{"title":"Tetraspanins CD63 and CD81 as potential prognostic biomarkers in breast cancer.","authors":"Erina Iwabuchi, Yasuhiro Miki, Junyao Xu, Ayako Kanai, Takanori Ishida, Takashi Suzuki","doi":"10.1007/s12282-025-01666-x","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s12282-025-01666-x","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Exosome markers, CD63 and CD81, belong to the tetraspanin family and are expressed in solid tumors. It has been reported that these tetraspanin family members are prognostic factors in some cancers. However, the expression of CD63 and CD81 in pathological breast cancer specimens has not been reported. It has been reported that CD63 promotes the proliferation of breast cancer cells in vitro through yes-associated protein (YAP). Therefore, in this study, the expression of tetraspanin family members, particularly CD63, CD81, and YAP were investigated in breast cancer tissue, by immunohistochemistry, to clarify the relationship between clinicopathological factors and prognosis. The number of CD63 and YAP double-positive breast cancer cells was significantly higher in patients with pathological T factor (pT) status (p = 0.030) and tended to be higher in patients with pathological N factor (pN) status (p = 0.054). Furthermore, the number of CD81 and YAP double-positive breast cancer cells was significantly higher in patients with histological grade (p = 0.015), pT status (p = 0.001), and Ki67 expression (p = 0.049), and tended to be higher in patients with pN status (p = 0.062) and TNM stage (p = 0.052). In addition, CD63 and YAP double-positive breast cancers and CD81 and YAP double-positive breast cancers were associated with shorter disease-free and breast cancer-specific survival, respectively. In conclusion, CD63 and YAP, and CD81 and YAP may serve as potential prognostic biomarkers in patients with breast cancer.</p>","PeriodicalId":56083,"journal":{"name":"Breast Cancer","volume":" ","pages":"393-403"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142980663","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Impact of breast size and composition on the accuracy of mammography and ultrasonography in breast cancer screening.","authors":"Akira Nakamura, Koji Ohnuki, Haruka Takahashi, Shin Usami, Yuki Ishida, Setsuko Shibata, Akiko Umemura, Atsushi Kano","doi":"10.1007/s12282-024-01664-5","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s12282-024-01664-5","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The accuracy of mammography in breast cancer screening is influenced by different factors such as breast composition. However, previous studies did not evaluate the impact of breast size on examination accuracy. This study aimed to investigate the influence of breast size on the accuracy of mammography and ultrasonography in breast cancer screening using compressed breast thickness (CBT) on mammography as an indicator of breast size.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study included Japanese women in their 40 s who underwent mammography alone (MG group) or mammography with adjunctive ultrasonography (MG + US group) at the Iwate Cancer Society (Iwate, Japan) in 2018 and 2019. Based on CBT, the participants were further divided into the L group (< 30 mm) and U group (≥ 30 mm). The recall rate, cancer detection rate, and positive predictive value of the L and U groups based on screening method and breast size were evaluated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 15,897 patients, 10,162 and 5735 underwent mammography alone and mammography with adjunctive ultrasonography, respectively. In the L group, the MG and MG + US groups did not significantly differ in terms of recall rate (1.9%, 95% CI 1.4-2.6 vs 1.9%, 1.2-2.9; p = 0.972). Moreover, the MG + US group had a higher cancer detection rate than the MG group. However, the difference was not significant (0.20%, 0.05-0.51 vs 0.63%, 0.25-1.29; p = 0.054). In the U group, the MG + US group had a significantly higher recall rate than the MG group (2.2%, 1.9-2.5 vs 2.9%, 2.5-3.4; p < 0.05). Nevertheless, there was no significant difference in the cancer detection rate (0.15%, 0.08-0.25 vs 0.28%, 0.15-0.48; p = 0.099).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>To the best of our knowledge, this study first showed that breast size, in addition to breast composition, influences the accuracy of mammography and ultrasonography in breast cancer screening. Hence, screening methods tailored to individual breast characteristics should be considered.</p>","PeriodicalId":56083,"journal":{"name":"Breast Cancer","volume":" ","pages":"385-392"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142924146","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Breast cancer statistics for Japan in 2022: annual report of the national clinical database-breast cancer registry-clinical implications including chemosensitivity of breast cancer with low estrogen receptor expression.","authors":"Masayuki Nagahashi, Hiraku Kumamaru, Naoko Kinukawa, Takayuki Iwamoto, Masahiro Kawashima, Takayuki Kinoshita, Takaaki Konishi, Yasuaki Sagara, Shinsuke Sasada, Shigehira Saji, Naoko Sanuki, Kenta Tanakura, Naoki Niikura, Minoru Miyashita, Masayuki Yoshida, Takanori Ishida, Naruto Taira","doi":"10.1007/s12282-025-01671-0","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s12282-025-01671-0","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This is an annual report by the Japanese Breast Cancer Society, which provides statistics on the clinical data on breast cancer in Japan, extracted from the National Clinical Database-Breast Cancer Registry (NCD-BCR). This report includes an update of 102,453 breast cancer cases at 1339 institutions registered in the NCD-BCR in 2022. Among the 101,793 female patients, the median age at cancer diagnosis was 62 years (interquartile range, 50-73 years), and 29.4% of the patients were premenopausal. Of these patients, 15,437 (15.2%) and 42,936 (42.2%) were diagnosed with stage 0 and I disease, respectively. Estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor, and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) were positive in 78.7%, 69.4%, and 12.8% of the patients, respectively. Of the 97,154 patients without distant metastasis, 40,521 (41.7%) underwent breast-conserving surgery, and 5780 (5.9%) patients underwent some form of breast reconstruction procedures at the time of mastectomy. A total of 66,894 (68.9%) patients were treated with sentinel lymph node biopsy and 7155 (7.4%) patients were treated with sentinel lymph node biopsy followed by axillary node dissection. In the group of patients treated with breast-conserving surgery (n = 40,521), 29,500 (72.8%) received whole-breast irradiation. In the group of patients who underwent mastectomy (n = 54,476), 6226 (11.4%) received radiation therapy to the chest wall. Of the 13,950 patients receiving preoperative chemotherapy with or without molecular targeted therapy, 4308 (30.9%) achieved a pathological complete response, with the highest rate of 60.5% in patients with the hormone receptor-negative/HER2-positive subtype.</p>","PeriodicalId":56083,"journal":{"name":"Breast Cancer","volume":" ","pages":"217-226"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11842403/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143256750","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"The impact of breast surgery and systemic therapy on the survival of patients with de novo stage IV breast cancer.","authors":"Eriko Tokunaga, Yumiko Koi, Wakako Tajiri, Chinami Koga, Hideki Ijichi, Sayuri Akiyoshi, Junji Kawasaki, Yoshiaki Nakamura, Kenichi Taguchi, Masahiro Okamoto","doi":"10.1007/s12282-025-01675-w","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s12282-025-01675-w","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Systemic therapy (ST) is essential for de novo stage IV breast cancer (BC). Stage IV BCs are highly heterogeneous, and it seems inappropriate to treat all de novo stage IV BCs equally. The survival benefit of surgery for primary sites in patients with de novo stage IV BC remains inconclusive.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>We investigated 220 patients with clinical de novo stage IV BC. The relationship between primary site surgery and overall survival (OS) was analyzed. Factors such as tumor subtype, timing of surgery, and efficacy of ST were also evaluated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The median follow-up time was 37.9 (0.5-201.7) months. In the total cohort, the median OS of the patients with and without primary site surgery was 70.5 months (95% confidence interval [CI] 58.4-107.3) and 42.7 months (95% CI 35.7-48.8), respectively. The OS was significantly longer in patients who underwent primary site surgery, especially in the hormone receptor (HR) + /HER2- and HER2 + subtypes, but not in the triple-negative subtype. OS prolongation was significant in patients who underwent surgery ≥ 24 months after the first diagnosis and in whom the first-line ST was effective for ≥ 24 months. Primary site surgery was a good prognostic factor in both univariate and multivariate analyses.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The OS was significantly longer in patients with de novo stage IV BC who underwent primary site surgery than in those who did not undergo surgery. Our results suggest that the tumor subtypes, efficacy of ST, and timing of surgery influenced the benefits of surgery.</p>","PeriodicalId":56083,"journal":{"name":"Breast Cancer","volume":" ","pages":"426-433"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11842408/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143076173","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Breast CancerPub Date : 2025-03-01Epub Date: 2024-12-19DOI: 10.1007/s12282-024-01659-2
Yu Shin Park, Sung-In Jang, Jaeyong Shin, Chung Mo Nam, Eun-Cheol Park, Suk-Yong Jang
{"title":"Factors associated with post acute care utilization after mastectomy for breast cancer patients.","authors":"Yu Shin Park, Sung-In Jang, Jaeyong Shin, Chung Mo Nam, Eun-Cheol Park, Suk-Yong Jang","doi":"10.1007/s12282-024-01659-2","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s12282-024-01659-2","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Although the demand for care immediately after mastectomy is rising, and such medical services are referred to as post-acute care (PAC), there is limited evidence on the factors influencing PAC choices among these patients in Korea.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 106,670 patients diagnosed with breast cancer and undergoing mastectomy were extracted from the Central Cancer Registry data from 2012 to 2019 using Public Cancer Library data of KCURE. PAC was defined as utilization of long-term care hospital (LTCH), hospital-based nursing care (HBNC), or HBC (hospital-based care) within 2 months post-surgery. Multinomial logistic regression was used to identify factors associated with different types of PAC utilization.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The utilization patterns of different types of PAC within 2 months after mastectomy were associated with age, income, cancer severity, and particularly the region of residence (Metropolitan; HBNC, OR 0.16, 95% CI 0.10-0.26; LTCH, OR 2.35, 95% CI 2.21-2.50; HBC, OR 2.17, 95% CI 1.97-2.39), as well as the location (capital areas; HBNC, OR 12.46, 95% CI 4.97-31.25; LTCH, OR 1.21, 95% CI 1.15-1.28; HBC, OR 1.90, 95% CI 1.74-2.07) and type of the hospital (tertiary hospital; HBNC, OR 13.70, 95% CI 7.86-23.86; LTCH, OR 1.45, 95% CI 1.37-1.53; HBC, OR 3.38, 95% CI 3.00-3.80) where the surgery was performed.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In this study, we found the factors associated with PAC utilization on mastectomy patients. Our study found that middle-aged breast cancer patients, residents of metropolitan or rural areas, and those who underwent surgery at hospitals in capital area were particularly associated with higher utilization of inpatient-related PAC services. Breast cancer patients with higher income, older adults, metropolitan residents, patients who underwent breast cancer surgery at metropolitan hospitals, and those treated at tertiary hospitals were strongly associated with higher utilization of HBNC services. Identifying factors that determine the use of PAC has meaningful implications for patients and healthcare systems.</p>","PeriodicalId":56083,"journal":{"name":"Breast Cancer","volume":" ","pages":"337-346"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142856983","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"A 5-year review of genomic medicine in breast cancer: insights from C-CAT data on 3776 Japanese patients.","authors":"Midori Morita, Ryo Tsunashima, Tetsuhiro Yoshinami, Masaki Ishida, Masahiro Iwasaku, Sae Kitano, Chikage Kato, Koichi Sakaguchi, Koichi Takayama, Yasuto Naoi","doi":"10.1007/s12282-024-01656-5","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s12282-024-01656-5","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In Japan, despite 5 years since CGP tests were covered by insurance in 2019, low drug accessibility rates remain a critical issue. We evaluated drug accessibility in 3776 breast cancer from the C-CAT database using two criteria: the proportion first linked to PMDA-approved drugs with phase III trial evidence for breast cancer through CGP tests but not existing Companion diagnostics [CDx] (*), and the proportion first linked to PMDA-approved drugs including based on phase I and II trial evidence (**). Additionally, cases linked to investigational drugs for non-PMDA-approved drugs were counted.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We identified the top 100 genetic alterations in Japanese breast cancer via CGP tests, listing corresponding drugs from C-CAT reports. Drug accessibility was re-evaluated through simulations with updated evidence levels by a member of the expert panel at Osaka University (EP-EL in OUH).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Results showed the proportion improved to 28.4% under the newest EP-EL in OUH, including 3.4% for HER2-negative cases eligible for HER2-targeted therapy due to ERBB2 amplification and 25.0% for ER-positive, HER2-negative cases eligible for capivasertib-fulvestrant therapy due to PIK3CA, AKT1, and PTEN alterations (*). However, in part, initial false negatives for HER2 status and practical difficulties in using CGP tests as a CDx for capivasertib exist. Including mutations like TMB-H, MSI-H, BRAF V600E mutation, and NTRK fusions raised the proportion to 37.9% (**), but lacking drugs with phase III trials evidence.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These findings highlight the ongoing difficulties in demonstrating clear clinical utility of CGP tests in Japan, emphasizing the need for broad discussions on its future direction.</p>","PeriodicalId":56083,"journal":{"name":"Breast Cancer","volume":" ","pages":"314-328"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142775142","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Breast CancerPub Date : 2025-03-01Epub Date: 2025-01-31DOI: 10.1007/s12282-025-01673-y
Min-Seung Park, Eun Hye Cho, Youngjin Youn, In-Gu Do, Hee-Yeon Woo, Hyosoon Park, Eun Young Kim, Min-Jung Kwon
{"title":"Importance of circulating tumor DNA analysis at diagnosis in early triple-negative breast cancer patients.","authors":"Min-Seung Park, Eun Hye Cho, Youngjin Youn, In-Gu Do, Hee-Yeon Woo, Hyosoon Park, Eun Young Kim, Min-Jung Kwon","doi":"10.1007/s12282-025-01673-y","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s12282-025-01673-y","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) enables non-invasive evaluation and is considered a promising tool for diagnosis, treatment selection, risk stratification, and disease monitoring. However, while the utility of ctDNA has been demonstrated in advanced-stage cancers, its detection in early breast cancer (EBC) remains limited. This study investigated the characteristics of EBC patients associated with higher ctDNA detectability.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 101 patients with EBC were enrolled. Formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded samples (FFPEs) were obtained from biopsy tissue, and plasma samples were collected before and after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC). Forty-seven breast cancer-related genes were analyzed using next-generation sequencing. The diagnostic performance of ctDNA was evaluated, and logistic regression analyses were conducted to assess the impact of clinical and molecular factors on ctDNA status.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The most frequently identified gene was TP53 (FFPE, 66.7%; ctDNA, 46.4%), followed by PIK3CA (FFPE, 36.2%; ctDNA, 17.4%). The diagnostic performance of the three most common genes showed a sensitivity range of 11.1-58.7%, specificity of 78.3-100%, and diagnostic accuracy of 65.2-78.3%. The triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) subtype exhibited the strongest association with ctDNA detection (odds ratio [OR] 209.50, p = 0.005) in multivariate analysis. Also, those who exhibited ctDNA clearance after NAC had a higher pathological complete response rate compared to those without clearance (38.5% vs. 11.1%, p = 0.238).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our study highlights that ctDNA analysis can complement genetic testing from a single tissue biopsy in breast cancer patients. Furthermore, ctDNA analysis may be particularly important in patients with TNBC.</p>","PeriodicalId":56083,"journal":{"name":"Breast Cancer","volume":" ","pages":"416-425"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143076191","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Breast CancerPub Date : 2025-03-01DOI: 10.1007/s12282-025-01685-8
Annika S Behrens, Hanna Huebner, Lothar Häberle, Marc Stamminger, Daniel Zint, Felix Heindl, Julius Emons, Carolin C Hack, Naiba Nabieva, Michael Uder, Matthias Wetzl, Marius Wunderle, Matthias W Beckmann, Peter A Fasching, Sabine Ohlmeyer
{"title":"Correction: Comparative assessment of breast volume using a smartphone device versus MRI.","authors":"Annika S Behrens, Hanna Huebner, Lothar Häberle, Marc Stamminger, Daniel Zint, Felix Heindl, Julius Emons, Carolin C Hack, Naiba Nabieva, Michael Uder, Matthias Wetzl, Marius Wunderle, Matthias W Beckmann, Peter A Fasching, Sabine Ohlmeyer","doi":"10.1007/s12282-025-01685-8","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12282-025-01685-8","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":56083,"journal":{"name":"Breast Cancer","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.0,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143538206","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Clinical utility of tumor-infiltrating lymphocyte evaluation by two different methods in breast cancer patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy.","authors":"Masayuki Nagahashi, Eri Ishikawa, Takahiro Nagai, Haruka Kanaoka, Aoi Oshiro, Yusa Togashi, Akira Hattori, Junko Tsuchida, Tomoko Higuchi, Arisa Nishimukai, Keiko Murase, Yuichi Takatsuka, Takako Kihara, Yiwei Ling, Shujiro Okuda, Seiichi Hirota, Yasuo Miyoshi","doi":"10.1007/s12282-025-01665-y","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s12282-025-01665-y","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The aim of this study was to examine the clinical utility of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) evaluated by \"average\" and \"hot-spot\" methods in breast cancer patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We examined 367 breast cancer patients without neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) by average and hot-spot methods to determine the consistency of TIL scores between biopsy and surgical specimens. TIL scores before NAC were also compared with the pathological complete response (pCR) rate and clinical outcomes in 144 breast cancer patients that received NAC. TIL scores evaluated by the two methods were predicted from clinicopathological data using random forest regression.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Surgical specimens showed higher TIL scores than biopsy specimens using the hot-spot method (p < 0.001), while biopsy and surgical specimens showed similar TIL scores using the average method. There was a linear relationship between the pCR rate and TIL scores determined using hot-spot (p < 0.001) and average methods (p = 0.001). Patients without pCR and low TILs by the average method had significantly worse overall survival compared to other patients (p = 0.02). The root mean squared errors of the predicted TIL score for the test set were 19.662 (hot-spot) and 10.955 (average).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The average method may have an advantage for breast cancer patients receiving NAC, since the TIL score using this method is more consistent between biopsy and surgical specimens, and it associates better with clinical outcomes. Our exploratory study showed that machine learning from clinicopathological data may better predict TIL scores assessed by the average, rather than hot-spot, method.</p>","PeriodicalId":56083,"journal":{"name":"Breast Cancer","volume":" ","pages":"404-415"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11842476/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142980659","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Breast CancerPub Date : 2025-03-01Epub Date: 2024-11-28DOI: 10.1007/s12282-024-01653-8
Yusuke Otani, Atsushi Tanaka, Masaki Maekawa, Tirso Peña, Anna Rogachevskaya, Teruhiko Ando, Takuto Itano, Haruyoshi Katayama, Eiji Nakata, Toshifumi Ozaki, Shinichi Toyooka, Hiroyoshi Doihara, Michael H Roehrl, Atsushi Fujimura
{"title":"The role of C1orf50 in breast cancer progression and prognosis.","authors":"Yusuke Otani, Atsushi Tanaka, Masaki Maekawa, Tirso Peña, Anna Rogachevskaya, Teruhiko Ando, Takuto Itano, Haruyoshi Katayama, Eiji Nakata, Toshifumi Ozaki, Shinichi Toyooka, Hiroyoshi Doihara, Michael H Roehrl, Atsushi Fujimura","doi":"10.1007/s12282-024-01653-8","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s12282-024-01653-8","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Although the prognosis of breast cancer has significantly improved compared to other types of cancer, there are still some patients who expire due to recurrence or metastasis. Therefore, it is necessary to develop a method to identify patients with poor prognosis at the early stages of cancer. In the process of discovering new prognostic markers from genes of unknown function, we found that the expression of C1orf50 determines the prognosis of breast cancer patients, especially for those with Luminal A breast cancer. This study aims to elucidate the molecular role of C1orf50 in breast cancer progression. Bioinformatic analyses of the breast cancer dataset of TCGA, and in vitro analyses, reveal the molecular pathways influenced by C1orf50 expression. C1orf50 knockdown suppressed the cell cycle of breast cancer cells and weakened their ability to maintain the undifferentiated state and self-renewal capacity. Interestingly, upregulation of C1orf50 increased sensitivity to CDK4/6 inhibition. In addition, C1orf50 was found to be more abundant in breast cancer cells than in normal breast epithelium, suggesting C1orf50's involvement in breast cancer pathogenesis. Furthermore, the mRNA expression level of C1orf50 was positively correlated with the expression of PD-L1 and its related factors. These results suggest that C1orf50 promotes breast cancer progression through cell cycle upregulation, maintenance of cancer stemness, and immune evasion mechanisms. Our study uncovers the biological functions of C1orf50 in Luminal breast cancer progression, a finding not previously reported in any type of cancer.</p>","PeriodicalId":56083,"journal":{"name":"Breast Cancer","volume":" ","pages":"292-305"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11842435/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142741542","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}