{"title":"Reading and Cognitive Correlates Underlying Inferencing Among Adolescent Readers.","authors":"Amy E Barth, Sharon Vaughn","doi":"","DOIUrl":"","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Little is known about how components of working memory (i.e., passive resonance of information in working memory, limited capacity working memory, and suppression of irrelevant information from working memory) impact near and far inferencing among adolescent readers. Using path analyses, the current study evaluated the relations of near and far inferencing, vocabulary, general knowledge, strategy use, and word reading efficiency as well as components of working memory among 1,085 students in Grades 7-12. Results indicated that near inferencing has the largest direct effect on far inferencing. Further, in a model that also included direct and indirect effects of cognitive processes on far inferences, results suggested that working memory (β = .08, <i>p</i> = .02), suppression (β = .07, <i>p</i> =.03), near inferencing (β = .25, <i>p</i> < .001) and vocabulary (β = .18, <i>p</i> < .001) had significant direct effects on far inferencing; whereas suppression (β = .13, <i>p</i> < .001), passive resonance in memory (β = .12, <i>p</i> <.001), background knowledge (β = .12, <i>p</i> = .005), and vocabulary β = .27, <i>p</i> < .001) had significant direct effects on near inferencing. In sum, results suggest that cognitive processes impact inferencing among adolescents.</p>","PeriodicalId":73417,"journal":{"name":"International journal for research in learning disabilities","volume":"8 1","pages":"3-15"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-02-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12461752/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145187723","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"New Directions in the Study of Neurodevelopmental Disorders","authors":"T. Papadopoulos","doi":"10.28987/6.1.3","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.28987/6.1.3","url":null,"abstract":"The Conference at the University of Oviedo, Spain, within the 44th Annual Meeting of the International Academy for Research in Learning Disabilities, was an excellent opportunity to share knowledge, explore perspectives and reflect on the study of neurodevelopmental disorders in Europe and elsewhere in the world. The William M. Cruickshank Memorial Keynote Address, New Directions in the Study of Neurodevelopmental Disorders, covered a broad range of topics relevant to cognition, intelligence, and achievement. It also provided the opportunity to present parts of our current work pertinent to the study of neurodevelopmental dysfunctions and the Marie Skłodowska-Curie Action (MSCA) ITN Neo-PRISM-C project. The presentation began by focusing on what we study and how and why we study what we study about neurodevelopmental disorders. This was followed by a discussion about the brain and (learning) behaviour, accompanied by some relevant evidence on the neurological basis for reading difficulties, particularly the phonological and visual deficits pathways in the framework of the magnocellular deficit theory. The session concluded with a discussion of the comorbidity of various disorders and the use of the Research Domain Criteria (RDoC) framework as an alternative to the traditional diagnostic categories for the study of neurodevelopmental disorders. Examples of how neuroscience research can contribute to this endeavour were also provided.","PeriodicalId":73417,"journal":{"name":"International journal for research in learning disabilities","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"46849847","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Using Virtual Manipulatives With Technology-Based Graphic Organizers to Support Students in Solving Proportion Word Problems","authors":"Rachel H. Billman, K. Regan, Rajiv Satsangi","doi":"10.28987/6.1.28","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.28987/6.1.28","url":null,"abstract":"Proportional reasoning and knowledge of fractions are critical skills for completing algebra successfully, yet many students with mathematics learning disabilities (MLD) enter algebra classes without adequate prior knowledge of these skills. This study used a single-subject/case research, combined multiple-baseline and alternating-treatment design to determine the functional relation between the use of varied technology-based interventions (i.e., a virtual manipulative [VM], a technology-based graphic organizer [TBGO], and a combination of both [VM+TBGO]) and student accuracy in solving proportion word problems. Additional dependent variables included student independence and duration. Three high school students with MLD solved proportion word problems without assistance in the baseline phase and then randomly alternated between the three treatments during intervention. Overall, student accuracy and independence increased, and the time required to solve word problems decreased. All students preferred using technology to solve word problems and the VM+TBGO. Limitations, implications for practice, and suggestions for future research are discussed.","PeriodicalId":73417,"journal":{"name":"International journal for research in learning disabilities","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"46017314","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
L. Tomitch, D. Neumann, Veema Lodhia, Nasrin Zamani Foroushani, K. Waldie
{"title":"Developmental Dyslexia: An Exploratory Study Using Thematic Analysis of the Self-Reported Reading Difficulties of Monolingual and Bilingual Adults","authors":"L. Tomitch, D. Neumann, Veema Lodhia, Nasrin Zamani Foroushani, K. Waldie","doi":"10.28987/6.1.44","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.28987/6.1.44","url":null,"abstract":"This exploratory study investigated the self-reported reading difficulties and compensatory strategies of monolingual and bilingual adults with dyslexia. Twenty monolinguals and six bilinguals answered a questionnaire that collected socio-demographic data as well as information regarding their reading difficulties, experiences, and possible comorbidities. Data were analyzed using thematic analysis. Four themes were determined: (a) reading difficulties may be pervasive but can be circumvented with effective coping strategies; (b) individuals with dyslexia can succeed academically and obtain a university degree, but they most likely have to work harder than typical readers; (c) dyslexia has an impact on reading habits, and reading is a challenge; and (d) comorbidities are a part of life for people with dyslexia. Our results highlight the struggles that individuals with dyslexia continue to have, regardless of when they were diagnosed, whether they received literacy assistance, and whether they learned a second language. Most important, this study shows that individuals with dyslexia, both monolinguals and bilinguals, are able to use effective coping strategies and obtain academic and professional success.","PeriodicalId":73417,"journal":{"name":"International journal for research in learning disabilities","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"48697098","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Deborah K. Reed, Adam J. Reeger, E. Hazeltine, B. McMurray
{"title":"The Accuracy of U.S. Middle School Teachers’ Judgment of Student Reading Abilities","authors":"Deborah K. Reed, Adam J. Reeger, E. Hazeltine, B. McMurray","doi":"10.28987/6.1.14","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.28987/6.1.14","url":null,"abstract":"Teacher judgments of students’ reading abilities in the elementary grades have been researched extensively, but less is known about how middle school teachers judge their students’ word reading, fluency, vocabulary, and comprehension skills. Such information could be useful when determining which students and reading components would be reasonable instructional priorities. Thus, the present study explored U.S. teachers’ accuracy at predicting the performance of students in Grades 6–8 on standardized measures of reading abilities. The multilevel analytic models accounted for the nesting of students (n = 97) within teacher raters (n = 12) at three middle schools in one school district. Results indicated that the teachers’ ratings of overall ability and their beliefs about the specific skills with which their students struggled were poor predictors of actual student performance. Although the small sample of teachers from one district in one country limits the generalizability of the results, the findings suggest that some middle school teachers’ judgments could misidentify students at potential risk for reading difficulties or misalign instruction with particular skill areas of need. The discussion addresses the importance of making efficient but accurate decisions about screening students for reading intervention and planning differentiated or targeted intervention.","PeriodicalId":73417,"journal":{"name":"International journal for research in learning disabilities","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"42301828","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Error Patterns in the Knowledge-Based Inference-Making of Less Skilled Middle-Grade Readers: An Exploratory Study.","authors":"Amy E Barth, Cathy Newman Thomas, Heather Kincaid, Ethan Ankrum, Brandon Ruiz, Leslie Salazar","doi":"","DOIUrl":"","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The primary aims of this mixed method study were to (a) examine the effectiveness of a brief inference intervention, (b) compare the types of knowledge-based inferencing errors less skilled middle grade readers make, and (c) evaluate if self-reported cognitive load relates to inferencing. Participants (<i>n</i> = 17) were randomly assigned to a graphic organizer-inference intervention (GO-Inference) (<i>n</i> = 9) or business as usual (BAU) condition (<i>n</i> = 8), and differences between groups were explored for each study purpose. Quantitative and qualitative results suggested that while less skilled readers in the GO-Inference condition made modest progress in forming knowledge-based inferences, they continued to struggle to distinguish relevant versus irrelevant information from text and/or retrieve knowledge necessary to form inferences. Students in the BAU condition were more likely to make errors such as providing irrelevant information or failing to respond. Additionally, students in the GO-Inference condition reported lower cognitive load during inference-making tasks.</p>","PeriodicalId":73417,"journal":{"name":"International journal for research in learning disabilities","volume":"5 2","pages":"18-35"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9881648/pdf/nihms-1802489.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9151244","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"The “Write Stuff”: What Do We Know About Developmental Dysgraphia?","authors":"C. McBride, Zebedee Rui En Cheah","doi":"10.28987/IJRLD.5.1.3","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.28987/IJRLD.5.1.3","url":null,"abstract":"As researchers come to recognize the origins of dysgraphia, we can better suggest optimal approaches to remediation. In defining dysgraphia, we review the writing process, research on the development of writing, and various factors related to either spelling difficulties, visual-motor difficulties, or both, that might interfere in the process of writing. We conclude by exploring some potentially helpful remediation techniques that should be considered as educators, clinicians, researchers, teachers, and parents work together to ameliorate the potentially devastating consequences of dysgraphia.","PeriodicalId":73417,"journal":{"name":"International journal for research in learning disabilities","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-01-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"44427327","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"The Effects of Blended Text-Processing and Linguistic Comprehension Interventions Among Struggling Middle-School Readers.","authors":"Amy E Barth, Sharon Vaughn, Elisabeth V McCulley","doi":"","DOIUrl":"","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Reading comprehension is an essential academic skill (Nash & Snowling, 2006; National Reading Panel, National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, 2000). Yet, among students in the eighth grade, approximately 64% of all students and 91% of students with disabilities do not read at proficient levels (National Center for Education Statistics [NCES], 2013). This suggests that when reading grade-level texts, a large percentage of middle-grade readers are not able to accurately connect important ideas in text, form inferences that integrate information in text with general knowledge of the topic, and synthesize common ideas across various texts (NCES, 2013). These data highlight the need for intensive reading interventions that explicitly teach middle-grade struggling readers how to comprehend grade-level texts and acquire content knowledge from the texts they read.</p>","PeriodicalId":73417,"journal":{"name":"International journal for research in learning disabilities","volume":"2 2","pages":"2-17"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2015-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5342250/pdf/nihms794187.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"34806776","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}