There Are No Bad Lots, Only Bad Formulations of Inference to the Best Explanation

IF 3.2 1区 哲学 Q1 HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE
Kevin Davey
{"title":"There Are No Bad Lots, Only Bad Formulations of Inference to the Best Explanation","authors":"Kevin Davey","doi":"10.1086/728458","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Previous articleNext article There Are No Bad Lots, Only Bad Formulations of Inference to the Best ExplanationKevin DaveyKevin Davey Search for more articles by this author PDFPDF PLUS Add to favoritesDownload CitationTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints Share onFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditEmailPrint SectionsMoreDetailsFiguresReferencesCited by The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science Just Accepted Society: The British Society for the Philosophy of Science Article DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1086/728458 HistoryAccepted October 30, 2023 © 2023 The British Society for the Philosophy of Science. All Rights reserved.PDF download Crossref reports no articles citing this article.","PeriodicalId":55327,"journal":{"name":"British Journal for the Philosophy of Science","volume":"15 2","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Journal for the Philosophy of Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1086/728458","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Previous articleNext article There Are No Bad Lots, Only Bad Formulations of Inference to the Best ExplanationKevin DaveyKevin Davey Search for more articles by this author PDFPDF PLUS Add to favoritesDownload CitationTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints Share onFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditEmailPrint SectionsMoreDetailsFiguresReferencesCited by The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science Just Accepted Society: The British Society for the Philosophy of Science Article DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1086/728458 HistoryAccepted October 30, 2023 © 2023 The British Society for the Philosophy of Science. All Rights reserved.PDF download Crossref reports no articles citing this article.
没有坏的批次,只有对最佳解释的错误推论
上一篇文章下一篇文章没有坏的东西,只有坏的推理公式,以最好的解释凯文·戴维凯文·戴维搜索作者的更多文章PDFPDF PLUS添加到收藏列表下载引文跟踪引文spermissions转载分享在facebook twitterlinkedinredditemailprint节smoredetailsfigures参考文献引用英国科学哲学杂志刚接受的社会:英国科学哲学学会文章DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1086/728458 history2023年10月30日已接受©2023英国科学哲学学会。Crossref报告没有引用这篇文章的文章。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
British Journal for the Philosophy of Science
British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 管理科学-科学史与科学哲学
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
50
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science encourages the application of philosophical techniques to issues raised by the natural and human sciences. These include general questions of scientific knowledge and objectivity, as well as more particular problems arising within specific disciplines. Topics currently being discussed in the journal include: causation, the logic of natural selection, the interpretation of quantum mechanics, the direction of time, probability, confirmation, foundations of mathematics, supertasks and the theory of emotion.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信