Law Enforcement Review最新文献

{"title":"Intellectual property rights in international and Russian investment law","authors":"V. N. Lisitsa","doi":"10.52468/2542-1514.2024.8(1).140-147","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.52468/2542-1514.2024.8(1).140-147","url":null,"abstract":"The investment activity is diverse and can be carried out with the use of intellectual property rights in accordance with the current international and Russian investment law. The article aims to identify the specifics of the application of intellectual property rights as investments and the implementation of intellectual investments, i.e. investments endowed into intellectual property rights. The objectives of the study are to consider the categories of an investment and object of investment activity, intellectual property, exclusive and other intellectual rights, as well as to analyze and determine the features of legal regulation of the activity in question at the international and national levels in the Russian Federation. Based on the results of the systematic analysis with the use of formal legal, comparative and other research methods, it is concluded that investments as a property in a broad sense may include both exclusive and other non-personal intellectual property rights to the results of intellectual activity and equated means of individualization of goods, works, services and enterprises. At the same time, they exclude intellectual property itself as a set of various types of intangible products, moral and other personal non-proprietary intellectual rights by virtue of their inalienable and non-transferable character. It is argued to be the same with respect to the object of investment activity, i.e. the property which the investment is endowed in and is capable to bring income to the investor in the future. Investments into such intellectual property rights can be called as intellectual investments.The legal regulation of investment activity with the use of intellectual property rights has a dual character (in the sense that it is carried out by different investment legislative acts with the similar subject of their regulation) and depends on the type of a particular object used. If intellectual property rights are invested in fixed capital, then they are to be recognized as capital investments and are governed by the Federal Law of February 25,1999 No. 39-FZ “On Investment Activity in the Russian Federation Carried out in the Form of Capital Investments”. If intellectual property rights are used as the object of investment activity, i.e. where investments are endowed in, such intellectual investments are subject to the regulation by the Law of the RSFSR of June 26, 1991 No. 1488-1 “On Investment Activity in the RSFSR”.","PeriodicalId":516290,"journal":{"name":"Law Enforcement Review","volume":" 67","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-03-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140212901","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"To the discussion about legal means of ensuring secret in operational-search activities","authors":"S. P. Senchikhin","doi":"10.52468/2542-1514.2024.8(1).121-130","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.52468/2542-1514.2024.8(1).121-130","url":null,"abstract":"This article examines the demand for additional legal instruments to ensure operational secrecy in law enforcement agencies. It identifies certain inconsistencies and gaps in the current regulatory framework, calling for improvements to consolidate both public and intra-departmental instruments into a unified legal framework. The study aims to confirm the hypothesis that enhancing the legal provisions governing operational secrecy will contribute to the effectiveness of law enforcement operations.The research employs a comprehensive analysis of existing laws, regulations, and practices related to operational activities. It explores the concept of operational secrecy and highlights the need for a coherent understanding of this legal category. Furthermore, it emphasizes the significance of confidentiality in operational activities and the associated challenges of regulating specific methods and techniques, considering their unique and dynamic nature.The findings reveal two key directions for the further development of operational secrecy instruments. Firstly, the article argues that publicly disclosing detailed information regarding the essence, specific instruments, and methods employed in operational activities would be counterproductive and undermine operational effectiveness. However, it also recognizes the necessity of harmonizing the understanding and application of operational secrecy by providing a clear legal definition within the legislation governing operational and investigative activities. Therefore, it proposes amending the relevant provisions of the Law “On Operational and Investigative Activities” to encompass a comprehensive legal framework for operational secrecy.Secondly, the research highlights that information regarding overt operational and investigative measures and their contents may indirectly or directly expose the interests of law enforcement agencies, reveal their tactics for gathering information, and compromise the effectiveness of their efforts to detect, prevent, and deter criminal activities and threats to national security. While administrative liability currently applies to breaches of emerging “operational secrecy”, violations of the “secrecy of investigation” fall under criminal liability, including imprisonment. Moreover, in certain cases, criminal liability exists for breaches of information protection rules even in the civil domain. Consequently, the article suggests exploring the balance between the level of responsibility and the potential damage caused to societal interests when imposing liability for breaches of operational secrecy.To address the identified challenges, one potential solution could be the codification of operational and investigative norms. Such an approach would not only provide a systematic and structured presentation of laws governing operational activities but also facilitate logical and consistent links between the discussed legal framework and related branches of law.In conclusion, t","PeriodicalId":516290,"journal":{"name":"Law Enforcement Review","volume":" 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-03-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140219455","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Compensation for moral harm in violation of the right to disrespect for kinship and family ties","authors":"N. Temnikova, E. Nevzgodina","doi":"10.52468/2542-1514.2024.8(1).92-101","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.52468/2542-1514.2024.8(1).92-101","url":null,"abstract":"The admissibility of a wider application of compensation for moral harm in violation of family rights in the science of family law is assessed ambiguously. The law provides for such an opportunity only in art. 30 of the Family Code for a conscientious spouse when the marriage is declared invalid.It is necessary to take into account the specifics of family relations, as deeply personal, and the fact that art. 8 of the Family Code does not limit the protection of family rights in the ways specified in the legal norms, allowing the use of other methods. At the same time, in accordance with the provisions of art. 4 of the Family Code, the application of civil legislation to family relations is allowed, if it does not contradict the essence of family relations, which leads to refusals in a claim for compensation for moral harm due to the presence of obstacles to relatives from one of the parents in communicating with the child, due to the fact that the provisions of the current civil and family legislation do not provide for the possibility of his penalties.One of the most important reasons for the negative attitude of the courts to the fundamental permissibility of a wider application of the above-mentioned measure of responsibility in violation of family rights is seen in the absence of developed conditions for an offense that would be the basis for the application of compensation for moral harm, given that such conditions, taking into account the specifics of family relations, differ significantly from the usual conditions of civil liability.Goal. Identification of the criteria of private and family life applied by the European Court of Human Rights, as well as the study of the fundamental possibility of filing a claim for compensation for moral harm caused by the refusal of a parent to provide an opportunity to communicate with a child and participate in his upbringing to a separate parent.Methodology. In the course of the research, methods of generalization, description, analysis, synthesis, formal legal method were used.Results. The necessity of expanding the subject of proof in such a dispute with the inclusion of the following circumstances is justified. The presence of objective obstacles to communication, which can be associated with both the child (illness, unwillingness of the child to communicate with the parent), and with the personality of the parent living separately, communication with which can negatively affect the child. It is necessary to take into account the opinion and interests of the child. It is also necessary to take into account the actions of the parent himself, demanding compensation for moral harm, so if he evades the duties of maintaining his child, we assume the possibility of refusing the claim. Making a decision on compensation for moral harm involves taking into account the fault of the causer and his motives, which should not correspond to the interests of the child.","PeriodicalId":516290,"journal":{"name":"Law Enforcement Review","volume":" 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-03-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140214440","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Review for the book: Shokhin S.O., Kudryashova E.V. The legal framework for strategic planning in contemporary Russia, Monograph. Moscow, MGIMO University Publ, 2022. 126 p. ISBN 978-5-9228-2622-8 (print).","authors":"V. V. Grib, A. Cenerelli","doi":"10.52468/2542-1514.2024.8(1).148-151","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.52468/2542-1514.2024.8(1).148-151","url":null,"abstract":"In 2022 the MGIMO University Publishing house has released the monograph authored by Shokhin and E.V. Kudryashova “The Legal Framework for strategic planning in contemporary Russia”. This review represents the book for the international audience. There is also a discussion of the monograph’s key points.","PeriodicalId":516290,"journal":{"name":"Law Enforcement Review","volume":" 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-03-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140217700","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"The dualistic legal nature of the contract for the performance of development work","authors":"Е. V. Белицина","doi":"10.52468/2542-1514.2024.8(1).102-110","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.52468/2542-1514.2024.8(1).102-110","url":null,"abstract":"The research is conducted in order to develop practical recommendations for the further development and improvement of various forms or sources of law, individual legal acts, norms and institutions. The main objective of the article is to highlight the problems of legal regulation in the theory of legal science and in law enforcement practice, the elaboration of legal mechanisms and recommendations for improving current legislation, overcoming legal gaps.The subject of the research is the norms of Russian legislation regulating relations in the field of development work, legal positions reflected in judicial practice. The object of research is public relations related to the legal institution of a contract for the performance of development work. These agreements belong to the group of consensual, retaliatory and mutual, that is, bilaterally binding agreements that are considered concluded from the moment the parties reach all essential conditions.This type of contract has the features characteristic of both contracts for the performance of work and contracts for the provision of services. The practice of using this legal institution shows the dualistic legal nature of contracts of this type and the need to separate it into a separate independent type of contract – a contract of design activities and special legal regulation. Today in Russia, the contract for the implementation of the R&D is considered adjacent to the contract for the performance of work and is regulated by Chapter 38 of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation.The purpose of this article is to study the main features of the contract for the performance of experimental design work, generalization or isolation of its general and specific features, analysis of various points of view on the issue of its legal nature, review of Russian legislation, as well as Russian judicial practice, their positive and negative aspects.Methodology. In order to best solve the task, a systematic approach was used in combination with a logical method. This allowed us to study the theoretical, factual and legal foundations of the phenomenon of the contract for the implementation of R&D. The comparative legal method was also used by comparing single legal concepts and processes, contrasting legal norms and identifying similarities and differences between them, using conclusions by analogy, relying on the similarity of the signs of the facts being studied, which will allow transferring the signs from one phenomenon being studied to another.Main results and scope of application. The article outlines the main features of the contract for the implementation of R&D, different points of view on the definition of the legal nature of this type of contract. The results of the study contribute to the identification of problems of legal regulation in the theory of legal science and in law enforcement practice, the elaboration of legal mechanisms and recommendations for improving current legislation, overcoming leg","PeriodicalId":516290,"journal":{"name":"Law Enforcement Review","volume":" 8","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-03-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140217468","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Countering transnational organized groups using information and communication technologies for the illegal sale of drugs","authors":"S. I. Davidov, M. V. Kondratev, V. Polyakov","doi":"10.52468/2542-1514.2024.8(1).111-120","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.52468/2542-1514.2024.8(1).111-120","url":null,"abstract":"The research subject is the features of forensic and operational-search tools and methods in the fight against illegal sale of drugs and psychotropic substances, carried out by transnational organized groups using information and communication technologies.The research goal is to analyze the current state of illicit drug trafficking, carried out by organized groups using information technologies, and to develop proposals on this basis for effective operational-search and forensic support for the detection, disclosure and investigation of such crimes.The dialectical-materialistic method, general scientific methods of cognition, the content analysis method of scientific literature and empirical sources, the comparative legal method, the method of expert assessments constitute the methodological basis of the present research.During the study, the following scientific findings have been obtained, namely based on the forensic practice analysis, it has been concluded that crime in the drug business has changed significantly over the last decade. It is distinguished by the complex structure of criminal groups, remote covert interaction between its members, the interstate nature of its activities, the rapid replacement of members and structural links of a criminal group, the anonymity of monetary transactions and remote legalization of criminal proceeds. Effective concealment of the crime traces and criminals through the use of information and telecommunication technologies has become its focus. Drug-related crime is rapidly transforming and adapting to changes in the criminal environment, the digital space development, in particular, it is moving into the shadow segment of the Internet (Darknet) through the TOR technology. All this allows us to state that transnational organized criminal drug trafficking activity is becoming high-tech.To counter modern drug-related crime, it is necessary to develop international cooperation, some ways, forms and procedures of which are being proposed by the authors of the paper. The article describes in detail the possibility and feasibility of the interconnected implementation of operational-search and investigative activities, which generates a positive synergistic effect from their combination. The article proposes a set of practical measures to identify and investigate such crimes. In particular, the possibilities of using systems operating on the basis of machine learning, contextual data analysis, honeypot are being disclosed. An addendum to the Federal Law “On Operational-Investigative Activity” has been formulated, concerning the inclusion of the norm on a new operational-search measure “Internet monitoring”. Its content and potential in the practice of combating the investigated crimes have been revealed.This study can fill a number of gaps that have existed in the scientific literature on improving the practice of countering the illegal sale of drugs by transnational organized groups using information and tele","PeriodicalId":516290,"journal":{"name":"Law Enforcement Review","volume":" 40","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-03-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140215793","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Requirements for court rulings in the light of guarantees of the right to a fair trial","authors":"L. Terekhova, A. V. Ryabusova","doi":"10.52468/2542-1514.2024.8(1).73-81","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.52468/2542-1514.2024.8(1).73-81","url":null,"abstract":"The subject of the study. The legislator does not establish a list of requirements that the rulings of the court of first instance must meet. The article analyzes the requirements for the rulings of the court of first instance in civil proceedings, in comparison with the requirements for court decisions based on domestic procedural legislation and scientific literature. The purpose of the article is to confirm that the main requirements for court rulings are legality, validity, motivation, and enforceability.The research methodology includes the formal-logical method, analysis, synthesis, logicallegal method.Main results. An analysis of domestic legislation and scientific literature led to the conclusion that, based on the requirements that court rulings must meet, the legislator has not correctly defined a list of definitions that must be substantiated, motivated and subject to appeal separately from the final judicial act. The category of protocol definitions should be rather exclusive. Such determinations must be made if it is not required to state the motives for the decision and if it does not affect the essence of the final judicial act.Conclusions. Court rulings must meet the above requirements by analogy with court decisions. The issues raised in this article have not only theoretical, but also practical meaning in relation to civil procedural law in the Russian Federation. The practical problem is that at the moment the legislator has not correctly defined the list of definitions that must be substantiated, motivated and subject to appeal separately from the final judicial act. Court rulings in civil proceedings subject to appeal must meet the requirements of legality, validity, motivation, and enforceability. Contrary to this, in practice the opposite situation often occurs. The category of protocol definitions should be rather exclusive. Such determinations must be made if it is not required to state the motives for the decision and if it does not affect the essence of the final judicial act. Otherwise, this will lead to a violation of the fundamental right to a fair trial and a restriction of a person's access to justice.","PeriodicalId":516290,"journal":{"name":"Law Enforcement Review","volume":" 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-03-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140211718","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"The mechanism of exercising the employee's right to conclude an employment contract and the formation of its content","authors":"E. Ofman","doi":"10.52468/2542-1514.2024.8(1).82-91","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.52468/2542-1514.2024.8(1).82-91","url":null,"abstract":"The subject of the research is the problems of developing an adequate, understandable for the employee and the employer mechanism of exercising the right to conclude an employment contract.The purpose of the scientific article is to confirm the hypothesis that the employment contract in modern conditions is not yet an agreement in its traditional sense, that the defect of will and/or expression of will, which the employee insists on challenging the terms of the employment contract, must be proved by himThe methodology of the study includes a systematic approach, formal-legal and logical interpretation, analysis and synthesis.The main scientific results, conclusions on the achievement of the purpose of the study. Conclusion of the employment contract is a complex, multi-motivated, multi-stage process as from the position of the content and the ways and the limits of the right of the employee and the employer. As a weak party of labor legal relations, the employee agrees to the conditions of the employment contract initiated by the employer under the fear of refusal to conclude the said contract. Using the opportunities of the Labor Code of the Russian Federation, employers determine the terms of this contract with minimal risks for themselves, of right, formation of contract content which causes the emergence of numerous lawsuits from employees about the defects of will when entering into labor legal relations, about the illegality of certain terms of the employment contract.The mechanism of concluding a labor contract by its parties, established by the labor legislation, is imperfect, and the process of forming its content is so formal that it does not allow the employee and the employer to reach a real compromise on mandatory and / or additional conditions of the contract. In the article there are proposals aimed at improving the mechanism of exercising by employees and employers of the right to conclude a contract of employment. It seems necessary to amend the Labor Code of the Russian Federation in terms of establishing a special period of appeal of an employee to the court to recognize a particular condition due to a defect of will in the conclusion of the employment contract as illegal (the beginning of the period should be defined as the day of the employment contract, since it is the day on which the employee learned or should have learned about the violation of his right); identified factors that influenced the emergence, evolution of the employee and employer will and deformed it (such factors include Only from the moment the necessary information is provided can the entitled person demand the implementation of the preferences established by labor law.","PeriodicalId":516290,"journal":{"name":"Law Enforcement Review","volume":" 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-03-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140215156","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Waiver to apply the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms in the resolution of disputes in the Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS)","authors":"I. A. Vasilyev","doi":"10.52468/2542-1514.2024.8(1).131-139","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.52468/2542-1514.2024.8(1).131-139","url":null,"abstract":"The subject. Sports legal relations, as having a private legal nature, and assuming “horizontal” inter-subject relations by default, do not imply the extension to them the guarantees provided by international acts in the field of human rights protection in order to protect the individual in “vertical” interaction with public subjects. However, this doctrinal approach is still questioned by sports actors, who make attempts to refute it through the involvement of certain norms of the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (ECHR) (Articles 6 and 8, mostly) as arguments in sports disputes. An additional incentive for this is the location of international and continental sports federations, their jurisdictional bodies and the Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS) in the national legal orders that recognize the application of the mentioned ECHR.The purpose of the study. The prospects of arguments in the resolution of sports disputes based on the requirements of the literal use of the norms of the ECHR are considered in this article.Methodology. Methods of analysis and comparison based on the CAS practice.The main results of research and the field of their application. The use of only certain meanings of part 1 of Article 6 of the ECHR in sports justice is forced to be taken into account by CAS due to the prospect of appealing decisions to the Swiss Federal Tribunal.Conclusions. The norms of the ECHR generally do not apply in sports justice.","PeriodicalId":516290,"journal":{"name":"Law Enforcement Review","volume":" 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-03-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140218603","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Ethical principles for the creation and application of artificial intelligence technologies in healthcare","authors":"A. A. Shutova, I. Begishev","doi":"10.52468/2542-1514.2024.8(1).34-43","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.52468/2542-1514.2024.8(1).34-43","url":null,"abstract":"The subject of the study is the norms of current legislation regulating the creation and application of artificial intelligence technology in healthcare, including acts of technical regulation, as well as available scientific research by domestic and foreign scientists in the field presented. In recent years, foreign experts have conducted a significant amount of research on the development of ethical principles for the use of artificial intelligence in healthcare. However, these works tend to be abstract and do not explain what justifies and justifies their recommendations and how these recommendations should be used in practice. In turn, in the Russian Federation at the moment there is a small number of domestic studies devoted to a comprehensive study of ethical principles that should guide subjects engaged in the creation and use of medical devices based on artificial intelligence technologies, which confirms the relevance and significance of our research.Objective: to develop a system of ethical principles for the creation and application of artificial intelligence technologies in the field of healthcare, which will serve as the basis for the legal regulation of public relations in the presented area.Methods: the methodological basis of the system of ethical principles for the creation and application of artificial intelligence technologies was made up of general scientific and private scientific methods of scientific cognition, including analysis, synthesis, deduction, induction, classification, analogy and comparison.Results: to the attention of lawyers, scientists and practitioners, medical professionals, members of clinical ethics committees, medical ethics specialists, representatives of law– making bodies, government departments, the business community and public organizations, patients, as well as a wide range of readers interested in the digital transformation of the healthcare system, ethical principles for the creation and application of artificial health technologies are proposed intelligence in healthcare, which can serve as the basis for the formation of an appropriate system of legal regulation. The stated goal has been achieved, which is confirmed by the development of a system of ethical principles that serve as the basis for the development of a system of legal regulation of artificial intelligence technologies in healthcare. The developed ethical principles can be used to further improve domestic legislation, and also lay the foundation for further research.","PeriodicalId":516290,"journal":{"name":"Law Enforcement Review","volume":"230 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-03-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140222559","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}