{"title":"Privatization as Delegation","authors":"Gillian E. Metzger","doi":"10.2307/3593390","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2307/3593390","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":51408,"journal":{"name":"Columbia Law Review","volume":"103 1","pages":"1367"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2003-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2307/3593390","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"69172911","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Diversity, the University, and the World Outside","authors":"J. Greenberg","doi":"10.2307/3593395","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2307/3593395","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":51408,"journal":{"name":"Columbia Law Review","volume":"103 1","pages":"1610"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2003-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2307/3593395","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"69173040","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"The Meaning of Professional Independence","authors":"E. Davis","doi":"10.2307/1123837","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2307/1123837","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":51408,"journal":{"name":"Columbia Law Review","volume":"103 1","pages":"1281"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2003-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2307/1123837","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"68286650","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Transforming Islamic Family Law: State Responsibility and the Role of Internal Initiative","authors":"Andra Nahal Behrouz","doi":"10.2307/1123833","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2307/1123833","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":51408,"journal":{"name":"Columbia Law Review","volume":"103 1","pages":"1136"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2003-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2307/1123833","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"68286584","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Engaging Facts and Policy: A Multi-Institutional Approach to Patent System Reform","authors":"A. Rai","doi":"10.2307/1123832","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2307/1123832","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":51408,"journal":{"name":"Columbia Law Review","volume":"103 1","pages":"1035"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2003-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2307/1123832","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"68285898","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"No-Citation Rules as a Prior Restraint on Attorney Speech","authors":"Marla Brooke Tusk","doi":"10.2307/1123835","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2307/1123835","url":null,"abstract":"The federal appellate courts promulgated selective publication and nocitation rules in the 1960’s as a means of alleviating the burden of an escalating caseload crisis. Selective publication rules permit courts to designate certain opinions as “unpublished,” while no-citation rules bar litigants from citing to, and simultaneously restrict the precedential value of, those opinions. Although these rules have arguably succeeded in their pursuit of judicial economy, courts and commentators have suggested myriad reasons why they may be constitutionally infirm. This Note focuses on the First Amendment implications of no-citation rules. Specifically, it maintains that these rules—which restrict attorneys from communicating certain information (the content of an unpublished opinion) in advance of the time that such communication is to occur (in a brief or at oral argument)—operate as an impermissible prior restraint on attorney speech.","PeriodicalId":51408,"journal":{"name":"Columbia Law Review","volume":"103 1","pages":"1202"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2003-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2307/1123835","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"68286640","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Square Pegs and round Holes: Substantive Due Process, Procedural Due Process, and the Bill of Rights","authors":"Peter J. Rubin","doi":"10.2307/1123779","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2307/1123779","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":51408,"journal":{"name":"Columbia Law Review","volume":"103 1","pages":"833"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2003-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2307/1123779","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"68284537","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Prosecutors and Their Agents - Agents and Their Prosecutors","authors":"D. Richman","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.316144","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.316144","url":null,"abstract":"This is an effort to describe the dynamics of interaction between federal prosecutors and federal enforcement agents, and to suggest how these dynamics affect the exercise of enforcement discretion. It concludes by exploring ways in which the proposed normative model - which sees prosecutors and agents as members of a \"working group,\" with each side monitoring the other - can be furthered or frustrated with various procedural and structural changes.","PeriodicalId":51408,"journal":{"name":"Columbia Law Review","volume":"103 1","pages":"749"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2003-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"68567982","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"The Business Judgment Rule: Should It Protect Nonprofit Directors?","authors":"Denise Lee","doi":"10.2307/1123781","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2307/1123781","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":51408,"journal":{"name":"Columbia Law Review","volume":"103 1","pages":"925"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2003-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2307/1123781","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"68284592","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"The Sentences That Bind (The States)","authors":"James J. Sample","doi":"10.2307/1123782","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2307/1123782","url":null,"abstract":"In certain circumstances, federal district court judges impose criminal sentences that are required to be consecutive to yet-to-be-imposed state criminal sentences, including those state sentences that may, in fact, never be imposed. The federal courts of appeals are divided as to whether such sentences are statutorily authorized under the applicable provision, 18 U.S.C. ? 3584(a). This Note argues that the sentences are not authorized under the statute, and further, that the sentences infringe on states' and defendants' rights.","PeriodicalId":51408,"journal":{"name":"Columbia Law Review","volume":"103 1","pages":"969"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2003-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2307/1123782","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"68284608","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}