ALBERTA LAW REVIEW最新文献_第6页

Defining Wrongful Dismissal: The Alberta Schism 定义不当解雇：阿尔伯塔分裂

IF 0.5

ALBERTA LAW REVIEW Pub Date : 2019-10-02 DOI: 10.29173/alr2567

Dennis D. Buchanan

引用次数: 0

Building Haystacks: Information Retention and Data Exploitation by the Canadian Security Intelligence Service 构建干草堆：加拿大安全情报局的信息保留和数据利用

IF 0.5

ALBERTA LAW REVIEW Pub Date : 2019-08-16 DOI: 10.29173/alr2573

Leah West, Craig Forcese

{"title":"Building Haystacks: Information Retention and Data Exploitation by the Canadian Security Intelligence Service","authors":"Leah West, Craig Forcese","doi":"10.29173/alr2573","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.29173/alr2573","url":null,"abstract":"This article examines the technical topic of CSIS’s modern data acquisition, retention, and exploitation, a matter not canvassed in the existing legal literature. As part of a special collection on the National Security Act (NSA 2017), it focuses on the policy and legal context driving the NSA 2017 amendments, relying on primary materials to memorialize this background. This article examines how CSIS has been pulled in divergent directions by its governing law, and sometimes a strained construal of those legal standards, toward controversial information retention practices. It argues that the tempered standards on acquisition, retention, and exploitation of non-threat-related information created by the NSA 2017 respond to civil liberties objections. The introduction of the “dataset” regime in the NSA 2017 may finally establish an equilibrium between too aggressive an information destruction standard that imperils due process and too constraining an information retention system that undermines CSIS’s legitimate intelligence functions. The article flags, however, areas of doubt, the resolution of which will have important implications for the constitutionality and legitimacy of the new system.","PeriodicalId":54047,"journal":{"name":"ALBERTA LAW REVIEW","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.5,"publicationDate":"2019-08-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"43092422","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Litigating on One's Doorstep: Access to Justice and the Question of Venue 家门口诉讼:诉诸司法与诉讼地点问题

IF 0.5

ALBERTA LAW REVIEW Pub Date : 2019-07-17 DOI: 10.29173/ALR2544

Anna J. Lund

{"title":"Litigating on One's Doorstep: Access to Justice and the Question of Venue","authors":"Anna J. Lund","doi":"10.29173/ALR2544","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.29173/ALR2544","url":null,"abstract":"Venue rules govern the location where legal proceedings are commenced and where applications and trials are heard. These rules can hamper litigants from participating in legal proceedings, such as when they require a litigant to travel a significant distance to take part in a hearing or trial. The expense and time required for such travel is prohibitive for some litigants. \u0000In this article, the author considers the extent to which the venue rules in Alberta hamper defendants from participating in three types of proceedings: mortgage default proceedings, residential eviction proceedings, and enforcement proceedings against a judgment debtor’s real property. The venue rules applicable to these proceedings raise serious access to justice issues because the defendants are commonly self-represented and are at risk of losing their homes. \u0000This article argues that Alberta venue rules are somewhat responsive to the plight of defendants, but they could be revised to ensure that self-represented litigants, especially those of limited means, can participate in legal proceedings regarding their homes. Changes to the substance of the rules must be matched with changes to the practices by which these rules are invoked, because these practices create additional hurdles for the defendants.","PeriodicalId":54047,"journal":{"name":"ALBERTA LAW REVIEW","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.5,"publicationDate":"2019-07-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"45693701","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Justice Jean E. L. Côté, The Court of Appeal, and the Changing Nature of Contract Law Jean E.L.Côté法官、上诉法院和合同法性质的变化

IF 0.5

ALBERTA LAW REVIEW Pub Date : 2019-07-17 DOI: 10.29173/ALR2556

Q. D. R. Percy, Q. C. Douglas Stollery

引用次数: 0

Jean E. L. Côté: The Law Student Jean E. L. Côté:法律系学生

IF 0.5

ALBERTA LAW REVIEW Pub Date : 2019-07-17 DOI: 10.29173/ALR2557

T. Anderson

引用次数: 0

Jean E. L. Côté: The Teacher Jean E. L. Côté:老师