California Law Review最新文献_第3页

Hidden Renvoi: The Search for Corporate Liability in Alien Tort Statute Litigation 隐性反悔:外国侵权法规诉讼中公司责任的探寻

IF 2.4 2区社会学

California Law Review Pub Date : 2019-01-01 DOI: 10.15779/Z38WM13T9T

Isaac Ramsey

{"title":"Hidden Renvoi: The Search for Corporate Liability in Alien Tort Statute Litigation","authors":"Isaac Ramsey","doi":"10.15779/Z38WM13T9T","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.15779/Z38WM13T9T","url":null,"abstract":"In its two most recent decisions regarding the Alien Tort Statute (ATS)—Jesner v. Arab Bank and Kiobel v. Royal Dutch Petroleum— the US Supreme Court failed to answer the specific question upon which it granted certiorari: whether the ATS permits suit against corporate defendants. These two cases reveal only that the ATS does not permit suits against foreign corporate defendants or suits for claims arising from conduct that takes place outside of the US. To frustrate the ATS saga further, the fractured Court in Jesner expressly declined to resolve the question whether international or domestic law should govern corporate liability. And only the plurality even entertained the issue that was central to the lower court’s reasoning: whether the ATS required a customary international law norm of corporate liability or, instead, allowed plaintiffs to bring tort claims ipso facto under federal common law. The inarticulation leaves a gap in international law that the Supreme Court would do well to fill. The question has begun to percolate among the lower federal courts, and it has emerged in a case before the Canadian Supreme Court as well. (Nevsun Res. v. Araya, 2018 CarswellBC 1552 (Can.) (WL) (granting petition for review)).","PeriodicalId":51452,"journal":{"name":"California Law Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2019-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"67575584","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Citizenship, National Security Detention, and the Habeas Remedy 公民身份，国家安全拘留和人身保护救济

IF 2.4 2区社会学

California Law Review Pub Date : 2019-01-01 DOI: 10.15779/Z387D2Q76Q

Lee B. Kovarsky

{"title":"Citizenship, National Security Detention, and the Habeas Remedy","authors":"Lee B. Kovarsky","doi":"10.15779/Z387D2Q76Q","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.15779/Z387D2Q76Q","url":null,"abstract":"Introduction ............................................................................................ 868 I. Situating the Debate ............................................................................ 871 II. Pre-Constitutional History ................................................................. 877 A. The English Experience ....................................................... 879 1. The English Privilege .................................................... 880 2. English Suspension ........................................................ 882 B. The American Experience ................................................... 884 C. The Coverage Rule .............................................................. 888 1. The major premise ......................................................... 890 2. The minor premise ......................................................... 892 3. The conclusion, and the history of which privilege? ..... 893 III. Verdicts on History ........................................................................... 895 A. President Lincoln and the Civil War .................................... 896 B. President Roosevelt and World War II ................................ 898 C. President George W. Bush and the War on Terror .............. 901 IV. The Thickness Plank ......................................................................... 903 A. The Extent of Citizen Detention .......................................... 904 1. Hamdi and Padilla .......................................................... 904 2. John Doe ........................................................................ 906 B. Wartime Flexibility and Incapacitation Strategies ............... 908 C. Suspension-as-Authorization ............................................... 914 V. The Coverage Plank ........................................................................... 918","PeriodicalId":51452,"journal":{"name":"California Law Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2019-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"67419118","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Big Data and the Non-Horizontal Merger Guidelines 大数据与非横向并购指引

IF 2.4 2区社会学

California Law Review Pub Date : 2019-01-01 DOI: 10.15779/Z38TT4FT2H

Charles A. Miller

引用次数: 1

Populism, Pluralism, and Criminal Justice 民粹主义、多元主义与刑事司法

IF 2.4 2区社会学

California Law Review Pub Date : 2019-01-01 DOI: 10.15779/Z38ZK55M88

D. Sklansky

{"title":"Populism, Pluralism, and Criminal Justice","authors":"D. Sklansky","doi":"10.15779/Z38ZK55M88","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.15779/Z38ZK55M88","url":null,"abstract":"The story that James Forman Jr. tells in his superb book, Locking Up Our Own,1 is local and nuanced. Forman explains that mass incarceration resulted from many small decisions made in many different places.2 Although all of those decisions were shaped by the legacies of racism and racial oppression, Forman shows that mass incarceration was not only a product of racism and racial oppression, or at least that the lines of causation are long and complicated. The story that Forman tells may therefore seem disconnected from the election of Donald Trump and from the nationwide resurgence of racism, nativism, and anti-Semitism since 2016. The fear and hate that Trump has whipped up have been anything but nuanced, and this is a national story, not a local one. It may therefore seem misguided to ask what Forman’s book can tell us about the distinctive challenges of the Trump era, other than to remind us of the continued, critical importance of local politics in criminal justice. Ultimately, though, Locking Up Our Own is about policing, prosecution, and punishment in a democracy. The direction that our national politics has taken in the past few years gives us reason to rethink democracy; not whether it is a good thing, but what it should mean, and what it requires to flourish. And Forman’s book does have some lessons about that, beyond “think local.” It can help us think more sensibly about the connections between criminal justice and democracy at the national as well as the local level. The most important lesson the book offers in this regard is that we should worry more about making criminal justice safe for democracy than about making democracy safe for criminal justice.","PeriodicalId":51452,"journal":{"name":"California Law Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2019-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"67593111","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 1

Transforming Property: Reclaiming Indigenous Land Tenures 改造财产:收回土著土地所有权

IF 2.4 2区社会学

California Law Review Pub Date : 2019-01-01 DOI: 10.15779/Z383R0PT7K

Jessica A. Shoemaker

引用次数: 0

Three Lessons for Criminal Law Reformers from Locking Up Our Own 我国刑法改革的三个教训

IF 2.4 2区社会学

California Law Review Pub Date : 2019-01-01 DOI: 10.15779/Z383775W0D

R. Barkow

引用次数: 2

SFFA v. Harvard: How Affirmative Action Myths Mask White Bonus SFFA诉哈佛:平权法案如何掩盖白人奖金