Filozofia Publiczna i Edukacja Demokratyczna最新文献

Does the Nobel Prize reflect current scientific and academic values? 诺贝尔奖是否反映了当前的科学和学术价值?

Filozofia Publiczna i Edukacja Demokratyczna Pub Date : 2021-11-30 DOI: 10.14746/fped.2021.10.1.5

J. A. Teixeira da Silva

引用次数: 0

Development and Validation of the General Learning Motivation Regulation Scale for Chinese High Middle School Students 中国高中生通用学习动机调节量表的编制与验证

Filozofia Publiczna i Edukacja Demokratyczna Pub Date : 2021-11-30 DOI: 10.14746/fped.2021.10.1.3

Li Li, Anhua Fan

{"title":"Development and Validation of the General Learning Motivation Regulation Scale for Chinese High Middle School Students","authors":"Li Li, Anhua Fan","doi":"10.14746/fped.2021.10.1.3","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.14746/fped.2021.10.1.3","url":null,"abstract":"Motivation regulation has a profound effect on the students’ learning and associated achievement. Yet, to date, there is a lack of a brief and valid approach for systematically assessing the regulation of learning motivation from the perspective of psychometrics, especially for the high middle school students. This study develops a general scale for quantitatively assessing the learning motivation regulation of high middle students, based on the combination of literature analysis and open‑ended interviews in china General Learning Motivation Regulation Scale for Chinese High Middle School Students (GLMR‑CHMSS). A total of 2,304 questionnaires of high middle school students were included for item analysis and exploratory factor analysis, and another 2,304 questionnaires of high middle school students were subjected to confirmatory factor analyses and a validation and reliability test. The scale consisted of 24‑items that can be divided into four factors: intrinsic motivation regulation, extrinsic motivation regulation, volitional behavioural regulation, and self‑efficacy regulation. As indicated by the confirmatory factor analysis with the control group, the four‑factor structure model of the GLMR‑CHMSS fitted well (χ2 /df=7.839, RMSEA=0.054, CFI=0.918, TLI=0.908). In ad dition, using academic achievement as the empirical validity criterion, the scores of each factor of GLMR‑CHMSS and the scale score were significantly correlated with academic achievement were the reliability indicators. This study show cases a novel and valid tool for mesuring the degree of learning motivation regulation of high middle school students in China.","PeriodicalId":52700,"journal":{"name":"Filozofia Publiczna i Edukacja Demokratyczna","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-11-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"46076317","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Revolutions as disasters of misconceived political projects of social mutations 革命是社会突变的错误政治计划的灾难

Filozofia Publiczna i Edukacja Demokratyczna Pub Date : 2021-11-30 DOI: 10.14746/fped.2021.10.1.2

Cǎtǎlin Mamali

引用次数: 0

Lügenbegriffe und Lügenpraxis in der Moderne 现在的谎言与谎言

Filozofia Publiczna i Edukacja Demokratyczna Pub Date : 2019-06-05 DOI: 10.14746/fped.2018.7.2.2019.8.1.3

S. Dietzsch

引用次数: 0

Księga Arystotelesa o dyspozycjach dianoetycznych (intelektualnych) „Etyka nikomachejska” VI

Filozofia Publiczna i Edukacja Demokratyczna Pub Date : 2019-06-05 DOI: 10.14746/fped.2018.7.2.2019.8.1.1

M. Wesoły

引用次数: 2

Applying legal narratives. Some comments on Bernard Jackson’s sociolinguistic approach in legal semiotics 运用法律叙事。论伯纳德·杰克逊法律符号学中的社会语言学方法

Filozofia Publiczna i Edukacja Demokratyczna Pub Date : 2019-06-02 DOI: 10.14746/fped.2018.7.2.2019.8.1.11

M. Pieniążek

引用次数: 0

Conflicting representations on Armenian genocide: exploring the relational future through self-inquiring technique 关于亚美尼亚种族灭绝的冲突表述：通过自我探究技术探索关系的未来

Filozofia Publiczna i Edukacja Demokratyczna Pub Date : 2019-06-02 DOI: 10.14746/fped.2018.7.2.2019.8.1.9

Cǎtǎlin Mamali, M. Kivu, J. Kutnik

{"title":"Conflicting representations on Armenian genocide: exploring the relational future through self-inquiring technique","authors":"Cǎtǎlin Mamali, M. Kivu, J. Kutnik","doi":"10.14746/fped.2018.7.2.2019.8.1.9","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.14746/fped.2018.7.2.2019.8.1.9","url":null,"abstract":"Major lethal conflicts (war crimes, genocides) between large social actors include many times opposing social representations, narratives and practical approaches to the events worked out by those placed on the aggressor or aggressed, perpetrators or victims’ side. War crimes and genocides seem to be historically associated, mainly in the case of dictatorial regimes, with system-atic repression not only of the information about such events but also of the interrogative potential of common people about the events. The study proposes that such conflicting representations cannot be approached only by questions pre-established by the researchers to which the participants are supposed to answer. Methodologically and theoretically it is justified to explore the assumptions and the questions that can be triggered by the presentation of conflicts to the participants who are supposed to look to the same conflict from both sides. Besides the use of national representative samples and of convenience samples before and after the 100 years commemoration of the 1915 Armenian genocide the study presents the findings based on self-inquiry technique applied at three levels of social complexity: (a) societal level, with questions directed to the general universe of discourse implied by the 1915 events; (b) at interpersonal level with questions directed to actors with leading roles on both sides; (c) at the individual level stimulating questions about 1915 genocide that are explicitly self-directed. We suggest, based on the findings, that the expression of the questioning potential on tragic events is useful for the relational future of the sides involved in the conflicts.","PeriodicalId":52700,"journal":{"name":"Filozofia Publiczna i Edukacja Demokratyczna","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-06-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"48531464","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

„Dopalacze” – nieprzewidywalne narkotyki. Problem społeczno-prawny “吸烟者”——不可预测的毒品。社会法律问题

Filozofia Publiczna i Edukacja Demokratyczna Pub Date : 2019-06-02 DOI: 10.14746/fped.2018.7.2.2019.8.1.10

Sebastian Matyjek

引用次数: 1

O pojęciach i praktyce kłamstwa w epoce nowoczesnej 论现代说谎的观念与实践

Filozofia Publiczna i Edukacja Demokratyczna Pub Date : 2019-06-02 DOI: 10.14746/fped.2018.7.2.2019.8.1.4

Steffen Dietzsch

引用次数: 0

‘The way we judge’ Observers’ assessing of elder care decisions of adult children who had been abused by the parents and the ultimate attribution error “我们判断‘观察者’评估被父母虐待的成年儿童的养老决策的方式以及最终的归因错误

Filozofia Publiczna i Edukacja Demokratyczna Pub Date : 2019-06-02 DOI: 10.14746/fped.2018.7.2.2019.8.1.8

Claudia Ammann

{"title":"‘The way we judge’ Observers’ assessing of elder care decisions of adult children who had been abused by the parents and the ultimate attribution error","authors":"Claudia Ammann","doi":"10.14746/fped.2018.7.2.2019.8.1.8","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.14746/fped.2018.7.2.2019.8.1.8","url":null,"abstract":" In this essay I want to concentrate on observers’ baseline assumptions on how we should be, or should have become in order to be accounted as morally ‘good.’ I will point out the significance for adult children who decided to not care for their elder parents. In three selected studies I show that observers, in trying to explain the decisions of others, or their moral development, respectively moral standing, misjudge or ignore their own implicit baseline assumptions. These assumptions are symptomatic of an implicit belief in all of us that wishes to see that ’good begets good’ for most of us, and infers, thereafter, that ‘bad begets bad’ for some who would show ‘no good.’ It is this implicit belief that guides the observers to make assumptions about the morally doubtful upbringing of a person, or their negative behavior that they wish to explain by flaws in the person’s personality. This biased belief says “it is this way, and only this way”, but, in fact, one cannot be certain about it. The baseline assumptions that observers bring along are basically the biased observer’s points of view which can be explained with the ultimate attribution error.","PeriodicalId":52700,"journal":{"name":"Filozofia Publiczna i Edukacja Demokratyczna","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-06-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"45021076","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0