Canadian Geriatrics Journal最新文献_第7页

The Canadian Frailty Priority Setting Partnership: Research Priorities for Older Adults Living with Frailty 加拿大脆弱性优先事项设定伙伴关系：针对老年人的脆弱性研究优先事项

IF 3.9

Canadian Geriatrics Journal Pub Date : 2019-03-01 DOI: 10.5770/CGJ.22.336

Jennifer Bethell, M. Puts, S. Sattar, M. Andrew, Andrew S. Choate, Barry Clarke, K. Cowan, C. DeAngelis, J. Elliott, M. Fitch, Chris Frank, Kathryn Hominick, M. Keatings, J. Mcelhaney, S. McKay, E. Pitters, J. Ploeg, S. Sidani, K. McGilton

{"title":"The Canadian Frailty Priority Setting Partnership: Research Priorities for Older Adults Living with Frailty","authors":"Jennifer Bethell, M. Puts, S. Sattar, M. Andrew, Andrew S. Choate, Barry Clarke, K. Cowan, C. DeAngelis, J. Elliott, M. Fitch, Chris Frank, Kathryn Hominick, M. Keatings, J. Mcelhaney, S. McKay, E. Pitters, J. Ploeg, S. Sidani, K. McGilton","doi":"10.5770/CGJ.22.336","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5770/CGJ.22.336","url":null,"abstract":"Background Patient engagement in research priority-setting is intended to democratize research and increase impact. The objectives of the Canadian Frailty Priority Setting Partnership (PSP) were to engage people with lived or clinical experience of frailty, and produce a list of research priorities related to care, support, and treatment of older adults living with frailty. Methods The Canadian Frailty PSP was supported by the Canadian Frailty Network, coordinated by researchers in Toronto, Ontario and followed the methods of the James Lind Alliance, which included establishing a Steering Group, inviting partner organizations, gathering questions related to care, support and treatment of older adults living with frailty, processing the data and prioritizing the questions. Results In the initial survey, 799 submissions were provided by 389 individuals and groups. The 647 questions that were within scope were categorized, merged, and summarized, then checked against research evidence, creating a list of 41 unanswered questions. Prioritization took place in two stages: first, 146 individuals and groups participated in survey and their responses short-listed 22 questions; and second, an in-person workshop was held on September 26, 2017 in Toronto, Ontario where these 22 questions were discussed and ranked. Conclusion Researchers and research funders can use these results to inform their agendas for research on frailty. Strategies are needed for involving those with lived experience of frailty in research.","PeriodicalId":56182,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Geriatrics Journal","volume":"22 1","pages":"23 - 33"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9,"publicationDate":"2019-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"41602927","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 18

2018 Canadian Consortium on Neurodegeneration in Aging (CCNA) Science Day Abstracts (Montréal, Québec - October 1–2, 2018) 2018年加拿大老龄化神经变性联合会（CCNA）科学日摘要（魁北克蒙特利尔-2018年10月1日至2日）

IF 3.9

Canadian Geriatrics Journal Pub Date : 2019-03-01 DOI: 10.5770/cgj.22.358

M. Banihashemi, Shraddha Sapkota, S. Bronskill, D. Stuss, S. Black, Sayeh Bayat, G. Naglie, M. Rapoport, B. Ye, E. Stasiulis, Alex Mihailidis, Selena P. Maxwell, M. Cash, S. Darvesh, M. Teper, C. Hudon, I. Vedel, Xin Qiang Yang, V. Khanassov, E. Guseva, O. Lungu, I. Vedel, Sondra Goldman, M. Wilchesky, Angela Tam, C. Dansereau, Yasser Itturia-Medina, S. Urchs, P. Orban, J. Breitner, Pierre Bellec, Yassine Benhajali, Helen Spiers, A. Badhwar, S. Urchs, L. Trouille, Pierre Bellec, L. Wallace, O. Theou, Judith Godin, K. Rockwood, M. Andrew, D. Starblanket, C. Bourassa, C. Godard-Sebillotte, N. Sourial, L. Rochette, M. Hardouin, É. Pelletier, E. Strumpf, M. Ruthirakuhan, N. Herrmann, A. Andreazza, D. Gallagher, N. Verhoeff, S. Black, K. Lanctôt, Shanna C. Trenaman, M. Andrew, K. Goralski, Allen McLean, D. Morgan, J. Kosteniuk, M. O'connell, Melanie Bayly, A. Chow, Valerie Elliot, N. Osgood, A. Badhwar, Yannik Collin-Verreault, P. Orban, I. Chouinard, J. Vogel, Olivier Potvin, S. Duchesne, Pierre Bellec, S. Mi

引用次数: 0

Assessing Determinants of Perceived Quality in Transitions for People with Dementia: a Prospective Observational Study 评估痴呆症患者过渡期感知质量的决定因素：一项前瞻性观察研究

IF 3.9

Canadian Geriatrics Journal Pub Date : 2019-03-01 DOI: 10.5770/cgj.22.332

N. Drummond, L. Mccleary, L. Garcia, K. McGilton, F. Molnar, W. Dalziel, T. J. Xu, D. Turner, J. Triscott, E. Freiheit

{"title":"Assessing Determinants of Perceived Quality in Transitions for People with Dementia: a Prospective Observational Study","authors":"N. Drummond, L. Mccleary, L. Garcia, K. McGilton, F. Molnar, W. Dalziel, T. J. Xu, D. Turner, J. Triscott, E. Freiheit","doi":"10.5770/cgj.22.332","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5770/cgj.22.332","url":null,"abstract":"Background The trajectory of dementia through time is characterized by common transitions which are difficult for persons with dementia (PWDs) and their families and friends. Our study sought to identify determinants for the quality of transition outcomes. Method A 24-month, prospective, longitudinal design identified specific transitions as they occurred in 108 person-with-dementia/caregiver dyads, and assessed the perceived transition quality from the perspective of the caregiver and what we denote as the ‘summative’ transition quality outcome variable (as explained in the Data Processing section under Methods). Results Among caregivers and during the authors’ deliberations of the summative transition quality outcomes, good transition quality was associated with the PWD’s baseline Disability Assessment for Dementia (OR 1.04, 95% CI 1.02–1.06 per increase in percent score based on summative assessments), and with the PWD’s higher baseline quality of life scores (OR 1.11, 95% CI 1.05–1.18 per increase in unit of score in QOL-AD based on summative assessments). Caregiver-perceived better outcome quality was associated with lower caregiver burden, (OR 0.97, 95% CI 0.95–0.99 per unit CBI score increase). Conclusion Identifying determinants of successful transitions is feasible and may be translated into practical guidance for use in clinical encounters. Those with worse prior quality of life or worse performance in activities of daily living appear to require specific support during transitions, as do those whose caregivers report higher levels of burden.","PeriodicalId":56182,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Geriatrics Journal","volume":"22 1","pages":"13 - 22"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9,"publicationDate":"2019-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"42509986","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 7

Efficacy of Ondansetron in the Prevention or Treatment of Post-operative Delirium—a Systematic Review 昂丹司琼预防或治疗术后谵妄的疗效系统评价

IF 3.9

Canadian Geriatrics Journal Pub Date : 2019-03-01 DOI: 10.5770/cgj.22.266

Nihal Haque, R. Naqvi, M. Dasgupta

{"title":"Efficacy of Ondansetron in the Prevention or Treatment of Post-operative Delirium—a Systematic Review","authors":"Nihal Haque, R. Naqvi, M. Dasgupta","doi":"10.5770/cgj.22.266","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5770/cgj.22.266","url":null,"abstract":"Background Post-operative delirium (POD) is associated with higher rates of functional decline and death. Ondansetron is a serotonin antagonist which could represent a therapeutic or preventive option in POD. Methods A systematic review of MEDLINE, EMBASE, CENTRAL, and PsychINFO was performed. Three randomized controlled trials (RCTs) met inclusion criteria (intervention of ondansetron compared to a control group). Results Two RCTs examined ondansetron for the treatment of POD in patients after cardiac or post-trauma surgery in the ICU. Studies assessed either a one-time dose or doses for 3 days of ondansetron or haloperidol IV. They suggested similar reductions in average delirium scores and rates in both interventions, although one study suggested ondansetron to be associated with higher rates of rescue haloperidol use. One RCT examined prophylactic ondansetron versus placebo IV, for five days postoperatively, to prevent POD in orthopedic patients. There were significantly fewer delirious patients in the ondansetron group. In general, studies had major methodological limitations and were very heterogenous in study tools, interventions used, and populations studied. Conclusions Ondansetron may be an effective agent for the prevention or treatment of POD, but studies are few and of poor quality, thus making the conclusions tenuous. Further large RCTs are needed.","PeriodicalId":56182,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Geriatrics Journal","volume":"22 1","pages":"1 - 6"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9,"publicationDate":"2019-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"44985453","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 5

CAGP-CCSMH Annual Scientific Meeting Canadian Academy of Geriatric Psychiatry and Canadian Coalition for Seniors’ Mental Health CAGP-CCSMH年度科学会议加拿大老年精神病学学会和加拿大老年人心理健康联盟

IF 3.9

Canadian Geriatrics Journal Pub Date : 2018-12-01 DOI: 10.5770/cgj.21.356

V. Authors

引用次数: 2

CGS 38th Annual Scientific Meeting Advances in Care: From the Individual to the Technology CGS第38届年度科学会议护理进展：从个人到技术

IF 3.9

Canadian Geriatrics Journal Pub Date : 2018-09-14 DOI: 10.5770/cgj.21.334

V. Authors

引用次数: 0

Canadian Academy of Geriatric Psychiatry (CAGP) 2017 Annual Scientific Meeting Book of Abstracts 加拿大老年精神病学学会（CAGP）2017年度科学会议摘要