Franciscan Studies最新文献

{"title":"Giovanni of Capestrano and Jan Brugman in a Manuscript of The Brothers of The Common life: The Hague, Koninklijke Bibliotheek, MS 78 H 54","authors":"P. Delcorno","doi":"10.1353/FRC.2017.0005","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1353/FRC.2017.0005","url":null,"abstract":"This article explores the presence and function of texts by two spokesmen of the Franciscan Observance sub vicaris, namely Giovanni of Capestrano (d. 1456) and Jan Brugman (d. 1473), within a religious miscellany most probably used – if not composed – by the Brothers of the Common Life in the house of Lüchtenhof (literally, ‘the court of light’), founded in 1440 in the neighbourhood of Hildesheim, Lower Saxony. The miscellany attests to the influence of these two prominent preachers beyond their religious order and beyond the geographic areas in which they had been active, thus showing the exchange and interconnection between different branches of the so-called Observant movement. The article first describes the miscellany by highlighting its probable connection with the Lüchtenhof community as well as the differentiated provenance of its texts. Next, it briefly discusses the section that includes Jan Brugman’s works. Finally, it focuses on two sermons of Giovanni of Capestrano, analysing in particular his sermon on spiritual armour and siege engines. Both texts stem from his 1452 preaching campaign in Leipzig. Their presence in this miscellany sheds light not only on the transnational fame of Giovanni of Capestrano, but also on his reputation as master of spiritual life among the Brethren of the Common Life.","PeriodicalId":53533,"journal":{"name":"Franciscan Studies","volume":"75 1","pages":"116 - 89"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2017-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1353/FRC.2017.0005","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"45233454","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"New Light on the 1230s: History, Hagiography, and Thomas of Celano’s The Life of Our Blessed Father Francis","authors":"S. Field","doi":"10.1353/FRC.2016.0010","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1353/FRC.2016.0010","url":null,"abstract":"Jacques Dalarun’s “re-discovery” of The Life of Our Blessed Father Francis (or Vita brevior, Shorter Life) by Thomas of Celano is about as exciting a find as the field of medieval history is ever likely to provide. As André Vauchez remarked in Le Monde in January 2015, “There hasn’t been a discovery of this importance in half a century.” And indeed, there may never have been a major manuscript discovery for which the new text was made available in an impeccable Latin edition so quickly, translated into French and published in book-form almost before the initial announcement of the discovery had sunk in, and then translated into practically all the major European languages within the next year and a half, including now Timothy Johnson’s wonderful new rendering into English. Not only the discovery itself, but the way it has been published and publicized is unprecedented. Moreover, we are talking about the recovery of not only a text but a whole new manuscript, which is now BnF nouv. ac. lat. 3245. Again, the speed with which this new manuscript has generously been made available to the public (through Gallica.bnf.fr) in the form of very high quality digital images has been extraordinary. The team led by Jacques Dalarun (with Isabelle le Masne de Chermont, Dominique Poirel, Nicole Bériou and others) which is studying the rest of the manuscript will evidently have further discoveries to announce in the near future. In the meantime, because of the rapid and excellent digitization of the manuscript, any competent scholar can jump right in, right now, and examine it in detail for him or herself. In other words, the field has been thrown wide open for all kinds of new research. Following Jacques Dalarun’s presentation of the manuscript, which has given us a tantalizing glimpse of its other potential treasures, I will turn to the newly rediscovered Vita brevior itself. After a few words about chronology and audience, my intention is simply to suggest several of the most readily apparent lines of new research it opens up. In terms of chronology, this newly discovered life obviously falls between Thomas of Celano’s First Life (Vita prima) of Francis, finished","PeriodicalId":53533,"journal":{"name":"Franciscan Studies","volume":"74 1","pages":"239 - 247"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2016-10-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1353/FRC.2016.0010","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"66382893","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Franciscan Studies and the Repercussions of the Digital Revolution: A Proposal","authors":"B. Roest","doi":"10.1353/FRC.2016.0002","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1353/FRC.2016.0002","url":null,"abstract":"Almost 22 years ago the Franciscan Authors Website: A Catalogue in Progress was published on-line for the first time. This internet site, which is a co-production of Maarten van der Heijden and myself, and which can still be found at its original internet address (http://users.bart. nl/~roestb/franciscan/), is meant to develop into a digital successor to the Franciscan authors catalogues of Lucas Wadding (Scriptores ordinis minorum) and Sbaraglia (Supplementum et castigatio ad scriptores trium ordinum S. Francisci). The site is by no means complete, but it does contain biographical information, bibliographical references, and information on the works produced by a large and growing number of Franciscan authors active between the early thirteenth century and the French Revolution. Although we try to keep abreast of the latest secondary literature on each and every author, the main emphasis is on the works written by the friars in question: both the manuscripts in which they can be found and the old and modern editions available to modern scholars. At present, and in the foreseeable future, it is a simple html-based private website, as it has never been possible to interest any institution into hosting it as an open access research instrument for Franciscan studies, and to guarantee its continued existence. This has blocked efforts to transform the site into a fully searchable database. In essence, it was and remains a slowly growing alphabetical list of authors with as much information as possible, and with a series of additional bibliographies concerning the study of medieval and Franciscan historiography, preaching, exegesis en geographical studies, and with references to secondary literature on Franciscan libraries, convents in various provinces, and comparable topics of relevance. At the very beginning, most of the information concerning manuscripts and editions of Franciscan authors was obtained by perusing manuscript catalogues, reference works such as Schneyer’s Repertorium of sermons, the Verfasserlexikon and the Dictionnaire d’Histoire et de Géographie Ecclésiastiques, as well as the bibliographical references in journals devoted to Franciscan life and learning, such as Archivum Franciscanum Histori-","PeriodicalId":53533,"journal":{"name":"Franciscan Studies","volume":"74 1","pages":"375 - 384"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2016-10-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1353/FRC.2016.0002","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"66383190","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"La Ristrutturazione Gnoseologica Della Metateologia. «Suscettibilità» Scientifica Della Natura Divina E Multiformità Dell’habitus Theologicus In Pietro Aureolo († 1322)","authors":"Davide Riserbato","doi":"10.1353/FRC.2016.0003","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1353/FRC.2016.0003","url":null,"abstract":"iva, non differunt ex parte obiecti, sed ex parte modi cognoscendi, ita quod cum dicitur quod intuitiva est obiecti existentis et praesentis hoc non debet intelligi obiective sed modaliter tamquam conditio se tenens ex parte notitiae» (Reportatio, fol. 5ra). Diverso è infatti attenersi all’oggetto o attenersi al modo in cui conosciamo questo stesso oggetto: FS16 Master.indd 299 10/12/2016 8:26:13 AM Davide Riserbato 300 no per quattro condizioni che caratterizzano la visione nel rapporto con il proprio oggetto, e che l’immaginazione – e, dunque, la conoscenza astrattiva – disattende128. Queste sono la «rectitudo», cioè l’apprensione diretta e immediata dell’esistenza della cosa, di cui la «notitia imaginaria» è invece priva, in quanto procede mediante argomentazioni (dalla causa all’effetto o viceversa)129. La «praesentialitas»: la presenza della realtà su cui porta l’astrazione è soltanto immaginata «quasi modo absenti», mentre la visione termina invece alla cosa – sia questa presente o assente – sempre «modo praesentiali»130. L’«actuactio obiecti»: benché anche l’immaginazione conduca all’attualità della cosa, ciò non avviene «modo actuativo», come se cioè fosse una sua prerogativa conferire al proprio oggetto l’essere in atto. La visione, invece, comporta sempre l’apparire dell’oggetto nella sua attualità, per quanto esso possa anche non essere in atto131. Infine, la «positio existentiae»: la visione sensibile può far apparire come realmente esistenti anche le realtà che non esistono132. Se ora applicassimo nell’ambito dell’intelletto le differenze tra conoscenza intuitiva e astrattiva osservate sul piano della conoscenza sensibile, potremmo individuare anche qui le caratteristiche delle due diverse modalità di conoscenza («modi cognitionis»): Primus videlicet qui directe apparere facit rei praesentialitatem, actualitatem et existentiam, immo non est aliud illa cognitio nisi quaedam praesentialis et actuativa apparitio et directa existentia rei; et iste modus est intuitivus. Secundus vero, qui non directe nec ex se, nec praesentialiter nec actuative facit res apparere; et hic est abstractivus133. «Perspectivus enim dicit quod omne quod videt est rectum unde et quae sunt ante et quae post et quae a latere per speculum et quae videt per radium fractum, omnia videt recte et tamen alia non sunt situata recte» (ibidem). 128 Cfr. Scriptum, p. 204, n. 104. 129 Cfr. ibid., n. 105. 130 Cfr. ibid., p. 204, n. 106. Sulla nozione di praesentialitas, cfr. J. Biard, « Intention et présence: la notion de presentialitas au xive siècle », in D. Perler (ed.), Ancient and Medieval Theories of Intentionality (Leiden : Brill, 2001), 265-282. 131 Cfr. Scriptum, pp. 204-205, n. 107. 132 Cfr. ibid., p. 205, n. 108. 133 Ibid., n. 110; «notitia abstractiva etsi sit praesentiae et actualis existentiae rei non est tamen notitia praesentialis, sed requirit absentiam rei nec est actuativa nec exhibitiva existentiae praesentis, sicut patet de astrologo qui in camera dicit e","PeriodicalId":53533,"journal":{"name":"Franciscan Studies","volume":"74 1","pages":"277 - 306"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2016-10-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1353/FRC.2016.0003","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"66383240","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"St. Francis of Assisi’s Admonitions In New Ecclesiastical And Secular Contexts","authors":"Robert J. Karris","doi":"10.1353/FRC.2016.0007","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1353/FRC.2016.0007","url":null,"abstract":"In the last number of years scholars have discovered many new “parallels”2 to Francis of Assisi’s Admonitions.3 In this article I will provide more new parallels that I have uncovered not only in ecclesiastical contexts, but also in non-ecclesiastical ones.4 While almost all students of Francis’ Admonitions are acquainted with the general ecclesiastical contexts, most are unfamiliar with the non-ecclesiastical contexts evidenced by Cato’s Distichs, Daniel of Beccles’ Urbanus Magnus, Egbert of Liège’s The WellLaden Ship, the Facetus, and a fourteen-volume collection of medieval proverbs. From these parallels I will argue that the Admonitions of Francis of Assisi belong to the literary genre of Conduct Literature, that its closest formal parallel is found in Egbert of Liège’s The Well-Laden Ship which contains short and extensive “teachings,” and that Francis and the editors of his Admonitions took deep breaths from the traditions of ecclesiastical and non-ecclesiastical instances of “teachings for life.” First I provide a general introduction to both the ecclesiastical and non-ecclesiastical authors that supply the parallels. Second I use parallels from these works to provide insight on individual admonitions.","PeriodicalId":53533,"journal":{"name":"Franciscan Studies","volume":"74 1","pages":"207 - 230"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2016-10-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1353/FRC.2016.0007","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"66383321","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"The Rediscovered Manuscript A Story of Friendship","authors":"Jacques Dalarun","doi":"10.1353/FRC.2016.0014","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1353/FRC.2016.0014","url":null,"abstract":"Many skills are required for research and many virtues too: patience, humility, audacity, prudence... But I would like to illustrate a very important dimension of our activity: friendship. Actually, our session at the International Congress of Medieval Studies in Kalamazoo, with Sean Field and Timothy Johnson, under Wayne Hellmann’s chairmanship, is exactly the illustration of what I want to say.1 On September 15, 2014, I received an email from Sean Field, in which he told me about a manuscript on sale on Sandra Hindman’s site, Les Enluminures. In the excellent description on line by Laura Light, I was immediately attracted by the mention “THOMAS OF CELANO (?), Vita et miracula sancti Francisci”: “The opening sections of the Vita agree with the Legenda S. Francisci, readings for Matins for the feast of St. Francis in a Breviary in the Vatican (Vat lat. 8737), printed by Lemmens, 1908. [...] The concluding sections of our Vita are found in another source, known as the Umbrian Legend (edited Dalarun, 2007). [...] The text in this manuscript, therefore, represents an important discovery regardless of whether it was compiled by an unknown author, using these two sources, or if it is in fact the original version of a hitherto unknown Life by Thomas of Celano, that was itself the source for the other two texts.” As soon as I deciphered the dedicatory letter which was reproduced on line, I understood that the second hypothesis was the right one: we were facing a complete Legend written by Thomas of Celano under Elias’ generalate (1232-1239), a Legend of which the readings for Matins of the Vatican Breviary (plus the readings of another breviary of the same Library I discovered in 2007) and the entire so called Umbrian Legend were only excerpts. Actually, all the fragments which were already known represent only 40 % of the complete text now exhumed, which runs from Francis’ birth to the translation of his corpse in the Assisi basilica and includes more than seventy posthumous miracles. It is true that, since 2007, I had been expecting such a discovery. It is true too that Sean could","PeriodicalId":53533,"journal":{"name":"Franciscan Studies","volume":"74 1","pages":"231 - 238"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2016-10-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1353/FRC.2016.0014","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"66383097","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Quaestiones Disputatae “De productione rerum” “De imagine” et “De anima” e schola bonaventuriana (codex Conv. Soppr. D.4.27 Bibliothecae Nationalis Centralis Florentinae) by Mikołaj Olszewski (review)","authors":"W. Crozier","doi":"10.1353/frc.2016.0020","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1353/frc.2016.0020","url":null,"abstract":"The question of whether there exist other quaestiones disputatae attributable to St. Bonaventure, beyond those contained within the definitive Quaracchi critical edition of his Opera Omnia, is a subject which has divided scholarly opinion for nearly a century. During the mid-twentieth-century, several newly discovered sets of quaestiones disputatae were claimed as authentic Bonaventurian works. Most notably, the Quaestiones de theologia transcribed by George Tavard and the Quaestiones de caritate et de novissimis edited by Palémon Glorieux. This is to say nothing, of the extensive and much discussed collection of draft quaestiones identified by François-Marie Henquinet in Assisi Bibl. Com. 186, which include the Quaestiones de prophetia, de raptu, and de nostra cognitione Dei. As those who follow the debate concerning Bonaventure’s literary corpus will know, Bonaventurian authorship of these quaestiones is by no means certain and was called into doubt by important figures such as Ignatius Brady and Henri-François Dondaine. More recently, it has been questioned by Jean-Pierre Torrell and Barbara Faes de Mottoni. Since the mid-twentieth century, however, little research has been devoted to identifying and critically engaging with other potentially authentic Bonaventurian quaestiones disputatae. One promising collection of quaestiones, with a strong claim to Bonaventurian authorship, is the Quaestiones de productione rerum, de imagine, and de anima, contained in a thirteenth-century Florentine manuscript (Biblioteca Nazionale Centrale, Conv. Soppr. D.4.27). Scholarship has been aware of these quaestiones since the rediscovery of the manuscript by the Quaracchi fathers during the nineteenth-century, and they have, in turn, been claimed as genuine works of Bonaventure by no less eminent Bonaventurian scholars than Jacques Guy Bougerol and Balduinus Distelbrink. Having said this, they have remained, for the most part, unedited and neglected. Re-","PeriodicalId":53533,"journal":{"name":"Franciscan Studies","volume":"74 1","pages":"389 - 391"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2016-10-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1353/frc.2016.0020","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"66383632","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Peter Olivi and Franciscan Poverty","authors":"David Flood","doi":"10.1353/FRC.2016.0009","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1353/FRC.2016.0009","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":53533,"journal":{"name":"Franciscan Studies","volume":"74 1","pages":"177 - 184"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2016-10-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1353/FRC.2016.0009","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"66382886","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Following Francis at the Time of the Antichrist: Evangelical Poverty and Worldly Riches in the Lectura super Lucam of Peter of John Olivi","authors":"P. Delcorno","doi":"10.1353/FRC.2016.0013","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1353/FRC.2016.0013","url":null,"abstract":"Forty years ago, speaking of Peter of John Olivi’s commentaries on the Gospel of Matthew and the Gospel of John, Raoul Manselli affirmed that these texts prove that Olivi had “a vast knowledge of the exegetes who preceded him, a vivid perception of the role of the Bible within the contemporary life of the Church, and, last but not least, a vivid understanding of the complex significance and value of being Franciscan.”1 Undoubtedly, this judgment can also be extended to the Lectura super Lucam, which Fortunato Iozzelli edited in 2010, thereby becoming the first of Olivi’s Gospel commentaries to be available in a modern edition.2 Iozzelli’s critical edition offers scholars a precious opportunity to better understand a text that, notwithstanding the increasing number of studies on Olivi, has remained largely unexplored and serves to point out the role of this text within the complex exegesis, theology, and spirituality of Olivi.3 His biblical commentaries assume a paramount","PeriodicalId":53533,"journal":{"name":"Franciscan Studies","volume":"74 1","pages":"147 - 176"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2016-10-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1353/FRC.2016.0013","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"66383084","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Nouvelles découvertes sur les débuts de l’exercice quodlibétique à Paris (avant 1245): Un quodlibet inédit de Godefroid de Poitiers","authors":"Sophie Delmas","doi":"10.1353/FRC.2016.0012","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1353/FRC.2016.0012","url":null,"abstract":"Les questions quodlibétiques ou quodlibets sont des questions disputées particulières que les maîtres de l’Université devaient organiser deux fois par an, à l’Avent et au Carême. Ils constituent les exercices universitaires fondamentaux durant les XIIIe et XIVe siècles. Selon la définition traditionnelle, n’importe qui (a quolibet) pouvait poser des questions sur n’importe quel sujet (de quolibet) à un maître, devant un large public, même extra-universitaire. La littérature quodlibétique a attiré l’attention de nombreux chercheurs (historiens et/ou théologiens) qui se sont efforcé de faire mieux connaître cet exercice scolastique à travers des monographies et des éditions de textes1. Dans un article paru en 2012, j’avais fait des ordres mendiants – à travers les figures du franciscain Alexandre de Halès et du dominicain Guerric de Saint Quentin, tous deux disparus en 1245 – les « inventeurs » du genre quodlibétique. De récentes découvertes dans les manuscrits m’imposent aujourd’hui de revenir sur cette question et même de nuancer certaines conclusions auxquelles j’étais alors parvenue2. En effet,","PeriodicalId":53533,"journal":{"name":"Franciscan Studies","volume":"74 1","pages":"263 - 276"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2016-10-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1353/FRC.2016.0012","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"66383038","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}