Survivorship of Allologous Structural Bone Graft at a Minimum of 2 Years When Used to Address Significant Glenoid Bone Loss in Revision Shoulder Arthroplasty: A Computed Tomographic and Clinical Review.

Aparna Viswanath, Amy K Newell, Lindsay J Cunningham, Mike Walton, Puneet Monga, Steve Bale, Ian A Trail
{"title":"Survivorship of Allologous Structural Bone Graft at a Minimum of 2 Years When Used to Address Significant Glenoid Bone Loss in Revision Shoulder Arthroplasty: A Computed Tomographic and Clinical Review.","authors":"Aparna Viswanath,&nbsp;Amy K Newell,&nbsp;Lindsay J Cunningham,&nbsp;Mike Walton,&nbsp;Puneet Monga,&nbsp;Steve Bale,&nbsp;Ian A Trail","doi":"10.1177/24715492231172371","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study assesses outcomes in revision shoulder replacements where the glenoid bone loss was managed using a structural allograft (donated femoral head) in combination with a trabecular titanium (TT) implant.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We contacted patients who had undergone revision shoulder arthroplasty using the Lima Axioma TT metal-backed glenoid with an allologous bone graft as a composite who were over 2 years since surgery. Patients underwent computerd tomography evaluation, clinical review, and scoring preoperatively, at 6 months and the latest follow-up.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fifteen patients were included with a mean age of 59 (33-76). The average follow-up period was 40.5 months (24-51). 80% showed satisfactory bone graft incorporation and peg integration at the latest follow-up. Three had signs of significant bone graft resorption, although in 2 patients the pegs were still soundly fixed in the host bone. Clinically all patients showed a statistically significant improvement in pain relief, movement, and function. No unusual complications were reported.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Results show femoral head structural allograft in combination with TT metal-backed glenoid baseplate is a viable option for revision total shoulder replacement in the context of massive glenoid bone loss. We do, however, acknowledge that this resorption rate is higher than in other reported series where autograft is used.</p>","PeriodicalId":73942,"journal":{"name":"Journal of shoulder and elbow arthroplasty","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/46/9b/10.1177_24715492231172371.PMC10184218.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of shoulder and elbow arthroplasty","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/24715492231172371","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: This study assesses outcomes in revision shoulder replacements where the glenoid bone loss was managed using a structural allograft (donated femoral head) in combination with a trabecular titanium (TT) implant.

Methods: We contacted patients who had undergone revision shoulder arthroplasty using the Lima Axioma TT metal-backed glenoid with an allologous bone graft as a composite who were over 2 years since surgery. Patients underwent computerd tomography evaluation, clinical review, and scoring preoperatively, at 6 months and the latest follow-up.

Results: Fifteen patients were included with a mean age of 59 (33-76). The average follow-up period was 40.5 months (24-51). 80% showed satisfactory bone graft incorporation and peg integration at the latest follow-up. Three had signs of significant bone graft resorption, although in 2 patients the pegs were still soundly fixed in the host bone. Clinically all patients showed a statistically significant improvement in pain relief, movement, and function. No unusual complications were reported.

Conclusion: Results show femoral head structural allograft in combination with TT metal-backed glenoid baseplate is a viable option for revision total shoulder replacement in the context of massive glenoid bone loss. We do, however, acknowledge that this resorption rate is higher than in other reported series where autograft is used.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

异体结构骨移植治疗肩关节翻修成形术中显著盂骨丢失至少2年的生存率:计算机断层扫描和临床回顾。
背景:本研究评估了肩关节翻修置换术中使用同种异体结构移植物(捐赠的股骨头)联合骨小梁钛(TT)植入治疗肩关节骨丢失的结果。方法:我们联系了使用Lima Axioma TT金属背盂与异体骨移植作为复合材料进行翻修肩关节置换术的患者,这些患者手术后超过2年。患者术前、6个月及最近一次随访时接受计算机断层扫描评估、临床回顾和评分。结果:15例患者入组,平均年龄59岁(33-76岁)。平均随访40.5个月(24-51)。在最近的随访中,80%的患者表现出满意的植骨融合和骨钉融合。3例有明显的骨移植物吸收征象,尽管2例骨钉仍牢固地固定在宿主骨上。临床所有患者在疼痛缓解、运动和功能方面均表现出统计学上显著的改善。无异常并发症报道。结论:结果表明,同种异体股骨头结构移植物联合TT金属背衬盂底板是治疗盂骨大量丢失的翻修全肩关节置换术的可行选择。然而,我们确实承认,这种再吸收率高于其他报道的自体移植物系列。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
10 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信