{"title":"A Rare and Lethal Ostial Left Main Trunk Lesion: A Case Report","authors":"Baotao Huang, Ran Zhang, Chen Li","doi":"10.1097/CD9.0000000000000043","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1097/CD9.0000000000000043","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Coronary artery involvement in cardiovascular syphilis is infrequent and often overlooked, especially in patients with latent syphilis. Herein, we present the case of myocardial infarction largely related to cardiovascular syphilis in a 63-year-old man. Invasive coronary angiography and contrast-enhanced computed tomography scan revealed a critical ostial narrowing of the left main trunk, an occlusive right coronary artery, and moderate-to-severe ostial stenosis of multiple major branches of the abdominal aorta. Syphilis screening and confirmatory tests were positive. Cardiovascular syphilis was considered. Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) was performed uneventfully, and a coronary stent was implanted in the ostium of the left main coronary artery. However, on day 3 after PCI, the patient died suddenly, likely because of stent thrombosis. In conclusion, severe coronary lesions confined to the ostia suggest rheumatologic large-vessel vasculitis or infectious aortitis.","PeriodicalId":72524,"journal":{"name":"Cardiology discovery","volume":"2 1","pages":"58 - 61"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-02-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"47036729","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Qin Jiang, J. Du, Tao Yu, Xiaobo Huang, Mingliang Zuo, Keli Huang
{"title":"Ascending Aortic Aneurysm and Dissection Secondary to Bicuspid Aortic Valve with Concomitant Coarctation of Descending Aorta Successfully Repaired with Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Support","authors":"Qin Jiang, J. Du, Tao Yu, Xiaobo Huang, Mingliang Zuo, Keli Huang","doi":"10.1097/cd9.0000000000000041","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1097/cd9.0000000000000041","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":72524,"journal":{"name":"Cardiology discovery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-02-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"47146629","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Irreversible Electroporation Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation: Status and Challenges","authors":"Fei Xie, Yonggang Chen, Xinhua Chen, Zhihong Zhao","doi":"10.1097/CD9.0000000000000045","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1097/CD9.0000000000000045","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Pulsed electric field (PEF) is a novel energy source by which high-voltage electric pulses are used to create irreversible electroporation. PEF is non-thermal and highly tissue-dependent in which specific targeting of the atrial myocardium is achieved and sparing of adjacent tissues is feasible, theoretically increasing the safety of the procedure, which could potentially break the trade-off between effective lesions and collateral damage and substantially improve risk-benefit ratios in atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation. Although recently published trials have shown a clear effect of AF ablation, large-scale clinical trials are lacking. Current clinical evidence has demonstrated significant efficacy in achieving durable pulmonary vein isolation without ablation-related adverse events. However, their putative benefits regarding efficacy, efficiency, and safety remain to be proven in randomized controlled trials.","PeriodicalId":72524,"journal":{"name":"Cardiology discovery","volume":"2 1","pages":"41 - 50"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-01-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"48790769","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Antiviral Abidol is Associated with the Reduction of In-Hospital Mortality in COVID-19 Patients.","authors":"Hesong Zeng, Xingwei He, Wanjun Liu, Jing Kan, Liqun He, Jinhe Zhao, Cynthia Chen, Junjie Zhang, Shaoliang Chen","doi":"10.1097/CD9.0000000000000014","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1097/CD9.0000000000000014","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is a global public health crisis. There are no specific antiviral agents for the treatment of SARS-CoV-2. Information regarding the effect of Abidol on in-hospital mortality is scarce. The present study aimed to evaluate the treatment effect of Abidol for patients with COVID-19 before and after propensity score matching (PSM).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective cohort study analyzed 1019 patients with confirmed COVID-19 in China from December 22, 2019 to March 13, 2020. Patients were divided to Abidol (200 mg, tid, 5-7 days, <i>n</i> = 788, 77.3%) and No-Abidol (<i>n</i> = 231, 22.7%) groups. The primary outcome was the mortality during hospitalization.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 1019 COVID-19 patients, the age was (60.4 ± 14.5) years. Abidol-treated patients, compared with No-Abidol-treated patients, had a shorter duration from onset of symptoms to admission, less frequent renal dysfunction, lower white blood cell counts (lymphocytes <0.8) and erythrocyte sending rate, lower interleukin-6, higher platelet counts and plasma IgG and oxygen saturation, and less frequent myocardial injury. The mortality during hospitalization before PSM was 17.9% in Abidol group and 34.6% in No-Abidol (hazard ratio (HR) = 2.610, 95% confident interval (CI): 1.980-3.440), all seen in severe and critical patients. After PSM, the in-hospital death was 13.6% in Abidol and 28.6% in No-Abidol group (HR = 2.728, 95% CI: 1.598-4.659).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Abidol-treatment results in less in-hospital death for severe and critical patients with COVID-19. Further randomized study is warranted to confirm the findings from this study.</p>","PeriodicalId":72524,"journal":{"name":"Cardiology discovery","volume":"1 1","pages":"37-43"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-12-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/9e/69/cd9-1-37.PMC8710295.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"39641898","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Correction to: Rationale and Design of a Randomized Controlled Trial on Intensive Management of Blood PRESSure and Cholesterol in Elderly Chinese with Hypertension and Atrial FibrillatION (IMPRESSION)","authors":"","doi":"10.1097/cd9.0000000000000042","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1097/cd9.0000000000000042","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":72524,"journal":{"name":"Cardiology discovery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"48858414","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Optimal Antithrombotic Therapy after Implantation of a Transcatheter Aortic Valve: Warfarin, Aspirin, or Non-Vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulants? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis","authors":"Wenjuan Yang, X. Fang, Yu Zhu, Fuqin Tang, Zhao Jian","doi":"10.1097/CD9.0000000000000036","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1097/CD9.0000000000000036","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Objective: Diverse antithrombotic strategies were applied to patients undergoing aortic valve replacement. However, the optimal therapeutic regimen for patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation/replacement (TAVI/TAVR) remains unclear. The purpose of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety of various antithrombotic therapies following TAVI/TAVR. Methods: Relevant clinical trials evaluating the effect of anticoagulation or antiplatelet regimens on patients after TAVI/TAVR from inception to September 2020 were identified using the PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library databases. The inclusion criteria including (1) all patients underwent TAVI/TAVR; (2) the interventions were antithrombotic strategies that prevent the occurrence of thrombotic events in patients; (3) randomized controlled trials or prospective observational studies; and (4) investigation of at least 1 outcome with a follow-up period of ≥3 months. The exclusion criteria including (1) research content was identical or irrelevant to the purpose of the present study; (2) lack of the required outcome index or availability of fragmentary original information; and (3) the full text is not available. The major outcomes were all-cause mortality, thromboembolic complications, and bleeding events. The Cochrane Collaboration's tool and the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale were used for assessing the risk of bias in included studies. Results: Thirteen studies (3 randomized controlled trials and 10 non-randomized studies) were identified, with a total of 23,497 patients. Four studies compared direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) with warfarin, 1 study compared aspirin with warfarin, 6 studies compared aspirin plus clopidogrel (dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT)) with aspirin monotherapy, and 2 studies compared DAPT and aspirin monotherapy with warfarin concurrently. There were no significant differences found between the DOAC and warfarin groups regarding all-cause mortality (risk ratio (RR): 1.03; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.65–1.64; P = 0.909; Phet = 0.105), clinical adverse events (RR: 1.59; 95% CI: 0.99–2.58; P = 0.057; Phet = 0.738), or bleeding events (RR: 0.93; 95% CI: 0.78–1.11; P = 0.437; Phet = 0.338). The rates of all-cause mortality (RR: 0.71; 95% CI: 0.54–0.93; P = 0.012; Phet = 0.845) and bleeding events (RR: 0.43; 95% CI: 0.22–0.83; P = 0.012; Phet = 0.569) were lower in the aspirin group versus the warfarin group; however, there was no difference in the rate of clinical adverse events (RR: 0.38; 95% CI: 0.14–1.07; P = 0.068; Phet = 0.593). The DAPT group had an advantage versus the aspirin group in all-cause mortality (RR: 0.89; 95% CI: 0.82–0.98; P = 0.013; Phet = 0.299); however, the incidence of bleeding events (RR: 2.06; 95% CI: 1.39–3.07; P < 0.001; Phet = 0.001) exhibited an increasing trend. Notably, there was a slight decrease in the incidence of clinical adverse events (RR: 1.09; 95% CI: 0.94–1.26; P = 0.268; Phet = 0.554). Conclusion: The pres","PeriodicalId":72524,"journal":{"name":"Cardiology discovery","volume":"2 1","pages":"30 - 40"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-11-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"45455587","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Cardiology discoveryPub Date : 2021-11-22eCollection Date: 2021-12-01DOI: 10.1097/CD9.0000000000000038
Yuanyuan Zhang, Mingjie Wang, Xian Zhang, Tianxiao Liu, Peter Libby, Guo-Ping Shi
{"title":"COVID-19, the Pandemic of the Century and Its Impact on Cardiovascular Diseases.","authors":"Yuanyuan Zhang, Mingjie Wang, Xian Zhang, Tianxiao Liu, Peter Libby, Guo-Ping Shi","doi":"10.1097/CD9.0000000000000038","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1097/CD9.0000000000000038","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>COVID-19 caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection likely ranks among the deadliest diseases in human history. As with other coronaviruses, SARS-CoV-2 infection damages not only the lungs but also the heart and many other organs that express angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2), a receptor for SARS-CoV-2. COVID-19 has upended lives worldwide. Dietary behaviors have been altered such that they favor metabolic and cardiovascular complications, while patients have avoided hospital visits because of limited resources and the fear of infection, thereby increasing out-hospital mortality due to delayed diagnosis and treatment. Clinical observations show that sex, age, and race all influence the risk for SARS-CoV-2 infection, as do hypertension, obesity, and pre-existing cardiovascular conditions. Many hospitalized COVID-19 patients suffer cardiac injury, acute coronary syndromes, or cardiac arrhythmia. SARS-CoV-2 infection may lead to cardiomyocyte apoptosis and necrosis, endothelial cell damage and dysfunction, oxidative stress and reactive oxygen species production, vasoconstriction, fibrotic and thrombotic protein expression, vascular permeability and microvascular dysfunction, heart inflammatory cell accumulation and activation, and a cytokine storm. Current data indicate that COVID-19 patients with cardiovascular diseases should not discontinue many existing cardiovascular therapies such as ACE inhibitors, angiotensin receptor blockers, steroids, aspirin, statins, and PCSK9 inhibitors. This review aims to furnish a framework relating to COVID-19 and cardiovascular pathophysiology.</p>","PeriodicalId":72524,"journal":{"name":"Cardiology discovery","volume":"1 4","pages":"233-258"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-11-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/54/42/cd9-1-233.PMC8638821.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"39710606","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}