The Canadian yearbook of international law. Annuaire canadien de droit international最新文献_第3页

Canadian Cases in Public International Law in 2021 2021年加拿大国际公法案例

The Canadian yearbook of international law. Annuaire canadien de droit international Pub Date : 2022-11-01 DOI: 10.1017/cyl.2022.25

Gib van Ert, Dahlia Shuhaibar

引用次数: 0

La détermination de l’objet du différend et la compétence ratione materiae dans le contentieux des mesures conservatoires devant la Cour internationale de Justice 在国际法院关于预防措施的争端中确定争端的主题和属事管辖权

The Canadian yearbook of international law. Annuaire canadien de droit international Pub Date : 2022-10-10 DOI: 10.1017/cyl.2022.21

Amara Kone

{"title":"La détermination de l’objet du différend et la compétence ratione materiae dans le contentieux des mesures conservatoires devant la Cour internationale de Justice","authors":"Amara Kone","doi":"10.1017/cyl.2022.21","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1017/cyl.2022.21","url":null,"abstract":"Résumé Cet article s’efforce de démontrer que la détermination de l’objet du différend par la Cour internationale de Justice (CIJ) est une constante dans l’appréciation de sa compétence ratione materiae dans le contentieux des mesures conservatoires. D’une part, l’objet du différend fonde la compétence ratione materiae de l’organe judiciaire principal de l’Organisation des Nations Unies (ONU), à travers la clause compromissoire contenue dans le traité liant les parties au différend, et d’autre part, cette compétence conditionne la détermination de l’objet du différend. L’influence réciproque des deux notions en fait des notions clefs du contentieux des mesures conservatoires devant la CIJ. Par ailleurs, l’interprétation de son pouvoir d’indication des mesures conservatoires au titre de l’article 41, paragraphe 1, du Statut de la Cour internationale de Justice confère à la cour la possibilité d’en indiquer aux fins de non-aggravation du différend, dont le sens et la portée soulèvent de sérieuses interrogations. Au-delà des questionnements portant sur leur possible “déconnection” de l’objet du différend et de la fonction des mesures conservatoires, les mesures conservatoires indiquées aux fins de non-aggravation du différend participeraient d’une certaine manière des buts et principes de l’ONU et plus précisément du maintien de la paix et de la sécurité internationales.","PeriodicalId":52441,"journal":{"name":"The Canadian yearbook of international law. Annuaire canadien de droit international","volume":"59 1","pages":"133 - 170"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"45448391","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

The Concept of “Marine Living Resources”: Navigating a Grey Zone in the Law of the Sea “海洋生物资源”概念：在海洋法的灰色地带航行

The Canadian yearbook of international law. Annuaire canadien de droit international Pub Date : 2022-10-10 DOI: 10.1017/cyl.2022.14

Vonintsoa Rafaly

引用次数: 0

At Global Affairs Canada in 2021 2021年在加拿大全球事务部任职

The Canadian yearbook of international law. Annuaire canadien de droit international Pub Date : 2022-10-03 DOI: 10.1017/cyl.2022.9

Alan H. Kessel

引用次数: 1

Réflexions épistémologiques sur l’illicéité résultant de l’incompatibilité du droit interne par rapport au droit international 关于国内法与国际法不相容所导致的非法性的认识论思考

The Canadian yearbook of international law. Annuaire canadien de droit international Pub Date : 2022-09-30 DOI: 10.1017/cyl.2022.18

Emmanuel Simo

{"title":"Réflexions épistémologiques sur l’illicéité résultant de l’incompatibilité du droit interne par rapport au droit international","authors":"Emmanuel Simo","doi":"10.1017/cyl.2022.18","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1017/cyl.2022.18","url":null,"abstract":"Résumé La schématisation de l’obligation juridique sous la forme d’une obligation de comportement ou de résultat poursuit un objectif cognitif tendant à en déterminer l’objet et l’exécution. Toutefois, en droit international, la démarche informe très souvent une logique de catégorisation. Or, dans les rapports de systèmes, le droit interne n’est pas seulement l’objet de l’obligation internationale, il est dans certains contextes la condition de son exécution. Par ailleurs, du fait de l’insuffisant accommodement de la schématisation à l’ontologie de l’obligation internationale, les doctrines dualiste et civiliste qui inspirent ses cadres de pensée en obèrent la valeur heuristique. Après avoir relevé l’incidence de ce porte-à-faux sur la saisie phénoménologique de l’illicéité, l’auteur suggère d’envisager l’obligation juridique sous la forme d’une proposition hypothétique. Cette démarche permet, en amont, d’identifier la position logique du droit interne dans l’obligation internationale; en aval, de mettre en lumière la part que prend son incompatibilité dans la concrétisation de l’illicéité.","PeriodicalId":52441,"journal":{"name":"The Canadian yearbook of international law. Annuaire canadien de droit international","volume":"59 1","pages":"36 - 79"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"44330822","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

The Delimitation of Outer Continental Shelf Areas: A Critical Analysis of Courts’ and Tribunals’ Heterogeneous Approaches 外大陆架区域的划定:对法院和法庭异质方法的批判性分析

The Canadian yearbook of international law. Annuaire canadien de droit international Pub Date : 2022-08-30 DOI: 10.1017/cyl.2022.15

Bjørn Kunoy

{"title":"The Delimitation of Outer Continental Shelf Areas: A Critical Analysis of Courts’ and Tribunals’ Heterogeneous Approaches","authors":"Bjørn Kunoy","doi":"10.1017/cyl.2022.15","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1017/cyl.2022.15","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract A number of maritime delimitation disputes, the resolution of which has been referred to international courts or tribunals, include overlapping outer continental shelf claims without relevant recommendations from the Commission on the Limits of the Continental Shelf (CLCS) in support of the claimed entitlements. The case law of courts and tribunals regarding the exercise of jurisdiction over such disputes has developed and appears now somewhat crystallized in a common understanding. Yet numerous uncertainties remain, which have arisen from the non-homogeneous approaches that underlie the decisions of courts and tribunals to exercise jurisdiction in the absence of recommendations from the CLCS. While courts and tribunals share the view that delimitation necessarily requires a prior determination of entitlement, differences appear in defining the threshold for ascertaining such a determination. In any event, treating submissions to delimit such claimed overlaps as admissible in the absence of recommendations from the CLCS may entail significant risks. Where a plea is considered admissible, a court or tribunal will not have unfettered discretion as to whether to exercise jurisdiction. This may result in unfortunate situations as it cannot be assumed that the CLCS will accept coastal states’ proposed outer limits of the continental shelf.","PeriodicalId":52441,"journal":{"name":"The Canadian yearbook of international law. Annuaire canadien de droit international","volume":"59 1","pages":"200 - 232"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-08-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"47987139","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

The First Challenge to Canada’s Supply Management System under CUSMA: Tweaking the Supply Management System One Dispute at a Time CUSMA下对加拿大供应管理系统的第一个挑战:一次调整一个争议的供应管理系统

The Canadian yearbook of international law. Annuaire canadien de droit international Pub Date : 2022-08-25 DOI: 10.1017/cyl.2022.16

L. Biukovic

引用次数: 0

State Responsibility for International Bail Jumping 国家对国际保释潜逃的责任

The Canadian yearbook of international law. Annuaire canadien de droit international Pub Date : 2022-07-22 DOI: 10.1017/cyl.2022.12

R. Currie, E. Matheson

引用次数: 0

Climate Change and International Legal Personality: “Climate Deterritorialized Nations” as Emerging Subjects of International Law? 气候变化与国际法律人格:“气候非属地化国家”作为新兴的国际法主体?

The Canadian yearbook of international law. Annuaire canadien de droit international Pub Date : 2022-07-22 DOI: 10.1017/cyl.2022.8

Davorin Lapaš

引用次数: 0

The Changing “Landscape” of Sovereignty Viewed through the Lens of International Tax: Reterritorializing the Offshore 从国际税收视角看主权“版图”的变化：离岸重新属地化

The Canadian yearbook of international law. Annuaire canadien de droit international Pub Date : 2022-07-21 DOI: 10.1017/cyl.2022.13

G. Lythgoe

{"title":"The Changing “Landscape” of Sovereignty Viewed through the Lens of International Tax: Reterritorializing the Offshore","authors":"G. Lythgoe","doi":"10.1017/cyl.2022.13","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1017/cyl.2022.13","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This article reviews the “gaps” that allow for the creation of the “offshore” in international law and argues that these are instead constituted by constraints on our spatial imaginary of law than by any “real” gaps between state jurisdictions. The modern practices of sovereignty by states and non-state actors are at odds with the implicit geography of international law that assumes a static and fixed concept of territory. By rethinking the relevant legal spaces of international law and the sovereign practices that constitute the supposedly deterritorialized offshore, we can see that the offshore is actually onshore somewhere; we can reterritorialize the supposed deterritorialized competences. This article identifies a desynchronization between state territories and the actual exercise of sovereignty that presents as pseudo deterritorialization. Yet if both the concept of sovereignty and the implicit geography of international law confirm and reinforce one another in international law discourse, international lawyers are blind to the changing “landscape” of sovereignty in international law.","PeriodicalId":52441,"journal":{"name":"The Canadian yearbook of international law. Annuaire canadien de droit international","volume":"59 1","pages":"171 - 199"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-07-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"43636788","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 1