Kantian ReviewPub Date : 2024-04-04DOI: 10.1017/s1369415424000062
Robert Campbell
{"title":"Followability, Necessity, and Excuse: Interpreting Kant’s Penal Theory","authors":"Robert Campbell","doi":"10.1017/s1369415424000062","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1017/s1369415424000062","url":null,"abstract":"Philosophers traditionally interpret Kant as a retributivist, but modern interpreters, with reference to Kant’s theory of justice and problematic passages, instead propose penal theories that mix retributive and deterrent features. Although these mixed penal theories are substantively compelling and capture the Kantian spirit, their dual aspects lead to a justificatory conflict that generates an apparent dilemma. To resolve this dilemma and clear the ground for these mixed theories, I will outline and reinterpret Kant’s penal theory by situating it in his broader moral and political philosophy. This move grounds the followability requirement, which is necessary to resolve the dilemma.","PeriodicalId":54140,"journal":{"name":"Kantian Review","volume":"5 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.5,"publicationDate":"2024-04-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140572477","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Kantian ReviewPub Date : 2024-04-04DOI: 10.1017/s1369415424000165
Jordan Pascoe
{"title":"Response to Critics: Kant’s Theory of Labour","authors":"Jordan Pascoe","doi":"10.1017/s1369415424000165","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1017/s1369415424000165","url":null,"abstract":"Elvira Basevich, Martin Sticker, and Helga Varden offered generative criticism of my monograph, <jats:italic>Kant’s Theory of Labour</jats:italic>. In this response, I explore how the resources they offer for thinking about gender, labour, and the state’s responsibility to ensure the material conditions of freedom can deepen both our attentiveness to patterns of systemic injustice in Kant’s political philosophy, and the resources Kant offers for addressing contemporary patterns of intersectional and material injustice.","PeriodicalId":54140,"journal":{"name":"Kantian Review","volume":"21 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.5,"publicationDate":"2024-04-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140572643","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Kantian ReviewPub Date : 2024-04-04DOI: 10.1017/s1369415424000141
Allen Wood
{"title":"Ian Proops: Kant on Transcendental Freedom (The Fiery Test of Critique: Chs. 11–12)","authors":"Allen Wood","doi":"10.1017/s1369415424000141","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1017/s1369415424000141","url":null,"abstract":"Kant’s position on the problem of free will can be perplexing and frustrating: all the real questions about human agential capacities or even about issues of moral imputability are empirical questions, which have empirical answers. But there remains a metaphysical or transcendental problem about the possibility of freedom, which is forever insoluble. Ian Proops’ discussion in <jats:italic>The Fiery Test of Critique</jats:italic> is to be commended for displaying the rare virtue of appreciating this last point and presenting Kant’s position about it accurately. The only questionable part has to do with the standard terminology – ‘determinism’, ‘libertarianism’, ‘compatibilism’, and ‘incompatibilism’. I argue that it would be better to say, as Kant does, and Proops also does most of the time, that practical freedom, hence transcendental freedom, must be presupposed whenever we act or even judge, but how freedom is possible is both unknowable and even incomprehensible to us.","PeriodicalId":54140,"journal":{"name":"Kantian Review","volume":"50 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.5,"publicationDate":"2024-04-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140572234","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Kantian ReviewPub Date : 2024-04-04DOI: 10.1017/s1369415424000207
Desmond P. Hogan
{"title":"Proops’s ‘Nugget of Gold’ in Kant’s Dialectic","authors":"Desmond P. Hogan","doi":"10.1017/s1369415424000207","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1017/s1369415424000207","url":null,"abstract":"<jats:italic>The Fiery Test of Critique</jats:italic> describes Kant’s indirect proof of idealism from the Antinomy of Pure Reason as the ‘nugget of gold’ in the <jats:italic>Critique of Pure Reason</jats:italic>’s Transcendental Dialectic. Here, I offer critical reflections on Proops’s reading of Kant’s indirect proof.","PeriodicalId":54140,"journal":{"name":"Kantian Review","volume":"92 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.5,"publicationDate":"2024-04-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140572285","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Kantian ReviewPub Date : 2024-04-01DOI: 10.1017/s1369415424000190
Tobias Rosefeldt
{"title":"‘In Itself’: A New Investigation of Kant’s Adverbial Wording of Transcendental Idealism","authors":"Tobias Rosefeldt","doi":"10.1017/s1369415424000190","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1017/s1369415424000190","url":null,"abstract":"<p>This article offers the first systematic investigation of the linguistic forms in which Kant expresses his transcendental idealism since Gerold Prauss’ seminal book <span>Kant und das Problem der Dinge an sich</span>. It is argued that Prauss’ own argument for the claim that ‘in itself’ is an adverbial expression that standardly modifies verbs of philosophical reflection is flawed and that there is hence very poor exegetical evidence for so-called ‘methodological two-aspect’ interpretations of Kant’s transcendental idealism. A comprehensive investigation of Kant’s adverbial uses of ‘in itself’ rather reveals that there are various groups of verbs that ‘in itself’ modifies, which can more or less all be reduced to a standard use in which ‘in itself’ modifies verbs of predicative being such as the copula. It is also discussed how these findings can be accommodated by the two main alternative kinds of interpretations, that is, two-object and ontological two-aspect interpretations.</p>","PeriodicalId":54140,"journal":{"name":"Kantian Review","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.5,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140572232","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Kantian ReviewPub Date : 2024-03-11DOI: 10.1017/s1369415424000025
Sara Di Giulio
{"title":"Between Faith and Judgement: Kant’s Dual Conception of Moral Certainty","authors":"Sara Di Giulio","doi":"10.1017/s1369415424000025","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1017/s1369415424000025","url":null,"abstract":"There are two main meanings in Kant’s concept of moral certainty (<jats:italic>moralische Gewissheit</jats:italic>, <jats:italic>certitudo moralis</jats:italic>): first, it applies to the kind of certainty embodied in rational faith in the existence of God and a future life; second, it applies to the conscientiousness (<jats:italic>Gewissenhaftigkeit</jats:italic>) required of an agent in the practice of moral judgement. Despite the growing attention to Kant’s theory of conscience and his concept of conscientiousness, this article is the first to discuss ‘moral certainty’ as the aim of ‘conscientiousness’ and to highlight the relevance of both notions in regard to moral education and the purposes of Kant’s ethical doctrines of method.","PeriodicalId":54140,"journal":{"name":"Kantian Review","volume":"7 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.5,"publicationDate":"2024-03-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140115589","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Kantian ReviewPub Date : 2024-03-01DOI: 10.1017/s1369415424000050
John Walsh
{"title":"Kant’s Principia Diiudicationis and Executionis","authors":"John Walsh","doi":"10.1017/s1369415424000050","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1017/s1369415424000050","url":null,"abstract":"A core feature of Kant’s Critical account of moral motivation is that pure reason can be practical by itself. I argue that Kant developed this view in the 1770s concerning the <jats:italic>principium diiudicationis</jats:italic> and <jats:italic>principium executionis</jats:italic>. These principles indicate the normative and performative aspects of moral motivation. I demonstrate that cognition of the normative principle effects the moral incentive. So, the hallmark of Kant’s Critical account of motivation was contained in his pre-Critical view. This interpretation resolves a controversy about Kant’s apparent eudaimonism in the first <jats:italic>Critique</jats:italic> and shows that he developed his account of moral autonomy in the 1770s.","PeriodicalId":54140,"journal":{"name":"Kantian Review","volume":"41 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.5,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140025262","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Kantian ReviewPub Date : 2024-03-01DOI: 10.1017/s1369415424000013
David Miller
{"title":"Kant, the Nation-State, and Immigration","authors":"David Miller","doi":"10.1017/s1369415424000013","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1017/s1369415424000013","url":null,"abstract":"Kant is invariably read by his followers as antipathetic to all forms of nationalism. Yet he was interested in differences of national character and used an organic metaphor to explain why states should not be broken up or annexed (unfortunately he never commented explicitly on the dismemberment of Poland by Prussia and its allies). He favoured a plural world in which national differences of language and religion prevented the emergence of despotic world government. So his acknowledgement of a limited obligation to provide refuge to vulnerable people should not be amplified into an acceptance of culturally disruptive mass migration.","PeriodicalId":54140,"journal":{"name":"Kantian Review","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.5,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140025019","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Kantian ReviewPub Date : 2024-01-08DOI: 10.1017/s136941542300050x
Karin de Boer
{"title":"Why Did Kant Conceive of the Critique of Pure Reason as a Critique? Comments on Gabriele Gava’s Kant’s Critique of Pure Reason and the Method of Metaphysics","authors":"Karin de Boer","doi":"10.1017/s136941542300050x","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1017/s136941542300050x","url":null,"abstract":"<p>My response to Gabriele Gava’s <span>Kant’s Critique of Pure Reason and the Method of Metaphysics</span> (2023) focuses on Kant’s conception of the role of critique in the <span>Critique of Pure Reason.</span> On my account, Gava’s emphasis on the constructive elements of the <span>Critique</span> downplays the critique of former metaphysics elaborated in all three parts of the Transcendental Doctrine of Elements. After some comments on Kant’s conception of the <span>Critique</span> as a doctrine of method, I support this view by discussing the relation between transcendental philosophy and transcendental critique, Kant’s analysis of the faculties, and his transcendental deduction of space.</p>","PeriodicalId":54140,"journal":{"name":"Kantian Review","volume":"120 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.5,"publicationDate":"2024-01-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139396780","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Kantian ReviewPub Date : 2024-01-08DOI: 10.1017/s1369415423000535
Kristi Sweet
{"title":"Susan Meld Shell (2022) The Politics of Beauty: A Study of Kant’s Critique of Taste. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. pp. 75. ISBN 9781009011808 (pbk) $22.00","authors":"Kristi Sweet","doi":"10.1017/s1369415423000535","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1017/s1369415423000535","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":54140,"journal":{"name":"Kantian Review","volume":"56 15","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.5,"publicationDate":"2024-01-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139447361","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}