中等年级低技能读者基于知识的推理错误模式的探索性研究。

Amy E Barth, Cathy Newman Thomas, Heather Kincaid, Ethan Ankrum, Brandon Ruiz, Leslie Salazar
{"title":"中等年级低技能读者基于知识的推理错误模式的探索性研究。","authors":"Amy E Barth,&nbsp;Cathy Newman Thomas,&nbsp;Heather Kincaid,&nbsp;Ethan Ankrum,&nbsp;Brandon Ruiz,&nbsp;Leslie Salazar","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The primary aims of this mixed method study were to (a) examine the effectiveness of a brief inference intervention, (b) compare the types of knowledge-based inferencing errors less skilled middle grade readers make, and (c) evaluate if self-reported cognitive load relates to inferencing. Participants (<i>n</i> = 17) were randomly assigned to a graphic organizer-inference intervention (GO-Inference) (<i>n</i> = 9) or business as usual (BAU) condition (<i>n</i> = 8), and differences between groups were explored for each study purpose. Quantitative and qualitative results suggested that while less skilled readers in the GO-Inference condition made modest progress in forming knowledge-based inferences, they continued to struggle to distinguish relevant versus irrelevant information from text and/or retrieve knowledge necessary to form inferences. Students in the BAU condition were more likely to make errors such as providing irrelevant information or failing to respond. Additionally, students in the GO-Inference condition reported lower cognitive load during inference-making tasks.</p>","PeriodicalId":73417,"journal":{"name":"International journal for research in learning disabilities","volume":"5 2","pages":"18-35"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9881648/pdf/nihms-1802489.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Error Patterns in the Knowledge-Based Inference-Making of Less Skilled Middle-Grade Readers: An Exploratory Study.\",\"authors\":\"Amy E Barth,&nbsp;Cathy Newman Thomas,&nbsp;Heather Kincaid,&nbsp;Ethan Ankrum,&nbsp;Brandon Ruiz,&nbsp;Leslie Salazar\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The primary aims of this mixed method study were to (a) examine the effectiveness of a brief inference intervention, (b) compare the types of knowledge-based inferencing errors less skilled middle grade readers make, and (c) evaluate if self-reported cognitive load relates to inferencing. Participants (<i>n</i> = 17) were randomly assigned to a graphic organizer-inference intervention (GO-Inference) (<i>n</i> = 9) or business as usual (BAU) condition (<i>n</i> = 8), and differences between groups were explored for each study purpose. Quantitative and qualitative results suggested that while less skilled readers in the GO-Inference condition made modest progress in forming knowledge-based inferences, they continued to struggle to distinguish relevant versus irrelevant information from text and/or retrieve knowledge necessary to form inferences. Students in the BAU condition were more likely to make errors such as providing irrelevant information or failing to respond. Additionally, students in the GO-Inference condition reported lower cognitive load during inference-making tasks.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73417,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International journal for research in learning disabilities\",\"volume\":\"5 2\",\"pages\":\"18-35\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9881648/pdf/nihms-1802489.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International journal for research in learning disabilities\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal for research in learning disabilities","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

这项混合方法研究的主要目的是(a)检验简短推理干预的有效性,(b)比较中等水平读者在基于知识的推理中所犯错误的类型,以及(c)评估自我报告的认知负荷是否与推理有关。参与者(n = 17)被随机分配到图形组织者推理干预(GO-Inference) (n = 9)或照常工作(BAU)条件(n = 8),并为每个研究目的探索组间差异。定量和定性结果表明,虽然在GO-Inference条件下,技能较差的读者在形成基于知识的推理方面取得了适度的进展,但他们仍然难以从文本中区分相关与不相关的信息和/或检索形成推理所需的知识。在BAU条件下,学生更容易犯错误,如提供不相关的信息或没有回应。此外,推理组的学生在推理任务中的认知负荷较低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Error Patterns in the Knowledge-Based Inference-Making of Less Skilled Middle-Grade Readers: An Exploratory Study.

Error Patterns in the Knowledge-Based Inference-Making of Less Skilled Middle-Grade Readers: An Exploratory Study.

The primary aims of this mixed method study were to (a) examine the effectiveness of a brief inference intervention, (b) compare the types of knowledge-based inferencing errors less skilled middle grade readers make, and (c) evaluate if self-reported cognitive load relates to inferencing. Participants (n = 17) were randomly assigned to a graphic organizer-inference intervention (GO-Inference) (n = 9) or business as usual (BAU) condition (n = 8), and differences between groups were explored for each study purpose. Quantitative and qualitative results suggested that while less skilled readers in the GO-Inference condition made modest progress in forming knowledge-based inferences, they continued to struggle to distinguish relevant versus irrelevant information from text and/or retrieve knowledge necessary to form inferences. Students in the BAU condition were more likely to make errors such as providing irrelevant information or failing to respond. Additionally, students in the GO-Inference condition reported lower cognitive load during inference-making tasks.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信