Jurnal Hukum Pembangunan最新文献_第4页

DELIK POLITIK DALAM HUKUM PIDANA INDONESIA 印度政策部

Jurnal Hukum Pembangunan Pub Date : 2021-05-31 DOI: 10.21143/JHP.VOL50.NO4.2859

David Hardiago

引用次数: 1

ANALISIS YURIDIS TINDAK PIDANA BLAST FISHING YANG DILAKUKAN NELAYAN KECIL 分析小渔民打击犯罪的管辖权

Jurnal Hukum Pembangunan Pub Date : 2021-05-31 DOI: 10.26532/jh.v37i1.15553

Ayu Izza Elvany

引用次数: 0

STATUS HAK TANGGUNGAN PADA PEMBIAYAAN KEPEMILIKAN RUMAH DI AKAD MUSYARAKAH MUTANAQISAH (MMQ) STATUS有权考虑哪个家庭管理层必须是MUTANAQISAH（MMQ）

Jurnal Hukum Pembangunan Pub Date : 2021-01-25 DOI: 10.21143/JHP.VOL50.NO3.2760

Febrian Dwi Laksono, Thohir Luth, Siti Hamidah

{"title":"STATUS HAK TANGGUNGAN PADA PEMBIAYAAN KEPEMILIKAN RUMAH DI AKAD MUSYARAKAH MUTANAQISAH (MMQ)","authors":"Febrian Dwi Laksono, Thohir Luth, Siti Hamidah","doi":"10.21143/JHP.VOL50.NO3.2760","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21143/JHP.VOL50.NO3.2760","url":null,"abstract":"The prevailing legal stipulations on the contract of the Musyarakah Mutanaqisah (MMQ) financing are occurred legal uncertainty, which is caused by obscurity of the encumbrance regulations for land relating to financing with the MMQ contract. One of arising legal issue in the MMQ financing mechanism is a blurring of the norms contained in Law Number 4 of 1996 concerning Encumbrance Right over Land And Land-Related Objects (UUHT). The obscurity is caused by unclear stipulating sharia financing or specifically financing with the MMQ contract in UUHT. One of the provisions that reflecting this lack of clarity is to examine the description of the definition of Encumbrance Right. The UUHT definition only explains that the Encumbrance Right is security right which is imposed on a land title to pay off a debt and making the position preferred for Encumbrance. The results showed that the concept of the debt and credit relationship in article 3 of the UUHT was not only limited to the legal relationship between the lending and borrowing as in the concept of the loan-lending agreement in article 1754 of the Civil Code (Civil Code) but also other agreements that have obligatory nature.","PeriodicalId":53034,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Hukum Pembangunan","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-01-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"41913157","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

PERLINDUNGAN DATA PRIBADI PENERIMA PINJAMAN DALAM TRANSAKSI PINJAM MEMINJAM UANG BERBASIS TEKNOLOGI INFORMASI (PEER TO PEER LENDING) 对等借贷环境

Jurnal Hukum Pembangunan Pub Date : 2020-12-07 DOI: 10.31599/krtha.v14i2.189

Hendrawan Agusta

引用次数: 5

KLAIM ASURANSI PESAWAT UDARA SEWA GUNA USAHA (OPERATING LEASE) SEBAGAI OBJEK JAMINAN FIDUSIA 世界航空安全保障索赔GUNA（经营租赁）作为fidsia安全目标

Jurnal Hukum Pembangunan Pub Date : 2020-09-28 DOI: 10.21143/JHP.VOL50.NO3.2754

Sukarmi, M. Sudirman, Dwi Egawati

引用次数: 0

MODEL PENGATURAN KEDARURATAN DAN PILIHAN KEDARURATAN INDONESIA DALAM MENGHADAPI PANDEMI COVID-19 印度尼西亚的紧急管理模式和应急方案与COVID-19大流行有关

Jurnal Hukum Pembangunan Pub Date : 2020-09-28 DOI: 10.21143/JHP.VOL50.NO2.2585

Fitra Arsil, Q. Ayuni

引用次数: 10

ANALISIS HUKUM SKEMA KONTRAK GROSS SPLIT TERHADAP PENINGKATAN INVESTASI HULU MINYAK DAN GAS BUMI 油气和布米天然气投资总承包的HUKUM方案分析

Jurnal Hukum Pembangunan Pub Date : 2020-07-13 DOI: 10.21143/jhp.vol50.no1.2482

M. Fajri

引用次数: 5

ON PROPOSAL TO REGULATE ABUSE OF SUPERIOR BARGAINING POSITION: LESSONS FROM OTHER JURISDICTIONS 监管滥用优势议价地位的建议:来自其他司法管辖区的教训

Jurnal Hukum Pembangunan Pub Date : 2020-07-13 DOI: 10.21143/jhp.vol50.no1.2487

Meirani Suyawan, Kurnia Togar Pandapotan Tanjung

{"title":"ON PROPOSAL TO REGULATE ABUSE OF SUPERIOR BARGAINING POSITION: LESSONS FROM OTHER JURISDICTIONS","authors":"Meirani Suyawan, Kurnia Togar Pandapotan Tanjung","doi":"10.21143/jhp.vol50.no1.2487","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21143/jhp.vol50.no1.2487","url":null,"abstract":"The latest version of the draft bill regarding Law on the Prohibition of Monopolistic Practices and Unfair Business Competition has added new arrangements about the abuse of a superior bargaining position. The new law proposal which is intended to amend existing Indonesian competition law (Law Number 5 Year 1999) stipulates that any business actor is prohibited from abuse its superior bargaining position within a partnership agreement with other less dominant entities. Under Law Number 20 Year 2008 on Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises, a partnership agreement means any agreement made between micro, small and medium enterprises and large enterprises like state or privately owned national businesses, joint ventures and foreign businesses that conduct economic activities in Indonesia. For example under the Indonesian Minister of State-Owned Enterprises (SoE) Regulation No. 7 of 2015, the SoE is obligated to arrange a business partnership agreement with small scale enterprise. Unlike the arrangements on abuse of dominant position which requires the establishment of monopoly power or dominance in a relevant market, the abuse of superior bargaining position may exist without market power and only required competition authority to detect whether there is any exploitation by the counterparty in a relatively stronger bargaining position. Such a condition makes many antitrust experts or economists question the relevancy of regulating abuse of superior bargaining position under competition law. However, several jurisdictions –Japan, Korea, Taiwan, France, and Germany- have regulated the abuse of superior bargaining position under their national competition laws","PeriodicalId":53034,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Hukum Pembangunan","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-07-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"44881633","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 1

MEREKONSTRUKSI PARADIGMA GUGATAN CITIZEN LAWSUIT DI INDONESIA SEBAGAI SENGKETA ADMINISTRASI 一个政府构建印尼公民权利的第一保障

Jurnal Hukum Pembangunan Pub Date : 2020-07-13 DOI: 10.21143/jhp.vol50.no1.2492

Muhammad Adiguna Bimasakti

{"title":"MEREKONSTRUKSI PARADIGMA GUGATAN CITIZEN LAWSUIT DI INDONESIA SEBAGAI SENGKETA ADMINISTRASI","authors":"Muhammad Adiguna Bimasakti","doi":"10.21143/jhp.vol50.no1.2492","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21143/jhp.vol50.no1.2492","url":null,"abstract":"Citizen Lawsuit is an alternative law enforcement mechanism for citizens. Every citizen has the same right to file a Citizen Lawsuit in the court. However, the problems are that there is no definite regulation regarding the authority to adjudicate Citizen Lawsuit, and its contact with the “Judicial Review” which is the constitutional authority of the Supreme Court. In addition there are also problems related to discretionary authority where there is a prohibition for judges to judge the good and bad of the government's discretionary actions. This paper tries to answer these problems through normative and theoretical approaches. The contact between Judicial Review and Citizen Lawsuit is that if the object is an existing regulation. Prohibition for judges from assessing the good and bad of the government's discretionary action can be ruled out as long as the assessment is made regarding purposes of discretionary actions ruled under Law No. 30 of 2014 concerning Government Administration. The character of Citizen Lawsuit is administrative, not civil, so it should be the authority of the State Administrative Court and not the General Court to adjudicate.","PeriodicalId":53034,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Hukum Pembangunan","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-07-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"44478424","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 2

INTERPRETASI KONSTITUSI DALAM PENGUJIAN KONSTITUSIONALITAS UNTUK MEWUJUDKAN THE LIVING CONSTITUTION 宪法检验中的宪法解释要涉及现行宪法

Jurnal Hukum Pembangunan Pub Date : 2020-06-19 DOI: 10.33756/jlr.v2i2.5644

Fakhris Lutfianto Hapsoro, I. Ismail

{"title":"INTERPRETASI KONSTITUSI DALAM PENGUJIAN KONSTITUSIONALITAS UNTUK MEWUJUDKAN THE LIVING CONSTITUTION","authors":"Fakhris Lutfianto Hapsoro, I. Ismail","doi":"10.33756/jlr.v2i2.5644","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.33756/jlr.v2i2.5644","url":null,"abstract":"Tujuan dari tulisan ini yaitu untuk menjelaskan kewenangan Mahkamah Konstitusi menguji konstitusionalitas undang-undang terhadap undang-undang dasar dalam hal ini kewenangan memberikan interpretasi terhadap UUD NRI 1945. Terkait dengan interpretasi konstitusi, maka suatu undang-undang dasar tidak hanya dianggap sebagai suatu documented constitution melainkan dapat bertransformasi menjadi the living constitution. Dalam praktik di Indonesia, dapat dijumpai putusan-putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi yang menggunakan interpretasi konstitusi untuk menilai konstitusionalitas suatu norma. Metode yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah pendekatan yuridis normatif. Hasil penelitian ini menguraikan sejauh mana upaya hakim dalam mewujudkan the living constitution melalui interpretasi hakim dalam pengujian konstitusionalitas. Dalam menafsirkan konstitusi, hakim bebas menggunakan metode interpretasi apapun. Namun kebebasan memilih dan menggunakan metode interpretasi tersebut harus tetap berada dalam koridor Pancasila dan UUD 1945. Hakim harus cermat, mampu memperhatikan, menggali hakekat atau merefleksikan suatu ketentuan pasal di dalam UUD sesuai dengan nilai-nilai Pancasila dan UUD 1945.","PeriodicalId":53034,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Hukum Pembangunan","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-06-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"41480873","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 22