全科医生在肌肉骨骼疼痛药物治疗中的决策策略:一项定性访谈研究。

IF 2.5 4区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
European Journal of General Practice Pub Date : 2025-12-01 Epub Date: 2025-08-01 DOI:10.1080/13814788.2025.2536764
Nele Kornder, Victoria Jessica Hill, Sophia Naomi Groffebert, Annette Becker, Annika Viniol, Nicole Lindner
{"title":"全科医生在肌肉骨骼疼痛药物治疗中的决策策略:一项定性访谈研究。","authors":"Nele Kornder, Victoria Jessica Hill, Sophia Naomi Groffebert, Annette Becker, Annika Viniol, Nicole Lindner","doi":"10.1080/13814788.2025.2536764","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Musculoskeletal pain is a leading reason for primary care visits and often requires pharmacological treatment. Despite rising prescription rates for non-opioid analgesics in Germany, little is known about GPs' broader prescribing behaviour beyond opioid-related discussions. Understanding how GPs navigate pain management is key to supporting evidence-based prescribing.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study explored GPs' decision-making strategies when prescribing for musculoskeletal pain and identified clinical challenges.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A qualitative study using semi-structured interviews was conducted with 15 GPs from Central and Northern Hesse, Germany. Participants were purposively recruited via a regional practice network. Interviews were analysed using Braun and Clarke's thematic analysis, applying a combined deductive-inductive approach.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Five major themes emerged: (1) prescribing approaches, (2) medication preferences, (3) doctor-patient relationship, (4) addressing psychosomatic factors, and (5) support needs. GPs preferred cautious prescribing, favouring metamizole and NSAIDs over opioids. Chronic pain was viewed as complex and required individualised, multimodal treatment and shared decision-making. Decision-making strategies were mainly shaped by guidelines like the WHO analgesic ladder and personal clinical experience; other guidelines were rarely mentioned. The doctor-patient relationship was considered essential, particularly in chronic pain contexts. Challenges included managing psychosomatic aspects and aligning treatment expectations.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>GPs' prescribing decisions are shaped by a combination of clinical judgement, patient dynamics, and systemic factors. The findings highlight the need for practical support tools that are integrated into daily workflows and emphasise shared decision-making, especially for chronic pain management. These insights can inform future interventions aimed at optimising prescribing practices in primary care.</p>","PeriodicalId":54380,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of General Practice","volume":"31 1","pages":"2536764"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12320255/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"General practitioners' decision-making strategies in the pharmacological treatment of musculoskeletal pain: A qualitative interview study.\",\"authors\":\"Nele Kornder, Victoria Jessica Hill, Sophia Naomi Groffebert, Annette Becker, Annika Viniol, Nicole Lindner\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/13814788.2025.2536764\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Musculoskeletal pain is a leading reason for primary care visits and often requires pharmacological treatment. Despite rising prescription rates for non-opioid analgesics in Germany, little is known about GPs' broader prescribing behaviour beyond opioid-related discussions. Understanding how GPs navigate pain management is key to supporting evidence-based prescribing.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study explored GPs' decision-making strategies when prescribing for musculoskeletal pain and identified clinical challenges.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A qualitative study using semi-structured interviews was conducted with 15 GPs from Central and Northern Hesse, Germany. Participants were purposively recruited via a regional practice network. Interviews were analysed using Braun and Clarke's thematic analysis, applying a combined deductive-inductive approach.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Five major themes emerged: (1) prescribing approaches, (2) medication preferences, (3) doctor-patient relationship, (4) addressing psychosomatic factors, and (5) support needs. GPs preferred cautious prescribing, favouring metamizole and NSAIDs over opioids. Chronic pain was viewed as complex and required individualised, multimodal treatment and shared decision-making. Decision-making strategies were mainly shaped by guidelines like the WHO analgesic ladder and personal clinical experience; other guidelines were rarely mentioned. The doctor-patient relationship was considered essential, particularly in chronic pain contexts. Challenges included managing psychosomatic aspects and aligning treatment expectations.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>GPs' prescribing decisions are shaped by a combination of clinical judgement, patient dynamics, and systemic factors. The findings highlight the need for practical support tools that are integrated into daily workflows and emphasise shared decision-making, especially for chronic pain management. These insights can inform future interventions aimed at optimising prescribing practices in primary care.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54380,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Journal of General Practice\",\"volume\":\"31 1\",\"pages\":\"2536764\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12320255/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Journal of General Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/13814788.2025.2536764\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/8/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of General Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13814788.2025.2536764","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/8/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:肌肉骨骼疼痛是初级保健就诊的主要原因,通常需要药物治疗。尽管德国非阿片类镇痛药的处方率不断上升,但除了阿片类药物相关的讨论之外,人们对全科医生更广泛的处方行为知之甚少。了解全科医生如何进行疼痛管理是支持循证处方的关键。目的:本研究探讨了全科医生在处方肌肉骨骼疼痛时的决策策略,并确定了临床挑战。方法:采用半结构化访谈法对来自德国黑森州中部和北部的15名全科医生进行定性研究。参与者是通过区域实践网络有目的地招募的。访谈分析采用布劳恩和克拉克的主题分析,运用演绎-归纳相结合的方法。结果:五大主题:(1)处方方法,(2)用药偏好,(3)医患关系,(4)心身因素处理,以及(5)支持需求。全科医生更倾向于谨慎开处方,倾向于使用安美唑和非甾体抗炎药而不是阿片类药物。慢性疼痛被认为是复杂的,需要个性化、多模式治疗和共同决策。决策策略主要受世卫组织镇痛阶梯等指南和个人临床经验影响;其他指导方针很少被提及。医患关系被认为是必不可少的,特别是在慢性疼痛的情况下。挑战包括管理身心方面和调整治疗期望。结论:全科医生的处方决定是由临床判断、患者动态和系统因素共同决定的。研究结果强调需要实用的支持工具,将其整合到日常工作流程中,并强调共同决策,特别是对于慢性疼痛管理。这些见解可以为未来旨在优化初级保健处方实践的干预措施提供信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

General practitioners' decision-making strategies in the pharmacological treatment of musculoskeletal pain: A qualitative interview study.

General practitioners' decision-making strategies in the pharmacological treatment of musculoskeletal pain: A qualitative interview study.

Background: Musculoskeletal pain is a leading reason for primary care visits and often requires pharmacological treatment. Despite rising prescription rates for non-opioid analgesics in Germany, little is known about GPs' broader prescribing behaviour beyond opioid-related discussions. Understanding how GPs navigate pain management is key to supporting evidence-based prescribing.

Objectives: This study explored GPs' decision-making strategies when prescribing for musculoskeletal pain and identified clinical challenges.

Methods: A qualitative study using semi-structured interviews was conducted with 15 GPs from Central and Northern Hesse, Germany. Participants were purposively recruited via a regional practice network. Interviews were analysed using Braun and Clarke's thematic analysis, applying a combined deductive-inductive approach.

Results: Five major themes emerged: (1) prescribing approaches, (2) medication preferences, (3) doctor-patient relationship, (4) addressing psychosomatic factors, and (5) support needs. GPs preferred cautious prescribing, favouring metamizole and NSAIDs over opioids. Chronic pain was viewed as complex and required individualised, multimodal treatment and shared decision-making. Decision-making strategies were mainly shaped by guidelines like the WHO analgesic ladder and personal clinical experience; other guidelines were rarely mentioned. The doctor-patient relationship was considered essential, particularly in chronic pain contexts. Challenges included managing psychosomatic aspects and aligning treatment expectations.

Conclusion: GPs' prescribing decisions are shaped by a combination of clinical judgement, patient dynamics, and systemic factors. The findings highlight the need for practical support tools that are integrated into daily workflows and emphasise shared decision-making, especially for chronic pain management. These insights can inform future interventions aimed at optimising prescribing practices in primary care.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
European Journal of General Practice
European Journal of General Practice PRIMARY HEALTH CARE-MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
5.90%
发文量
31
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The EJGP aims to: foster scientific research in primary care medicine (family medicine, general practice) in Europe stimulate education and debate, relevant for the development of primary care medicine in Europe. Scope The EJGP publishes original research papers, review articles and clinical case reports on all aspects of primary care medicine (family medicine, general practice), providing new knowledge on medical decision-making, healthcare delivery, medical education, and research methodology. Areas covered include primary care epidemiology, prevention, diagnosis, pharmacotherapy, non-drug interventions, multi- and comorbidity, palliative care, shared decision making, inter-professional collaboration, quality and safety, training and teaching, and quantitative and qualitative research methods.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信