发布求助
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献

Review of Politics最新文献

筛选
英文 中文
Colin Bird: Human Dignity and Political Criticism. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2021. Pp. xiii, 266.) 科林·伯德：《人类尊严与政治批评》。（剑桥：剑桥大学出版社，2021年。第xiii页，266。）
Review of Politics Pub Date : 2022-09-19 DOI: 10.1017/s0034670522000845
Rachel Bayefsky
{"title":"Colin Bird: Human Dignity and Political Criticism. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2021. Pp. xiii, 266.)","authors":"Rachel Bayefsky","doi":"10.1017/s0034670522000845","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1017/s0034670522000845","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":52549,"journal":{"name":"Review of Politics","volume":"85 1","pages":"128 - 130"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"44496311","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Jonathan Marks: Let's Be Reasonable: A Conservative Case for Liberal Education. (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2021. Pp. xviii, 221.) 乔纳森·马克斯:《让我们理性一点:博雅教育的保守案例》。普林斯顿:普林斯顿大学出版社，2021年。第18页，221页。)
Review of Politics Pub Date : 2022-09-14 DOI: 10.1017/s0034670522000596
Daniel E. Cullen
{"title":"Jonathan Marks: Let's Be Reasonable: A Conservative Case for Liberal Education. (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2021. Pp. xviii, 221.)","authors":"Daniel E. Cullen","doi":"10.1017/s0034670522000596","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1017/s0034670522000596","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":52549,"journal":{"name":"Review of Politics","volume":"84 1","pages":"656 - 658"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-09-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"41319420","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Caroline Ashcroft: Violence and Power in the Thought of Hannah Arendt. (Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2021. Pp. 278.) 卡罗琳·阿什克罗夫特:《汉娜·阿伦特思想中的暴力与权力》。(费城:宾夕法尼亚大学出版社，2021。278页。)
Review of Politics Pub Date : 2022-09-14 DOI: 10.1017/s0034670522000833
Christopher Peys
{"title":"Caroline Ashcroft: Violence and Power in the Thought of Hannah Arendt. (Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2021. Pp. 278.)","authors":"Christopher Peys","doi":"10.1017/s0034670522000833","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1017/s0034670522000833","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":52549,"journal":{"name":"Review of Politics","volume":"85 1","pages":"136 - 138"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-09-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"45963935","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The English Utilitarians, Some Recent Reconsiderations 英国功利主义者最近的一些反思
Review of Politics Pub Date : 2022-09-13 DOI: 10.1017/S003467052200078X
G. Conti
{"title":"The English Utilitarians, Some Recent Reconsiderations","authors":"G. Conti","doi":"10.1017/S003467052200078X","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S003467052200078X","url":null,"abstract":"In 1900, perhaps the greatest Victorian historian of ideas, Leslie Stephen, released his three-volume English Utilitarians. Coming to grips with the political thought of the century that had just ended, he believed, required considering the “dominant beliefs of the adherents of this school.” So privileged a point of access was offered by what we would now call “classical utilitarianism” that a study of it could serve as a “sequel” to his previous History of English Thought in the Eighteenth Century. The utilitarians, Stephen was confident, could serve as a kind of synecdoche for a whole age. Further, if the utilitarians did not grasp the whole truth, there was no doubt that their “creed” would make up part of the “definitive system” that would arrive in due time.","PeriodicalId":52549,"journal":{"name":"Review of Politics","volume":"84 1","pages":"613 - 629"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-09-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"48744978","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
S. D. Chrostowska: Utopia in the Age of Survival: Between Myth and Politics. (Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 2021. Pp. 215.) 克里斯托夫斯卡：《生存时代的乌托邦：神话与政治之间》。（加利福尼亚州斯坦福：斯坦福大学出版社，2021年。第215页）
Review of Politics Pub Date : 2022-09-13 DOI: 10.1017/S0034670522000869
Mathias Thaler
{"title":"S. D. Chrostowska: Utopia in the Age of Survival: Between Myth and Politics. (Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 2021. Pp. 215.)","authors":"Mathias Thaler","doi":"10.1017/S0034670522000869","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S0034670522000869","url":null,"abstract":"liberal value. By the book’s end, tempered liberalism is revealed to be a species of perfectionist liberalism, complete with prescriptions for how society could educate citizens so that they internalize pluralism (201). Sensing trouble, Cherniss denies that his view is perfectionist, claiming that it is “not a comprehensive ideal, but a specifically political ethos” (208). Yet this is belied by his earlier depiction of pluralism. There, pluralism is “a certain relationship to the moral life” (190) and is “connected to existential and epistemological/methodological pluralism,” which denies that there could be “one infallible method of intellectual framework” to make sense of human experience; Cherniss also claims that pluralism rejects the idea that “life can be rendered meaningful by reference to some single ultimate good” (201). Oddly, Liberalism in Dark Times ends where the later Rawls begins. The lingering question is whether there is a viable conception of liberalism that can accommodate the fact that liberal citizens will disagree persistently over fundamentals concerning the structure and content of liberal values. Ultimately, tempered liberalism stands as nothing more than another liberal doctrine that one hopes can join an overlapping consensus on specific institutional arrangements. That said, Cherniss is correct to think that the political project of liberalism would be on firmer ground amid the social turmoil we are currently experiencing if all liberals were committed to the same way of understanding how core liberal values fit together. But that is no response to the liberal predicament. Rather, it is simply another formulation of it.","PeriodicalId":52549,"journal":{"name":"Review of Politics","volume":"85 1","pages":"141 - 144"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-09-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"45700714","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Judgment in the Fourth-Century BCE Athenian Courts as Anti-Tragedy: Demosthenes's On the Crown 公元前4世纪雅典法院的反悲剧判决：德摩斯梯尼的《论王冠》
Review of Politics Pub Date : 2022-09-06 DOI: 10.1017/S0034670522000663
E. Street
{"title":"Judgment in the Fourth-Century BCE Athenian Courts as Anti-Tragedy: Demosthenes's On the Crown","authors":"E. Street","doi":"10.1017/S0034670522000663","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S0034670522000663","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract In 330 BCE, before a jury of 501 Athenian citizens, the statesman Demosthenes delivered what would become his most famous court speech, On the Crown. Commentators have called the speech “tragic” owing to the litigant's unusual appropriation of tropes from Attic tragedy to make his case. I offer an alternative reading of Demosthenes's speech that rests upon an alternative approach to theorizing democratic judgment. I argue that the rhetorical force and political significance of Demosthenes's metaphors, linguistic expressions and ideas depend upon the institutional setting in which they were delivered. This is because within each institutional site, a specific political practice of judgment is taking place that structures the reception of and response to ideas and images. Demosthenes's speech is in fact “anti-tragic” and reflects the democratic practice for which it was created.","PeriodicalId":52549,"journal":{"name":"Review of Politics","volume":"84 1","pages":"497 - 519"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-09-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"47302633","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
David Graeber and David Wengrow: The Dawn of Everything: A New History of Humanity. (New York: Farrar, Straus, Giroux, 2021. Pp. xii, 692.)
Review of Politics Pub Date : 2022-09-06 DOI: 10.1017/s003467052200064x
Fred L. Rush
{"title":"David Graeber and David Wengrow: The Dawn of Everything: A New History of Humanity. (New York: Farrar, Straus, Giroux, 2021. Pp. xii, 692.)","authors":"Fred L. Rush","doi":"10.1017/s003467052200064x","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1017/s003467052200064x","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":52549,"journal":{"name":"Review of Politics","volume":"84 1","pages":"630 - 634"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-09-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"44655499","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
From Laslett to Waldmann: The Case for Reconsidering Strauss on Locke 从拉斯利特到瓦尔德曼：施特劳斯对洛克的再思考
Review of Politics Pub Date : 2022-09-06 DOI: 10.1017/S0034670522000730
Nasser Behnegar, D. Stauffer, Rafael Major, C. Nadon
{"title":"From Laslett to Waldmann: The Case for Reconsidering Strauss on Locke","authors":"Nasser Behnegar, D. Stauffer, Rafael Major, C. Nadon","doi":"10.1017/S0034670522000730","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S0034670522000730","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The denial of Locke's debt to Hobbes has long been characteristic of many scholars of Locke influenced by the Cambridge School. Peter Laslett was the first to argue for this view, and he did so in conscious opposition to Leo Strauss and his interpretation of Locke. The recent discovery by Felix Waldmann of a memoir that confirms Locke's deep interest in Hobbes as well as his prudent concealment of that interest has undermined Laslett's case against Strauss. Waldmann's discovery, moreover, comes in the wake of other historical work, by Jeffrey Collins and others, that has provided further grounds for abandoning the Cambridge view of Locke. These developments have yet to lead to a serious reengagement with Strauss's interpretation of Locke, but they should, because his controversial claim about Locke's debt to Hobbes has been vindicated.","PeriodicalId":52549,"journal":{"name":"Review of Politics","volume":"84 1","pages":"570 - 591"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-09-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"42949562","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Caleb J. Basnett: Adorno, Politics, and the Aesthetic Animal. (Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 2021. Pp. x, 205.) Caleb J. Basnett:《阿多诺、政治与审美动物》(多伦多:多伦多大学出版社，2021。第x页，205页。)
Review of Politics Pub Date : 2022-09-02 DOI: 10.1017/s0034670522000626
Samuel Weber
{"title":"Caleb J. Basnett: Adorno, Politics, and the Aesthetic Animal. (Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 2021. Pp. x, 205.)","authors":"Samuel Weber","doi":"10.1017/s0034670522000626","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1017/s0034670522000626","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":52549,"journal":{"name":"Review of Politics","volume":"84 1","pages":"650 - 653"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"42753231","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Ioanna Tourkochoriti: Freedom of Expression: The Revolutionary Roots of American and French Legal Thought. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2021. Pp. viii, 296.) 《言论自由:美国和法国法律思想的革命根源》。(剑桥:剑桥大学出版社，2021。页8,296)
Review of Politics Pub Date : 2022-09-02 DOI: 10.1017/s0034670522000778
J. Warner
{"title":"Ioanna Tourkochoriti: Freedom of Expression: The Revolutionary Roots of American and French Legal Thought. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2021. Pp. viii, 296.)","authors":"J. Warner","doi":"10.1017/s0034670522000778","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1017/s0034670522000778","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":52549,"journal":{"name":"Review of Politics","volume":"84 1","pages":"645 - 647"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"41781829","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
首页 上一页 下一页 尾页
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整，为了账户安全，请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
相关产品
×
本文献相关产品
联系我们：info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务，方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号：481959085
Book学术官方微信