An Attitude toward the Collaborative Information Behavior: A Systematic Review

IF 0.6 4区管理学 Q3 INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE

Serials Review Pub Date : 2023-09-22 DOI:10.1080/00987913.2023.2249783

Saeed Rezaei Sharifabadi, Shahrzad Gholami, Masumeh Karbala Aghaei Kamran

{"title":"An Attitude toward the Collaborative Information Behavior: A Systematic Review","authors":"Saeed Rezaei Sharifabadi, Shahrzad Gholami, Masumeh Karbala Aghaei Kamran","doi":"10.1080/00987913.2023.2249783","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"AbstractObjective Collaborative information behavior researches explain different types of functions and activities that people utilize in teamwork information-oriented environments by interacting with each other. The aim of this paper is to analyze the methodological structure and identify the main variables in existing CIB, CIS, and CIR studies.Methodology All papers extracted from international databases including Scopus and Web of Science from 1997 to 2019 were reviewed in terms of quality and appropriateness. Then the full text of 91 selected articles was assessed. Based on a prepared checklist, information was extracted in a variety of fields such as first author, year, main subject, type of study, analysis tools, variables studied, and number and type of participants.Finding The evaluation of the articles’ methodology showed that the most methodological structure was qualitative in 39 papers. Also, an investigation of the measurement tools showed that data were collected in 28 articles by questionnaire, 13 articles by interview, and questionnaire. Seventy-four percent of the selected studies have been done by mixed methods in the last five years.Conclusion This systematic review investigated the published papers in the field of CIB, CIS & CIR to evaluating of the research content structures and components. Team awareness, interaction, information sharing, collaboration, division of labor, communication, problem-solving, and cognitive dimension have been identified as the main elements of CIB.Keywords: Collaborative information behaviorcontent reviewresearch methods AcknowledgmentsWe would like to acknowledge and thank of the Research and Technology Deputy of Qazvin University of Medical Sciences for supporting this research work.Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Notes1 CIB2 CIS3 CIR","PeriodicalId":54165,"journal":{"name":"Serials Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Serials Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00987913.2023.2249783","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

AbstractObjective Collaborative information behavior researches explain different types of functions and activities that people utilize in teamwork information-oriented environments by interacting with each other. The aim of this paper is to analyze the methodological structure and identify the main variables in existing CIB, CIS, and CIR studies.Methodology All papers extracted from international databases including Scopus and Web of Science from 1997 to 2019 were reviewed in terms of quality and appropriateness. Then the full text of 91 selected articles was assessed. Based on a prepared checklist, information was extracted in a variety of fields such as first author, year, main subject, type of study, analysis tools, variables studied, and number and type of participants.Finding The evaluation of the articles’ methodology showed that the most methodological structure was qualitative in 39 papers. Also, an investigation of the measurement tools showed that data were collected in 28 articles by questionnaire, 13 articles by interview, and questionnaire. Seventy-four percent of the selected studies have been done by mixed methods in the last five years.Conclusion This systematic review investigated the published papers in the field of CIB, CIS & CIR to evaluating of the research content structures and components. Team awareness, interaction, information sharing, collaboration, division of labor, communication, problem-solving, and cognitive dimension have been identified as the main elements of CIB.Keywords: Collaborative information behaviorcontent reviewresearch methods AcknowledgmentsWe would like to acknowledge and thank of the Research and Technology Deputy of Qazvin University of Medical Sciences for supporting this research work.Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Notes1 CIB2 CIS3 CIR

查看原文本刊更多论文

对协同信息行为的态度:系统回顾

【摘要】目的协同信息行为研究解释了人们在团队信息环境中通过相互作用而发挥的不同类型的功能和活动。本文的目的是分析现有的CIB、CIS和CIR研究的方法结构，并确定主要变量。方法对1997 - 2019年从Scopus和Web of Science等国际数据库中提取的所有论文进行质量和适宜性评价。然后对选定的91篇文章进行全文评估。根据准备好的检查表，提取了各种领域的信息，如第一作者、年份、主要主题、研究类型、分析工具、研究变量以及参与者的数量和类型。对39篇论文的方法学评价表明，大多数的方法学结构是定性的。同时，对测量工具的调查显示，通过问卷调查的方式收集了28篇文章的数据，通过访谈和问卷调查的方式收集了13篇文章的数据。在过去的五年中，74%的入选研究是通过混合方法完成的。结论本系统回顾了CIB、CIS和CIR领域已发表的论文，对其研究内容结构和组成进行了评价。团队意识、互动、信息共享、协作、分工、沟通、问题解决和认知维度已被确定为协同信息行为的主要要素。关键词:协同信息行为;内容审查;研究方法;致谢感谢卡兹温医科大学研究与技术副主任对本研究工作的支持。披露声明作者未报告潜在的利益冲突。注1 CIB2 CIS3 CIR

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Serials Review INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE-

CiteScore

1.60

自引率

11.10%

发文量

期刊介绍： Serials Review, issued quarterly, is a peer-reviewed scholarly journal for the international serials community. Articles focus on serials in the broadest sense of the term and cover all aspects of serials information; regular columns feature interviews, exchanges on controversial topics, book reviews, and conference reports. The journal encompasses practical, theoretical, and visionary ideas for librarians, publishers, vendors, and anyone interested in the changing nature of serials. Serials Review covers all aspects of serials management: format considerations, publishing models, statistical studies, collection analysis, collaborative efforts, reference and access issues, cataloging and acquisitions, people who have shaped the serials community, and topical bibliographic studies.