发布求助
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献

British Journal for the Philosophy of Science最新文献

筛选
英文 中文
There Are No Bad Lots, Only Bad Formulations of Inference to the Best Explanation 没有坏的批次，只有对最佳解释的错误推论
1区 哲学
British Journal for the Philosophy of Science Pub Date : 2023-11-06 DOI: 10.1086/728458
Kevin Davey
{"title":"There Are No Bad Lots, Only Bad Formulations of Inference to the Best Explanation","authors":"Kevin Davey","doi":"10.1086/728458","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1086/728458","url":null,"abstract":"Previous articleNext article There Are No Bad Lots, Only Bad Formulations of Inference to the Best ExplanationKevin DaveyKevin Davey Search for more articles by this author PDFPDF PLUS Add to favoritesDownload CitationTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints Share onFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditEmailPrint SectionsMoreDetailsFiguresReferencesCited by The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science Just Accepted Society: The British Society for the Philosophy of Science Article DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1086/728458 HistoryAccepted October 30, 2023 © 2023 The British Society for the Philosophy of Science. All Rights reserved.PDF download Crossref reports no articles citing this article.","PeriodicalId":55327,"journal":{"name":"British Journal for the Philosophy of Science","volume":"15 2","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-11-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"135590168","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Epistemological Pitfalls in the Proxy Theory of Race: The Case of Genomics-Based Medicine 种族代理理论的认识论陷阱:以基因组医学为例&#x0D
1区 哲学
British Journal for the Philosophy of Science Pub Date : 2023-09-26 DOI: 10.1086/727957
Joanna Karolina Malinowska, Davide Serpico
{"title":"Epistemological Pitfalls in the Proxy Theory of Race: The Case of Genomics-Based Medicine
","authors":"Joanna Karolina Malinowska, Davide Serpico","doi":"10.1086/727957","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1086/727957","url":null,"abstract":"Next article FreeEpistemological Pitfalls in the Proxy Theory of Race: The Case of Genomics-Based Medicine Joanna Karolina Malinowska and Davide SerpicoJoanna Karolina Malinowska Search for more articles by this author and Davide Serpico Search for more articles by this author PDFPDF PLUS Add to favoritesDownload CitationTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints Share onFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditEmailPrint SectionsMoreDetailsFiguresReferencesCited by The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science Just Accepted Society: The British Society for the Philosophy of Science Article DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1086/727957 HistoryAccepted August 22, 2023 © 2023 The British Society for the Philosophy of Science. All Rights reserved.PDF download Crossref reports no articles citing this article.","PeriodicalId":55327,"journal":{"name":"British Journal for the Philosophy of Science","volume":"21 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"134886125","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
A new low: Reassessing (and revising) the local recurrency theory of consciousness 一个新的低点:重新评估(和修改)意识的局部循环理论
1区 哲学
British Journal for the Philosophy of Science Pub Date : 2023-09-22 DOI: 10.1086/727890
Benjamin Kozuch
{"title":"A new low: Reassessing (and revising) the local recurrency theory of consciousness","authors":"Benjamin Kozuch","doi":"10.1086/727890","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1086/727890","url":null,"abstract":"Next article No AccessA new low: Reassessing (and revising) the local recurrency theory of consciousnessBenjamin KozuchBenjamin Kozuch Search for more articles by this author PDFPDF PLUS Add to favoritesDownload CitationTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints Share onFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditEmailPrint SectionsMoreDetailsFiguresReferencesCited by The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science Just Accepted Society: The British Society for the Philosophy of Science Article DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1086/727890 HistoryAccepted September 21, 2023 © 2023 The British Society for the Philosophy of Science. All Rights reserved.PDF download Crossref reports no articles citing this article.","PeriodicalId":55327,"journal":{"name":"British Journal for the Philosophy of Science","volume":"27 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-09-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"136014889","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Rational Aversion to Information 对信息的理性厌恶
1区 哲学
British Journal for the Philosophy of Science Pub Date : 2023-09-14 DOI: 10.1086/727772
Sven Neth
{"title":"Rational Aversion to Information","authors":"Sven Neth","doi":"10.1086/727772","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1086/727772","url":null,"abstract":"Is more information always better? Or are there some situations in which more information can make us worse off? Good (1967) argues that expected utility maximizers should always accept more information if the information is cost-free and relevant. But Good's argument presupposes that you are certain you will update by conditionalization. If we relax this assumption and allow agents to be uncertain about updating, these agents can be rationally required to reject free and relevant information. Since there are good reasons to be uncertain about updating, rationality can require you to prefer ignorance.","PeriodicalId":55327,"journal":{"name":"British Journal for the Philosophy of Science","volume":"30 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-09-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"134910676","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The Origins of Distinctively Human Mindreading: A Bio-social-technological Co-evolutionary Account 独特的人类读心术的起源:一个生物-社会-技术共同进化的解释
1区 哲学
British Journal for the Philosophy of Science Pub Date : 2023-09-14 DOI: 10.1086/727784
Armin W. Schulz
{"title":"The Origins of Distinctively Human Mindreading: A Bio-social-technological Co-evolutionary Account","authors":"Armin W. Schulz","doi":"10.1086/727784","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1086/727784","url":null,"abstract":"Previous articleNext article No AccessThe Origins of Distinctively Human Mindreading: A Bio-social-technological Co-evolutionary AccountArmin W. SchulzArmin W. Schulz Search for more articles by this author PDFPDF PLUS Add to favoritesDownload CitationTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints Share onFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditEmailPrint SectionsMoreDetailsFiguresReferencesCited by The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science Just Accepted Society: The British Society for the Philosophy of Science Views: 1Total views on this site Views: 1Total views on this site Article DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1086/727784 Views: 1Total views on this site HistoryAccepted September 11, 2023 © 2023 The British Society for the Philosophy of Science. All Rights reserved.PDF download Crossref reports no articles citing this article.","PeriodicalId":55327,"journal":{"name":"British Journal for the Philosophy of Science","volume":"23 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-09-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"134910710","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Approaching Truth by Resolving Questions 通过解决问题接近真理
1区 哲学
British Journal for the Philosophy of Science Pub Date : 2023-09-14 DOI: 10.1086/727773
Jakob Süskind
{"title":"Approaching Truth by Resolving Questions","authors":"Jakob Süskind","doi":"10.1086/727773","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1086/727773","url":null,"abstract":"Previous articleNext article No AccessApproaching Truth by Resolving QuestionsJakob SüskindJakob Süskind Search for more articles by this author PDFPDF PLUS Add to favoritesDownload CitationTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints Share onFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditEmailPrint SectionsMoreDetailsFiguresReferencesCited by The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science Just Accepted Society: The British Society for the Philosophy of Science Views: 1Total views on this site Views: 1Total views on this site Article DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1086/727773 Views: 1Total views on this site HistoryAccepted September 08, 2023 © 2023 The British Society for the Philosophy of Science. All Rights reserved.PDF download Crossref reports no articles citing this article.","PeriodicalId":55327,"journal":{"name":"British Journal for the Philosophy of Science","volume":"28 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-09-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"134910688","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Front Matter 前页
1区 哲学
British Journal for the Philosophy of Science Pub Date : 2023-06-01 DOI: 10.1086/726286
{"title":"Front Matter","authors":"","doi":"10.1086/726286","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1086/726286","url":null,"abstract":"Next article FreeFront MatterPDFPDF PLUS Add to favoritesDownload CitationTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints Share onFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditEmailPrint SectionsMoreDetailsFiguresReferencesCited by The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science Volume 74, Number 2June 2023 Society: The British Society for the Philosophy of Science Article DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1086/726286 © The Author(s) 2023. All rights reserved.PDF download Crossref reports no articles citing this article.","PeriodicalId":55327,"journal":{"name":"British Journal for the Philosophy of Science","volume":"57 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"136169408","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Scientific Explanation 科学的解释
IF 3.4 1区 哲学
British Journal for the Philosophy of Science Pub Date : 2018-07-19 DOI: 10.1093/oso/9780190690649.003.0001
Denis Bonnay
{"title":"Scientific Explanation","authors":"Denis Bonnay","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780190690649.003.0001","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190690649.003.0001","url":null,"abstract":"One of the major aims of science, it is commonly held, is to provide explanations. Philosophers of science have tried to understand what it is to provide a scientific explanation, what distinguishes good from bad explanations, and why explanations are valuable. This chapter goes through the main answers that have been elaborated in the last decades. It starts with a detailed discussion of the famous deductive-nomological (DN) model of explanation proposed by Hempel and Oppenheim. Then, the two main rivals to the DN model, the causal theory and the unificationist theory, are introduced and discussed. Some other contemporary approaches are sketched out in the closing section.","PeriodicalId":55327,"journal":{"name":"British Journal for the Philosophy of Science","volume":"85 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4,"publicationDate":"2018-07-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"80360881","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Philosophy of Biology 生物学哲学
IF 3.4 1区 哲学
British Journal for the Philosophy of Science Pub Date : 2018-07-19 DOI: 10.1093/OSO/9780190690649.003.0012
T. Pradeu
{"title":"Philosophy of Biology","authors":"T. Pradeu","doi":"10.1093/OSO/9780190690649.003.0012","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/OSO/9780190690649.003.0012","url":null,"abstract":"The aim of this chapter is to address the conceptual, theoretical, and methodological questions bearing on the foundations of today’s life sciences. It discusses the main themes of the philosophy of evolutionary biology, asking what is meant by the idea of adaptation and reviewing the various answers to the units of selection problem. The latter considers on which biological entities—genes, genomes, cells, organisms, groups, species, and so forth—natural selection operates and is a nice illustration of how philosophy of biology situates itself at the frontier between philosophy and the most theoretical parts of biology. The chapter also presents recent debates over the notions of genetic programming and organismal development and the reduction of macromolecular biology to molecular biology.","PeriodicalId":55327,"journal":{"name":"British Journal for the Philosophy of Science","volume":"27 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4,"publicationDate":"2018-07-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"75843820","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 18
Theories and Models 理论与模型
IF 3.4 1区 哲学
British Journal for the Philosophy of Science Pub Date : 2018-07-19 DOI: 10.1093/OSO/9780190690649.003.0005
M. Vorms
{"title":"Theories and Models","authors":"M. Vorms","doi":"10.1093/OSO/9780190690649.003.0005","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/OSO/9780190690649.003.0005","url":null,"abstract":"Theories are among the main achievements of scientific inquiry and appear as the repositories of scientific knowledge. This chapter is devoted to an examination of the notion of theory as a unit of analysis for the study of scientific knowledge. Most of the analysis consists in presenting and criticizing two major proposals made by philosophers of science, the “received view,” commonly attributed to logical empiricism, and the “semantic view of theories,” which became the new orthodoxy in the 1960s. Both proposals aim at formal reconstructions of theories. The shared assumptions underlying this common project will be questioned. Alternative ways of construing scientific theorizing will be sketched, notably those which are more “agent-centered” and put forward the way scientists use and understand their theories in practice.","PeriodicalId":55327,"journal":{"name":"British Journal for the Philosophy of Science","volume":"141 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4,"publicationDate":"2018-07-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"76426806","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
首页 上一页 下一页 尾页
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整，为了账户安全，请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
相关产品
×
本文献相关产品
联系我们：info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务，方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号：481959085
Book学术官方微信