发布求助
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献

California Law Review最新文献

筛选
英文 中文
The United Nations Mechanism on Syria: Will the Syrian Crimes Evidence be Admissible in European Courts? 联合国叙利亚问题机制:欧洲法院是否会接纳叙利亚犯罪证据?
IF 2.4 2区 社会学
California Law Review Pub Date : 2019-01-01 DOI: 10.15779/Z38Z31NP4G
Natalia Krapiva
{"title":"The United Nations Mechanism on Syria: Will the Syrian Crimes Evidence be Admissible in European Courts?","authors":"Natalia Krapiva","doi":"10.15779/Z38Z31NP4G","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.15779/Z38Z31NP4G","url":null,"abstract":"This Note explores potential admissibility challenges that may arise when European courts use evidence of Syrian crimes collected by the newly-established International, Impartial and Independent Mechanism for Syria (“the IIIM”). The Note examines the evidentiary rules of four European countries—France, Germany, the Netherlands, and Sweden––where Syrian cases are currently being investigated or prosecuted. Specifically, it focuses on evidence that was improperly or illegally obtained, including evidence procured by private actors. This Note also looks at the European Convention on Human Rights (“ECHR”) Article 8 and relevant case law from the European Court of Human Rights concerning illegal searches and seizures. Finally, this Note highlights the importance of avoiding admissibility issues that may arise as a result of the IIIM’s close cooperation with both private groups who gather the evidence on the ground and the European authorities that will ultimately be using such evidence in court.","PeriodicalId":51452,"journal":{"name":"California Law Review","volume":"127 1 1","pages":"1101"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2019-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"67590352","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
Proximate Cause in Statutory Standing and the Genesis of Federal Common Law 成文法中的近因与联邦普通法的起源
IF 2.4 2区 社会学
California Law Review Pub Date : 2019-01-01 DOI: 10.15779/Z380000111
D. Yablon
{"title":"Proximate Cause in Statutory Standing and the Genesis of Federal Common Law","authors":"D. Yablon","doi":"10.15779/Z380000111","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.15779/Z380000111","url":null,"abstract":"The federal courts have long struggled to articulate a set of coherent standards for who may assert rights under a federal statute. Apart from the constitutional limitations of the judicial power under Article III, courts have until recently addressed this question under a series of freestanding “prudential” rules governing standing to sue. The Supreme Court’s 2014 decision in Lexmark International v. Static Control Components marked a sea change, holding that the federal courts may not decline to assert jurisdiction for prudential reasons and that standing to sue under a federal statute depends on whom Congress intended to authorize to sue. But Lexmark raised as many questions as it answered. In the same breath that it declared statutory standing a matter of congressional intent, the Court held that proximate cause— a creature of the common law of tort—generally defines the limits of federal statutory claims. Subsequent decisions applying this rule have extrapolated the Court’s decisional law from narrow and specific settings to provide a new, trans-substantive limitation on standing to assert federal statutory rights.","PeriodicalId":51452,"journal":{"name":"California Law Review","volume":"107 1","pages":"1609"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2019-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"67366926","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The Fallacy of the (Racial) Solidarity Presumption (种族)团结假设的谬误
IF 2.4 2区 社会学
California Law Review Pub Date : 2019-01-01 DOI: 10.15779/Z38707WP36
L. S. Richardson, Cristina Mora, Sabrina McGraw, Caroline Mae McKay, Paul von Autenried, Lexi Heller, Patrick Rubalcava, Devon W. Carbado
{"title":"The Fallacy of the (Racial) Solidarity Presumption","authors":"L. S. Richardson, Cristina Mora, Sabrina McGraw, Caroline Mae McKay, Paul von Autenried, Lexi Heller, Patrick Rubalcava, Devon W. Carbado","doi":"10.15779/Z38707WP36","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.15779/Z38707WP36","url":null,"abstract":"I. The Solidarity Presumption ............................................................ 1994 II. The Fallacy ................................................................................... 1996 A. Racial Anxiety Experienced by Blacks ............................ 1996 1. Conformity Pressure.................................................. 1997 2. Value Threat ............................................................. 2000 3. Lower Performance Ratings for Diversity-Valuing Behavior ................................................................... 2003 B. Racial Anxiety Experienced by Whites............................ 2004 Conclusion ........................................................................................ 2007","PeriodicalId":51452,"journal":{"name":"California Law Review","volume":"107 1","pages":"1993"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2019-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"67415588","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Hidden Renvoi: The Search for Corporate Liability in Alien Tort Statute Litigation 隐性反悔:外国侵权法规诉讼中公司责任的探寻
IF 2.4 2区 社会学
California Law Review Pub Date : 2019-01-01 DOI: 10.15779/Z38WM13T9T
Isaac Ramsey
{"title":"Hidden Renvoi: The Search for Corporate Liability in Alien Tort Statute Litigation","authors":"Isaac Ramsey","doi":"10.15779/Z38WM13T9T","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.15779/Z38WM13T9T","url":null,"abstract":"In its two most recent decisions regarding the Alien Tort Statute (ATS)—Jesner v. Arab Bank and Kiobel v. Royal Dutch Petroleum— the US Supreme Court failed to answer the specific question upon which it granted certiorari: whether the ATS permits suit against corporate defendants. These two cases reveal only that the ATS does not permit suits against foreign corporate defendants or suits for claims arising from conduct that takes place outside of the US. To frustrate the ATS saga further, the fractured Court in Jesner expressly declined to resolve the question whether international or domestic law should govern corporate liability. And only the plurality even entertained the issue that was central to the lower court’s reasoning: whether the ATS required a customary international law norm of corporate liability or, instead, allowed plaintiffs to bring tort claims ipso facto under federal common law. The inarticulation leaves a gap in international law that the Supreme Court would do well to fill. The question has begun to percolate among the lower federal courts, and it has emerged in a case before the Canadian Supreme Court as well. (Nevsun Res. v. Araya, 2018 CarswellBC 1552 (Can.) (WL) (granting petition for review)).","PeriodicalId":51452,"journal":{"name":"California Law Review","volume":"107 1","pages":"2071"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2019-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"67575584","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Citizenship, National Security Detention, and the Habeas Remedy 公民身份，国家安全拘留和人身保护救济
IF 2.4 2区 社会学
California Law Review Pub Date : 2019-01-01 DOI: 10.15779/Z387D2Q76Q
Lee B. Kovarsky
{"title":"Citizenship, National Security Detention, and the Habeas Remedy","authors":"Lee B. Kovarsky","doi":"10.15779/Z387D2Q76Q","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.15779/Z387D2Q76Q","url":null,"abstract":"Introduction ............................................................................................ 868 I. Situating the Debate ............................................................................ 871 II. Pre-Constitutional History ................................................................. 877 A. The English Experience ....................................................... 879 1. The English Privilege .................................................... 880 2. English Suspension ........................................................ 882 B. The American Experience ................................................... 884 C. The Coverage Rule .............................................................. 888 1. The major premise ......................................................... 890 2. The minor premise ......................................................... 892 3. The conclusion, and the history of which privilege? ..... 893 III. Verdicts on History ........................................................................... 895 A. President Lincoln and the Civil War .................................... 896 B. President Roosevelt and World War II ................................ 898 C. President George W. Bush and the War on Terror .............. 901 IV. The Thickness Plank ......................................................................... 903 A. The Extent of Citizen Detention .......................................... 904 1. Hamdi and Padilla .......................................................... 904 2. John Doe ........................................................................ 906 B. Wartime Flexibility and Incapacitation Strategies ............... 908 C. Suspension-as-Authorization ............................................... 914 V. The Coverage Plank ........................................................................... 918","PeriodicalId":51452,"journal":{"name":"California Law Review","volume":"107 1","pages":"867"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2019-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"67419118","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Big Data and the Non-Horizontal Merger Guidelines 大数据与非横向并购指引
IF 2.4 2区 社会学
California Law Review Pub Date : 2019-01-01 DOI: 10.15779/Z38TT4FT2H
Charles A. Miller
{"title":"Big Data and the Non-Horizontal Merger Guidelines","authors":"Charles A. Miller","doi":"10.15779/Z38TT4FT2H","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.15779/Z38TT4FT2H","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":51452,"journal":{"name":"California Law Review","volume":"107 1","pages":"309"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2019-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"67561439","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Populism, Pluralism, and Criminal Justice 民粹主义、多元主义与刑事司法
IF 2.4 2区 社会学
California Law Review Pub Date : 2019-01-01 DOI: 10.15779/Z38ZK55M88
D. Sklansky
{"title":"Populism, Pluralism, and Criminal Justice","authors":"D. Sklansky","doi":"10.15779/Z38ZK55M88","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.15779/Z38ZK55M88","url":null,"abstract":"The story that James Forman Jr. tells in his superb book, Locking Up Our Own,1 is local and nuanced. Forman explains that mass incarceration resulted from many small decisions made in many different places.2 Although all of those decisions were shaped by the legacies of racism and racial oppression, Forman shows that mass incarceration was not only a product of racism and racial oppression, or at least that the lines of causation are long and complicated. The story that Forman tells may therefore seem disconnected from the election of Donald Trump and from the nationwide resurgence of racism, nativism, and anti-Semitism since 2016. The fear and hate that Trump has whipped up have been anything but nuanced, and this is a national story, not a local one. It may therefore seem misguided to ask what Forman’s book can tell us about the distinctive challenges of the Trump era, other than to remind us of the continued, critical importance of local politics in criminal justice. Ultimately, though, Locking Up Our Own is about policing, prosecution, and punishment in a democracy. The direction that our national politics has taken in the past few years gives us reason to rethink democracy; not whether it is a good thing, but what it should mean, and what it requires to flourish. And Forman’s book does have some lessons about that, beyond “think local.” It can help us think more sensibly about the connections between criminal justice and democracy at the national as well as the local level. The most important lesson the book offers in this regard is that we should worry more about making criminal justice safe for democracy than about making democracy safe for criminal justice.","PeriodicalId":51452,"journal":{"name":"California Law Review","volume":"107 1","pages":"2009"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2019-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"67593111","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Transforming Property: Reclaiming Indigenous Land Tenures 改造财产:收回土著土地所有权
IF 2.4 2区 社会学
California Law Review Pub Date : 2019-01-01 DOI: 10.15779/Z383R0PT7K
Jessica A. Shoemaker
{"title":"Transforming Property: Reclaiming Indigenous Land Tenures","authors":"Jessica A. Shoemaker","doi":"10.15779/Z383R0PT7K","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.15779/Z383R0PT7K","url":null,"abstract":"This Article challenges existing narratives about the future of American Indian land tenure. The current highly-federalized system for reservation property is deeply problematic. In particular, the trust status of many reservation lands is expensive, bureaucratic, oppressive, and linked to persistent poverty in many reservation communities. Yet, for complex reasons, trust property has proven largely immune from fundamental reform. Today, there seem to be two primary approaches floated for the future of reservation property. The first is a “do the best with what we have” strategy that largely accepts core problems with trust, perhaps with some minor efficiency-oriented tinkering, for the sake of the benefits and security it does provide. The second is a return to old, already-failed reform strategies focused on “liberating” American Indian people with a forced transition to statebased fee simple property. Both strategies respond, sometimes implicitly, to deep impulses about how property should work, especially in a market economy. But both of these approaches also neglect sufficient respect for the true potential of more autonomous Indigenous property regimes.","PeriodicalId":51452,"journal":{"name":"California Law Review","volume":"107 1","pages":"1531"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2019-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"67394023","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Three Lessons for Criminal Law Reformers from Locking Up Our Own 我国刑法改革的三个教训
IF 2.4 2区 社会学
California Law Review Pub Date : 2019-01-01 DOI: 10.15779/Z383775W0D
R. Barkow
{"title":"Three Lessons for Criminal Law Reformers from Locking Up Our Own","authors":"R. Barkow","doi":"10.15779/Z383775W0D","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.15779/Z383775W0D","url":null,"abstract":"I. The Architecture and Accountability of Crime Policy ..................... 1968 A. The “Cultural Change” Frame ......................................... 1969 B. The “Institutional Change” Frame ................................... 1973 II. Moving Beyond the Most Sympathetic Cases................................ 1975 III. Getting to All of the Above ......................................................... 1979 Conclusion ........................................................................................ 1982","PeriodicalId":51452,"journal":{"name":"California Law Review","volume":"107 1","pages":"1967"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2019-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"67390082","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
SFFA v. Harvard: How Affirmative Action Myths Mask White Bonus SFFA诉哈佛:平权法案如何掩盖白人奖金
IF 2.4 2区 社会学
California Law Review Pub Date : 2019-01-01 DOI: 10.15779/Z38Z02Z882
J. Feingold
{"title":"SFFA v. Harvard: How Affirmative Action Myths Mask White Bonus","authors":"J. Feingold","doi":"10.15779/Z38Z02Z882","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.15779/Z38Z02Z882","url":null,"abstract":"In the ongoing litigation of Students for Fair Admissions v. Harvard College, Harvard faces allegations that its once-heralded admissions process discriminates against Asian Americans. Public discourse has revealed a dominant narrative: affirmative action is viewed as the presumptive cause of Harvard’s alleged “Asian penalty.” Yet this narrative misrepresents the plaintiff’s own theory of discrimination. Rather than implicating affirmative action, the underlying allegations portray the phenomenon of “negative action” — that is, an admissions regime in which White applicants take the seats of their more qualified Asian-American counterparts. Nonetheless, we are witnessing a broad failure to see this case for what it is. This misperception invites an unnecessary and misplaced referendum on race-conscious admissions at Harvard and beyond.","PeriodicalId":51452,"journal":{"name":"California Law Review","volume":"107 1","pages":"707"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2019-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"67589645","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
首页 上一页 下一页 尾页
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整，为了账户安全，请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
相关产品
×
本文献相关产品
联系我们：info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务，方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号：604180095
Book学术官方微信