Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research最新文献

{"title":"Correction to “Evaluation of the Estimated Role of Yes-Associated Protein in the Etiology of Peri-Implantitis: A Case–Control Study”","authors":"","doi":"10.1111/cid.70191","DOIUrl":"10.1111/cid.70191","url":null,"abstract":"<p>\u0000 <span>S. M. Emam</span>, <span>M. M. Khamis</span>, <span>M. Haroun</span>, and <span>N. Moussa</span>, “ <span>Evaluation of the Estimated Role of Yes-Associated Protein in the Etiology of Peri-Implantitis: A Case–Control Study</span>,” <i>Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research</i> <span>28</span>, no. <span>2</span> (<span>2026</span>): e70148, https://doi.org/10.1111/cid.70148.\u0000 </p><p>In paragraph 8 of the Discussion, the sentence “YAP is a mechanosensitive protein affected by extracellular forces, and it has an essential role in transforming extracellular mechanical stimuli into mechanical signals in a process called ‘mechanotransduction’.” was incorrect. It should read:</p><p>“YAP is a mechanosensitive protein affected by extracellular forces, and it has an essential role in transforming extracellular mechanical stimuli into biological signals in a process called ‘mechanotransduction’.”</p><p>We apologize for this error.</p>","PeriodicalId":50679,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research","volume":"28 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.9,"publicationDate":"2026-10-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/cid.70191","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"149302905","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Treatment of Small Peri-Implant Buccal Dehiscence Defects With SCTG or GBR: 3-Year Results of a Pilot Study","authors":"Anina N. Zuercher,&nbsp;Fabienne Rusch,&nbsp;Franz J. Strauss,&nbsp;Ronald E. Jung,&nbsp;Hyun-Chang Lim,&nbsp;Daniel Thoma","doi":"10.1111/cid.70192","DOIUrl":"10.1111/cid.70192","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Objective</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>To evaluate and compare subepithelial connective tissue grafts (SCTG) and guided bone regeneration (GBR) for the treatment of small peri-implant buccal bone dehiscences over a 3-year follow-up, in terms of profilometric contour change, peri-implant parameters and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs).</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Material and Methods</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Patients presenting with small buccal bone dehiscences (≤ 3 mm) after single implant placement were included. Defect sites were randomly treated with either SCTG or GBR, while five patients without dehiscences served as a negative control group. All patients received an implant crown and were followed for 3 years. Profilometric measurements, marginal bone levels, peri-implant parameters, and PROMs were recorded at baseline, 1, and 3 years. Data were analyzed descriptively.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Results</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>A total of 16 patients were available for the 3-year follow-up (SCTG, <i>n</i> = 5; GBR, <i>n</i> = 6; negative control, <i>n</i> = 5). Both augmentation approaches maintained stable buccal soft-tissue contours. At 1 mm below the mucosal margin, the median buccal contour change was 0.19 mm (Q1: −0.28; Q3: 0.29) in the SCTG group and 0.11 mm (Q1: −0.20; Q3: 0.30) in the GBR group. At 3 mm below the mucosal margin, the corresponding median contour changes were 0.05 mm (Q1: −0.36; Q3: 0.31) for SCTG and −0.05 mm (Q1: −0.22; Q3: 0.07) for GBR. Peri-implant clinical parameters (probing depth, bleeding on probing, and plaque) remained stable, indicating maintained peri-implant health in both groups. Marginal bone levels were preserved throughout the observation period and oral health-related quality of life remained high and comparable between the SCTG and GBR groups.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Conclusion</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Within the limitations of this pilot study, both SCTG and GBR were associated with stable buccal contour conditions and favorable peri-implant health over a 3-year follow-up period. These findings were observed under adequate self-performed plaque control and adherence to supportive care. Adequately powered RCTs are needed to confirm these findings.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":50679,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research","volume":"28 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.9,"publicationDate":"2026-10-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/cid.70192","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"149302928","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Patient-Reported Outcomes and Esthetics of Single Dental Implants After 38.9 Years: A Cross-Sectional Study","authors":"Jan Kowar,&nbsp;Sargon Barkarmo","doi":"10.1111/cid.70190","DOIUrl":"10.1111/cid.70190","url":null,"abstract":"&lt;div&gt;\u0000 \u0000 \u0000 &lt;section&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;h3&gt; Introduction&lt;/h3&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;p&gt;Long-term evaluations of single dental implants have mainly focused on clinician-reported outcomes, whereas patient-reported and esthetic outcomes beyond 20 years remain sparsely documented.&lt;/p&gt;\u0000 &lt;/section&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;section&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;h3&gt; Objective&lt;/h3&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;p&gt;To assess patient-reported outcomes, peri-implant soft-tissue esthetics, and crown infraposition of single dental implants after a mean follow-up of 38.9 years.&lt;/p&gt;\u0000 &lt;/section&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;section&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;h3&gt; Materials and Methods&lt;/h3&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;p&gt;This cross-sectional study included 13 patients with 18 single dental implants placed between 1982 and 1985 (mean follow-up: 38.9 ± 0.8 years; range: 37.9–40.5 years). Patient-reported outcomes were assessed using the Oral Health Impact Profile-14 (OHIP-14), the Orofacial Esthetic Scale (OES), and study-specific Visual Analog Scale (VAS) evaluating overall treatment outcome, function, esthetics, and oral hygiene. Peri-implant soft-tissue esthetics were assessed using the Pink Esthetic Score (PES), with assessments conducted independently by two calibrated prosthodontists. Infraposition-related incisal and cervical discrepancies were evaluated descriptively in six maxillary central-incisor implant sites using intraoral scans or calibrated photographic analysis.&lt;/p&gt;\u0000 &lt;/section&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;section&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;h3&gt; Results&lt;/h3&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;p&gt;The mean OHIP-14 score was 18.1 ± 7.3. Mean VAS scores were 92.8 ± 9.0 for overall treatment outcome, 95.5 ± 6.9 for function, 80.9 ± 27.0 for esthetics, and 90.2 ± 14.5 for oral hygiene. The mean total OES score was 40.8 ± 20.5 (&lt;i&gt;n&lt;/i&gt; = 12; possible range: 0–80), with substantial interindividual variation. Mean total PES was 7.9 ± 2.2 and 8.6 ± 1.9 for the two observers. Interobserver reliability was assessed using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), yielding an ICC of 0.47 (95% CI: 0.04–0.76). At all six assessable anterior implant sites, incisal and cervical discrepancies were observed, with the cervical discrepancy exceeding the incisal discrepancy in most cases.&lt;/p&gt;\u0000 &lt;/section&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;section&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;h3&gt; Conclusion&lt;/h3&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;p&gt;After a mean of 38.9 years in function, the available single-implant cohort reported high overall and functional satisfaction, while patient-reported esthetic outcomes and professional peri-implant soft-tissue assessments were more variable. Incisal and cervical discrepancies were present in the small assessable anterior subgroup; because baseline esthetic measurements were unavailable, these cross-sectional discrepancies cannot be","PeriodicalId":50679,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research","volume":"28 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.9,"publicationDate":"2026-10-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13686797/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"149240783","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Retaining Complete Overdentures With Immediately Loaded One-Piece Mini-Implants: A 24-Month Prospective Clinical Study","authors":"Alexander De Greef,&nbsp;Samuel Akhondi,&nbsp;Bahoz Sanaan,&nbsp;Wim Coucke,&nbsp;Marc Quirynen,&nbsp;David Norré","doi":"10.1111/cid.70188","DOIUrl":"10.1111/cid.70188","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Objectives</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>To evaluate 24-month clinical and radiographic outcomes of a minimally invasive protocol using flaplessly placed, immediately loaded one-piece mini-implants to retain complete maxillary and mandibular overdentures.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Materials and Methods</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>This prospective single-center clinical study included 25 fully edentulous patients requiring improved denture retention in one or both jaws. Patients received six mini-implants in the maxilla and/or four mini-implants in the mandible. Existing or newly fabricated complete dentures were converted chairside into implant-retained overdentures for immediate loading. Implant survival, peri-implant clinical attachment level changes, and radiographic marginal bone level changes were assessed at baseline, 1 year, and 2 years.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Results</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>A total of 158 mini-implants were placed, 120 in the maxilla and 38 in the mandible. At 24 months, 145 implants remained in function, corresponding to implant-level survival of 91.8%. Survival was 91.7% in the maxilla and 92.1% in the mandible. Mean radiographic marginal bone loss was 0.54 ± 1.64 mm in the maxilla and 0.80 ± 1.17 mm in the mandible, with no statistically significant interjaw difference (<i>p</i> = 0.774). Mean peri-implant clinical attachment loss was 0.89 ± 1.27 mm and 0.41 ± 0.57 mm, respectively, with significantly greater attachment loss in the maxilla (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.001).</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Conclusion</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Flapless placement and immediate loading of one-piece mini-implants provided favorable 24-month survival and limited peri-implant tissue changes when used to retain complete overdentures in selected edentulous patients. The protocol showed clinically relevant outcomes in both jaws, including the maxilla, where evidence for removable overdentures retained by unsplinted one-piece mini-implants remains limited. This minimally invasive approach may expand treatment options for edentulous patients with reduced denture retention, narrow residual ridges, or limited willingness to undergo augmentation procedures.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":50679,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research","volume":"28 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.9,"publicationDate":"2026-10-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13677799/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"149221078","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Maintenance Adherence, Periodontitis, and Prosthetic Factors in Peri-Implantitis: A Cohort Study","authors":"Huiran Yu,&nbsp;Zhe Wen","doi":"10.1111/cid.70187","DOIUrl":"10.1111/cid.70187","url":null,"abstract":"&lt;div&gt;\u0000 \u0000 \u0000 &lt;section&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;h3&gt; Background&lt;/h3&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;p&gt;Implant survival rates are high, yet peri-implantitis and implant failure still compromise long-term treatment success. How maintenance adherence, patient susceptibility, and prosthetic design interact to shape these outcomes in routine practice has not been fully characterized.&lt;/p&gt;\u0000 &lt;/section&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;section&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;h3&gt; Methods&lt;/h3&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;p&gt;This single-center retrospective cohort included 260 patients with 469 implants placed between 2017 and 2023 and followed until June 2026 (median 69.3 months). From documented supportive-care records we classified maintenance adherence as regular (≥ 2 documented visits per year or mean interval ≤ 6 months), irregular (0.5–&lt; 2 visits per year among patients not meeting the absent/lost rule), or absent/lost (&lt; 0.5 visits per year; patients with 0.5–&lt; 0.8 visits per year were assigned to absent/lost only when the chart explicitly documented long-term nonadherence to the planned recall schedule). Periodontitis history was staged according to the 2017 classification. Prosthetic and implant-level factors included keratinized mucosa width, retention type, residual cement, emergence profile, food impaction, and occlusal overload. The primary outcome was peri-implantitis; secondary outcomes included implant failure and marginal bone loss. Generalized estimating equations accounted for implant clustering within patients, and survival was assessed by Kaplan–Meier analysis.&lt;/p&gt;\u0000 &lt;/section&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;section&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;h3&gt; Results&lt;/h3&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;p&gt;Peri-implantitis developed in 80 implants (17.1%) and implant failure in 18 (3.8%). Compared with regular maintenance, irregular maintenance (adjusted OR: 2.09, 95% CI: 1.08–4.06; &lt;i&gt;p&lt;/i&gt; = 0.029) and absent/lost maintenance (adjusted OR: 4.67, 95% CI: 2.21–9.87; &lt;i&gt;p&lt;/i&gt; &lt; 0.001) carried progressively higher peri-implantitis risk. Stages III–IV periodontitis (OR: 1.70, 95% CI: 0.87–3.32), keratinized mucosa &lt; 2 mm, suspected residual cement, food impaction, and occlusal overload showed directionally elevated but nonsignificant associations. Longer maintenance intervals were associated with higher peri-implantitis probability in a dose–response fashion, and marginal bone loss was most pronounced when advanced periodontitis and absent/lost maintenance coincided.&lt;/p&gt;\u0000 &lt;/section&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;section&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;h3&gt; Conclusions&lt;/h3&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;p&gt;Poor maintenance adherence was independently associated with peri-implantitis and greater marginal bone loss. Advanced periodontitis history and site- or prosthesis-related factors showed directionally elevated but statistically nonsignificant adjusted associations with peri-implantitis, while advanced periodontitis remained associated with greate","PeriodicalId":50679,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research","volume":"28 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.9,"publicationDate":"2026-10-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"149186838","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Maxillary Rehabilitation With All-On-6 and Bilateral Lateral Window Sinus Elevation: 1–10-Year Outcomes","authors":"Yutao Qu,&nbsp;Chang Yang,&nbsp;Weijie Wu,&nbsp;Hongye Lu,&nbsp;Fuming He","doi":"10.1111/cid.70186","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/cid.70186","url":null,"abstract":"&lt;div&gt;\u0000 \u0000 \u0000 &lt;section&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;h3&gt; Objectives&lt;/h3&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;p&gt;To evaluate the long-term clinical and radiographic outcomes of fixed full-arch maxillary rehabilitation supported by six implants combined with bilateral lateral-window sinus floor elevation.&lt;/p&gt;\u0000 &lt;/section&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;section&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;h3&gt; Materials and Methods&lt;/h3&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;p&gt;This retrospective cohort study included patients with completely edentulous maxillae treated with an All-on-6 protocol and simultaneous bilateral lateral-window sinus floor elevation between 2015 and 2024. The immediate provisional prosthesis was supported by the four anterior implants, whereas the two posterior implants in the augmented sinus regions were left submerged and incorporated into the definitive prosthesis after healing. Only patients with at least 1 year of follow-up after definitive prosthesis delivery were included. The primary outcome was longitudinal marginal bone loss (MBL), assessed across the 0–1-, 1–5-, and 5–10-year follow-up intervals. Radiographic measurements included crestal bone level, cumulative and interval MBL, apical bone height, endo-sinus bone gain, and graft bone volume. Graft bone volume was additionally evaluated as an exploratory outcome in patients with suitable serial CBCT scans. Marginal bone level changes were measured on panoramic radiographs. CBCT was used for assessment of sinus graft-related parameters and, when necessary, for anatomical confirmation. Secondary outcomes included implant and prosthesis survival, mechanical and biological complications, and patient-reported outcomes. Longitudinal MBL was analyzed using linear mixed-effects models, and implant-level mechanical complications were assessed using generalized estimating equation logistic regression.&lt;/p&gt;\u0000 &lt;/section&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;section&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;h3&gt; Results&lt;/h3&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;p&gt;Thirty-five patients restored with 210 implants and 35 definitive full-arch prostheses were included, with a mean follow-up of 6.06 ± 2.08 years. The overall implant survival rate was 99.1% (210/212), and the post-definitive implant and prosthesis survival rates were 100% (210/210 and 35/35, respectively). Mechanical complications of definitive prostheses were frequent, occurring in 82.9% of patients and 45.7% of implants, with prosthetic screw loosening being the most common event. Augmented posterior sites were associated with prosthetic screw loosening, whereas angulated abutments and greater cantilever/AP distance were associated with abutment screw loosening. Biological complications were less frequent, with peri-implantitis observed in 2.9% of patients and 0.95% of implants. Cumulative MBL increased over time, while annualized cumulative MBL and interval MBL decreased, suggesting early marginal bone remodeling followed by gradual stabilization. Patient-reported outcomes r","PeriodicalId":50679,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research","volume":"28 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.9,"publicationDate":"2026-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"149146327","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Influence of Implant Timing on Peri-Implant Tissue Healing in Interradicular Septal Bone: A Preclinical in Vivo Study","authors":"Myong Ji Kim,&nbsp;Sung Jin Yoo,&nbsp;Jin-Young Park,&nbsp;Jae-Kook Cha,&nbsp;Ui-Won Jung,&nbsp;Daniel S. Thoma,&nbsp;Ronald E. Jung","doi":"10.1111/cid.70185","DOIUrl":"10.1111/cid.70185","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Aim</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>This study aimed to assess the influence of implant timing on peri-implant tissue healing and osseointegration around implants placed in the interradicular septal bone of multirooted teeth.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Materials and Methods</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>In seven beagle dogs, the mandibular second and third premolars with bifurcated roots were extracted. Bone-level implants were placed into the septal bone according to four experimental protocols: Immediate (0 week), Early-1 (2 weeks), Early-2 (4 weeks), and Delayed (8 weeks). All animals were euthanized 16 weeks after tooth extraction. Histomorphometric analysis was performed to assess bone-to-implant contact (BIC), first bone-to-implant contact (fBIC) at the mesial and distal aspects, and peri-implant soft tissue dimensions. Radiographic analysis using micro-computed tomography (micro-CT) was additionally performed to assess fBIC at the buccal and lingual aspects. Statistical analyses were performed using repeated-measures ANOVA for BIC and the Friedman test for fBIC and peri-implant soft tissue parameters, with a significance level set at <i>p</i> &lt; 0.05. Normality and sphericity were confirmed for BIC via Shapiro–Wilk and Mauchly's tests, respectively.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Results</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Buccal fBIC values gradually decreased with longer healing periods prior to implant placement (Immediate: 3.21 mm; Early-1: 2.77 mm; Early-2: 2.09 mm; Delayed: 1.82 mm), whereas mesial, distal, and lingual fBIC values were &lt; 1 mm in all groups. None of the intergroup differences in fBIC reached statistical significance. BIC values were also comparable among the groups (54.48%, 48.40%, 45.18%, and 54.54%, respectively). Similarly, peri-implant soft tissue measurements, including gingival margin-to-fBIC (3.17–4.04 mm) and junctional epithelium-to-fBIC (1.27–1.96 mm), did not differ significantly among the groups.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Conclusion</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Implant placement performed immediately or at 2, 4, and 8 weeks after tooth extraction without additional bone grafting resulted in successful osseointegration in all groups, with no statistically significant differences in peri-implant tissue healing among the experimental groups.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":50679,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research","volume":"28 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.9,"publicationDate":"2026-10-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"149139230","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Correction to “Variability in Particle Degradation of Four Commonly Employed Dental Bone Grafts”","authors":"","doi":"10.1111/cid.70184","DOIUrl":"10.1111/cid.70184","url":null,"abstract":"<p> <span>S. Yang</span>, <span>L. Lan</span>, <span>R. J. Miron</span>, <span>L. Wei</span>, <span>M. Zhang</span>, and <span>Y. Zhang</span>, “ <span>Degradation of Four Dental Bone Grafts</span>,” <i>Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research</i> <span>17</span> (<span>2015</span>): <span>996</span>–<span>1003</span>, https://doi.org/10.1111/cid.12196.</p><p>In Figure 1, Saffarin O staining of LifeNet DFDBA 4W group (Figure 1H) was mistakenly assembled. The corrected Figure 1 is provided below:</p><p>We apologize for this error.</p>","PeriodicalId":50679,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research","volume":"28 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.9,"publicationDate":"2026-09-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/cid.70184","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"149027241","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Indications, Techniques and Complications Associated With Pterygoid Implants: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis","authors":"Francesco Gianfreda,&nbsp;Luca Guarente,&nbsp;Marzia Lommi,&nbsp;Maria Scarpati Cioffari di Castiglione,&nbsp;Alberto Antonio Nativio,&nbsp;Carlo Raffone,&nbsp;Mirko Martelli,&nbsp;Patrizio Bollero","doi":"10.1111/cid.70180","DOIUrl":"10.1111/cid.70180","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Background and Objectives</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Pterygoid implants represent a graftless option for rehabilitation of patients with posterior maxillary atrophy, engaging the dense cortical bone of the pterygomaxillary complex. Despite clinical growth, a comprehensive synthesis of indications, surgical techniques, and complications is lacking. This review evaluated the prevalence of complications, implant survival rates, and marginal bone loss (MBL) associated with pterygoid implant placement.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Methods</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>The reporting of this review follows PRISMA 2020 guidelines. Six electronic databases (PubMed, Ovid, Scopus, WoS, CENTRAL, and Dentistry &amp; Oral Sciences Source) were searched from 1 January 2020 to 31 December 2025. Included criteria comprised randomized and non-randomized clinical studies reporting outcomes of pterygoid implants (≥ 13 mm) in adult patients with posterior maxillary atrophy (minimum 10 implants). Risk of bias was assessed using JBI critical appraisal checklists. Proportions were pooled using the Freeman-Tukey double arcsine transformation under a random-effects model. Certainty of evidence was assessed using GRADE.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Results</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Seventeen studies reporting 846 patients and 1915 pterygoid implants were included. The pooled survival rate was 97.9% (95% CI: 97.1%–98.6%; I² = 0%; 14 studies) and the overall failure rate was 2.1% (95% CI: 1.4%–3.0%). Early failure rate was 0.9% (95% CI: 0.0%–3.0%; I² = 59.5%). Late failure and MBL were summarized narratively. Certainty of evidence was low to very low.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Conclusions</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Pterygoid implants demonstrate excellent survival (97.9%) and low failure rates (2.1%), primarily early, supporting their reliability as a graftless solution for posterior maxillary atrophy. Complications appear infrequent though heterogeneously reported. Low evidence certainty necessitates prospective studies with standardized outcome reporting.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":50679,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research","volume":"28 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.9,"publicationDate":"2026-09-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"148922218","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Correction to “H-PRF Bone Block Versus Sausage Technique for Horizontal Ridge Augmentation: A Retrospective Study”","authors":"","doi":"10.1111/cid.70183","DOIUrl":"10.1111/cid.70183","url":null,"abstract":"<p>\u0000 <span>Y. Feng</span>, <span>Y. Wei</span>, <span>Y. Li</span>, et al., “ <span>H-PRF Bone Block Versus Sausage Technique for Horizontal Ridge Augmentation: A Retrospective Study</span>,” <i>Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research</i> <span>28</span>, no. <span>4</span> (<span>2026</span>): e70178, https://doi.org/10.1111/cid.70178.\u0000 </p><p>The affiliation of the author “Yanchuan Feng” was incomplete as it should be linked to the first three affiliations. In addition, the affiliations' order was incorrect.</p><p>The corrected affiliations for all the authors should be as follows:</p><p>Yanchuan Feng ^1,2,3, Yan Wei ^1,2, Yongjun Li ⁴, Ting Xia ^1,2, Qihang Fan ^1,2, Richard J. Miron ⁵, Yufeng Zhang ^1,2, Hao Zeng ^1,2, Yulan Wang ^1,2</p><p>¹ State Key Laboratory of Oral &amp; Maxillofacial Reconstruction and Regeneration, Key Laboratory of Oral Biomedicine Ministry of Education, Hubei Key Laboratory of Stomatology, School &amp; Hospital of Stomatology, Wuhan University, Wuhan, China.</p><p>² Department of Oral Implantology, School and Hospital of Stomatology, Wuhan University, Wuhan, China.</p><p>³ The Stomatological Hospital, Anyang Sixth People's Hospital, Anyang, China.</p><p>⁴ Department of Oral Implantology, Wuhan Dazhong Stomatological Hospital, Wuhan, China.</p><p>⁵ Department of Periodontology, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.</p><p>The online version of this article has been corrected accordingly.</p><p>We apologize for this error.</p>","PeriodicalId":50679,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research","volume":"28 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.9,"publicationDate":"2026-09-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13542777/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"148889577","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}