{"title":"Lügenbegriffe und Lügenpraxis in der Moderne","authors":"S. Dietzsch","doi":"10.14746/fped.2018.7.2.2019.8.1.3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Lies occupy a surprisingly favorable place within our daily life. As the Polish aphorist Stanisław Jerzy Lec once remarked: if you want to see the lie you need to face the obvious truth. With lies, we do not simply stigmatize the dark part or the “backside” of the humankind. To lie, meaning the ability to deceive, with or without words, even to deceive with the truth (for example in statistics), is one of the intellectual modalities of human existence, as well as an expression of misery. This leads to the paradox: One cannot live with lies or, at the same time, live without them. Lies thus reveal their double nature; they attempt to maintain vivid things, just as they generally tend to destroy them. This double nature of lies makes it impossible to condemn them by means of “ethical conviction”, as Max Weber would put it, or with the words of another famous French philosopher of our present time, Vladimir Jankélévitch, who says that consciousness is already provided with an inner disposi-tion to lie, as a litmus test of its noble and mean sides.","PeriodicalId":52700,"journal":{"name":"Filozofia Publiczna i Edukacja Demokratyczna","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-06-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Filozofia Publiczna i Edukacja Demokratyczna","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14746/fped.2018.7.2.2019.8.1.3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Lies occupy a surprisingly favorable place within our daily life. As the Polish aphorist Stanisław Jerzy Lec once remarked: if you want to see the lie you need to face the obvious truth. With lies, we do not simply stigmatize the dark part or the “backside” of the humankind. To lie, meaning the ability to deceive, with or without words, even to deceive with the truth (for example in statistics), is one of the intellectual modalities of human existence, as well as an expression of misery. This leads to the paradox: One cannot live with lies or, at the same time, live without them. Lies thus reveal their double nature; they attempt to maintain vivid things, just as they generally tend to destroy them. This double nature of lies makes it impossible to condemn them by means of “ethical conviction”, as Max Weber would put it, or with the words of another famous French philosopher of our present time, Vladimir Jankélévitch, who says that consciousness is already provided with an inner disposi-tion to lie, as a litmus test of its noble and mean sides.
谎言在我们的日常生活中占据着令人惊讶的有利地位。正如波兰格言家Stanisław Jerzy Lec曾经说过的那样:如果你想看到谎言,你需要面对显而易见的真相。通过谎言,我们不能简单地污蔑人类的黑暗部分或“背后”。撒谎,意味着无论是否用语言欺骗,甚至用真相欺骗(例如在统计学中)的能力,是人类存在的智力模式之一,也是痛苦的表现。这导致了一个悖论:一个人不能生活在谎言中,也不能同时生活在没有谎言的情况下。谎言由此揭示了它们的双重性;他们试图保持生动的东西,就像他们通常倾向于破坏它们一样。谎言的这种双重性质使得我们不可能像马克斯·韦伯所说的那样,通过“道德信念”来谴责它们,也不可能用我们这个时代另一位著名的法国哲学家弗拉基米尔·詹凯莱维奇的话来谴责它们。他说,意识已经具备了撒谎的内在倾向,这是对其高尚和卑鄙一面的试金石。