Digital Valuation: Lessons in relevance from the prototyping of a recommendation app

Celia Lury, Sophie Day, Andre Simon, Martín Tironi, Matías Valderrama, Scott Wark
{"title":"Digital Valuation: Lessons in relevance from the prototyping of a recommendation app","authors":"Celia Lury, Sophie Day, Andre Simon, Martín Tironi, Matías Valderrama, Scott Wark","doi":"10.3384/vs.2001-5992.2024.11.1.38-59","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article describes the use of a prototype recommendation app to explore how users are included and/or excluded in categories of various kinds of ‘People Like You’. In the study, interviews with users of the prototype app indicate that the experience of receiving personalized recommendations isroutinely evaluated in terms of relevance, that is, as either of interest to them or as beside the point, as accurate or inaccurate, with accuracy often understood as recognition of their context(s). We build on the interviews to develop an analysis which suggests that the capacity of recommendation systems to make relevant recommendations is a function of the parallel projections – from the app on one side and users on the other – that are made as part of an interaction order. In developing this analysis, we reflect on the implications of the interaction order for the inclusion and exclusion of users in categories or kinds of people. We highlight the importance of the temporal formatting of interaction as a continuous present for the relation between belonging and belongings, and thus for the creation of a datasset (Beauvisage and Mellett 2020).","PeriodicalId":510318,"journal":{"name":"Valuation Studies","volume":"89 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Valuation Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3384/vs.2001-5992.2024.11.1.38-59","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article describes the use of a prototype recommendation app to explore how users are included and/or excluded in categories of various kinds of ‘People Like You’. In the study, interviews with users of the prototype app indicate that the experience of receiving personalized recommendations isroutinely evaluated in terms of relevance, that is, as either of interest to them or as beside the point, as accurate or inaccurate, with accuracy often understood as recognition of their context(s). We build on the interviews to develop an analysis which suggests that the capacity of recommendation systems to make relevant recommendations is a function of the parallel projections – from the app on one side and users on the other – that are made as part of an interaction order. In developing this analysis, we reflect on the implications of the interaction order for the inclusion and exclusion of users in categories or kinds of people. We highlight the importance of the temporal formatting of interaction as a continuous present for the relation between belonging and belongings, and thus for the creation of a datasset (Beauvisage and Mellett 2020).
数字估值:从推荐应用程序的原型设计中汲取相关性方面的经验教训
本文介绍了如何使用原型推荐应用程序来探索用户如何被纳入和/或排除在各类 "像你一样的人 "的类别之外。在这项研究中,对原型应用程序用户的访谈表明,接收个性化推荐的体验通常是根据相关性来评估的,也就是说,要么是他们感兴趣的,要么是无关紧要的,要么是准确的,要么是不准确的,而准确性通常被理解为对其上下文的认可。我们在访谈的基础上进行了分析,认为推荐系统提供相关推荐的能力是应用程序和用户并行预测的函数,而应用程序和用户并行预测是交互秩序的一部分。在进行这一分析时,我们思考了交互秩序对将用户纳入或排除在类别或类型中的影响。我们强调互动的时间格式对于归属与归属之间关系的持续存在的重要性,因此对于数据集的创建也很重要(Beauvisage 和 Mellett,2020 年)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书