走向主权领土之路:从中国现代领土宪法想象中解读中国的(反)联邦思想

IF 16.4 1区 化学 Q1 CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Ming-Sung Kuo
{"title":"走向主权领土之路:从中国现代领土宪法想象中解读中国的(反)联邦思想","authors":"Ming-Sung Kuo","doi":"10.1093/icon/moad047","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This article aims to shed light on how China has (re)imagined the geographical distribution of authority on its path towards modern statehood by unpacking the debate surrounding the constitutional status of Hong Kong in China’s territorial constitution. Challenging the conventional wisdom that China is constitutionally impervious to the federal idea, it makes a threefold argument. First, elements of federalism do exist in China, as intimated in its territorial constitution regarding Hong Kong, but have become nearly invisible as the relationship between mainland China and Hong Kong is traveling in the opposite direction. Second, the opposite development is attributable to the antifederal idea embedded in China’s modern constitutional imaginary, which has been shaped by its multifaceted experience with federalism in history. Under the antifederal idea, intimations of federalism in China’s territorial constitution are far from the bridge to a full-fledged Chinese federation, but only meant to be instrumental and transitional. Third, the antifederal idea reflects China’s modern territorial constitutional imaginary under which variegated imperial frontiers are reimagined as homogenized state territory. In conclusion, China’s encounter with Western legal concepts is formative of the Chinese modern constitutional imaginary and thus further influences its attitude towards federalism in framing the territorial constitution.","PeriodicalId":1,"journal":{"name":"Accounts of Chemical Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":16.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The path towards sovereign territory: Reading China’s (anti)federal idea against its modern territorial constitutional imaginary\",\"authors\":\"Ming-Sung Kuo\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/icon/moad047\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract This article aims to shed light on how China has (re)imagined the geographical distribution of authority on its path towards modern statehood by unpacking the debate surrounding the constitutional status of Hong Kong in China’s territorial constitution. Challenging the conventional wisdom that China is constitutionally impervious to the federal idea, it makes a threefold argument. First, elements of federalism do exist in China, as intimated in its territorial constitution regarding Hong Kong, but have become nearly invisible as the relationship between mainland China and Hong Kong is traveling in the opposite direction. Second, the opposite development is attributable to the antifederal idea embedded in China’s modern constitutional imaginary, which has been shaped by its multifaceted experience with federalism in history. Under the antifederal idea, intimations of federalism in China’s territorial constitution are far from the bridge to a full-fledged Chinese federation, but only meant to be instrumental and transitional. Third, the antifederal idea reflects China’s modern territorial constitutional imaginary under which variegated imperial frontiers are reimagined as homogenized state territory. In conclusion, China’s encounter with Western legal concepts is formative of the Chinese modern constitutional imaginary and thus further influences its attitude towards federalism in framing the territorial constitution.\",\"PeriodicalId\":1,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Accounts of Chemical Research\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":16.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Accounts of Chemical Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/icon/moad047\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"化学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Accounts of Chemical Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/icon/moad047","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文旨在通过解析围绕香港在中国领土宪法中的宪法地位的辩论,揭示中国在走向现代国家的道路上如何(重新)想象权力的地理分布。它挑战了传统观念,即中国在宪法上不受联邦制理念的影响,并提出了三个论点。首先,联邦制的元素在中国确实存在,正如其领土宪法中对香港的暗示,但随着中国大陆和香港之间的关系朝着相反的方向发展,联邦制的元素已经变得几乎看不见了。其次,相反的发展可归因于中国现代宪法想象中嵌入的反联邦思想,这是由其历史上多方面的联邦制经验形成的。在反联邦制的思想下,中国领土宪法中的联邦制暗示远不是通往成熟的中国联邦的桥梁,而只是工具性和过渡性的。第三,反联邦思想反映了中国现代领土宪法的想象,在这种想象下,各种各样的帝国边界被重新想象为同质化的国家领土。总之,中国与西方法律概念的相遇形成了中国现代宪法想象,从而进一步影响了中国在制定领土宪法时对联邦制的态度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The path towards sovereign territory: Reading China’s (anti)federal idea against its modern territorial constitutional imaginary
Abstract This article aims to shed light on how China has (re)imagined the geographical distribution of authority on its path towards modern statehood by unpacking the debate surrounding the constitutional status of Hong Kong in China’s territorial constitution. Challenging the conventional wisdom that China is constitutionally impervious to the federal idea, it makes a threefold argument. First, elements of federalism do exist in China, as intimated in its territorial constitution regarding Hong Kong, but have become nearly invisible as the relationship between mainland China and Hong Kong is traveling in the opposite direction. Second, the opposite development is attributable to the antifederal idea embedded in China’s modern constitutional imaginary, which has been shaped by its multifaceted experience with federalism in history. Under the antifederal idea, intimations of federalism in China’s territorial constitution are far from the bridge to a full-fledged Chinese federation, but only meant to be instrumental and transitional. Third, the antifederal idea reflects China’s modern territorial constitutional imaginary under which variegated imperial frontiers are reimagined as homogenized state territory. In conclusion, China’s encounter with Western legal concepts is formative of the Chinese modern constitutional imaginary and thus further influences its attitude towards federalism in framing the territorial constitution.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Accounts of Chemical Research
Accounts of Chemical Research 化学-化学综合
CiteScore
31.40
自引率
1.10%
发文量
312
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Accounts of Chemical Research presents short, concise and critical articles offering easy-to-read overviews of basic research and applications in all areas of chemistry and biochemistry. These short reviews focus on research from the author’s own laboratory and are designed to teach the reader about a research project. In addition, Accounts of Chemical Research publishes commentaries that give an informed opinion on a current research problem. Special Issues online are devoted to a single topic of unusual activity and significance. Accounts of Chemical Research replaces the traditional article abstract with an article "Conspectus." These entries synopsize the research affording the reader a closer look at the content and significance of an article. Through this provision of a more detailed description of the article contents, the Conspectus enhances the article's discoverability by search engines and the exposure for the research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信