagiannis,&nbsp;I Tatani,&nbsp;Z T Kokkalis","doi":"10.1177/24715492221108285","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/24715492221108285","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Complex fractures of the proximal humerus with splitting-head component and metaphyseal propagation are very rare injuries that are difficult to treat. Preservation of the humeral head is always considered except in cases with severe comminution and compromised vascularity where shoulder hemiarthroplasty is an alternative option.</p><p><strong>Case report: </strong>We present two male patients, 57- and 62-years-old who sustained such a complex proximal humeral fracture after a high-energy injury. They both managed with long-stemmed shoulder hemiarthroplasty and cerclage wiring of the metaphyseal area. They both demonstrated good clinical and radiological outcome at 32- and 24-months postoperatively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We report the functional and radiological outcomes of two cases of a rare proximal humeral fracture's pattern - combination of splitting-head and metaphyseal comminution - that were managed with long-stemmed hemiarthroplasty and cerclage wire and demonstrated good midterm clinical outcome.</p>","PeriodicalId":73942,"journal":{"name":"Journal of shoulder and elbow arthroplasty","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-06-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/2e/04/10.1177_24715492221108285.PMC9203719.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"40012598","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Comparison of Early Range of Motion in Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty Based on Indication: A Single Center Retrospective Review.","authors":"Michael E Doany,&nbsp;Kenny Ling,&nbsp;Rosen Jeong,&nbsp;Alireza Nazemi,&nbsp;David E Komatsu,&nbsp;Edward D Wang","doi":"10.1177/24715492221108283","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/24715492221108283","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) is commonly used in the treatment of rotator cuff arthropathy. Indications for RSA have expanded to include complex proximal humerus fractures. Studies directly comparing outcomes between traumatic and traditional elective indications are limited. The purpose of this study was to compare early active range of motion (aROM) within the first two years postoperatively between traumatic and non-traumatic primary RSA, as well as compare ASES scores, and patient satisfaction at final follow-up.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective analysis was conducted of all RSA performed by a single surgeon between January 2000 and December 2018. Patients were grouped by indication into traumatic and non-traumatic elective groups. Demographics, surgical data, and routine aROM data were collected. aROM was compared at 3, 6, 12, and 24 months. American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score and patient satisfaction were determined at the time of this investigation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>367 RSA procedures were performed by the senior author during the study period, 88 for fracture (24%), and 279 for non-traumatic elective indications (76%). Forward elevation and external rotation were inferior in the fracture group at all time points in the first two years. Internal rotation was equivalent throughout the first two years. Final ASES scores were 77.6 versus 83.5 in the fracture and non-fracture groups, respectively (<i>p</i> = .33).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Patients undergoing RSA for fracture had statistically significant inferior aROM in forward elevation and external rotation throughout the first two years. Despite having inferior aROM, ASES scores and patient satisfaction at final follow-up were statistically equivalent.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Level III; Retrospective Cohort Comparision; Prognosis Study.</p>","PeriodicalId":73942,"journal":{"name":"Journal of shoulder and elbow arthroplasty","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-06-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/52/5b/10.1177_24715492221108283.PMC9203724.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"40012599","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Shoulder Arthroplasty Options for Glenohumeral Osteoarthritis in Young and Active Patients (<60 Years Old): A Systematic Review","authors":"H. Fonte, Tiago Amorim-Barbosa, S. Diniz, L. Barros, J. Ramos, R. Claro","doi":"10.1177/24715492221087014","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/24715492221087014","url":null,"abstract":"Aim This study aims to describe the shoulder arthroplasty options for young and active patients (<60 years old) with glenohumeral osteoarthritis. Methods A systematic review of the literature was conducted by searching on Pubmed database. Studies that reported outcomes of patients with glenohumeral arthritis, younger than 60 years, that underwent shoulder arthroplasty [(Hemiarthroplasty (HA), Hemiarthroplasty with biological resurfacing (HABR), Total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA), Reversed total shoulder arthroplasty (RSA)] were included. Data include patient characteristics, surgical technique, range of motion, pain relief, outcome scores, functional improvement, complications, need for and time to revision. Results A total of 1591 shoulders met the inclusion criteria. Shoulder arthroplasty provided improvements in terms of ROM on the 3 plains, forward flexion (FF), abduction (Abd) and external rotation (ER), in different proportions for each type of implant. Patients submitted to RSA had lower preoperative FF (p = 0.011), and the highest improvement (Δ) in Abd, but the worst in terms of ER (vsTSA, p = 0.05). HA had better ER postoperative values (vsRSA p = 0.049). Pain scores improved in all groups but no difference between them (p = 0.642). TSA and RSA groups had the best CS Δ (p = 0.012). HA group had higher complication rates (21.7%), RSA (19.4%, p = 0.034) and TSA (19.4%, p = 0.629) groups the lowest, and HABR had the highest rate of revisions (34.5%). Conclusions HA had the highest rate of complications and HABR unacceptable rates of revision. These implants have been replaced by modern TSAs, with RSA reserved for complex cases. Surgeons should be aware of the common pitfalls of each option.","PeriodicalId":73942,"journal":{"name":"Journal of shoulder and elbow arthroplasty","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"42978227","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Remote Follow-up of Shoulder Arthroplasty Patients During COVID-19 Pandemic - Is This the way Forward?","authors":"Sameer A Mansukhani,&nbsp;Praveen Gopinath,&nbsp;Amit Chaturvedi,&nbsp;Georgios Konstantopoulos,&nbsp;Dimitra Leivadiotou","doi":"10.1177/24715492221075460","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/24715492221075460","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The COVID-19 Pandemic has affected the way health care systems function across the globe. Apart from eliminating the risk of being in a vulnerable environment during the pandemic such as a hospital setting, virtual arthroplasty follow-up reduces the demand on funding and resources on the National Health Services (NHS).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively reviewed our shoulder arthroplasty patients (55) operated between October 2018 to November 2020 at both our hospital sites. For remote follow-up, patients were contacted on a scheduled appointment date via telephone by an orthopaedic surgeon to enquire about their wound, pain and function. Patients were questioned as per questionnaire from the Oxford Shoulder Score (OSS) and American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) Standardised Assessment form.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>50 patients were included in the final data set after excluding those who had died (5 patients). All patients had had final x-rays with full Covid-19 precautions at the time of final follow-up. No patient had wound problems except one who had concerns of wound appearance. There were no cases of notching, impingement, deep infection, dislocation or nerve injury. Of the 50 patients, 40 (80%) patients were satisfied to have a remote follow-up. 36 (72%) patients said they wouldn't mind a remote follow-up appointment.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Remote follow-up via audio consultation may be an effective alternative to in person visits after shoulder arthroplasty. Patients in this series demonstrated a high level of satisfaction with virtual visits and post-operative complications were effectively identified.</p>","PeriodicalId":73942,"journal":{"name":"Journal of shoulder and elbow arthroplasty","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-02-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/90/16/10.1177_24715492221075460.PMC8853837.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"39945546","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Total Elbow Arthroplasty and Antegrade Posterior Interosseous Flap for Infected Posttraumatic Arthritis with an Active Fistula. A Rationale for Comprehensive Treatment. Case Report.","authors":"Efraín Farías-Cisneros,&nbsp;Jorge Luis Martínez-Peniche,&nbsp;Luis Carlos Olguín-Delgado,&nbsp;Francisco Guillermo Castillo-Vázquez,&nbsp;Ranulfo Romo-Rodríguez,&nbsp;Armando Torres-Gómez","doi":"10.1177/24715492221090745","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/24715492221090745","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The indication for total elbow arthroplasty (TEA) for primary and posttraumatic elbow arthritis has increased, however, its indication after infection remains elusive. Wound closure about the elbow increases the challenge of treating a previously infected elbow, often necessitating soft tissue coverage with local or regional flaps. We present a 75-year-old male patient with an elbow infection following a failed complex intraarticular fracture open reduction and internal fixation of the distal humerus. Initially, he presented with severe functional impairment and pain, also with an active fistula with serous exudate, whose culture was positive for <i>Cutinebacterium acnes</i>. Septic hardware loosening, and septic nonunion with intraarticular involvement of the left elbow was diagnosed. The patient underwent hardware removal, fistulectomy, serial irrigation and debridement and a pedicled antegrade posterior interosseous artery (PIA) flap on staged surgical treatment. Finally, after ruling out infection persistence, a TEA was performed. We aim to report the outcome of a patient treated with a TEA in the context of a previously infected elbow with soft tissue coverage with an antegrade PIA flap. Comprehensive treatment must be done in an appropriate manner, to obtain an expedited and desirable outcome.</p>","PeriodicalId":73942,"journal":{"name":"Journal of shoulder and elbow arthroplasty","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/89/a9/10.1177_24715492221090745.PMC9163731.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10619847","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}