The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science最新文献

筛选
英文 中文
A Proposed Probabilistic Extension of the Halpern and Pearl Definition of 'Actual Cause'. Halpern和Pearl对“实际原因”定义的概率扩展。
IF 3.4
The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science Pub Date : 2017-12-01 Epub Date: 2016-03-29 DOI: 10.1093/bjps/axv056
Luke Fenton-Glynn
{"title":"A Proposed Probabilistic Extension of the Halpern and Pearl Definition of 'Actual Cause'.","authors":"Luke Fenton-Glynn","doi":"10.1093/bjps/axv056","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/bjps/axv056","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Joseph Halpern and Judea Pearl ([2005]) draw upon structural equation models to develop an attractive analysis of 'actual cause'. Their analysis is designed for the case of deterministic causation. I show that their account can be naturally extended to provide an elegant treatment of probabilistic causation. 1Introduction2Preemption3Structural Equation Models4The Halpern and Pearl Definition of 'Actual Cause'5Preemption Again6The Probabilistic Case7Probabilistic Causal Models8A Proposed Probabilistic Extension of Halpern and Pearl's Definition9Twardy and Korb's Account10Probabilistic Fizzling11Conclusion.</p>","PeriodicalId":509962,"journal":{"name":"The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science","volume":"68 4","pages":"1061-1124"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4,"publicationDate":"2017-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1093/bjps/axv056","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"35957375","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 34
Counterfactual Desirability. 反事实的愿望。
IF 3.4
The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science Pub Date : 2017-06-01 Epub Date: 2015-08-04 DOI: 10.1093/bjps/axv023
Richard Bradley, H Orri Stefánsson
{"title":"Counterfactual Desirability.","authors":"Richard Bradley,&nbsp;H Orri Stefánsson","doi":"10.1093/bjps/axv023","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/bjps/axv023","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The desirability of what actually occurs is often influenced by what could have been. Preferences based on such value dependencies between actual and counterfactual outcomes generate a class of problems for orthodox decision theory, the best-known perhaps being the so-called Allais paradox. In this article we solve these problems by extending Richard Jeffrey's decision theory to counterfactual prospects, using a multidimensional possible-world semantics for conditionals, and showing that preferences that are sensitive to counterfactual considerations can still be desirability-maximizing. We end the article by investigating the conditions necessary and sufficient for a desirability function to be a standard expected-utility function. It turns out that the additional conditions imply highly implausible epistemic principles. 1Two Paradoxes of Rational Choice2Jeffrey Desirability3Counterfactuals 3.1Probability and desirability of counterfactuals3.2Representations4Counterfactual-Dependent Preferences 4.1Preference actualism and desirability maximization4.2Modelling Allais's and Diamond's preferences5Ethical Actualism and Separability 5.1Independence and additive separability5.2 Ethical actualism5.3Expected utility, separability, and ethical actualism6Concluding Remarks7Appendix.</p>","PeriodicalId":509962,"journal":{"name":"The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science","volume":"68 2","pages":"485-533"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4,"publicationDate":"2017-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1093/bjps/axv023","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"36659262","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 19
Sameness of age cohorts in the mathematics of population growth. 人口增长数学中年龄群的同一性。
IF 3.4
The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science Pub Date : 1994-01-01 DOI: 10.1093/bjps/45.2.679
A Akkerman
{"title":"Sameness of age cohorts in the mathematics of population growth.","authors":"A Akkerman","doi":"10.1093/bjps/45.2.679","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/bjps/45.2.679","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>\"Considering age groups as part of cohorts, implicit in LLM [a Leslie-Lotka finitist model], causes difficulty, manifested by the extensionality paradox. The proposition made here was that cohorts are empirical temporal entities, while age groups are theoretical entities, references only. Cohort is a multitude of persons born at the same time interval, throughout the totality of their lives. Age group, on the other hand, is a concept only, constituted by the notion of the age interval....A model of household and population growth based on the household composition matrix yields results that are inherently different from these of LLM.\"</p>","PeriodicalId":509962,"journal":{"name":"The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science","volume":"45 ","pages":"679-91"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4,"publicationDate":"1994-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1093/bjps/45.2.679","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"22015597","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
相关产品
×
本文献相关产品
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信