Valuation StudiesPub Date : 2024-05-02DOI: 10.3384/vs.2001-5992.2024.11.1.1-8
Francis Lee, Andrea Mennicken, Jacob Reilley, Malte Ziewitz
{"title":"Experiences of Digitized Valuation","authors":"Francis Lee, Andrea Mennicken, Jacob Reilley, Malte Ziewitz","doi":"10.3384/vs.2001-5992.2024.11.1.1-8","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.3384/vs.2001-5992.2024.11.1.1-8","url":null,"abstract":"In","PeriodicalId":510318,"journal":{"name":"Valuation Studies","volume":"77 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-05-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141021907","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Valuation StudiesPub Date : 2024-05-02DOI: 10.3384/vs.2001-5992.2024.11.1.38-59
Celia Lury, Sophie Day, Andre Simon, Martín Tironi, Matías Valderrama, Scott Wark
{"title":"Digital Valuation: Lessons in relevance from the prototyping of a recommendation app","authors":"Celia Lury, Sophie Day, Andre Simon, Martín Tironi, Matías Valderrama, Scott Wark","doi":"10.3384/vs.2001-5992.2024.11.1.38-59","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.3384/vs.2001-5992.2024.11.1.38-59","url":null,"abstract":"This article describes the use of a prototype recommendation app to explore how users are included and/or excluded in categories of various kinds of ‘People Like You’. In the study, interviews with users of the prototype app indicate that the experience of receiving personalized recommendations isroutinely evaluated in terms of relevance, that is, as either of interest to them or as beside the point, as accurate or inaccurate, with accuracy often understood as recognition of their context(s). We build on the interviews to develop an analysis which suggests that the capacity of recommendation systems to make relevant recommendations is a function of the parallel projections – from the app on one side and users on the other – that are made as part of an interaction order. In developing this analysis, we reflect on the implications of the interaction order for the inclusion and exclusion of users in categories or kinds of people. We highlight the importance of the temporal formatting of interaction as a continuous present for the relation between belonging and belongings, and thus for the creation of a datasset (Beauvisage and Mellett 2020).","PeriodicalId":510318,"journal":{"name":"Valuation Studies","volume":"89 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-05-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141019403","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Valuation StudiesPub Date : 2024-05-02DOI: 10.3384/vs.2001-5992.2024.11.1.91-137
Stacy E. Lom
{"title":"Judging by the Rules? The emergence of evaluation practices","authors":"Stacy E. Lom","doi":"10.3384/vs.2001-5992.2024.11.1.91-137","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.3384/vs.2001-5992.2024.11.1.91-137","url":null,"abstract":"How does evaluation work differently, and how do evaluation practices emerge, in different contexts? Drawing on a mixed-methods study of evaluation in figure skating and classical music, I discuss the divergent evaluative cultures in these settings, especially in terms of how formal and standardized they are, to consider how and why evaluation practices change over time and why different settings use different evaluation practices. I emphasize the importance of organizational structure, including context, competition structure, degree of centralization, and governance structure. My findings suggest that highly centralized settings governed by more powerful organizations and where competitions build on each other tend to use more formal and standardized evaluation practices compared to other settings with fewer constraints. Understanding how evaluation practices develop and what they look like in different contexts is important because in addition to influencing the objects of evaluation and perceived fairness and legitimacy, these practices often affect outcomes, which have significant consequences for participants.","PeriodicalId":510318,"journal":{"name":"Valuation Studies","volume":"20 12","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-05-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141022717","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Valuation StudiesPub Date : 2024-05-02DOI: 10.3384/vs.2001-5992.2024.11.1.60-90
Susann Wagenknecht, Laura Kocksch, Stefan Laser, Ann-Kristin Kühnen
{"title":"Valuing Data: Attaching online data to stakes, selves, and other data","authors":"Susann Wagenknecht, Laura Kocksch, Stefan Laser, Ann-Kristin Kühnen","doi":"10.3384/vs.2001-5992.2024.11.1.60-90","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.3384/vs.2001-5992.2024.11.1.60-90","url":null,"abstract":"As datafication proceeds rapidly, a large, unwieldy amount of data is available online. In this article, we ask: How valuable is this data, how is it made valuable? To answer this question, we study how online data is endowed with worth in virtual collaboration workshops. Our workshops challenged participants to assert and question the worth of online data – a challenge that participants addressed by using a set of techniques of which we describe collage, hierarchy building, and calculation. Data, we show, gains value through attachment. Thinking with attachment, we foreground affect, materiality, and the situatedness of valuing online data. As ethnographers, we study how data, as haphazard as it comes, is attached to the circumstances and stakes at hand, to ourselves and to other data. Our study contributes a conceptual perspective that attends to the shifting boundaries of the personal and the public, tensions between locality and generality, the role of contiguity, and the limits of combinatorial connectivity.","PeriodicalId":510318,"journal":{"name":"Valuation Studies","volume":"14 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-05-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141022153","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Valuation StudiesPub Date : 2024-05-02DOI: 10.3384/vs.2001-5992.2024.11.1.9-37
L. Justesen, Ursula Plesner
{"title":"Angry Citizens and Black Belt Employees: Cascading classifications of and around a predictive algorithm","authors":"L. Justesen, Ursula Plesner","doi":"10.3384/vs.2001-5992.2024.11.1.9-37","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.3384/vs.2001-5992.2024.11.1.9-37","url":null,"abstract":"Over past decades, predictive algorithms have been used extensively as profiling tools in the private sector, but today they are also increasingly entering public sector domains. This article builds on an ethnographic study of the development of a predictive algorithm in a debt collecting public sector organization. The algorithm was designed to profile citizens on the basis of their calculated ‘readiness to pay’ their debt and to guide employees’ case handling according to ‘type’ of citizen. The article examines how the classification of citizens produced by the algorithm was mediated by different visualizations and by organizational actors who superimposed new and different classifications (moral and emotional) onto those provided by the algorithm. The article draws on the concepts of nominal and ordinal classification to identify how intended non-hierarchical classification glides into new hierarchical valuations of both citizens and employees. Classifications were ‘cascading’ – a concept the article develops to account for how classification of and around the algorithm multiplied and had organizational ripple effects. Based on empirical insights, the study advocates an agnostic approach to how algorithmic predictions impact work, organizations, and the situation of profiled individuals. It emphasizes a dynamic and and unstable relationship between algorithms and organizational practices.","PeriodicalId":510318,"journal":{"name":"Valuation Studies","volume":"54 S1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-05-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141018108","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Valuation StudiesPub Date : 2024-05-02DOI: 10.3384/vs.2001-5992.2024.11.1.138-161
Tineke van der Schoor, Alexander Peine, Harro van Lente
{"title":"Contested Commensuration: The case of a valuation instrument for historical buildings","authors":"Tineke van der Schoor, Alexander Peine, Harro van Lente","doi":"10.3384/vs.2001-5992.2024.11.1.138-161","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.3384/vs.2001-5992.2024.11.1.138-161","url":null,"abstract":"Environmental values are becoming increasingly important in restoration of historical buildings, while energy interventions can seriously damage historical qualities. Cultural-historical values and environmental values are often considered difficult to commensurate, with energy engineers and heritage experts adhering to widely differing values and relating to different discourses. Valuation instruments are devised to deal with such value conflicts in restoration projects. In this article we study what such instruments perform in the case of assessing historical buildings. We ask how these instruments work, and how they afford, support and guide valuation processes? Furthermore, we enquire what is achieved and what is lost in the reconciliation of values. Theoretically, we start from the notion of commensuration, which allows comparison of values through a shared metric. Empirically, this research note examines the history and use of DuMo, an instrument that aims to reconcile cultural – historical and environmental values and provides a range of sustainable restoration strategies. We find that DuMo indeed performs commensuration of these conflicting values, but also keeps intact the epistemic authority of the two professions. Our claim thus is that valuation instruments can successfully perform commensuration while at the same being contested by involved professionals.","PeriodicalId":510318,"journal":{"name":"Valuation Studies","volume":"2 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-05-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141018527","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}