Serials Review最新文献

An Attitude toward the Collaborative Information Behavior: A Systematic Review 对协同信息行为的态度:系统回顾

4区管理学

Serials Review Pub Date : 2023-09-22 DOI: 10.1080/00987913.2023.2249783

Saeed Rezaei Sharifabadi, Shahrzad Gholami, Masumeh Karbala Aghaei Kamran

{"title":"An Attitude toward the Collaborative Information Behavior: A Systematic Review","authors":"Saeed Rezaei Sharifabadi, Shahrzad Gholami, Masumeh Karbala Aghaei Kamran","doi":"10.1080/00987913.2023.2249783","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00987913.2023.2249783","url":null,"abstract":"AbstractObjective Collaborative information behavior researches explain different types of functions and activities that people utilize in teamwork information-oriented environments by interacting with each other. The aim of this paper is to analyze the methodological structure and identify the main variables in existing CIB, CIS, and CIR studies.Methodology All papers extracted from international databases including Scopus and Web of Science from 1997 to 2019 were reviewed in terms of quality and appropriateness. Then the full text of 91 selected articles was assessed. Based on a prepared checklist, information was extracted in a variety of fields such as first author, year, main subject, type of study, analysis tools, variables studied, and number and type of participants.Finding The evaluation of the articles’ methodology showed that the most methodological structure was qualitative in 39 papers. Also, an investigation of the measurement tools showed that data were collected in 28 articles by questionnaire, 13 articles by interview, and questionnaire. Seventy-four percent of the selected studies have been done by mixed methods in the last five years.Conclusion This systematic review investigated the published papers in the field of CIB, CIS & CIR to evaluating of the research content structures and components. Team awareness, interaction, information sharing, collaboration, division of labor, communication, problem-solving, and cognitive dimension have been identified as the main elements of CIB.Keywords: Collaborative information behaviorcontent reviewresearch methods AcknowledgmentsWe would like to acknowledge and thank of the Research and Technology Deputy of Qazvin University of Medical Sciences for supporting this research work.Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Notes1 CIB2 CIS3 CIR","PeriodicalId":54165,"journal":{"name":"Serials Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-09-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"136058820","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

The Read Feed: Reviews 阅读提要:评论

4区管理学

Serials Review Pub Date : 2023-08-03 DOI: 10.1080/00987913.2023.2235666

Catherine Johnson, Michelle DeMars, Elizabeth Parang

引用次数: 0

Overlap Analysis: A Case Study 重叠分析:案例研究

IF 0.9 4区管理学

Serials Review Pub Date : 2023-07-25 DOI: 10.1080/00987913.2023.2235665

Mandi Smith, Lora Lennertz

引用次数: 0

Current and Historical Publication Trends of State Library Association Journals and Newsletters 国家图书馆协会期刊通讯的出版现状与历史趋势

IF 0.9 4区管理学

Serials Review Pub Date : 2023-07-24 DOI: 10.1080/00987913.2023.2235671

Janelle Zetty

{"title":"Current and Historical Publication Trends of State Library Association Journals and Newsletters","authors":"Janelle Zetty","doi":"10.1080/00987913.2023.2235671","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00987913.2023.2235671","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Librarians have reflected on their literature since state library association journals and newsletters began publication. This trend peaked in the 70s and 80s, and there was a virtual gap in the literature in the following decades. It is crucial to reassess publication trends due to recent changes in the library profession, such as declining membership and ease of publishing online. Print publication trends in state library association journals and newsletters will be examined using OCLC MARC records retrieved in Connexion and compiled in an Excel spreadsheet and graph. In addition, electronic publishing trends will be analyzed by assessing state association websites for the presence of a journal or newsletter, its format, and whether it is open source. Results from the study show that there were changing trends in the frequency of print publishing over the years, and most state associations presently publish an online journal in open-access PDF format. However, OCLC users should update OCLC records to reflect accurate publication dates and make separate records for an electronic format to depict publication trends accurately. State associations should also create a retention plan for electronically published material to avoid losing a historical archive.","PeriodicalId":54165,"journal":{"name":"Serials Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.9,"publicationDate":"2023-07-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"46461708","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Identifying Combinations of Altmetrics and Web of Science Usage That Linked to Early Citations of an Article Received: A Crisp-Set Qualitative Comparative Analysis (csQCA) 确定Altmetrics和Web of Science用法与文章早期引用相关的组合:一个Crisp-Set定性比较分析(csQCA)

IF 0.9 4区管理学

Serials Review Pub Date : 2023-07-20 DOI: 10.1080/00987913.2023.2234242

Qianjin Zong, Zhihong Huang, Zhijun Deng, Weiwei Deng, Yafen Xie, Yisheng Yu

{"title":"Identifying Combinations of Altmetrics and Web of Science Usage That Linked to Early Citations of an Article Received: A Crisp-Set Qualitative Comparative Analysis (csQCA)","authors":"Qianjin Zong, Zhihong Huang, Zhijun Deng, Weiwei Deng, Yafen Xie, Yisheng Yu","doi":"10.1080/00987913.2023.2234242","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00987913.2023.2234242","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The relations of altmetrics/usage of an article and its citations have been studied extensively by using several variable-oriented approaches, e.g., correlations analysis, regression analysis, and so on. Variable-oriented approaches are symmetrically designed to estimate the “net effects” of independent variables on outcomes. In contrast to variable-oriented approaches, Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA), a case-oriented approach based on set theory, models the concept of conjunctural causation, rather than a single net effect. QCA assumes asymmetry, equifinality, and causal complexity. In this study, based on four data sets from Scientific Reports, a Crisp-set Qualitative Comparative Analysis (csQCA) was employed to identify combinations of altmetrics and Web of Science usage (WOSusage) that linked to early citations an article received. Our results revealed the existence of diverse combinations of altmetrics and WOSusage that linked to early citations. The four combinations with the highest raw coverage for each data set indicated that high Mendeley readers together with high WOSusage played a key role in early citations an article received. The other altmetrics, including Twitter, Facebook, blogs, and news, played roles in linking to early citations an article received but varied in different combinations for each data set.","PeriodicalId":54165,"journal":{"name":"Serials Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.9,"publicationDate":"2023-07-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"44760260","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 1

Reports on Conferences, Institutes, and Seminars 会议、研究所和研讨会报告

IF 0.9 4区管理学

Serials Review Pub Date : 2023-07-19 DOI: 10.1080/00987913.2023.2235667

Elaine Walker

引用次数: 0

Public Access to Federally Funded Research 公共访问联邦资助的研究

IF 0.9 4区管理学

Serials Review Pub Date : 2023-04-03 DOI: 10.1080/00987913.2023.2174399

Chris Bulock

引用次数: 0

Decolonization and the Cambridge University Libraries—Interview with Mel Bach 非殖民化与剑桥大学图书馆——采访梅尔·巴赫

IF 0.9 4区管理学

Serials Review Pub Date : 2023-03-10 DOI: 10.1080/00987913.2023.2174398

Scott Vieira

引用次数: 0

The Read Feed: Reviews 阅读提要：评论

IF 0.9 4区管理学

Serials Review Pub Date : 2023-02-28 DOI: 10.1080/00987913.2023.2174401

Scott Johnson, Elizabeth Parang

引用次数: 0

Predatory Publishing in Indian LIS Research: A Case Study 印度法律研究中的掠夺性出版:一个案例研究

IF 0.9 4区管理学

Serials Review Pub Date : 2023-02-21 DOI: 10.1080/00987913.2023.2174405

Mallikarjun Dora, Raj Kishor Kampa

{"title":"Predatory Publishing in Indian LIS Research: A Case Study","authors":"Mallikarjun Dora, Raj Kishor Kampa","doi":"10.1080/00987913.2023.2174405","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00987913.2023.2174405","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The study examines the possible predatory journals in Library and Information Science research in India, including the affiliation status of the authors publishing in those predatory journals, frequency of returning authors, and country-wise distribution of authors. The paper used Beall’s list to find out the predatory journals in LIS published from India. Publication trends, affiliations of authors, and the status of the 22 LIS journals under the study were critically analyzed. The result shows that the predatory journals were diminishing slowly; in 2016, there were eight active journals, while in 2021, it was reduced to four journals. Similarly, the publication trends show that the highest number of articles (398) was published in the year 2015, and it was only 66 articles in 2020. It is revealed that academics hailing from state universities (42.88%) are the highest contributors to the predatory journals, followed by professionals from government colleges (16.76%). The results indicate that predatory publishing was rampant in the early years but declined gradually. Researchers from India have published the most articles, totaling 1760 (93%), followed by those from Nigeria (64, 3.3%), Bangladesh (10), and Saudi Arabia (eight articles). It is also revealed that 21.66% (n = 438) are returning authors who have published more than one article in the sample journals. The paper discusses the role of the government and especially the University Grants Commission (UGC) in curbing the menace of predatory publishing. The authors also discuss the possible role of library professionals in stopping the plague of predatory publishing.","PeriodicalId":54165,"journal":{"name":"Serials Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.9,"publicationDate":"2023-02-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"45994307","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0