Contested Commensuration: The case of a valuation instrument for historical buildings

Tineke van der Schoor, Alexander Peine, Harro van Lente
{"title":"Contested Commensuration: The case of a valuation instrument for historical buildings","authors":"Tineke van der Schoor, Alexander Peine, Harro van Lente","doi":"10.3384/vs.2001-5992.2024.11.1.138-161","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Environmental values are becoming increasingly important in restoration of historical buildings, while energy interventions can seriously damage historical qualities. Cultural-historical values and environmental values are often considered difficult to commensurate, with energy engineers and heritage experts adhering to widely differing values and relating to different discourses. Valuation instruments are devised to deal with such value conflicts in restoration projects. In this article we study what such instruments perform in the case of assessing historical buildings. We ask how these instruments work, and how they afford, support and guide valuation processes? Furthermore, we enquire what is achieved and what is lost in the reconciliation of values. Theoretically, we start from the notion of commensuration, which allows comparison of values through a shared metric. Empirically, this research note examines the history and use of DuMo, an instrument that aims to reconcile cultural – historical and environmental values and provides a range of sustainable restoration strategies. We find that DuMo indeed performs commensuration of these conflicting values, but also keeps intact the epistemic authority of the two professions. Our claim thus is that valuation instruments can successfully perform commensuration while at the same being contested by involved professionals.","PeriodicalId":510318,"journal":{"name":"Valuation Studies","volume":"2 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Valuation Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3384/vs.2001-5992.2024.11.1.138-161","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Environmental values are becoming increasingly important in restoration of historical buildings, while energy interventions can seriously damage historical qualities. Cultural-historical values and environmental values are often considered difficult to commensurate, with energy engineers and heritage experts adhering to widely differing values and relating to different discourses. Valuation instruments are devised to deal with such value conflicts in restoration projects. In this article we study what such instruments perform in the case of assessing historical buildings. We ask how these instruments work, and how they afford, support and guide valuation processes? Furthermore, we enquire what is achieved and what is lost in the reconciliation of values. Theoretically, we start from the notion of commensuration, which allows comparison of values through a shared metric. Empirically, this research note examines the history and use of DuMo, an instrument that aims to reconcile cultural – historical and environmental values and provides a range of sustainable restoration strategies. We find that DuMo indeed performs commensuration of these conflicting values, but also keeps intact the epistemic authority of the two professions. Our claim thus is that valuation instruments can successfully perform commensuration while at the same being contested by involved professionals.
有争议的比照:历史建筑估值工具案例
在修复历史建筑时,环境价值变得越来越重要,而能源干预可能会严重破坏历史品质。文化历史价值和环境价值往往被认为是难以相称的,能源工程师和遗产专家坚持的价值观大相径庭,并涉及不同的论述。为解决修复项目中的价值冲突,人们设计了评估工具。在本文中,我们将研究这些工具在历史建筑评估中的作用。我们要问的是,这些工具是如何发挥作用的,它们又是如何提供、支持和指导评估过程的?此外,我们还探究了在价值协调过程中取得的成果和失去的东西。从理论上讲,我们从 "调和"(commensuration)这一概念出发,通过共同的衡量标准对价值进行比较。在经验方面,本研究报告考察了 DuMo 的历史和使用情况,这是一种旨在调和文化、历史和环境价值并提供一系列可持续修复策略的工具。我们发现,DuMo 确实能够调和这些相互冲突的价值,同时还能保持两种专业的认识权威。因此,我们的主张是,估价工具可以成功地进行调和,同时也会受到相关专业人士的质疑。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书