Actas urologicas espanolas最新文献

{"title":"Comentario editorial sobre el artículo «Medición de la presión intrarrenal durante la ureterorrenoscopia (URS) flexible: antecedentes históricos, innovaciones tecnológicas y perspectivas de futuro»","authors":"J. Sáenz Medina","doi":"10.1016/j.acuro.2024.01.009","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.acuro.2024.01.009","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":7145,"journal":{"name":"Actas urologicas espanolas","volume":"48 2","pages":"Pages 111-112"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139882086","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Tendencias de punción extrapapilar en nefrolitotomía percutánea. Revisión de la literatura","authors":"P. Kallidonis ,&nbsp;A. Peteinaris ,&nbsp;V. Tatanis ,&nbsp;A. Vagionis ,&nbsp;S. Faitatziadis ,&nbsp;E. Liatsikos","doi":"10.1016/j.acuro.2023.04.004","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.acuro.2023.04.004","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) is the gold standard of treatment for large renal calculi. Papillary puncture is the mainstay of treatment for large renal calculi, but the non-papilary has been introduced and gained some interest. The aim of this study is the investigation of trends of non-papillary access for PCNL over the years. A review of the literature took place and 13 publications were included in the study. Two experimental studies investigating the feasibility of non-papillary access were found. Five cohort prospective and 2<!--> <!-->retrospective studies for non-papillary access and 4<!--> <!-->comparative studies between papillary and non-papillary access were included. Non papillary access is a technique that has been proved as a safe and efficient solution that keeps up with the latest endoscopic trends. A wider use of this method could be expected in the future.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":7145,"journal":{"name":"Actas urologicas espanolas","volume":"48 1","pages":"Pages 52-56"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"47452427","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"¿Cómo calcular el volumen litiásico y cuál es su aplicación quirúrgica?","authors":"F. Panthier ,&nbsp;S. Kutchukian ,&nbsp;H. Ducousso ,&nbsp;S. Doizi ,&nbsp;C. Solano ,&nbsp;L. Candela ,&nbsp;M. Corrales ,&nbsp;M. Chicaud ,&nbsp;O. Traxer ,&nbsp;S. Hautekeete ,&nbsp;T. Tailly","doi":"10.1016/j.acuro.2023.07.005","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.acuro.2023.07.005","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>Current interventional guidelines refer to the cumulative stone diameter to choose the appropriate surgical modality (ureteroscopy (URS), extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy (ESWL) and percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL)). The stone volume (SV) has been introduced recently, to better estimate the stone burden. This review aimed to summarize the available methods to evaluate the SV and its use in urolithiasis treatment.</p></div><div><h3>Material and methods</h3><p>A comprehensive review of the literature was performed in December 2022 by searching Embase, Cochrane and Pubmed databases. Articles were considered eligible if they described SV measurement or the stone free rate after different treatment modalities (SWL, URS, PCNL) or spontaneous passage, based on SV measurement. Two reviewers independently assessed the eligibility and the quality of the articles and performed the data extraction.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>In total, 28 studies were included. All studies used different measurement techniques for stone volume. The automated volume measurement appeared to be more precise than the calculated volume. In vitro studies showed that the automated volume measurement was closer to actual stone volume, with a lower inter-observer variability. Regarding URS, stone volume was found to be more predictive of stone free rates as compared to maximum stone diameter or cumulative diameter for stones &gt;20<!--> <!-->mm. This was not the case for PCNL and SWL.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Stone volume estimation is feasible, manually or automatically and is likely a better representation of the actual stone burden. While for larger stones treated by retrograde intrarenal surgery, stone volume appears to be a better predictor of SFR, the superiority of stone volume throughout all stone burdens and for all stone treatments, remains to be proven. Automated volume acquisition is more precise and reproducible than calculated volume.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":7145,"journal":{"name":"Actas urologicas espanolas","volume":"48 1","pages":"Pages 71-78"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"53918891","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Edición especial: monográfico de litiasis","authors":"E. Emiliani ,&nbsp;O. Traxer","doi":"10.1016/j.acuro.2023.10.001","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acuro.2023.10.001","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":7145,"journal":{"name":"Actas urologicas espanolas","volume":"48 1","pages":"Page 1"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139100947","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Aplicaciones clínicas, experimentales y resultados del uso de diferentes dispositivos de aspiración en la cirugía intrarrenal retrógrada. Revisión sistemática","authors":"C. Giulioni ,&nbsp;D. Castellani ,&nbsp;O. Traxer ,&nbsp;N. Gadzhiev ,&nbsp;G.M. Pirola ,&nbsp;Y. Tanidir ,&nbsp;R.D. Da Silva ,&nbsp;X. Glover ,&nbsp;G. Giusti ,&nbsp;S. Proietti ,&nbsp;P.M. Mulawkar ,&nbsp;V. De Stefano ,&nbsp;A. Cormio ,&nbsp;J.Y.-C. Teoh ,&nbsp;A.B. Galosi ,&nbsp;B.K. Somani ,&nbsp;E. Emiliani ,&nbsp;V. Gauhar","doi":"10.1016/j.acuro.2023.02.008","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.acuro.2023.02.008","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To identify the latest advances in suction devices and evaluate their effect in Retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) and ureteroscopy for stones.</p></div><div><h3>Basic procedures</h3><p>A systematic literature search was performed on 4<!--> <!-->th January 2023 using Scopus, PubMed, and EMBASE. Only English papers were included; both pediatric and adult studies were accepted. Duplicate studies, case reports, letters to the editor, and meeting abstracts were excluded.</p></div><div><h3>Main findings</h3><p>Twenty-one papers were selected. Several methods have been proposed for suction use in RIRS, such as through the ureteral access sheath or directly to the scope. Artificial intelligence can also regulate this system, monitoring pressure and perfusion flow values. All the proposed techniques showed satisfactory perioperative results for operative time, stone-free rate (SFR), and residual fragments. Moreover, the reduction of intrarenal pressure (induced by aspiration) was also associated with a lower infection rate. Even the studies that considered kidney stones with a diameter of 20<!--> <!-->mm or higher reported higher SFR and reduced postoperative complications. However, the lack of well-defined settings for suction pressure and fluid flow prevents the standardization of the procedure.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Aspiration device in the surgical treatment of urinary stones favours a higher SFR, reducing infectious complications, as supported by the included studies. RIRS with a suction system provided to be a natural successor to the traditional technique, regulating intrarenal pressure and aspirating fine dust.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":7145,"journal":{"name":"Actas urologicas espanolas","volume":"48 1","pages":"Pages 57-70"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"48915661","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Litiasis en receptores de trasplante renal: revisión sistemática","authors":"A. Piana ,&nbsp;G. Basile ,&nbsp;S. Masih ,&nbsp;G. Bignante ,&nbsp;A. Uleri ,&nbsp;A. Gallioli ,&nbsp;T. Prudhomme ,&nbsp;R. Boissier ,&nbsp;A. Pecoraro ,&nbsp;R. Campi ,&nbsp;M. Di Dio ,&nbsp;S. Alba ,&nbsp;A. Breda ,&nbsp;A. Territo ,&nbsp;en representación del grupo de trabajo de trasplante renal de la sección de Jóvenes Urólogos Académicos (YAU) de la Asociación Europea de Urología (EAU)","doi":"10.1016/j.acuro.2023.07.003","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.acuro.2023.07.003","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Lithiasis in renal graft recipients might be a dangerous condition with a potential risk of organ function impairment.</p></div><div><h3>Evidence acquisition</h3><p>A systematic literature search was conducted through February 2023. The primary objective was to assess the incidence of lithiasis in kidney transplant (KT) recipients. The secondary objective was to assess the timing of stone formation, localization and composition of stones, possible treatment options, and the incidence of graft loss.</p></div><div><h3>Evidence synthesis</h3><p>A total of 41 non-randomized studies comprising 699 patients met our inclusion criteria. The age at lithiasis diagnosis ranged between 29-53 years. Incidence of urolithiasis ranged from 0.1 to 6.3%, usually diagnosed after 12 months from KT. Most of the stones were diagnosed in the calyces or in the pelvis. Calcium oxalate composition was the most frequent. Different treatment strategies were considered, namely active surveillance, ureteroscopy, percutaneous/combined approach, or open surgery. 15.73% of patients were submitted to extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL), while 26.75% underwent endoscopic lithotripsy or stone extraction. 18.03% of patients underwent percutaneous nephrolithotomy whilst 3.14% to a combined approach. Surgical lithotomy was performed in 5.01% of the cases. Global stone-free rate was around 80%.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Lithiasis in kidney transplant is a rare condition usually diagnosed after one year after surgery and mostly located in the calyces and renal pelvis, more frequently of calcium oxalate composition. Each of the active treatments is associated with good results in terms of stone-free rate, thus the surgical technique should be chosen according to the patient's characteristics and surgeon preferences.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":7145,"journal":{"name":"Actas urologicas espanolas","volume":"48 1","pages":"Pages 79-104"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0210480623001213/pdfft?md5=1dfb0e8d511e7159e19c7ff36bfacdec&pid=1-s2.0-S0210480623001213-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"53918866","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Evolución y perfeccionamiento de técnicas endourológicas (urs y nlpc) sin fluoroscopia. Revisión sistemática de la literatura","authors":"V. Massella ,&nbsp;A. Pietropaolo ,&nbsp;V. Gauhar ,&nbsp;E. Emiliani ,&nbsp;B.K. Somani ,&nbsp;el Grupo de Trabajo de Urolitiasis de la sección de Jóvenes Urólogos Académicos (YAU) de la Asociación Europea de Urología (EAU","doi":"10.1016/j.acuro.2023.04.003","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.acuro.2023.04.003","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Radiation via the use of imaging is a key tool in management of kidney stones. Simple measures are largely taken by the endourologists to implement the ‘As Low As Reasonably Achievable’ (ALARA) principle, including the use of fluoroless technique. We performed a scoping literature review to investigate the success and safety of fluoroless ureteroscopy (URS) or percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) procedures for the treatment of KSD.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A literature review was performed searching bibliographic databases PubMed, EMBASE and Cochrane library, and 14 full papers were included in the review in accordance with the PRISMA guidelines.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Of the 2535 total procedures analysed, 823 were fluoroless URS vs. 556 fluoroscopic URS; and 734 fluoroless PCNL vs. 277 fluoroscopic PCNL. The SFR for fluoroless vs. fluoroscopic guided URS was 85.3% and 77%, respectively (<em>P</em>=.2), while for fluoroless PCNL vs. fluoroscopic group was 83.8% and 84.6%, respectively (<em>P</em>=.9). The overall Clavien-Dindo I/II and III/IV complications for fluoroless and fluoroscopic guided procedures were 3.1% (<em>n</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->71) and 8.5% (<em>n</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->131), and 1.7% (<em>n</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->23) and 3% (<em>n</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->47) respectively. Only 5 studies reported a failure of the fluoroscopic approach with a total of 30 (1.3%) failed procedures.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The ALARA protocol has been implemented in endourology in numerous ways to protect both patients and healthcare workers during recent years. Fluoroless procedures for treatment of KSD are safe and effective with outcomes comparable to standard procedures and could become the new frontier of endourology in selected cases.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":7145,"journal":{"name":"Actas urologicas espanolas","volume":"48 1","pages":"Pages 2-10"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"53918667","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Seguridad, consejos y límites para el uso del láser en la cirugía retrógrada intrarrenal","authors":"M. Corrales ,&nbsp;F. Panthier ,&nbsp;C. Solano ,&nbsp;L. Candela ,&nbsp;O. Traxer","doi":"10.1016/j.acuro.2023.04.005","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.acuro.2023.04.005","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To analyze the current information about laser safety in retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS), focusing on the two main laser technologies that we use in urology, the holmium:yttrium-aluminum-garnet (Ho:YAG) laser, and the thulium fiber laser (TFL).</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Narrative overview of the most relevant articles published in Medline and Scopus databases about this subject.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>TFL and Ho:YAG laser at similar settings (0.2 J/40 Hz) have similar volume-averaged temperature increase and the average heating rate increase proportionally to laser power, especially when high frequencies are used. Recent preclinical data, comparing both laser technologies at different laser settings, agreed that when the delivered energy increases in expenses of higher frequencies, the thermal damage increases too. Higher frequencies, despite of the rise of temperature in the irrigation medium, can cause accidental thermal lasering lesions.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The use of low frequency settings and a proper irrigation is critical to avoid thermal injury in endoscopic laser lithotripsy (ELL). In addition, the use of laser safety eyeglasses is recommended in Ho:YAG and TFL ELL.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":7145,"journal":{"name":"Actas urologicas espanolas","volume":"48 1","pages":"Pages 19-24"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"53918688","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Medición de la presión intrarrenal durante la ureterorrenoscopia (URS) flexible: antecedentes históricos, innovaciones tecnológicas y perspectivas de futuro","authors":"F. Pauchard ,&nbsp;N. Bhojani ,&nbsp;B. Chew ,&nbsp;E. Ventimiglia","doi":"10.1016/j.acuro.2023.09.001","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.acuro.2023.09.001","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>High intrarenal pressure (IRP) is a potential risk factor for infectious complications related to URS. Methods to lower IRP have been described. However, it is still not possible to assess live IRP values during URS. The objective of this study was to perform a systematic review of the literature regarding endoscopic methods to measure IRP during URS.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A systematic search and review of Medline, PubMed and Scopus was conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta Analysis (PRISMA) checklist and a narrative synthesis of the study results was performed.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>A total of 19 articles were included in the review. Four non invasive (i.e. endoscopic) methods to measure IRP were reported: ureteral catheter, sensor wire, pressure sensor proximal to an irrigation system and a novel ureteral access sheath that integrates suction, irrigation, and IRP measurement.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>We provide here a comprehensive overview of the reported clinical measuring systems of IRP during URS. The ideal system has not been developed yet, but urologists will be able to measure IRP during their daily practice soon. The implications of having this type of data during surgery remains unknown. Systems that could integrate irrigation, suction, IRP and temperature seems to be ideal.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":7145,"journal":{"name":"Actas urologicas espanolas","volume":"48 1","pages":"Pages 42-51"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"135434222","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Aplicación de tecnologías móviles (m-Salud) y salud electrónica (e-Salud) en el manejo y en la prevención de la litiasis renal: revisión sistemática","authors":"G.N. Ungerer ,&nbsp;J.S. Winoker ,&nbsp;K.A. Healy ,&nbsp;O. Shah ,&nbsp;K. Koo","doi":"10.1016/j.acuro.2023.04.008","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.acuro.2023.04.008","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Kidney stone disease (KSD) is a common urological condition that often requires long-term care. Mobile health (mHealth) and eHealth technologies have the potential to enhance chronic disease management and behavioral change. To assess opportunities to apply these tools to improve KSD treatment and prevention, we aimed to assess current evidence on the use, benefits, and limitations of mHealth and eHealth in KSD.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>We performed a systematic review of primary research studies of mHealth and eHealth in the evaluation and management of KSD. Two independent researchers screened citations by title and abstract for relevance, then full-text review was performed for descriptive summary of the studies.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>A total of 37 articles were included for analysis. Primary domains of evidence included: 1) “smart” water bottles and mobile-device apps for tracking fluid consumption, which showed increased intake in most studies; 2) ureteral stent tracking platforms, which improved the rate of long-term retained stents; 3) virtual stone clinics, which have been suggested to increase access, lower costs, and have satisfactory outcomes; 4) smartphone-based endoscopy platforms, which offered cost-effective image quality in resource-limited settings; 5) patient information about KSD online, which was typically characterized as poor quality and/or accuracy, particularly on YouTube. Most studies were proof-of-concept or single-arm intervention designs, with limited assessment of effectiveness or long-term clinical outcomes.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Mobile and eHealth technologies have significant real-world applications to KSD prevention, intervention, and patient education. A lack of rigorous effectiveness studies currently limits evidence-based conclusions and incorporation in clinical guidelines.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":7145,"journal":{"name":"Actas urologicas espanolas","volume":"48 1","pages":"Pages 25-41"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"47505523","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}