Laure Elkrief, Virginia Hernandez-Gea, Marco Senzolo, Agustin Albillos, Anna Baiges, Annalisa Berzigotti, Christophe Bureau, Sarwa Darwish Murad, Andrea De Gottardi, François Durand, Juan-Carlos Garcia-Pagan, Ton Lisman, Mattias Mandorfer, Valérie McLin, Lucile Moga, Filipe Nery, Patrick Northup, Alexandre Nuzzo, Valérie Paradis, David Patch, Audrey Payancé, Vincent Plaforet, Aurélie Plessier, Johanne Poisson, Lara Roberts, Riad Salem, Shiv Sarin, Akash Shukla, Christian Toso, Dhiraj Tripathi, Dominique Valla, Maxime Ronot, Pierre-Emmanuel Rautou
{"title":"Portal vein thrombosis: diagnosis, management, and endpoints for future clinical studies.","authors":"Laure Elkrief, Virginia Hernandez-Gea, Marco Senzolo, Agustin Albillos, Anna Baiges, Annalisa Berzigotti, Christophe Bureau, Sarwa Darwish Murad, Andrea De Gottardi, François Durand, Juan-Carlos Garcia-Pagan, Ton Lisman, Mattias Mandorfer, Valérie McLin, Lucile Moga, Filipe Nery, Patrick Northup, Alexandre Nuzzo, Valérie Paradis, David Patch, Audrey Payancé, Vincent Plaforet, Aurélie Plessier, Johanne Poisson, Lara Roberts, Riad Salem, Shiv Sarin, Akash Shukla, Christian Toso, Dhiraj Tripathi, Dominique Valla, Maxime Ronot, Pierre-Emmanuel Rautou","doi":"10.1016/S2468-1253(24)00155-9","DOIUrl":"10.1016/S2468-1253(24)00155-9","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Portal vein thrombosis (PVT) refers to the development of a non-malignant obstruction of the portal vein, its branches, its radicles, or a combination. This Review first provides a comprehensive overview of all aspects of PVT, namely the specifics of the portal venous system, the risk factors for PVT, the pathophysiology of portal hypertension in PVT, the interest in non-invasive tests, as well as therapeutic approaches including the effect of treating risk factors for PVT or cause of cirrhosis, anticoagulation, portal vein recanalisation by interventional radiology, and prevention and management of variceal bleeding in patients with PVT. Specific issues are also addressed including portal cholangiopathy, mesenteric ischaemia and intestinal necrosis, quality of life, fertility, contraception and pregnancy, and PVT in children. This Review will then present endpoints for future clinical studies in PVT, both in patients with and without cirrhosis, agreed by a large panel of experts through a Delphi consensus process. These endpoints include classification of portal vein thrombus extension, classification of PVT evolution, timing of assessment of PVT, and global endpoints for studies on PVT including clinical outcomes. These endpoints will help homogenise studies on PVT and thus facilitate reporting, comparison between studies, and validation of future studies and trials on PVT.</p>","PeriodicalId":56028,"journal":{"name":"Lancet Gastroenterology & Hepatology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":30.9,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141602252","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Trends and levels of the global, regional, and national burden of appendicitis between 1990 and 2021: findings from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2021.","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/S2468-1253(24)00157-2","DOIUrl":"10.1016/S2468-1253(24)00157-2","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Appendicitis is a common surgical emergency that poses a large clinical and economic burden. Understanding the global burden of appendicitis is crucial for evaluating unmet needs and implementing and scaling up intervention services to reduce adverse health outcomes. This study aims to provide a comprehensive assessment of the global, regional, and national burden of appendicitis, by age and sex, from 1990 to 2021.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Vital registration and verbal autopsy data, the Cause of Death Ensemble model (CODEm), and demographic estimates from the Global Burden of Diseases, Injuries, and Risk Factors Study (GBD) were used to estimate cause-specific mortality rates (CSMRs) for appendicitis. Incidence data were extracted from insurance claims and inpatient discharge sources and analysed with disease modelling meta-regression, version 2.1 (DisMod-MR 2.1). Years of life lost (YLLs) were estimated by combining death counts with standard life expectancy at the age of death. Years lived with disability (YLDs) were estimated by multiplying incidence estimates by an average disease duration of 2 weeks and a disability weight for abdominal pain. YLLs and YLDs were summed to estimate disability-adjusted life-years (DALYs).</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>In 2021, the global age-standardised mortality rate of appendicitis was 0·358 (95% uncertainty interval [UI] 0·311-0·414) per 100 000. Mortality rates ranged from 1·01 (0·895-1·13) per 100 000 in central Latin America to 0·054 (0·0464-0·0617) per 100 000 in high-income Asia Pacific. The global age-standardised incidence rate of appendicitis in 2021 was 214 (174-274) per 100 000, corresponding to 17 million (13·8-21·6) new cases. The incidence rate was the highest in high-income Asia Pacific, at 364 (286-475) per 100 000 and the lowest in western sub-Saharan Africa, at 81·4 (63·9-109) per 100 000. The global age-standardised rates of mortality, incidence, YLLs, YLDs, and DALYs due to appendicitis decreased steadily between 1990 and 2021, with the largest reduction in mortality and YLL rates. The global annualised rate of decline in the DALY rate was greatest in children younger than the age of 10 years. Although mortality rates due to appendicitis decreased in all regions, there were large regional variations in the temporal trend in incidence. Although the global age-standardised incidence rate of appendicitis has steadily decreased between 1990 and 2021, almost half of GBD regions saw an increase of greater than 10% in their age-standardised incidence rates.</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>Slow but promising progress has been observed in reducing the overall burden of appendicitis in all regions. However, there are important geographical variations in appendicitis incidence and mortality, and the relationship between these measures suggests that many people still do not have access to quality health care. As the incidence of appendicitis is rising ","PeriodicalId":56028,"journal":{"name":"Lancet Gastroenterology & Hepatology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":30.9,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11306195/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141735816","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Oswaldo Ortiz, Maria Daca-Alvarez, Liseth Rivero-Sanchez, Antonio Z Gimeno-Garcia, Marta Carrillo-Palau, Victoria Alvarez, Alejandro Ledo-Rodriguez, Luigi Ricciardiello, Chiera Pierantoni, Robert Hüneburg, Jacob Nattermann, Raf Bisschops, Sabine Tejpar, Alain Huerta, Faust Riu Pons, Cristina Alvarez-Urturi, Jorge López-Vicente, Alessandro Repici, Cessare Hassan, Lucia Cid, Giulia Martina Cavestro, Cristina Romero-Mascarell, Jordi Gordillo, Ignasi Puig, Maite Herraiz, Maite Betes, Jesús Herrero, Rodrigo Jover, Francesc Balaguer, Maria Pellisé
{"title":"An artificial intelligence-assisted system versus white light endoscopy alone for adenoma detection in individuals with Lynch syndrome (TIMELY): an international, multicentre, randomised controlled trial.","authors":"Oswaldo Ortiz, Maria Daca-Alvarez, Liseth Rivero-Sanchez, Antonio Z Gimeno-Garcia, Marta Carrillo-Palau, Victoria Alvarez, Alejandro Ledo-Rodriguez, Luigi Ricciardiello, Chiera Pierantoni, Robert Hüneburg, Jacob Nattermann, Raf Bisschops, Sabine Tejpar, Alain Huerta, Faust Riu Pons, Cristina Alvarez-Urturi, Jorge López-Vicente, Alessandro Repici, Cessare Hassan, Lucia Cid, Giulia Martina Cavestro, Cristina Romero-Mascarell, Jordi Gordillo, Ignasi Puig, Maite Herraiz, Maite Betes, Jesús Herrero, Rodrigo Jover, Francesc Balaguer, Maria Pellisé","doi":"10.1016/S2468-1253(24)00187-0","DOIUrl":"10.1016/S2468-1253(24)00187-0","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Computer-aided detection (CADe) systems for colonoscopy have been shown to increase small polyp detection during colonoscopy in the general population. People with Lynch syndrome represent an ideal target population for CADe-assisted colonoscopy because adenomas, the primary cancer precursor lesions, are characterised by their small size and higher likelihood of showing advanced histology. We aimed to evaluate the performance of CADe-assisted colonoscopy in detecting adenomas in individuals with Lynch syndrome.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>TIMELY was an international, multicentre, parallel, randomised controlled trial done in 11 academic centres and six community centres in Belgium, Germany, Italy, and Spain. We enrolled individuals aged 18 years or older with pathogenic or likely pathogenic MLH1, MSH2, MSH6, or EPCAM variants. Participants were consecutively randomly assigned (1:1) to either CADe (GI Genius) assisted white light endoscopy (WLE) or WLE alone. A centre-stratified randomisation sequence was generated through a computer-generated system with a separate randomisation list for each centre according to block-permuted randomisation (block size 26 patients per centre). Allocation was automatically provided by the online AEG-REDCap database. Participants were masked to the random assignment but endoscopists were not. The primary outcome was the mean number of adenomas per colonoscopy, calculated by dividing the total number of adenomas detected by the total number of colonoscopies and assessed in the intention-to-treat population. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04909671.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>Between Sept 13, 2021, and April 6, 2023, 456 participants were screened for eligibility, 430 of whom were randomly assigned to receive CADe-assisted colonoscopy (n=214) or WLE (n=216). 256 (60%) participants were female and 174 (40%) were male. In the intention-to-treat analysis, the mean number of adenomas per colonoscopy was 0·64 (SD 1·57) in the CADe group and 0·64 (1·17) in the WLE group (adjusted rate ratio 1·03 [95% CI 0·72-1·47); p=0·87). No adverse events were reported during the trial.</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>In this multicentre international trial, CADe did not improve the detection of adenomas in individuals with Lynch syndrome. High-quality procedures and thorough inspection and exposure of the colonic mucosa remain the cornerstone in surveillance of Lynch syndrome.</p><p><strong>Funding: </strong>Spanish Gastroenterology Association, Spanish Society of Digestive Endoscopy, European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, Societat Catalana de Digestologia, Instituto Carlos III, Beca de la Marato de TV3 2020. Co-funded by the European Union.</p>","PeriodicalId":56028,"journal":{"name":"Lancet Gastroenterology & Hepatology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":30.9,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141735789","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Renée Duijzer, Lucas H P Bernts, Anja Geerts, Bart van Hoek, Minneke J Coenraad, Chantal Rovers, Domenico Alvaro, Ed J Kuijper, Frederik Nevens, Jan Halbritter, Jordi Colmenero, Juozas Kupcinskas, Mahdi Salih, Marie C Hogan, Maxime Ronot, Valerie Vilgrain, Nicolien M Hanemaaijer, Patrick S Kamath, Pavel Strnad, Richard Taubert, Ron T Gansevoort, Roser Torra, Silvio Nadalin, Tatsuya Suwabe, Tom J G Gevers, Vincenzo Cardinale, Joost P H Drenth, Marten A Lantinga
{"title":"Clinical management of liver cyst infections: an international, modified Delphi-based clinical decision framework.","authors":"Renée Duijzer, Lucas H P Bernts, Anja Geerts, Bart van Hoek, Minneke J Coenraad, Chantal Rovers, Domenico Alvaro, Ed J Kuijper, Frederik Nevens, Jan Halbritter, Jordi Colmenero, Juozas Kupcinskas, Mahdi Salih, Marie C Hogan, Maxime Ronot, Valerie Vilgrain, Nicolien M Hanemaaijer, Patrick S Kamath, Pavel Strnad, Richard Taubert, Ron T Gansevoort, Roser Torra, Silvio Nadalin, Tatsuya Suwabe, Tom J G Gevers, Vincenzo Cardinale, Joost P H Drenth, Marten A Lantinga","doi":"10.1016/S2468-1253(24)00094-3","DOIUrl":"10.1016/S2468-1253(24)00094-3","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Liver cyst infections often necessitate long-term hospital admission and are associated with considerable morbidity and mortality. We conducted a modified Delphi study to reach expert consensus for a clinical decision framework. The expert panel consisted of 24 medical specialists, including 12 hepatologists, from nine countries across Europe, North America, and Asia. The Delphi had three rounds. The first round (response rate 21/24 [88%]) was an online survey with questions constructed from literature review and expert opinion, in which experts were asked about their management preferences and rated possible management strategies for seven clinical scenarios. Experts also rated 14 clinical decision-making items for relevancy and defined treatment outcomes. During the second round (response rate 13/24 [54%]), items that did not reach consensus and newly suggested themes were discussed in an online panel meeting. In the third round (response rate 16/24 [67%]), experts voted on definitions and management strategies using an online survey based on previous answers. Consensus was predefined as a vote threshold of at least 75%. We identified five subclassifications of liver cyst infection according to cyst phenotypes and patient immune status and consensus on episode definitions (new, persistent, and recurrent) and criteria for treatment success or failure was reached. The experts agreed that fever and elevated C-reactive protein are pivotal decision-making items for initiating and evaluating the management of liver cyst infections. Consensus was reached on 26 management statements for patients with liver cyst infections across multiple clinical scenarios, including two treatment algorithms, which were merged into one after comments. We provide a clinical decision framework for physicians managing patients with liver cyst infections. This framework will facilitate uniformity in the management of liver cyst infections and can constitute the basis for the development of future guidelines.</p>","PeriodicalId":56028,"journal":{"name":"Lancet Gastroenterology & Hepatology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":30.9,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141328189","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Do-Youn Oh, Aiwu Ruth He, Mohamed Bouattour, Takuji Okusaka, Shukui Qin, Li-Tzong Chen, Masayuki Kitano, Choong-Kun Lee, Jin Won Kim, Ming-Huang Chen, Thatthan Suksombooncharoen, Masafumi Ikeda, Myung Ah Lee, Jen-Shi Chen, Piotr Potemski, Howard A Burris, Vikas Ostwal, Suebpong Tanasanvimon, Chigusa Morizane, Renata E Zaucha, Mairéad G McNamara, Antonio Avallone, Juan E Cundom, Valeriy Breder, Benjamin Tan, Satoshi Shimizu, David Tougeron, Ludovic Evesque, Mila Petrova, David B Zhen, Roopinder Gillmore, Vineet Govinda Gupta, Farshid Dayyani, Joon Oh Park, Gary L Buchschacher, Felipe Rey, Hyosung Kim, Julie Wang, Claire Morgan, Nana Rokutanda, Magdalena Żotkiewicz, Arndt Vogel, Juan W Valle
{"title":"Durvalumab or placebo plus gemcitabine and cisplatin in participants with advanced biliary tract cancer (TOPAZ-1): updated overall survival from a randomised phase 3 study.","authors":"Do-Youn Oh, Aiwu Ruth He, Mohamed Bouattour, Takuji Okusaka, Shukui Qin, Li-Tzong Chen, Masayuki Kitano, Choong-Kun Lee, Jin Won Kim, Ming-Huang Chen, Thatthan Suksombooncharoen, Masafumi Ikeda, Myung Ah Lee, Jen-Shi Chen, Piotr Potemski, Howard A Burris, Vikas Ostwal, Suebpong Tanasanvimon, Chigusa Morizane, Renata E Zaucha, Mairéad G McNamara, Antonio Avallone, Juan E Cundom, Valeriy Breder, Benjamin Tan, Satoshi Shimizu, David Tougeron, Ludovic Evesque, Mila Petrova, David B Zhen, Roopinder Gillmore, Vineet Govinda Gupta, Farshid Dayyani, Joon Oh Park, Gary L Buchschacher, Felipe Rey, Hyosung Kim, Julie Wang, Claire Morgan, Nana Rokutanda, Magdalena Żotkiewicz, Arndt Vogel, Juan W Valle","doi":"10.1016/S2468-1253(24)00095-5","DOIUrl":"10.1016/S2468-1253(24)00095-5","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In the preplanned interim analysis of the TOPAZ-1 study, durvalumab plus gemcitabine-cisplatin significantly improved overall survival versus placebo plus gemcitabine-cisplatin in participants with advanced biliary tract cancer. We aimed to report updated overall survival and safety data from TOPAZ-1 with additional follow-up and data maturity beyond the interim analysis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>TOPAZ-1 was a phase 3, randomised, double-masked, placebo-controlled, global study done at 105 sites in 17 countries. Participants aged 18 years or older with unresectable, locally advanced, or metastatic biliary tract cancer were randomly assigned (1:1) to durvalumab plus gemcitabine-cisplatin or placebo plus gemcitabine-cisplatin using a computer-generated randomisation scheme, stratified by disease status and primary tumour location. Participants received durvalumab (1500 mg) or placebo on day 1 of each cycle every 3 weeks for up to eight cycles, plus gemcitabine (1000 mg/m<sup>2</sup>) and cisplatin (25 mg/m<sup>2</sup>) intravenously on days 1 and 8 of each cycle every 3 weeks for up to eight cycles, followed by durvalumab (1500 mg) or placebo monotherapy every 4 weeks until disease progression or other discontinuation criteria were met. Investigators and participants were masked to study treatment. The primary endpoint was overall survival. TOPAZ-1 met its primary endpoint at the preplanned interim analysis, and the study is active but no longer recruiting participants. Updated overall survival and safety data from TOPAZ-1, with additional follow-up (data cutoff Feb 25, 2022) and data maturity beyond the interim analysis, are reported here. Efficacy was assessed in the full analysis set (all randomly assigned participants). Safety was assessed in the safety analysis set (all participants who received at least one dose of study treatment). The TOPAZ-1 study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03875235.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>From April 16, 2019, to Dec 11, 2020, 914 participants were enrolled, 685 of whom were randomly assigned (341 to the durvalumab plus gemcitabine-cisplatin group and 344 to the placebo plus gemcitabine-cisplatin group). 345 (50%) participants were male and 340 (50%) were female. Median follow-up at the updated data cutoff was 23·4 months (95% CI 20·6-25·2) in the durvalumab plus gemcitabine-cisplatin group and 22·4 months (21·4-23·8) in the placebo plus gemcitabine-cisplatin group. At the updated data cutoff, 248 (73%) participants in the durvalumab plus gemcitabine-cisplatin group and 279 (81%) participants in the placebo plus gemcitabine-cisplatin group had died (median overall survival 12·9 months [95% CI 11·6-14·1] vs 11·3 months [10·1-12·5]; hazard ratio 0·76 [95% CI 0·64-0·91]). Kaplan-Meier-estimated 24-month overall survival rates were 23·6% (95% CI 18·7-28·9) in the durvalumab plus gemcitabine-cisplatin group and 11·5% (7·6-16·2) in the placebo plus gemcitabine-cispl","PeriodicalId":56028,"journal":{"name":"Lancet Gastroenterology & Hepatology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":30.9,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141186927","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Arndt Vogel, Anna Saborowski, Patrick Wenzel, Henning Wege, Gunnar Folprecht, Albrecht Kretzschmar, Philipp Schütt, Lutz Jacobasch, Nicolas Ziegenhagen, Stefan Boeck, Danmei Zhang, Stephan Kanzler, Sebastian Belle, Johannes Mohm, Eray Gökkurt, Christian Lerchenmüller, Ullrich Graeven, Daniel Pink, Thorsten Götze, Martha M Kirstein
{"title":"Nanoliposomal irinotecan and fluorouracil plus leucovorin versus fluorouracil plus leucovorin in patients with cholangiocarcinoma and gallbladder carcinoma previously treated with gemcitabine-based therapies (AIO NALIRICC): a multicentre, open-label, randomised, phase 2 trial.","authors":"Arndt Vogel, Anna Saborowski, Patrick Wenzel, Henning Wege, Gunnar Folprecht, Albrecht Kretzschmar, Philipp Schütt, Lutz Jacobasch, Nicolas Ziegenhagen, Stefan Boeck, Danmei Zhang, Stephan Kanzler, Sebastian Belle, Johannes Mohm, Eray Gökkurt, Christian Lerchenmüller, Ullrich Graeven, Daniel Pink, Thorsten Götze, Martha M Kirstein","doi":"10.1016/S2468-1253(24)00119-5","DOIUrl":"10.1016/S2468-1253(24)00119-5","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>There is an unmet need for effective therapies in pretreated advanced biliary tract cancer. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy of nanoliposomal irinotecan and fluorouracil plus leucovorin compared with fluorouracil plus leucovorin as second-line treatment for biliary tract cancer.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>NALIRICC was a multicentre, open-label, randomised, phase 2 trial done in 17 German centres for patients aged 18 years or older, with an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0-1, metastatic biliary tract cancer, and progression on gemcitabine-based therapy. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive intravenous infusions of nanoliposomal irinotecan (70 mg/m<sup>2</sup>), fluorouracil (2400 mg/m<sup>2</sup>), and leucovorin (400 mg/m<sup>2</sup>) every 2 weeks (nanoliposomal irinotecan group) or fluorouracil (2400 mg/m<sup>2</sup>) plus leucovorin (400 mg/m<sup>2</sup>) every 2 weeks (control group). Randomisation was by permutated block randomisation in block sizes of four, stratified by primary tumour site. Investigator-assessed progression-free survival was the primary endpoint, which was evaluated in all randomly assigned patients. Secondary efficacy outcomes were overall survival, objective response rate, and quality of life. Safety was assessed in all randomly assigned patients who received at least one dose of the study treatment. Enrolment for this trial has been completed, and it is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03043547.</p><p><strong>Finding: </strong>Between Dec 4, 2017, and Aug 2, 2021, 49 patients were randomly assigned to the nanoliposomal irinotecan group and 51 patients to the control group. Median age was 65 years (IQR 59-71); 45 (45%) of 100 patients were female. Median progression-free survival was 2·6 months (95% CI 1·7-3·6) in the nanoliposomal irinotecan group and 2·3 months (1·6-3·4) in the control group (hazard ratio [HR] 0·87 [0·56-1·35]). Median overall survival was 6·9 months (95% CI 5·3-10·6) in the nanoliposomal irinotecan group and 8·2 months (5·4-11·9) in the control group (HR 1·08 [0·68-1·72]). The objective response rate was 14% (95% CI 6-27; seven patients) in the nanoliposomal irinotecan group and 4% (1-14; two patients) in the control group. The most common grade 3 or worse adverse events in the nanoliposomal irinotecan group were neutropenia (eight [17%] of 48 vs none in the control group), diarrhoea (seven [15%] vs one [2%]), and nausea (four [8%] vs none). In the control group, the most common grade 3 or worse adverse events were cholangitis (four [8%] patients vs none in the nanoliposomal irinotecan group) and bile duct stenosis (four [8%] vs three [6%]). Treatment-related serious adverse events occurred in 16 (33%) patients in the nanoliposomal irinotecan group (grade 2-3 diarrhoea in five patients; one case each of abdominal infection, acute kidney injury, pancytopenia, increased blood bilirubin, colitis, dehydration, dyspnoea, infe","PeriodicalId":56028,"journal":{"name":"Lancet Gastroenterology & Hepatology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":30.9,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141319080","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Marietta Iacucci, Giovanni Santacroce, Irene Zammarchi, Yasuharu Maeda, Rocío Del Amor, Pablo Meseguer, Bisi Bode Kolawole, Ujwala Chaudhari, Antonio Di Sabatino, Silvio Danese, Yuichi Mori, Enrico Grisan, Valery Naranjo, Subrata Ghosh
{"title":"Artificial intelligence and endo-histo-omics: new dimensions of precision endoscopy and histology in inflammatory bowel disease.","authors":"Marietta Iacucci, Giovanni Santacroce, Irene Zammarchi, Yasuharu Maeda, Rocío Del Amor, Pablo Meseguer, Bisi Bode Kolawole, Ujwala Chaudhari, Antonio Di Sabatino, Silvio Danese, Yuichi Mori, Enrico Grisan, Valery Naranjo, Subrata Ghosh","doi":"10.1016/S2468-1253(24)00053-0","DOIUrl":"10.1016/S2468-1253(24)00053-0","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Integrating artificial intelligence into inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) has the potential to revolutionise clinical practice and research. Artificial intelligence harnesses advanced algorithms to deliver accurate assessments of IBD endoscopy and histology, offering precise evaluations of disease activity, standardised scoring, and outcome prediction. Furthermore, artificial intelligence offers the potential for a holistic endo-histo-omics approach by interlacing and harmonising endoscopy, histology, and omics data towards precision medicine. The emerging applications of artificial intelligence could pave the way for personalised medicine in IBD, offering patient stratification for the most beneficial therapy with minimal risk. Although artificial intelligence holds promise, challenges remain, including data quality, standardisation, reproducibility, scarcity of randomised controlled trials, clinical implementation, ethical concerns, legal liability, and regulatory issues. The development of standardised guidelines and interdisciplinary collaboration, including policy makers and regulatory agencies, is crucial for addressing these challenges and advancing artificial intelligence in IBD clinical practice and trials.</p>","PeriodicalId":56028,"journal":{"name":"Lancet Gastroenterology & Hepatology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":30.9,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140961124","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}