{"title":"Book review symposium: Introduction","authors":"Chien-Chih Lin","doi":"10.1093/icon/moad037","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/icon/moad037","url":null,"abstract":"Journal Article Book review symposium: Introduction Get access Chien-Chih Lin Chien-Chih Lin I•CON Book Review Editor wrath0421@gmail.com https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2427-7445 Search for other works by this author on: Oxford Academic Google Scholar International Journal of Constitutional Law, Volume 21, Issue 2, April 2023, Page 690, https://doi.org/10.1093/icon/moad037 Published: 14 June 2023","PeriodicalId":51599,"journal":{"name":"Icon-International Journal of Constitutional Law","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"135673419","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"The path towards sovereign territory: Reading China’s (anti)federal idea against its modern territorial constitutional imaginary","authors":"Ming-Sung Kuo","doi":"10.1093/icon/moad047","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/icon/moad047","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This article aims to shed light on how China has (re)imagined the geographical distribution of authority on its path towards modern statehood by unpacking the debate surrounding the constitutional status of Hong Kong in China’s territorial constitution. Challenging the conventional wisdom that China is constitutionally impervious to the federal idea, it makes a threefold argument. First, elements of federalism do exist in China, as intimated in its territorial constitution regarding Hong Kong, but have become nearly invisible as the relationship between mainland China and Hong Kong is traveling in the opposite direction. Second, the opposite development is attributable to the antifederal idea embedded in China’s modern constitutional imaginary, which has been shaped by its multifaceted experience with federalism in history. Under the antifederal idea, intimations of federalism in China’s territorial constitution are far from the bridge to a full-fledged Chinese federation, but only meant to be instrumental and transitional. Third, the antifederal idea reflects China’s modern territorial constitutional imaginary under which variegated imperial frontiers are reimagined as homogenized state territory. In conclusion, China’s encounter with Western legal concepts is formative of the Chinese modern constitutional imaginary and thus further influences its attitude towards federalism in framing the territorial constitution.","PeriodicalId":51599,"journal":{"name":"Icon-International Journal of Constitutional Law","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"135673732","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Citation dice are loaded","authors":"Urška Šadl","doi":"10.1093/icon/moad036","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/icon/moad036","url":null,"abstract":"Dear Editors, The article by Rosalind Dixon and Mila Versteeg in this issue (21:2), titled “Unsexing Citations: Closing the Gender Gap in Global Public Law,” asks whether citation patterns in I•CON reflect the gender composition of the ICON•S community, the scholars publishing in I•CON, or those reading I•CON. Differently put, do cross citations reveal a gender bias in the academia? The authors convincingly demonstrate that—as Leonard Cohen puts it—the dice are loaded. The article is sobering in showing how prima facie unbiased (gender-neutral) practices and routines perpetuate (gender) bias. It is provocative, in part attributing this fact to subtle advantages of informal, male-dominated networks. Finally, it is visceral in highlighting the academic merit-independent drivers of academic success. I applaud I•CON for sticking its neck out for the cause. Supposing that debate can encourage a healthier (more equal) academic life(style), let me contrast the conclusions of “Unsexing Citations” with the conclusions of an article by David Card et al., “Are Referees and Editors in Economics Gender Neutral?” published in 2020 in the Quarterly Journal of Economics (vol. 135, at 269).","PeriodicalId":51599,"journal":{"name":"Icon-International Journal of Constitutional Law","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"135672129","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"State-centric proportionality analysis in Chinese administrative litigation","authors":"Shiling Xiao","doi":"10.1093/icon/moad051","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/icon/moad051","url":null,"abstract":"\u0000 This article examines the application of proportionality in Chinese administrative litigation over the last two decades and argues that courts in administrative litigation that serve the party-state and tend to uphold state/collective interest have altered proportionality to be state-centric. It finds that the courts invoked proportionality in a negligible portion of all administrative litigation judgments and had inadequate emphases on protecting individual rights. Proportionality has not appreciably assisted the courts in enhancing their oversight of governmental power and protection of individual rights. This article suggests that this is attributable to the restricted function of administrative litigation in China’s party-state governance structure and owing to the country’s long-held belief that public interest takes precedence over individual rights. Administrative litigation, which China’s ruling party employs to resolve principal–agent issues, is seriously constrained. The courts are expected to review the formal legality of executive actions, but not their substance. Informed by the Chinese human rights belief, which favors collectivism over individualism, the courts are skewed toward public interest in the balancing analysis when applying proportionality.","PeriodicalId":51599,"journal":{"name":"Icon-International Journal of Constitutional Law","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0,"publicationDate":"2023-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"47890681","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Achieving holistic feminisation: A review of <i>Women and the Judiciary in the Asia-Pacific</i>","authors":"Susan Glazebrook","doi":"10.1093/icon/moad038","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/icon/moad038","url":null,"abstract":"Women and the Judiciary in the Asia-Pacific is an important contribution to the study of women judges around the world, in particular because it covers jurisdictions that have not yet been widely examined: India, Indonesia, Malaysia, Nepal, several Pacific Island nations, Sri Lanka, Thailand, and the Philippines. Each of the chapters covers the history of the appointment of women judges in the particular jurisdiction, as well as discussing current numbers of women judges and remaining barriers to appointment and promotion, including biases (at 278–82), gender stereotypes (at 42), family responsibilities (at 136–40), and flawed processes (including through nepotism and corruption) (at 252). Much of the discussion covers ground familiar from other studies.1 But the chapters remain rooted in the history and traditions of their particular jurisdictions, which will allow the pursuit of tailored solutions. One of the main themes of the book is that it is not sufficient just to appoint more women to the bench (“thin feminisation”) (at 4–9). What is needed are justice systems that are more broadly influenced by the perspectives of women (“thick feminisation”) (at 4–13). This means that what is required is the appointment of women judges who embody a “feminist consciousness” (at 10). It is not automatically the case that women judges will make feminist decisions (at 86–8).","PeriodicalId":51599,"journal":{"name":"Icon-International Journal of Constitutional Law","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"135573802","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Constitutional framings of the right to abortion: A global view","authors":"A. Śledzińska-Simon","doi":"10.1093/icon/moad029","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/icon/moad029","url":null,"abstract":"\u0000 At the present time, no national constitution expressly guarantees access to abortion as a human right. Yet, despite the absence of explicit constitutional provisions, a growing body of case law from countries’ highest courts recognizes abortion as a fundamental, natural right. Judicial interpretations of the right to abortion are evolving, with courts considering it a derivative of the constitutional guarantees of liberty, equality, dignity, or, more recently, the protection of health. Conversely, some courts, notably in the United States and Poland, have ruled out the possibility of such a right having constitutional status. This Reflection outlines current constitutional approaches to the right to abortion. It highlights an important paradigm shift in constitutional law toward framing abortion as part of the right to reproductive health, as already affirmed in international human rights law. Reproductive rights are now defined in relation to the state’s obligation, on the one hand, not to interfere with reproductive choices and, on the other hand, to provide women and girls with conditions ensuring freedom of choice, but also to determine the limits of their choices.","PeriodicalId":51599,"journal":{"name":"Icon-International Journal of Constitutional Law","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0,"publicationDate":"2023-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"41281660","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Trans parents and the gendered law: Critical reflections on the Swedish regulation","authors":"Daniela Alaattinoğlu, A. Margaria","doi":"10.1093/icon/moad056","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/icon/moad056","url":null,"abstract":"\u0000 Sweden has attracted international attention for its 2018 legislative provisions which recognize trans parenthood in line with legal gender. This legislation provides that a trans man who gives birth is registered as his child’s father in Sweden, unlike in most countries of the world. This article offers an original engagement with the genesis, peculiarities, and future of the revised Swedish Children and Parents Code, and the criticism it attracts, as an illustrative example of the inherent challenges present in regulating trans parenthood in a gendered, cis- and hetero-normative legal system. The critical analysis of the Swedish provisions investigates two alternative legal models for regulating trans parenthood from a comparative perspective: degendering legal parenthood and misalignment of legal gender and parental status. Looking towards the future, the article normatively embraces a substantive conceptualization of degendering legal parenthood, rather than merely a nominal one, highlighting the need to rethink and redistribute childcare.","PeriodicalId":51599,"journal":{"name":"Icon-International Journal of Constitutional Law","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0,"publicationDate":"2023-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"47793135","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Introducción: Los entes autónomos en el derecho constitucional latinoamericano","authors":"L. García-Huidobro, Sebastián Guidi","doi":"10.1093/icon/moad016","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/icon/moad016","url":null,"abstract":"\u0000 This introduction provides an overview of the concept and role of independent authorities in comparative public law, with a particular emphasis on Latin America. First, we outline an idea of these institutions and examine how they have assumed critical responsibilities traditionally allocated to one of the three branches of government. We also explore their role in protecting constitutional democracy and discuss some problems associated with their democratic legitimacy. Second, we outline these entities’ situation in Latin America, stressing how little academic attention they have received in contrast with their growing importance. Finally, we provide a critical review of each of the contributions to the symposium.","PeriodicalId":51599,"journal":{"name":"Icon-International Journal of Constitutional Law","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0,"publicationDate":"2023-03-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"43624752","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Editorial: In this issue; Guest Editorial: Islands and ocean: Public law and international legal ordering in Oceania; Ten good reads","authors":"","doi":"10.1093/icon/moad010","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/icon/moad010","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":51599,"journal":{"name":"Icon-International Journal of Constitutional Law","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0,"publicationDate":"2023-03-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"46118978","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Brandon Camilo Archila Jaimes, Review of Richard Albert, Reforma y desmembramiento constitucional","authors":"Brandon Camilo Archila Jaimes","doi":"10.1093/icon/moac100","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/icon/moac100","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":51599,"journal":{"name":"Icon-International Journal of Constitutional Law","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0,"publicationDate":"2023-03-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"49364206","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}