Efficacy of Ondansetron in the Prevention or Treatment of Post-operative Delirium—a Systematic Review

IF 1.6 Q4 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY
Nihal Haque, R. Naqvi, M. Dasgupta
{"title":"Efficacy of Ondansetron in the Prevention or Treatment of Post-operative Delirium—a Systematic Review","authors":"Nihal Haque, R. Naqvi, M. Dasgupta","doi":"10.5770/cgj.22.266","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background Post-operative delirium (POD) is associated with higher rates of functional decline and death. Ondansetron is a serotonin antagonist which could represent a therapeutic or preventive option in POD. Methods A systematic review of MEDLINE, EMBASE, CENTRAL, and PsychINFO was performed. Three randomized controlled trials (RCTs) met inclusion criteria (intervention of ondansetron compared to a control group). Results Two RCTs examined ondansetron for the treatment of POD in patients after cardiac or post-trauma surgery in the ICU. Studies assessed either a one-time dose or doses for 3 days of ondansetron or haloperidol IV. They suggested similar reductions in average delirium scores and rates in both interventions, although one study suggested ondansetron to be associated with higher rates of rescue haloperidol use. One RCT examined prophylactic ondansetron versus placebo IV, for five days postoperatively, to prevent POD in orthopedic patients. There were significantly fewer delirious patients in the ondansetron group. In general, studies had major methodological limitations and were very heterogenous in study tools, interventions used, and populations studied. Conclusions Ondansetron may be an effective agent for the prevention or treatment of POD, but studies are few and of poor quality, thus making the conclusions tenuous. Further large RCTs are needed.","PeriodicalId":56182,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Geriatrics Journal","volume":"22 1","pages":"1 - 6"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2019-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian Geriatrics Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5770/cgj.22.266","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

Background Post-operative delirium (POD) is associated with higher rates of functional decline and death. Ondansetron is a serotonin antagonist which could represent a therapeutic or preventive option in POD. Methods A systematic review of MEDLINE, EMBASE, CENTRAL, and PsychINFO was performed. Three randomized controlled trials (RCTs) met inclusion criteria (intervention of ondansetron compared to a control group). Results Two RCTs examined ondansetron for the treatment of POD in patients after cardiac or post-trauma surgery in the ICU. Studies assessed either a one-time dose or doses for 3 days of ondansetron or haloperidol IV. They suggested similar reductions in average delirium scores and rates in both interventions, although one study suggested ondansetron to be associated with higher rates of rescue haloperidol use. One RCT examined prophylactic ondansetron versus placebo IV, for five days postoperatively, to prevent POD in orthopedic patients. There were significantly fewer delirious patients in the ondansetron group. In general, studies had major methodological limitations and were very heterogenous in study tools, interventions used, and populations studied. Conclusions Ondansetron may be an effective agent for the prevention or treatment of POD, but studies are few and of poor quality, thus making the conclusions tenuous. Further large RCTs are needed.
昂丹司琼预防或治疗术后谵妄的疗效系统评价
背景术后谵妄(POD)与较高的功能下降率和死亡率有关。昂丹司琼是一种血清素拮抗剂,可作为POD的治疗或预防选择。方法对MEDLINE、EMBASE、CENTRAL和PsychINFO进行系统综述。三项随机对照试验(RCT)符合纳入标准(与对照组相比,昂丹司琼干预)。结果两项随机对照试验检测了昂丹司琼对ICU心脏或创伤后患者POD的治疗作用。研究评估了一次性剂量或3天剂量的昂丹司琼或氟哌啶醇IV。他们表明,在两种干预措施中,平均谵妄评分和发生率都有相似的降低,尽管一项研究表明昂丹司酮与更高的氟哌啶醇抢救使用率有关。一项随机对照试验在术后五天内检查了预防性昂丹司琼与安慰剂IV,以预防骨科患者的POD。昂丹司琼组的谵妄患者明显减少。总的来说,研究有很大的方法局限性,并且在研究工具、使用的干预措施和研究人群方面非常异质。结论昂丹司琼可能是预防或治疗POD的有效药物,但研究较少,质量较差,因此结论不可靠。还需要更多的大型随机对照试验。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Canadian Geriatrics Journal
Canadian Geriatrics Journal Nursing-Gerontology
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
30
期刊介绍: The Canadian Geriatrics Journal (CGJ) is a peer-reviewed publication that is a home for innovative aging research of a high quality aimed at improving the health and the care provided to older persons residing in Canada and outside our borders. While we gratefully accept submissions from researchers outside our country, we are committed to encouraging aging research by Canadians. The CGJ is targeted to family physicians with training or an interest in the care of older persons, specialists in geriatric medicine, geriatric psychiatrists, and members of other health disciplines with a focus on gerontology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信