Journal of Chinese Literature and Culture最新文献_第7页

The communication and antagonism of Western Europe in Modern China 近代中国与西欧的交往与对抗

IF 0.2 3区文学

Journal of Chinese Literature and Culture Pub Date : 2022-05-30 DOI: 10.31985/jcl.87.2

Hwan-Jin Kim

引用次数: 0

A Study on Duoduo(多多)’s Poetic Attitudes and Language Orientation - With the Focus on ‘Middle Ideas’ “多多”的诗歌态度与语言取向研究——以“中间思想”为中心

IF 0.2 3区文学

Journal of Chinese Literature and Culture Pub Date : 2022-05-30 DOI: 10.31985/jcl.87.4

Hie-heon Lee

引用次数: 0

A study on the foreign language(Korean, English) teaching material compiled by the Chinese people's volunteer army during the Korean War - Focusing on captured document owned by NARA 6•25战争时期中国人民志愿军编写的外文(韩文、英文)教材研究——以NARA缴获文件为中心

IF 0.2 3区文学

Journal of Chinese Literature and Culture Pub Date : 2022-05-30 DOI: 10.31985/jcl.87.7

Sang Kyu Kim

引用次数: 0

Yang Zhen's Appeal essays in political thoughts 杨震在政治思想上的诉求

IF 0.2 3区文学

Journal of Chinese Literature and Culture Pub Date : 2022-05-30 DOI: 10.31985/jcl.87.1

Mo Chen, Byungmin An

引用次数: 0

A Study on Fallen Angels 《堕落天使研究

IF 0.2 3区文学

Journal of Chinese Literature and Culture Pub Date : 2022-05-30 DOI: 10.31985/jcl.87.5

Hong-sun Cho

引用次数: 0

The emergence of the Chinese character "她" and the change in meaning 汉字“某某”的出现及其意义的变化

IF 0.2 3区文学

Journal of Chinese Literature and Culture Pub Date : 2022-05-30 DOI: 10.31985/jcl.87.10

Bok Yeon Song, Kang Hun Joo

引用次数: 0

A Comparative Study of meiyou in Taiwan and Mainland Chinese 台湾梅友与大陆梅友之比较研究

IF 0.2 3区文学

Journal of Chinese Literature and Culture Pub Date : 2022-05-30 DOI: 10.31985/jcl.87.8

Jee-won Lee

引用次数: 0

Lu Xun and Le Bon - Focusing on the concept of Civilization․Tradition․Crowd 鲁迅与勒庞——聚焦文明、传统、大众的概念

IF 0.2 3区文学

Journal of Chinese Literature and Culture Pub Date : 2022-05-30 DOI: 10.31985/jcl.87.3

Yang Su Kim

引用次数: 0

Feminist Theories and Women Writers of Late Imperial China: Impact and Critique 女性主义理论与晚清女性作家：影响与批判

IF 0.2 3区文学

Journal of Chinese Literature and Culture Pub Date : 2022-04-01 DOI: 10.1215/23290048-9681176

G. Fong

{"title":"Feminist Theories and Women Writers of Late Imperial China: Impact and Critique","authors":"G. Fong","doi":"10.1215/23290048-9681176","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1215/23290048-9681176","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:Feminism, feminist theory, feminist literary theory were already highly contentious in what they represented to Euro-American critics and theorists in the 1980s, when scholars in Chinese literary studies began sustained research on women writers in late imperial China (ca. 1600–1911). Their research drew on developments in Western feminist theories while problematizing certain applications. In this article, I review major debates in 1980s and 1990s Western feminist literary theory, divided by the different approaches of Anglo-American and French feminist critics and gender studies, examining why specific arguments on women and language, genres studied, and theoretical underpinnings did not hold significant relevance to the study of similar issues when applied to women's writing in pre-twentieth-century China. Yet certain concepts were highly fruitful in critical analysis. Feminist theory was never monolithic, even when it was Eurocentric; theories were drawn from a plurality of different disciplines and schools. Concepts that came into currency—gender, gaze, voice, agency, subjectivity, authorship, and so on—from poststructuralist, postcolonial, cultural, and film studies proved to be useful tools in feminist literary studies. Some came to be deployed in scholarship on women's literature in historical China. In this context, I reflect on theoretical approaches in significant studies of women's writing of late imperial China and consider the impact or critique this subfield of Chinese literary studies posed to Western feminist theories and broader questions of the applicability of modern/postmodern feminist theories to literature of earlier periods and other cultures before the globalization of the twentieth and twenty-first centuries.","PeriodicalId":53810,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Chinese Literature and Culture","volume":"9 1","pages":"105 - 130"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2,"publicationDate":"2022-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"48149638","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 1

The Elusiveness of Commonality: Late Twentieth-Century Sinology and the Search for a Shared Lyric Language 共同性的难以捉摸:20世纪晚期汉学与对共同抒情语言的探索

IF 0.2 3区文学

Journal of Chinese Literature and Culture Pub Date : 2022-04-01 DOI: 10.1215/23290048-9681137

Paulo Varsano

{"title":"The Elusiveness of Commonality: Late Twentieth-Century Sinology and the Search for a Shared Lyric Language","authors":"Paulo Varsano","doi":"10.1215/23290048-9681137","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1215/23290048-9681137","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:As the study of what we now call \"premodern\" China gained traction among students in the postwar United States, the question of how it should be approached emerged as a divisive issue among interested scholars, perhaps nowhere as much as it did among those with a particular interest in Chinese poetry. From the 1960s to the 1980s, the stakes seemed high as scholars confronted their passionate disagreements about things as fundamental as the proper subject of study and the most fruitful methodology. Is China a coherent and self-sufficient subject of study? Can it be rightly and accurately characterized as a civilization so separate from the West, and so perfectly integrated within itself, as to render impossible—and even damaging—an approach to any aspect of its civilization that enables comparison? What is lost and what is gained if one chooses to focus more on Chinese poetry as poetry and less on Chinese poetry as Chinese? Is it really necessary—or possible—to choose? Or is it possible to find balance along a continuum? Of particular interest is the discourse of scholars who saw in the rise of formalist studies of literature either an opportunity or a threat. This article traces just some of the lines of resistance and exploration, convergence, and bifurcation that developed in this period, observing that the disagreements that were exercising these camps, while quite real, were not as absolute as their rhetoric would suggest.","PeriodicalId":53810,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Chinese Literature and Culture","volume":"9 1","pages":"46 - 8"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2,"publicationDate":"2022-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"42591694","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0