{"title":"青少年读者的阅读和认知相关:潜在推理。","authors":"Amy E Barth, Sharon Vaughn","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Little is known about how components of working memory (i.e., passive resonance of information in working memory, limited capacity working memory, and suppression of irrelevant information from working memory) impact near and far inferencing among adolescent readers. Using path analyses, the current study evaluated the relations of near and far inferencing, vocabulary, general knowledge, strategy use, and word reading efficiency as well as components of working memory among 1,085 students in Grades 7-12. Results indicated that near inferencing has the largest direct effect on far inferencing. Further, in a model that also included direct and indirect effects of cognitive processes on far inferences, results suggested that working memory (β = .08, <i>p</i> = .02), suppression (β = .07, <i>p</i> =.03), near inferencing (β = .25, <i>p</i> < .001) and vocabulary (β = .18, <i>p</i> < .001) had significant direct effects on far inferencing; whereas suppression (β = .13, <i>p</i> < .001), passive resonance in memory (β = .12, <i>p</i> <.001), background knowledge (β = .12, <i>p</i> = .005), and vocabulary β = .27, <i>p</i> < .001) had significant direct effects on near inferencing. In sum, results suggest that cognitive processes impact inferencing among adolescents.</p>","PeriodicalId":73417,"journal":{"name":"International journal for research in learning disabilities","volume":"8 1","pages":"3-15"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12461752/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Reading and Cognitive Correlates Underlying Inferencing Among Adolescent Readers.\",\"authors\":\"Amy E Barth, Sharon Vaughn\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Little is known about how components of working memory (i.e., passive resonance of information in working memory, limited capacity working memory, and suppression of irrelevant information from working memory) impact near and far inferencing among adolescent readers. Using path analyses, the current study evaluated the relations of near and far inferencing, vocabulary, general knowledge, strategy use, and word reading efficiency as well as components of working memory among 1,085 students in Grades 7-12. Results indicated that near inferencing has the largest direct effect on far inferencing. Further, in a model that also included direct and indirect effects of cognitive processes on far inferences, results suggested that working memory (β = .08, <i>p</i> = .02), suppression (β = .07, <i>p</i> =.03), near inferencing (β = .25, <i>p</i> < .001) and vocabulary (β = .18, <i>p</i> < .001) had significant direct effects on far inferencing; whereas suppression (β = .13, <i>p</i> < .001), passive resonance in memory (β = .12, <i>p</i> <.001), background knowledge (β = .12, <i>p</i> = .005), and vocabulary β = .27, <i>p</i> < .001) had significant direct effects on near inferencing. In sum, results suggest that cognitive processes impact inferencing among adolescents.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73417,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International journal for research in learning disabilities\",\"volume\":\"8 1\",\"pages\":\"3-15\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12461752/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International journal for research in learning disabilities\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/6/2 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal for research in learning disabilities","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/6/2 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
关于工作记忆的组成部分(即工作记忆中信息的被动共振、有限容量的工作记忆和工作记忆中无关信息的抑制)如何影响青少年读者的远近推理,我们知之甚少。本研究采用通径分析的方法,对1085名7-12年级学生的远近推理、词汇量、一般知识、策略使用、单词阅读效率以及工作记忆成分之间的关系进行了评价。结果表明,近推理对远推理的直接影响最大。此外,在一个包括认知过程对远推理的直接和间接影响的模型中,结果表明工作记忆(β = .08, p = .02)、抑制(β = .07, p =.03)、近推理(β = .25, p < .001)和词汇(β = .18, p < .001)对远推理有显著的直接影响;而抑制(β = .13, p < .001)、记忆被动共振(β = .12, p = .005)和词汇β = .27, p < .001)对近推理有显著的直接影响。总之,结果表明认知过程影响青少年的推理。
Reading and Cognitive Correlates Underlying Inferencing Among Adolescent Readers.
Little is known about how components of working memory (i.e., passive resonance of information in working memory, limited capacity working memory, and suppression of irrelevant information from working memory) impact near and far inferencing among adolescent readers. Using path analyses, the current study evaluated the relations of near and far inferencing, vocabulary, general knowledge, strategy use, and word reading efficiency as well as components of working memory among 1,085 students in Grades 7-12. Results indicated that near inferencing has the largest direct effect on far inferencing. Further, in a model that also included direct and indirect effects of cognitive processes on far inferences, results suggested that working memory (β = .08, p = .02), suppression (β = .07, p =.03), near inferencing (β = .25, p < .001) and vocabulary (β = .18, p < .001) had significant direct effects on far inferencing; whereas suppression (β = .13, p < .001), passive resonance in memory (β = .12, p <.001), background knowledge (β = .12, p = .005), and vocabulary β = .27, p < .001) had significant direct effects on near inferencing. In sum, results suggest that cognitive processes impact inferencing among adolescents.