Environmental DNA最新文献

{"title":"Using Environmental DNA to Detect and Identify Sweetpotato Whitefly Bemisia argentifolii and Twospotted Spider Mite Tetranychus urticae in Greenhouse-Grown Tomato Plants","authors":"Jonathan Lee-Rodriguez,&nbsp;Christopher M. Ranger,&nbsp;Ashley Leach,&nbsp;Andrew Michel,&nbsp;Michael E. Reding,&nbsp;Luis Canas","doi":"10.1002/edn3.70026","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/edn3.70026","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Environmental DNA (eDNA) consists of genetic material shed by living organisms, including those that are deceased, offering a unique opportunity to detect and identify terrestrial insect pests without requiring visual identification. The sweetpotato whitefly, <i>Bemisia argentifolii</i>, and the twospotted spider mite, <i>Tetranychus urticae</i>, are notorious for causing crop losses through virus transmission and direct feeding. Our study aimed to: (1) assess the effectiveness of <i>B. argentifolii</i> literature-based PCR primers compared to newly developed primers for eDNA amplification, (2) evaluate the sensitivity of conventional PCR (cPCR) and real-time quantitative PCR (qPCR) for detecting eDNA of <i>B. argentifolii</i> and <i>T. urticae</i>, (3) establish a rapid eDNA processing methodology using the LGC Biosearch Technologies QuickExtract DNA extraction kit and the Qiagen DNeasy Blood and Tissue kit, and (4) test the specificity of the developed primers against non-target species. <i>B. argentifolii</i> and <i>T. urticae</i> were confined to tomato leaves (<i>Solanum lycopersicum</i>) using clip cages for 24 h, after which eDNA was collected from leaf surfaces using a water spray method, filtered, and processed for DNA amplification. While literature-based primers showed sufficient sensitivity, their specificity for eDNA applications was inadequate, prompting the design of novel PCR primers for both pest species. Positive eDNA detection was achieved with both amplification methods, with qPCR proving more reliable than cPCR due to the latter's inconsistent performance with positive control samples. We also introduced a rapid eDNA processing approach using the QuickExtract DNA extraction kit, contrasting it with the more conventional Qiagen DNeasy Blood and Tissue kit. We believe that our findings are the first step toward the practical use of eDNA as a highly sensitive, early detection technique.</p>","PeriodicalId":52828,"journal":{"name":"Environmental DNA","volume":"6 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/edn3.70026","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142404628","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Optimizing eDNA Replication for Standardized Application in Lotic Systems in Aotearoa, New Zealand","authors":"Josh Smith,&nbsp;Bruno David,&nbsp;Andy Hicks,&nbsp;Shaun Wilkinson,&nbsp;Nicolas Ling,&nbsp;Daniel Fake,&nbsp;Alastair Suren,&nbsp;Amy Gault","doi":"10.1002/edn3.70017","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/edn3.70017","url":null,"abstract":"<p>National standardization of ecological sampling protocols between different agencies in Aotearoa New Zealand has historically been difficult to attain, creating challenges for combining datasets for national scale analyses. The introduction of new methods for biological monitoring, such as environmental DNA (eDNA), presents an opportunity to standardize aquatic sampling protocols prior to widespread adoption. The objective of this study was to optimize eDNA sample replication for the consistent characterization of freshwater fish and macroinvertebrate communities in flowing waters, and ultimately, to inform the development of robust national monitoring standards. A comparison of field replication and extraction methods (pooling of preservation buffer) was also trialed as part of this high replication (<i>n</i> = 16) eDNA study to assess any potential benefits in measuring species richness and reducing processing costs alongside replication optimisation. This involved two ‘syringe’ sampling methods (‘standard’ and ‘boosted’, eight each) conducted across 54 riverine sites throughout the country. No significant difference was found for species richness between the standardized (eight replicates) or boosted (16 replicates composited to eight) eDNA methods for fish and macroinvertebrates. Results indicated that six replicates were needed to consistently detect 89.5% of fish species likely to be present using field-based syringe eDNA sampling and preservation. However, an altitudinal species richness effect was observed for fish. For macroinvertebrates, six replicates were required to identify 86% of taxa identified to the NEMS (National Environmental Monitoring Standards) level used for the Macroinvertebrate Community Index (MCI: usually genera) while eight replicates were required to detect 89% of NEMS taxa. For fish and macroinvertebrate biodiversity, this study suggests that six replicates are a reasonable trade-off between effective community characterization and cost in New Zealand lotic systems.</p>","PeriodicalId":52828,"journal":{"name":"Environmental DNA","volume":"6 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-10-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/edn3.70017","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142404334","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Environmental DNA Particle Size Distribution and Quantity Differ Across Taxa and Organelles","authors":"Héloïse Verdier,&nbsp;Thibault Datry,&nbsp;Maxime Logez,&nbsp;Lara Konecny-Duprè,&nbsp;Maïlys Gauthier,&nbsp;Tristan Lefébure","doi":"10.1002/edn3.598","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/edn3.598","url":null,"abstract":"<p>The use of environmental DNA to detect species is now widespread in freshwater ecology. However, the detectability of species depends on many factors, such as the quantity of eDNA particles available in the environment and their state (e.g., free DNA fragments, organellar, or aggregated DNA particles). To date, the most advanced knowledge of the production and state of DNA particles concerns teleosts. Most often, these studies target mitochondrial genes, since they are present in multiple copies in a cell. However, it is likely that the characteristics of eDNA molecules vary greatly among taxa and genetic compartments, with direct consequences for species detection. Using an indoor mesocosm experiment, we compared the rate of mitochondrial and nuclear eDNA production and particle size distribution (PSD) of four distinct and common aquatic taxa (zebrafish, tadpole, isopod and mollusk). The tank water was filtered through a series of filters with decreasing porosity and mitochondrial and nuclear eDNA at each size fraction were quantified by qPCR. We found that the production and the size of eDNA particles varied greatly among taxa and genetic compartments. For most taxa, the number of nuclear eDNA particles released in water was higher than that of mitochondrial origin. The PSD of mt-eDNA showed a pattern common to all taxa: the relative number of particles increased from the smallest size fractions (0.2 μm and less) to the largest (over 1.2 μm), while the distribution of nu-eDNA was very different from one taxon to another. We also observed a high temporal variability in the quantity of eDNA particles and in PSD, although the latter was more complex to model. These results call for caution in how to sample and analyze eDNA in aquatic environments, particularly for organisms that emit small particles in small quantities such as isopods.</p>","PeriodicalId":52828,"journal":{"name":"Environmental DNA","volume":"6 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-10-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/edn3.598","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142404267","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Development and Application of a Portable Environmental DNA Test for the Detection of Rafetus swinhoei in Viet Nam","authors":"Tracie A. Seimon,&nbsp;Nguyen Van Long,&nbsp;Minh Le,&nbsp;Timothy E. M. McCormack,&nbsp;Tham Thi Nguyen,&nbsp;Hanh Ngo,&nbsp;Nguyen Tai Thang,&nbsp;Thuy Hoang,&nbsp;Steven G. Platt,&nbsp;Hoang Van Ha,&nbsp;Nguyen Van Trong,&nbsp;Brian Horne,&nbsp;Colleen A. Barrett,&nbsp;Denise McAloose,&nbsp;Paul P. Calle","doi":"10.1002/edn3.70011","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/edn3.70011","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Swinhoe's (or Yangtze) giant softshell turtle (<i>Rafetus swinhoei</i>) is a large, critically endangered freshwater turtle and considered among the rarest species in the world. As of 2024, only two individuals have been confirmed to remain alive, one at the Suzhou Zoo in China and one in Xuan Khanh Lake, Viet Nam. The only hope for the long-term survival of <i>R. swinhoei</i> is finding additional, as yet undiscovered, animals that have thus far eluded detection by traditional survey methods. In recent years, numerous studies have been published on the use of environmental DNA (eDNA) for species detection and monitoring. This method takes advantage of the persistence of DNA in the environment, such as in water, soil, and air. An organism's DNA is shed into the environment through urine, feces, and the sloughing of skin. Species-specific quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) testing can be used to detect eDNA in samples collected from the environment. eDNA trials to detect <i>R. swinhoei</i> were initiated by the Asian Turtle Program and Washington State University in 2013. To expand the use of eDNA for species detection by conservationists, we developed and validated a first-of-its-kind innovative point-of-detection (POD) qPCR platform for the rapid, onsite detection of <i>R. swinhoei</i> from water samples. Here we show that the portable eDNA test kit can be used for the successful detection of <i>R. swinhoei</i> in a large body of water and that pooling filters may be a useful strategy to reduce test costs and improve detection efficiency. Use of this test can expand the search for <i>R. swinhoei</i> in unexplored and understudied lakes, reservoirs, and other bodies of water where this species may be present and could inform field surveys utilizing eDNA for other threatened species that are rare in nature.</p>","PeriodicalId":52828,"journal":{"name":"Environmental DNA","volume":"6 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-10-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/edn3.70011","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142404266","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"High-Resolution Longitudinal eDNA Metabarcoding and Morphological Tracking of Planktonic Threats to Salmon Aquaculture","authors":"María Algueró-Muñiz,&nbsp;Sofie Spatharis,&nbsp;Toni Dwyer,&nbsp;Michele de Noia,&nbsp;Bachar Cheaib,&nbsp;Yee Wan Liu,&nbsp;Brendan A. Robertson,&nbsp;Calum Johnstone,&nbsp;Jennifer Welsh,&nbsp;Annabell Macphee,&nbsp;Marta Mazurkiewicz,&nbsp;Ralph Bickerdike,&nbsp;Hervé Migaud,&nbsp;Clara McGhee,&nbsp;Kim Præbel,&nbsp;Martin Llewellyn","doi":"10.1002/edn3.70005","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/edn3.70005","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Salmonid aquaculture, a major component of the Northern European, North American, and Chilean coastal economies, is under threat from challenges to gill health, many of which originate from plankton communities. A first step toward mitigating losses is to characterize the biological drivers of poor gill health. Numerous planktonic taxa have been implicated, including toxic and siliceous microalgae, hydrozoans, and scyphozoans; however, rigorous longitudinal surveys of plankton diversity and gill health have been lacking. In the current study, we present and assess an exhaustive identification approach combining both morphological and molecular methods together with robust statistical models to identify the planktonic drivers of proliferative gill disease (PGD) and fish mortality. We undertook longitudinal evaluation at two marine aquaculture facilities on the west coast of Scotland using daily data collected during the 2021 growing season (March–October). Examining these two different sites, one sheltered and one exposed to the open sea, we identified potentially new, important, and unexpected planktonic drivers of PGD and mortality (e.g., doliolids and appendicularians) and confirmed the significance of some established threats (e.g., hydrozoans and diatoms). We also explored delayed or “lagged” effects of plankton abundances on gill health and undertook a comparison of environmental DNA (eDNA) metabarcoding and microscopy in their ability to identify and quantify planktonic species. Our data highlight the diversity of planktonic threats to salmonid aquaculture as well as the importance of using both molecular and morphological approaches to detect these. There is now an urgent need to expand systematic longitudinal molecular and morphological approaches across multiple sites and over multiple years. The resultant catalogue of main biological drivers will enable early warning systems, new treatments, and, ultimately, a sustainable platform for future salmonid aquaculture in the marine environment.</p>","PeriodicalId":52828,"journal":{"name":"Environmental DNA","volume":"6 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/edn3.70005","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142404846","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Environmental DNA Metabarcoding Detects Predators at Higher Rates Than Electrofishing","authors":"Eric A. Bonk,&nbsp;Robert H. Hanner,&nbsp;Adrienne J. Bartlett,&nbsp;Gerald R. Tetreault","doi":"10.1002/edn3.70019","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/edn3.70019","url":null,"abstract":"<p>There are numerous downsides and risks associated with electrofishing; hence, environmental DNA (eDNA) metabarcoding is becoming increasingly common in aquatic ecological studies. Generally, researchers agree that eDNA metabarcoding is more sensitive than electrofishing, and that eDNA metabarcoding is better at detecting rare species. As predatory species tend to be rarer than prey species, eDNA metabarcoding should hypothetically detect more predator species than electrofishing. Instead of supporting the notion that eDNA must replace electrofishing, or that eDNA and electrofishing must display the same results, the current study aims to establish the strengths and weaknesses of eDNA metabarcoding when compared to electrofishing. eDNA metabarcoding and electrofishing data were collected on three sampling dates at four experimental sites. A RV coefficient analysis confirmed that the eDNA metabarcoding data (RV = 0.395, <i>p</i> = 0.057) are statistically different from the electrofishing data. A paired Wilcoxon signed rank test revealed that eDNA data collection techniques detect more predatory species than electrofishing (<i>p</i> = 0.041). When the analysis was conducted for prey species a statistically significant difference did not occur (<i>p</i> = 0.661). Overall, the results of the study suggest that eDNA metabarcoding does not display the same results as electrofishing due to eDNA metabarcoding detecting predatory species at higher rates. The combined use of eDNA alongside electrofishing can help mitigate electrofishing's bias against predatory species, while electrofishing can address reliability concerns associated with eDNA. This collaborative approach ultimately enhances the accuracy of fish community assessments.</p>","PeriodicalId":52828,"journal":{"name":"Environmental DNA","volume":"6 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/edn3.70019","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142359832","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Towards a Standardized Operating Procedure for eDNA-Based Biomonitoring in Coastal Marine Salmon Aquaculture","authors":"Mahshid Oladi,&nbsp;Thomas A. Wilding,&nbsp;Adam Wyness,&nbsp;Thorsten Stoeck","doi":"10.1002/edn3.70014","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/edn3.70014","url":null,"abstract":"<p>The marine aquaculture industry and regulators are in the process of implementing environmental DNA (eDNA) metabarcoding of microbial communities for compliance monitoring. This requires standardization of sampling, laboratory, and data analysis protocols. Towards this goal, we in this study completed two further milestones using samples collected from two Scottish salmon farms: (i) We tested the effect of using two different PCR protocols (i.e., different DNA polymerases, master mixes, and annealing temperatures), which are frequently being used in eDNA biomonitoring of aquaculture installations, for the amplification of the taxonomic marker gene (V3-V4 hypervariable region of the bacterial 16S rRNA gene). (ii) We quantified sampling background noise obtained from eDNA samples and statistically compared results with the sampling bias observed in macrofaunal samples from the same source sediments. We detected differences in bacterial community structures resulting from the performance of different PCR protocols, profoundly influencing the interpretation of biomonitoring results. Furthermore, we found that sampling-induced errors for eDNA samples were similar to errors for macrofaunal samples collected according to compliance monitoring protocol (~25% variability in both cases). Finally, we showed that within-grab variances of microbial community structures were in the same order of magnitude (less than 10× difference in all cases) as the one obtained from replicate grabs collected from the same locale (impact category). Based on our findings, we suggest using a consistent PCR protocol for biomonitoring efforts to improve the comparability of results, especially when different service providers are conducting the biomonitoring. We propose a sampling scheme to be considered in eDNA biomonitoring that includes taking three replicate grabs at each locale, with one replicate sample from each grab. This minimizes sampling-induced errors and makes upcoming eDNA-based monitoring results comparable with previous compliance monitoring results obtained from macrofaunal data.</p>","PeriodicalId":52828,"journal":{"name":"Environmental DNA","volume":"6 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-09-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/edn3.70014","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142359970","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Sample Preservation Solution Increases Nucleic Acid Yield and Environmental RNA Quality in Sediments Across an Estuarine Salinity Gradient","authors":"Christopher Keneally,&nbsp;Virginie Gaget,&nbsp;Stephen P. Kidd,&nbsp;Justin D. Brookes","doi":"10.1002/edn3.70016","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/edn3.70016","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Environmental nucleic acid-based assessments are powerful tools for understanding microbial ecology, and environmental degradation in aquatic environments. This approach is particularly useful in guiding restoration in estuaries, some of the most degraded ecosystems in the world. The recent popularity of this approach has been accompanied by a parallel increase in the diversity of applied methods. A range of best practice methods exist across the field that can be employed and are selected based on environmental considerations such as physicochemical gradients, maximizing yield, and quality of nucleic acids sampled across sites within a study area. A consistent approach to intra-study nucleic acid sampling also ensures accurate comparison between those sites. This study evaluates environmental nucleic acid (eNA) sampling methods across salinity gradients in aquatic ecosystems, focusing on the impact of preservation techniques on environmental DNA (eDNA) yield and environmental RNA (eRNA) yield and quality. Fieldwork was conducted at three sites within the Coorong estuary system in South Australia, representing low salinity, marine, and hypersaline conditions. Snap freezing and <i>LifeGuard</i> preservation solution treatments were applied in situ to compare their effects on nucleic acid yields and eRNA integrity. Snap freezing enhanced eDNA yield in low salinity sediments but negatively impacted eRNA integrity in marine and hypersaline conditions. Conversely, treatment with preservation solution consistently improved both eDNA and eRNA recovery across all salinity levels, which makes this approach a good candidate for preserving eNA molecules across environmental gradients. The study underscores the necessity of tailoring sample preservation methods to specific environmental conditions for accurate eNA-based microbial community assessments in coastal ecosystems. These findings contribute to the development of robust eNA sampling protocols for benthic communities under varying salinity conditions.</p>","PeriodicalId":52828,"journal":{"name":"Environmental DNA","volume":"6 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-09-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/edn3.70016","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142320898","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"A Guide to Environmental DNA Extractions for Non-Molecular Trained Biologists, Ecologists, and Conservation Scientists","authors":"Jessica Rieder,&nbsp;Eliane Jemmi,&nbsp;Margaret E. Hunter,&nbsp;Irene Adrian-Kalchhauser","doi":"10.1002/edn3.70002","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/edn3.70002","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Ecologists, biologists, and conservation scientists are increasingly interested in the use of environmental DNA (eDNA) data for research and potentially decision-making. While commercial DNA extraction kits are typically user-friendly and accessible, they may fail to deliver the desired results with inherently complex eDNA samples, necessitating protocol optimization or educated selection of alternative approaches. To this end, knowledge of the basic steps and principles of DNA extractions is essential, but traditional education tracks in ecology, conservation, and environmental management typically do not include in-depth training in molecular methods. The primary objective of this paper is to enable scientists with an ecological background and limited molecular training to understand the four key steps of eDNA isolations, and to use this expertise to their advantage. We describe the purpose of commonly used reagents and chemicals, point out alternatives for each key step, explain the impact of certain choices regarding isolation approaches on DNA integrity and purity, and highlight the possibility of a tailor-made “mix and match” approach. We anticipate that this paper will enable field ecologists to develop a deeper understanding of the mechanisms and chemistry underlying eDNA extractions, thus allowing them to make informed decisions regarding the best eDNA extraction method for their research goals. Our intention is not to provide comprehensive, step-by-step protocols, but to offer guiding principles while highlighting alternative solutions. Finally, we hope that this paper will act as a useful resource to support knowledge transfer and teaching.</p>","PeriodicalId":52828,"journal":{"name":"Environmental DNA","volume":"6 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-09-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/edn3.70002","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142276637","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Refining Sampling Efforts for Fish Diversity Assessment in Subtropical Urban Estuarine and Oceanic Waters Using Environmental DNA With Multiple Primers","authors":"Chun Ming How,&nbsp;Jack Chi-Ho Ip,&nbsp;Dumas Deconinck,&nbsp;Meihong Zhao,&nbsp;Meng Yan,&nbsp;Jinping Cheng,&nbsp;Kenneth Mei Yee Leung,&nbsp;Leo Lai Chan,&nbsp;Jian-Wen Qiu","doi":"10.1002/edn3.70013","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/edn3.70013","url":null,"abstract":"<p>The environmental DNA (eDNA) approach is an emerging tool for monitoring marine biodiversity. However, the sampling effort needs optimization according to the site characteristics and target taxonomic groups. In this study, we optimized the eDNA sampling effort in terms of sample volume and number of replicates to monitor the diversity of marine vertebrates (mainly fish) in Hong Kong's subtropical waters that show a gradient of estuarine to oceanic waters. To maximize detection, we used three pairs of metabarcoding primers (12S-v5, MiFish-U, and MiFish-E). We compared vertebrate diversity in 78 water samples, ranging from 1 to 10 L, collected from oceanic and estuarine sites. Metabarcoding yielded a total of 140 vertebrate species, of which 18 were unique to the estuarine site, 66 unique to the oceanic site, and 56 shared between both sites. The detected species were predominantly ray-finned fish (136 species), and the three primer pairs exhibited differential sensitivity toward different taxa, especially cartilaginous fish and cetaceans. Increasing sampling volume per replicate generally increased the total detected species, average species per replicate, and species coverage, and sampling 3 or 4 × 4 L represented the most efficient sampling effort for the estuarine and oceanic sites, respectively. The diversity analysis revealed that sampling &gt;2 L per replicate reduced variability and improved diversity analysis. The results also showed that a larger sampling volume per replicate increased the probability of detecting endangered, indicator, invasive, and elusive species, with 4 L representing the most efficient volume. This study recommended sampling 4 L per replicate and 3 replicates for estuarine and 4 for oceanic sites, respectively for effectively monitoring marine fish in subtropical waters using the eDNA approach.</p>","PeriodicalId":52828,"journal":{"name":"Environmental DNA","volume":"6 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/edn3.70013","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142244820","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}