Learned Publishing最新文献_第3页

Disability inclusion in the workplace: A conversation on equity for disabled employees within the university publishing sphere 工作场所的残疾包容：关于大学出版领域残疾员工平等的对话

IF 2.2 3区管理学

Learned Publishing Pub Date : 2024-11-26 DOI: 10.1002/leap.1642

Simon Holt, Erin Osborne-Martin, Stacy Scott

引用次数: 0

On building community in scholarly publishing: Modern ambitions and actions inspired by ancient wisdoms 关于在学术出版领域建立社区：受古代智慧启发的现代抱负和行动

IF 2.2 3区管理学

Learned Publishing Pub Date : 2024-11-22 DOI: 10.1002/leap.1643

Christie Henry

引用次数: 0

Three sustainability case studies in the scholarly publishing ecosystem 学术出版生态系统中的三个可持续性案例研究

IF 2.2 3区管理学

Learned Publishing Pub Date : 2024-11-22 DOI: 10.1002/leap.1644

Oliver Gadsby, Zoe Cokeliss Barsley, Catherine Hodgson, Scott Davidson

引用次数: 0

Collaborating for growth: Insights from Publisherspeak UK 2024, a scholarly publishing community gathering – part 1 合作促进增长：来自学术出版社区聚会Publisherspeak UK 2024的见解-第1部分

IF 2.2 3区管理学

Learned Publishing Pub Date : 2024-11-22 DOI: 10.1002/leap.1632

Ravi Venkataramani, Sowmya Mahadevan, Arun Ramkumar, Jason De Boer, Janani Krishnan, Louise Russell, Sophia Anderton, Caroline Burley, Emily Cockburn, Joe Kelly

引用次数: 0

Collaborating for growth: Insights from Publisherspeak UK 2024, a scholarly publishing community gathering – part 2 合作促进发展：学术出版界聚会 Publisherspeak UK 2024 的启示 - 第 2 部分

IF 2.2 3区管理学

Learned Publishing Pub Date : 2024-11-22 DOI: 10.1002/leap.1633

Ravi Venkataramani, Sowmya Mahadevan, Arun Ramkumar, Jason De Boer, Janani Krishnan, Louise Russell, Sophia Anderton, Caroline Burley, Emily Cockburn, Joe Kelly

引用次数: 0

From being disrupted to being a disruptor: How university presses are helping to drive positive change 从被颠覆到成为颠覆者：大学出版社如何帮助推动积极变革

IF 2.2 3区管理学

Learned Publishing Pub Date : 2024-11-14 DOI: 10.1002/leap.1641

Mandy Hill

引用次数: 0

AI and language change: The case of the hallucinating spellchecker 人工智能和语言变化：以产生幻觉的拼写检查器为例

IF 2.2 3区管理学

Learned Publishing Pub Date : 2024-11-11 DOI: 10.1002/leap.1639

Keith Abbott

引用次数: 0

Special issues: The roles of special issues in scholarly communication in a changing publishing landscape 特刊：在不断变化的出版环境中，特刊在学术交流中的作用

IF 2.2 3区管理学

Learned Publishing Pub Date : 2024-11-08 DOI: 10.1002/leap.1635

Robyn M. Gleasner, Akshay Sood

引用次数: 0

Adoption and use of author identifier services: A French national survey 作者标识服务的采用和使用：一项法国全国性调查

IF 2.2 3区管理学

Learned Publishing Pub Date : 2024-11-07 DOI: 10.1002/leap.1640

Christophe Boudry, Aline Bouchard

{"title":"Adoption and use of author identifier services: A French national survey","authors":"Christophe Boudry, Aline Bouchard","doi":"10.1002/leap.1640","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/leap.1640","url":null,"abstract":"<p>This paper studies awareness and use of author identifier services (AIDs) in the French academic community and explores needs and forms of support required for these tools, using a national questionnaire survey. ArXivID, IdHAL, ORCID, ResearcherID and Scopus Author ID were investigated. A total of 6125 people completed the questionnaire in full. The results of this survey show that discipline and age play an important role in French researchers' familiarity with AIDs. IdHAL and ORCID were by far the two best known AIDs, probably because they have been promoted by institutions in France for several years. French researchers use AIDs mainly to respond to external requests (e.g., to submit an article or a research project), while, surprisingly, few use them to ‘facilitate their work’. When French researchers were asked about their needs and the form of support required for AIDs, more than 30% of them said they either required an introduction to or practical training in these tools. The results of this national survey should help stakeholders to adapt their policies and to guide and support researchers more efficiently in the use of these tools.</p>","PeriodicalId":51636,"journal":{"name":"Learned Publishing","volume":"38 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2024-11-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/leap.1640","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142860455","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Fundamental problems in the peer-review process and stakeholders' perceptions of potential suggestions for improvement 同行评审过程中的基本问题和利益相关者对潜在改进建议的看法

IF 2.2 3区管理学

Learned Publishing Pub Date : 2024-10-29 DOI: 10.1002/leap.1637

Cigdem Kadaifci, Erkan Isikli, Y. Ilker Topcu

{"title":"Fundamental problems in the peer-review process and stakeholders' perceptions of potential suggestions for improvement","authors":"Cigdem Kadaifci, Erkan Isikli, Y. Ilker Topcu","doi":"10.1002/leap.1637","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/leap.1637","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Academic papers are essential for researchers to communicate their work to their peers and industry experts. Quality research is published in prestigious scientific journals, and is considered as part of the hiring and promotion criteria at leading universities. Scientific journals conduct impartial and anonymous peer reviews of submitted manuscripts; however, individuals involved in this process may encounter issues related to the duration, impartiality, and transparency of these reviews. To explore these concerns, we created a questionnaire based on a comprehensive review of related literature and expert opinions, which was distributed to all stakeholders (authors, reviewers, and editors) who participated in the peer-review process from a variety of countries and disciplines. Their opinions on the primary issues during the process and suggestions for improvement were collected. The data were then analysed based on various groups, such as gender, country of residence, and contribution type, using appropriate multivariate statistical techniques to determine the perceptions and experiences of participants in the peer-review process. The results showed that unethical behaviour was not uncommon and that editors and experienced reviewers encountered it more frequently. Women and academics from Türkiye were more likely to experience ethical violations and perceived them as more ethically severe. Incentives and stakeholder involvement were seen as ways to enhance the quality and impartiality of peer review. The scale developed can serve as a useful tool for addressing difficulties in the peer-review process and improving its effectiveness and performance.</p>","PeriodicalId":51636,"journal":{"name":"Learned Publishing","volume":"38 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2024-10-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/leap.1637","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142869107","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0