Response to Critics: Kant’s Theory of Labour

IF 1.1 2区哲学 0 PHILOSOPHY

Kantian Review Pub Date : 2024-04-04 DOI:10.1017/s1369415424000165

Jordan Pascoe

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Elvira Basevich, Martin Sticker, and Helga Varden offered generative criticism of my monograph, Kant’s Theory of Labour. In this response, I explore how the resources they offer for thinking about gender, labour, and the state’s responsibility to ensure the material conditions of freedom can deepen both our attentiveness to patterns of systemic injustice in Kant’s political philosophy, and the resources Kant offers for addressing contemporary patterns of intersectional and material injustice.

查看原文本刊更多论文

对批评家的回应：康德的劳动理论

Elvira Basevich、Martin Sticker 和 Helga Varden 对我的专著《康德的劳动理论》提出了富有启发性的批评。在这篇回应中，我将探讨他们为思考性别、劳动以及国家确保自由的物质条件的责任所提供的资源，如何加深我们对康德政治哲学中系统性不公正模式的关注，以及康德为解决当代交叉不公正和物质不公正模式所提供的资源。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Kantian Review PHILOSOPHY-

CiteScore

1.00

自引率

20.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： The journal aims to publish the best contemporary work on Kant and Kantian issues and places an emphasis on those current philosophical debates which reflect a Kantian influence. Almost all recent Western philosophy makes some reference to the work of Kant, either consciously rejecting or consciously endorsing some aspect of that work. In epistemology, in philosophy of mind and language, in moral and political philosophy, and in aesthetics, such Kantian influences are widely acknowledged and extensively discussed. Kant"s work has also increasingly become a concern for the social and political sciences. The journal strengthens this interest both by establishing interpretations of Kant"s own writing and by discussing the substance of the related current philosophical debates.