Three Lessons for Criminal Law Reformers from Locking Up Our Own

IF 2.2 2区社会学 Q1 LAW

California Law Review Pub Date : 2019-01-01 DOI:10.15779/Z383775W0D

R. Barkow

引用次数: 2

Abstract

I. The Architecture and Accountability of Crime Policy ..................... 1968 A. The “Cultural Change” Frame ......................................... 1969 B. The “Institutional Change” Frame ................................... 1973 II. Moving Beyond the Most Sympathetic Cases................................ 1975 III. Getting to All of the Above ......................................................... 1979 Conclusion ........................................................................................ 1982

查看原文本刊更多论文

我国刑法改革的三个教训

一、犯罪政策的体系结构和问责制……1968 A。The”Cultural三十Frame .........................................1969 b。The”Institutional三十Frame ...................................在1973二世。Moving the静止口号奏效了Sympathetic Cases ................................在1975三世。你越来越大的“老表演这幅作品里。 .........................................................在1979 Conclusion ........................................................................................1982

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

California Law Review LAW-

CiteScore

2.70

自引率

8.30%

发文量

期刊介绍： This review essay considers the state of hybrid democracy in California through an examination of three worthy books: Daniel Weintraub, Party of One: Arnold Schwarzenegger and the Rise of the Independent Voter; Center for Governmental Studies, Democracy by Initiative: Shaping California"s Fourth Branch of Government (Second Edition), and Mark Baldassare and Cheryl Katz, The Coming of Age of Direct Democracy: California"s Recall and Beyond. The essay concludes that despite the hoopla about Governor Schwarzenegger as a "party of one" and a new age of "hybrid democracy" in California.