一个政府构建印尼公民权利的第一保障

Muhammad Adiguna Bimasakti
{"title":"一个政府构建印尼公民权利的第一保障","authors":"Muhammad Adiguna Bimasakti","doi":"10.21143/jhp.vol50.no1.2492","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Citizen Lawsuit is an alternative law enforcement mechanism for citizens. Every citizen has the same right to file a Citizen Lawsuit in the court. However, the problems are that there is no definite regulation regarding the authority to adjudicate Citizen Lawsuit, and its contact with the “Judicial Review” which is the constitutional authority of the Supreme Court. In addition there are also problems related to discretionary authority where there is a prohibition for judges to judge the good and bad of the government's discretionary actions. This paper tries to answer these problems through normative and theoretical approaches. The contact between Judicial Review and Citizen Lawsuit is that if the object is an existing regulation. Prohibition for judges from assessing the good and bad of the government's discretionary action can be ruled out as long as the assessment is made regarding purposes of discretionary actions ruled under Law No. 30 of 2014 concerning Government Administration. The character of Citizen Lawsuit is administrative, not civil, so it should be the authority of the State Administrative Court and not the General Court to adjudicate.","PeriodicalId":53034,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Hukum Pembangunan","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-07-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"MEREKONSTRUKSI PARADIGMA GUGATAN CITIZEN LAWSUIT DI INDONESIA SEBAGAI SENGKETA ADMINISTRASI\",\"authors\":\"Muhammad Adiguna Bimasakti\",\"doi\":\"10.21143/jhp.vol50.no1.2492\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Citizen Lawsuit is an alternative law enforcement mechanism for citizens. Every citizen has the same right to file a Citizen Lawsuit in the court. However, the problems are that there is no definite regulation regarding the authority to adjudicate Citizen Lawsuit, and its contact with the “Judicial Review” which is the constitutional authority of the Supreme Court. In addition there are also problems related to discretionary authority where there is a prohibition for judges to judge the good and bad of the government's discretionary actions. This paper tries to answer these problems through normative and theoretical approaches. The contact between Judicial Review and Citizen Lawsuit is that if the object is an existing regulation. Prohibition for judges from assessing the good and bad of the government's discretionary action can be ruled out as long as the assessment is made regarding purposes of discretionary actions ruled under Law No. 30 of 2014 concerning Government Administration. The character of Citizen Lawsuit is administrative, not civil, so it should be the authority of the State Administrative Court and not the General Court to adjudicate.\",\"PeriodicalId\":53034,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Jurnal Hukum Pembangunan\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-07-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Jurnal Hukum Pembangunan\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21143/jhp.vol50.no1.2492\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal Hukum Pembangunan","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21143/jhp.vol50.no1.2492","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

公民诉讼是公民的一种替代性执法机制。每个公民都有向法院提起公民诉讼的权利。但存在的问题是,我国对公民诉讼审判权及其与最高法院宪法赋予的“司法审查”的联系没有明确的规定。此外,还存在与自由裁量权有关的问题,即禁止法官判断政府自由裁量行为的好坏。本文试图通过规范和理论的方法来回答这些问题。司法审查与公民诉讼之间的联系是,如果客体是一项现行法规。可以排除禁止法官评估政府自由裁量行为的好坏,只要评估是针对根据2014年第30号关于政府行政的法律裁定的自由裁量行为的目的进行的。公民诉讼的性质是行政性的,而不是民事的,因此应当由国家行政法院而不是普通法院来裁决。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
MEREKONSTRUKSI PARADIGMA GUGATAN CITIZEN LAWSUIT DI INDONESIA SEBAGAI SENGKETA ADMINISTRASI
Citizen Lawsuit is an alternative law enforcement mechanism for citizens. Every citizen has the same right to file a Citizen Lawsuit in the court. However, the problems are that there is no definite regulation regarding the authority to adjudicate Citizen Lawsuit, and its contact with the “Judicial Review” which is the constitutional authority of the Supreme Court. In addition there are also problems related to discretionary authority where there is a prohibition for judges to judge the good and bad of the government's discretionary actions. This paper tries to answer these problems through normative and theoretical approaches. The contact between Judicial Review and Citizen Lawsuit is that if the object is an existing regulation. Prohibition for judges from assessing the good and bad of the government's discretionary action can be ruled out as long as the assessment is made regarding purposes of discretionary actions ruled under Law No. 30 of 2014 concerning Government Administration. The character of Citizen Lawsuit is administrative, not civil, so it should be the authority of the State Administrative Court and not the General Court to adjudicate.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信