发布求助
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献

Phronesis最新文献

筛选
英文 中文
Bryson of Heraclea and Polyxenus, Megarian Philosophers 赫拉克勒斯的布莱森和波吕克塞努斯，美加尼哲学家
Phronesis Pub Date : 2024-06-07 DOI: 10.1163/15685284-bja10092
Santiago Chame
{"title":"Bryson of Heraclea and Polyxenus, Megarian Philosophers","authors":"Santiago Chame","doi":"10.1163/15685284-bja10092","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1163/15685284-bja10092","url":null,"abstract":"\u0000Bryson of Heraclea and Polyxenus have received little attention from scholars. Sources on these philosophers are few and difficult to interpret. However, they present interesting dialectical arguments that concern some of Plato’s and Aristotle’s most important theoretical elaborations: Bryson’s arguments on the issue of semantic ambiguity were explicitly discussed by Aristotle, and Polyxenus is credited with a particular version of the Third Man argument. My purpose in this paper is to reconstruct the historical background of these two philosophers and to analyze the philosophical implications of the arguments that the ancient tradition ascribes to them.","PeriodicalId":518820,"journal":{"name":"Phronesis","volume":" 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-06-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141375037","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
A Linguistic Muddle. Sextus’ Arguments against Universals at PH 2.227–8 语言学的混乱。塞克斯图斯反对普遍性的论证（PH 2.227-8
Phronesis Pub Date : 2024-05-22 DOI: 10.1163/15685284-bja10090
Michele Pecorari
{"title":"A Linguistic Muddle. Sextus’ Arguments against Universals at PH 2.227–8","authors":"Michele Pecorari","doi":"10.1163/15685284-bja10090","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1163/15685284-bja10090","url":null,"abstract":"\u0000At Outlines of Pyrrhonism (PH) 2.227–8, Sextus Empiricus argues that certain entities which his adversaries hold to be one and the same for different individuals are in fact not. This he does by, among other things, considering the truth-value of sentences of which the subject is a common noun, thereby drawing an interesting connection between metaphysics and semantics. In this article, I provide a careful analysis of Sextus’ arguments at PH 2.227–8 and explore the origins and limits of such a connection. In particular, I argue that Sextus’ argument at PH 2.227 probably reflects a Stoic argument against Aristotelian essences, thereby relying on specifically Stoic doctrines about universals and common nouns, whereas his next argument at PH 2.228 targets accidents. If this is true, it follows that the overall structure of PH 2.227–8 fits well with the typically Aristotelian distinction between essence and accident.","PeriodicalId":518820,"journal":{"name":"Phronesis","volume":"47 12","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-05-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141109362","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Aristotle on Softness and Endurance: Nicomachean Ethics 7.7, 1150a9–b19 亚里士多德论柔软与忍耐：尼各马可伦理学》7.7，1150a9-b19
Phronesis Pub Date : 2024-01-23 DOI: 10.1163/15685284-bja10082
Patricia Marechal
{"title":"Aristotle on Softness and Endurance: Nicomachean Ethics 7.7, 1150a9–b19","authors":"Patricia Marechal","doi":"10.1163/15685284-bja10082","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1163/15685284-bja10082","url":null,"abstract":"\u0000In Nicomachean Ethics 7.7 (= Eudemian Ethics 6.7), Aristotle distinguishes softness (malakia) from lack of self-control (akrasia) and endurance (karteria) from self-control (enkrateia). This paper argues that unqualified softness consists of a disposition to give up acting to avoid the painful toil (ponos) required to execute practical resolutions, and (coincidentally) to enjoy the pleasures of rest and relaxation. The enduring person, in contrast, persists in her commitments despite the painful effort required to enact them. Along the way, I argue that this interpretation qualifies our understanding of the pleasures and pains with which temperance and intemperance are concerned.","PeriodicalId":518820,"journal":{"name":"Phronesis","volume":"8 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-01-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140530798","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Socratic Heterodoxy? Ontological Commitment in the Hippias Major 苏格拉底式的异端邪说？希庇阿斯大书》中的本体论承诺
Phronesis Pub Date : 2024-01-23 DOI: 10.1163/15685284-bja10080
Sean Driscoll
{"title":"Socratic Heterodoxy? Ontological Commitment in the Hippias Major","authors":"Sean Driscoll","doi":"10.1163/15685284-bja10080","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1163/15685284-bja10080","url":null,"abstract":"\u0000The question of ontological commitment in Plato’s Hippias Major has been important in disputes over the dialogue’s place in the corpus, its meaning, and its authenticity. But this question seems to have been settled—the Hippias Major is not committed to the ‘forms.’ Such an ontological conclusion has been vigorously defended, but its defenses rest on a problematic meta-ontological framework. This paper suggests a more adequate framework and brings more evidence to the evaluation of the question of ontological commitment in the Hippias Major. It concludes that the dialogue is indeed committed to some kind of form.","PeriodicalId":518820,"journal":{"name":"Phronesis","volume":"28 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-01-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140530619","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整，为了账户安全，请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
相关产品
×
本文献相关产品
联系我们：info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务，方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号：481959085
Book学术官方微信