European Journal of General Practice最新文献

{"title":"Burnout among Catalan general practitioners. A repeated cross-sectional study, during and after the COVID-19 pandemic.","authors":"Maria Miñana- Castellanos, María Isabel Fernández-San-Martín, María Rodríguez-Barragán, Maria Teresa Santos E Silva Caldeira Marques, Antoni Sisó, Josep Basora, Enric Aragonès","doi":"10.1080/13814788.2025.2485073","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13814788.2025.2485073","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>COVID-19 pandemic caused a significant impact on healthcare workers' mental health and burnout, which continues after the pandemic.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To assess the levels of burnout in general practitioners (GP) in Catalonia at three different times.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Cross-sectional study involving members of the GPs' Catalan Society (<i>n</i> = 4700). A self-administered survey was sent via institutional email in June-July 2021 (T1), in March-April 2022 (T2), and in May-June 2023 (T3). Probable burnout was assessed through Maslach Burnout Inventory (MBI) test, with three independent dimensions: emotional exhaustion, depersonalisation, and personal achievement. A descriptive analysis was performed, as well as a comparison between T1, T2, and T3 results.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>500 GPs responded in T1, 454 in T2, and 386 in T3. Samples were similar in demographic variables. Regarding burnout dimensions, the level of emotional exhaustion was 67.5% in T1, with a statistically significant decrease in T2 and T3 (56.4 and 58.1%, respectively, <i>p</i> = 0.001); levels of depersonalisation were 42.7% in T1, 37.0% in T2 and 36.7% in T3 (<i>p</i> = 0.091); levels of personal achievement were 29.9% in T1, 30.4% in T2 and 24.2% in T3 (<i>p</i> = 0.086).  Starting at high levels of emotional exhaustion and depersonalisation, the prevalence decreased significantly over time in two groups: women and GPs who worked <10 years at the same workplace.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Catalan GPs experienced significant burnout during the COVID-19 pandemic with emotional exhaustion being particularly high. Although the prevalence of burnout decreased slightly over time, over half of the participants consistently reported high levels of emotional exhaustion.</p>","PeriodicalId":54380,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of General Practice","volume":"31 1","pages":"2485073"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11986852/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144021902","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Correction.","authors":"","doi":"10.1080/13814788.2025.2477962","DOIUrl":"10.1080/13814788.2025.2477962","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":54380,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of General Practice","volume":"31 1","pages":"2477962"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11963180/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143765934","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"From trainee to general practitioner: A qualitative study of transition experiences of Flemish GP trainees.","authors":"Ellen Tisseghem, Joke Fleer, Melissa Horlait, Peter Pype, Emelien Lauwerier","doi":"10.1080/13814788.2024.2443603","DOIUrl":"10.1080/13814788.2024.2443603","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The transition from trainee to professional marks a key milestone in a family doctor's career, bringing both emotional and mental challenges. This critical period of specialisation shapes how young doctors adapt and influences their future career choices.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>We explored trainees' experiences during their first year of advanced medical training in family medicine/general practice, including barriers and facilitators.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using qualitative methodology, we conducted ten focus group interviews with 111 trainees. These group interviews were held as part of small-group sessions integrated into a self-guided reflection course. All interviews were held between February 2021 and March 2021, conducted online via MS Teams, recorded, and transcribed verbatim for analysis.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>Our analysis uncovered two adaptational processes during this transition period: personal adaptation and professional socialisation. We interpreted this as a complex balancing act, with impact on mental health aspects such as energy, exhaustion, and self-confidence. Multiple elements at different levels influenced these processes, including the workplace (e.g. interactions with colleagues and patients), the educational program (e.g. assignments, courses), and societal expectations (e.g. role expectations, support).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The findings highlight the importance of understanding both personal adaptation and professional socialisation to support trainees effectively during their transition into practice. Future studies should validate these findings and explore their evolution over time, particularly in relation to adaptation and career choices.</p>","PeriodicalId":54380,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of General Practice","volume":"31 1","pages":"2443603"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11722024/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142958903","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Pain and feasibility of capillary self-blood collection in general practice: A cross-sectional investigative study.","authors":"Christopher Schuchardt, Frank Müller, Angelika Hafke, Eva Hummers, Julie Schanz, Alexandra Dopfer-Jablonka, Georg M N Behrens, Dominik Schröder","doi":"10.1080/13814788.2025.2501309","DOIUrl":"10.1080/13814788.2025.2501309","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Capillary self-blood collection (SBC) with mailed samples enables remote laboratory monitoring without in-person healthcare visits. This approach may improve continuity of care for patients, especially with chronic conditions.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Compare pain perception between venous blood draws and capillary SBC and evaluate the usability and blood volume yield of SBC devices.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this cross-sectional study, general practice patients from mid of Germany, Germany performed SBC using the Tasso+^® upper-arm device and mailed samples to a laboratory. Pain, usability, SBC volume, and associated factors were analysed using bivariate and general linear models.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 106 patients, 57.5% performed SBC without assistance. Self-perceived pain was lower among SBC draws (0.13, SD = 0.42) versus venous draws (1.21, SD = 1.60) (<i>p</i> < .001). 59.4% self-collected ≥130 μL blood plasma. Patient characteristics were not associated with SBC volume in regression analysis. Overall, the mean System Usability Scale (SUS) score was 86.2, indicating high usability. Lower school education was associated with lower usability scores, while lower fear of blood and needles were associated with higher usability scores in regression analysis.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Capillary SBC had high feasibility and usability and caused less pain than venous draws in the general practice setting. SBC shows promises for enabling remote laboratory monitoring.</p>","PeriodicalId":54380,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of General Practice","volume":"31 1","pages":"2501309"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12107643/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144132463","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Identifying opportunities for shared decision-making through patients' and physicians' perceptions on the diagnostic process: A qualitative analysis of malpractice claims in general practice.","authors":"Sofie Jacobse, Hanneke Rijkels-Otters, Manon Eikens-Jansen, Trudy van der Weijden, Glyn Elwyn, Walter van den Broek, Patrick Bindels, Laura Zwaan","doi":"10.1080/13814788.2025.2501302","DOIUrl":"10.1080/13814788.2025.2501302","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Shared decision-making (SDM) is considered the preferred communication model, yet its applicability in the diagnostic process is understudied.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To identify clinical situations in the diagnostic process that could benefit from SDM.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An observational study of closed malpractice claims against general practitioners (2012-2020) related to problems of diagnosis, obtained from a liability insurance company in the Netherlands. We established SDM-selection criteria, specified for the diagnostic process (i.e. diagnostic uncertainty, multiple options and clinical equipoise). Phase 1: We selected and categorised eligible cases, using summarised information from a claim database. Phase 2: We analysed 90 fully documented claims and extracted information from GPs and patients related to the diagnostic process. Using this data, we conducted an inductive thematic analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Phase 1: 261 out of 1477 claims (18%) met the SDM-selection criteria. The main reason for complaints was (omitted) test-ordering (155 claims, 59.4%). The most frequent final diagnoses were: fracture (49%), malignancy (10%), infection (9%), tendon rupture (8%) and cardiovascular disease (4%). Phase 2: Six types of diagnostic considerations emerged from the data: diagnostic uncertainty, using time as a diagnostic tool, management consequences, information about test indication or procedure, indications for re-evaluation and individual patient context. Contradictory statements from GPs and patients demonstrated a lack of shared understanding.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The diagnostic process could benefit from SDM in several areas, including discussing diagnostic options, test conditions (e.g. timing and procedure) and follow-up. SDM training programs should be tailored to encourage clinicians to apply SDM in diagnostic decisions.</p>","PeriodicalId":54380,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of General Practice","volume":"31 1","pages":"2501302"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12131537/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144210241","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Reframing prevention: A clinician's perspective.","authors":"Paulo Santos","doi":"10.1080/13814788.2025.2549809","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13814788.2025.2549809","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":54380,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of General Practice","volume":"31 1","pages":"2549809"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12377113/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144979216","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Factors influencing primary care physicians recommending patients to use digital health technologies for self-management: A cross-sectional study across 20 countries.","authors":"Wuraola Oluwayomi Odunlami, Edmond Li, Geva Greenfield, Gabriele Kerr, Austen El-Osta, Rosy Tsopra, Heidrun Lingner, Ensieh Memarian, Robert Hoffman, Katarzyna Nessler, Geronimo Jimenez, Claire Collins, Davorina Petek, Ana Clavería, Maria José Fernández, Gustavo Gusso, Mehmet Ungan, Greg Irving, Liliana Laranjo, Saira Ghafur, Gianluca Fontana, Josip Car, Benedict Hayhoe, Azeem Majeed, Ana Luisa Neves","doi":"10.1080/13814788.2025.2555819","DOIUrl":"10.1080/13814788.2025.2555819","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Expanding access to self-management via Digital Health Technologies may supplement traditional care, mitigating pressures on primary care through self-management. Primary Care Physicians (PCP) can play a critical role in the integration of digital health technologies into patient care, but it is unclear what factors influence PCPs' recommendation of such technologies.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>To identify the factors associated with PCPs recommending digital health technologies to patients for self-management before and during the pandemic.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>PCPs across 20 countries completed an online questionnaire between June and September 2020. The outcome was a self-report of recommending patients to at least one of six listed forms of digital health technologies. Univariable logistic regression models were performed to explore factors associated with recommending digital health technologies to patients before and during the pandemic.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>1,592 PCPs were included. Before the pandemic, the odds of recommending digital health technologies for self-management were lower for PCPs not involved in teaching, or practising in Turkey, Australia, Chile, Colombia, France, Italy, Poland, Portugal, Slovenia, and Spain. During the pandemic, PCPs practising in rural settings had higher odds of starting to recommend digital health technologies, as well as those from Brazil, Colombia, and Italy. There was no significant difference in recommending digital health technologies before and during the pandemic.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Involvement in teaching (pre-pandemic) and practising in a rural setting (during the pandemic) positively influenced the recommendation of digital health technologies. Significant variation in recommending digital health technologies was present across countries.</p>","PeriodicalId":54380,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of General Practice","volume":"31 1","pages":"2555819"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12439800/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145066431","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Trajectories towards poor mental health: Can general practice contribute to prevention of bad outcomes for young children?","authors":"Philip Wilson","doi":"10.1080/13814788.2025.2524430","DOIUrl":"10.1080/13814788.2025.2524430","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Factors present in early life account for much of the variation in mental wellbeing in adulthood. In regions where general practitioners (GPs) provide first-contact care for pregnant women and children, there are many opportunities to identify children at risk of later psychiatric problems. These risks are contingent on genetic and antenatal factors, parent-child interaction and family functioning, and are influenced by poverty, the neighbourhood and the educational environment. Depending on the context in which they work, GPs may be able to offer support or referral to specialist services to prevent adverse outcomes. GPs are not able to predict accurately which children will be at developmental risk, so it is important to ensure that systems exist to identify neurodevelopmental problems in the whole population, whether in general practice or elsewhere. When developmental surveillance takes place outside general practice, there are strong arguments for data sharing. Awareness and systematic recording of risk factors for later psychopathology, along with appropriate intervention when available, offer the potential for substantial benefits to population mental health in the long term.</p>","PeriodicalId":54380,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of General Practice","volume":"31 1","pages":"2524430"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12231261/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144562012","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Understanding (non)disclosure of sexual orientation and gender identity in Slovenian primary healthcare: Perspectives from LGBT+ individuals and general practitioners.","authors":"Nina Jerala, Davorina Petek","doi":"10.1080/13814788.2025.2536236","DOIUrl":"10.1080/13814788.2025.2536236","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Disclosure ('coming out') is an ongoing process for LGBT+ individuals, impacting various aspects of their lives. While research underscores the importance of disclosure for the health and well-being of LGBT+ people, concerns about stigma and discrimination often lead to non-disclosure, affecting healthcare access and outcomes. In Slovenia, where general practitioners (GPs) play a pivotal role in healthcare, understanding the dynamics of disclosure within primary healthcare settings is crucial.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This qualitative study utilised an online survey with open-ended questions to explore the experiences and expectations of both LGBT+ individuals and GPs regarding disclosure. Thematic analysis was employed to identify key themes and subthemes from the data collected between October and December 2021.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 214 LGBT+ participants and 28 GPs, four main themes emerged: the necessity and relevance of disclosure; fear, insecurity, or neutrality towards non-disclosure; characteristics and actions of GPs helpful for disclosure; and GPs' self-evaluation of reactions to disclosure. Some participants viewed disclosure as essential for quality healthcare, disclosing their sexual orientation when necessary for medical treatment or to establish a trusting relationship with their GP, but others feared discrimination and preferred non-disclosure. GPs' characteristics and actions, such as creating a safe environment and using inclusive language, were crucial for facilitating disclosure.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our findings reinforce the significance of GP engagement in fostering safe and supportive environments for disclosure, ultimately improving healthcare access and outcomes for LGBT+ individuals in Slovenia.</p>","PeriodicalId":54380,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of General Practice","volume":"31 1","pages":"2536236"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12308859/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144735507","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"General practitioners' decision-making strategies in the pharmacological treatment of musculoskeletal pain: A qualitative interview study.","authors":"Nele Kornder, Victoria Jessica Hill, Sophia Naomi Groffebert, Annette Becker, Annika Viniol, Nicole Lindner","doi":"10.1080/13814788.2025.2536764","DOIUrl":"10.1080/13814788.2025.2536764","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Musculoskeletal pain is a leading reason for primary care visits and often requires pharmacological treatment. Despite rising prescription rates for non-opioid analgesics in Germany, little is known about GPs' broader prescribing behaviour beyond opioid-related discussions. Understanding how GPs navigate pain management is key to supporting evidence-based prescribing.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study explored GPs' decision-making strategies when prescribing for musculoskeletal pain and identified clinical challenges.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A qualitative study using semi-structured interviews was conducted with 15 GPs from Central and Northern Hesse, Germany. Participants were purposively recruited via a regional practice network. Interviews were analysed using Braun and Clarke's thematic analysis, applying a combined deductive-inductive approach.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Five major themes emerged: (1) prescribing approaches, (2) medication preferences, (3) doctor-patient relationship, (4) addressing psychosomatic factors, and (5) support needs. GPs preferred cautious prescribing, favouring metamizole and NSAIDs over opioids. Chronic pain was viewed as complex and required individualised, multimodal treatment and shared decision-making. Decision-making strategies were mainly shaped by guidelines like the WHO analgesic ladder and personal clinical experience; other guidelines were rarely mentioned. The doctor-patient relationship was considered essential, particularly in chronic pain contexts. Challenges included managing psychosomatic aspects and aligning treatment expectations.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>GPs' prescribing decisions are shaped by a combination of clinical judgement, patient dynamics, and systemic factors. The findings highlight the need for practical support tools that are integrated into daily workflows and emphasise shared decision-making, especially for chronic pain management. These insights can inform future interventions aimed at optimising prescribing practices in primary care.</p>","PeriodicalId":54380,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of General Practice","volume":"31 1","pages":"2536764"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12320255/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144762343","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}