Clinical Journal of Pain最新文献_第3页

I am in Charge, But Not Always in Control: A Qualitative Exploration of Female's Beliefs and Knowledge About Their Pelvic Pain. 我说了算，但并不总是我能控制：对女性盆腔疼痛的信念和知识的定性探索》。

IF 2.6 3区医学

Clinical Journal of Pain Pub Date : 2024-11-01 DOI: 10.1097/AJP.0000000000001242

Sophie M Crouch, John A Baranoff, Samantha Bunzli, Amelia K Mardon, K Jane Chalmers

{"title":"I am in Charge, But Not Always in Control: A Qualitative Exploration of Female's Beliefs and Knowledge About Their Pelvic Pain.","authors":"Sophie M Crouch, John A Baranoff, Samantha Bunzli, Amelia K Mardon, K Jane Chalmers","doi":"10.1097/AJP.0000000000001242","DOIUrl":"10.1097/AJP.0000000000001242","url":null,"abstract":"Objectives: Beliefs and knowledge about pain can influence how an individual approaches pain management. At present, there have been no investigations into the beliefs and knowledge that females hold about their pelvic pain; therefore, pain intervention approaches may not be targeted at current patient understandings. Exploring beliefs and knowledge may help inform and subsequently improve pain intervention outcomes for pelvic pain by allowing more tailored content to be delivered. This study aimed to identify beliefs and knowledge that females hold about their pelvic pain.Materials and methods: Semistructured interviews (n = 12) were conducted. Based on the common sense model, interview questions investigated participants' beliefs and knowledge related to the identity (diagnostic labels), cause, consequence, control, and timeline of their pelvic pain. Transcribed interviews were analyzed using an Interpretive Description Framework.Results: Participants reported holding biopsychosocial understandings of pain; however, many described their own pain experience in a way that was more aligned with the biomedical model of pain, suggesting incongruence in pain understanding. Participants valued their ability to take charge of their pain management, highlighting bodily autonomy and being proactive in pain management approaches. This approach to management did not provide total control over participants' pelvic pain. Pelvic pain was perceived as disruptive of life, both at present and into the future, with the predictability of pain varying over time.Conclusion: This study provides insight into the perspectives of females with pelvic pain. Recommendations for clinicians are provided with a focus on delivering targeted education and equipping patients with helpful representations of their pain.","PeriodicalId":50678,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Journal of Pain","volume":" ","pages":"673-683"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142300069","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Self-Medication Paths: A Descriptive Study Unveiling the Interplay Between Medical and Nonmedical Cannabis in Chronic Pain Management. 自我药疗之路：一项描述性研究揭示了医用大麻和非医用大麻在慢性疼痛治疗中的相互作用。

IF 2.6 3区医学

Clinical Journal of Pain Pub Date : 2024-11-01 DOI: 10.1097/AJP.0000000000001241

Claudie Audet, Christian Bertrand, Marc O Martel, Anne Marie Pinard, Mélanie Bérubé, Anaïs Lacasse

{"title":"Self-Medication Paths: A Descriptive Study Unveiling the Interplay Between Medical and Nonmedical Cannabis in Chronic Pain Management.","authors":"Claudie Audet, Christian Bertrand, Marc O Martel, Anne Marie Pinard, Mélanie Bérubé, Anaïs Lacasse","doi":"10.1097/AJP.0000000000001241","DOIUrl":"10.1097/AJP.0000000000001241","url":null,"abstract":"Objectives: Cannabis is used by one-third of people living with chronic pain to alleviate their symptoms despite warnings from several organizations regarding its efficacy and safety. We currently know little about self-medication practices (use of cannabis for therapeutic purposes without guidance), mainly since the legalization of recreational cannabis in countries such as Canada has expanded the scope of this phenomenon. This study aimed to describe legal cannabis self-medication for pain relief in people living with chronic pain and to explore perceptions of the effectiveness and safety of cannabis.Methods: A cross-sectional descriptive study was performed among 73 individuals living with chronic pain and using cannabis (Quebec, Canada). Data collection using telephone interviews occurred in early 2023.Results: Results indicated that 61.6% of participants reported using cannabis without the guidance of a health care professional (self-medication). Surprisingly, among those, 40.0% held a medical authorization. Overall, 20.6% of study participants were using both medical and legal nonmedical cannabis. Different pathways to self-medication were revealed. Proportion of women versus men participants self-medicating were 58.2% versus 70.6% ( P =0.284). In terms of perceptions, 90.4% of the sample perceived cannabis to be effective for pain management; 72.6% estimated that it posed no or minimal health risk.Discussion: Cannabis research is often organized around medical versus nonmedical cannabis but in the real-world, those 2 vessels are connected. Interested parties, including researchers, health care professionals, and funding agencies, need to consider this. Patients using cannabis feel confident in the safety of cannabis, and many of them self-medicate, which calls for action.","PeriodicalId":50678,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Journal of Pain","volume":" ","pages":"635-645"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11462876/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142082467","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Comparing Pain Outcomes and Treatment Adherence Between In-Person and Virtual Interdisciplinary Pain Rehabilitation Programs at the San Francisco VA Health Care System. 比较旧金山退伍军人医疗保健系统中亲临现场和虚拟跨学科疼痛康复计划的疼痛结果和治疗依从性。

IF 2.6 3区医学

Clinical Journal of Pain Pub Date : 2024-11-01 DOI: 10.1097/AJP.0000000000001243

Emily Murphy, Tiffany Toor, Sarah Palyo, Sara Librodo, Kathryn Schopmeyer, Alan N Simmons, Irina A Strigo

{"title":"Comparing Pain Outcomes and Treatment Adherence Between In-Person and Virtual Interdisciplinary Pain Rehabilitation Programs at the San Francisco VA Health Care System.","authors":"Emily Murphy, Tiffany Toor, Sarah Palyo, Sara Librodo, Kathryn Schopmeyer, Alan N Simmons, Irina A Strigo","doi":"10.1097/AJP.0000000000001243","DOIUrl":"10.1097/AJP.0000000000001243","url":null,"abstract":"Objective: This study compared clinical pain outcomes between patients in a pain treatment program that was conducted in-person, compared with a virtual program.Methods: In-person (N=127) and virtual (N=101) pain treatment programs were compared based on patient-reported, practitioner-collected, and medical record data. The patients were measured at baseline and post-treatment (week 12 for In-Person and week 8 for Virtual patients). We employed the last observation carried forward (LOCF) to handle missing data.Results: Both the In-Person and Virtual groups were similar in regard to all baseline outcomes, except the In-person group having significantly more co-morbidities at baseline, with particularly more cases of mental, behavioral, or neurodevelopmental diseases. Both groups demonstrated significant improvements in the pain-related measurements of pain interference and pain catastrophizing thoughts, but neither group displayed a change in average pain across treatment. Further, both groups improved significantly on emotional well-being scores, but not on physical functioning scores. No significant differences existed between groups on outcomes, except for pain catastrophizing, which was higher in the Virtual group at both time points. The Virtual group had lower rates of dropouts compared with In-Person, while the In-Person group had a larger proportion reach a clinically meaningful change in pain-related outcomes, defined as a >30% improvement.Discussion: While some changes were unique to the In-Person program, overall, patients in the Virtual program achieved similar treatment outcomes, suggesting that it can successfully treat Veterans seeking pain management, with less need for in-person facilities for both patients and clinicians.","PeriodicalId":50678,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Journal of Pain","volume":" ","pages":"655-664"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142300065","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Reduces Pressure Pain Sensitivity in Patients With Noncancer Chronic Pain. 经颅直流电刺激降低非恶性慢性疼痛患者的压痛敏感性

IF 2.6 3区医学

Clinical Journal of Pain Pub Date : 2024-11-01 DOI: 10.1097/AJP.0000000000001246

Daniela M Zolezzi, Sebastian Kold, Christina Brock, Anne Birthe Helweg Jensen, Sarah Thorius Jensen, Isabelle Myriam Larsen, Søren Schou Olesen, Carsten Dahl Mørch, Asbjørn Mohr Drewes, Thomas Graven-Nielsen

{"title":"Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Reduces Pressure Pain Sensitivity in Patients With Noncancer Chronic Pain.","authors":"Daniela M Zolezzi, Sebastian Kold, Christina Brock, Anne Birthe Helweg Jensen, Sarah Thorius Jensen, Isabelle Myriam Larsen, Søren Schou Olesen, Carsten Dahl Mørch, Asbjørn Mohr Drewes, Thomas Graven-Nielsen","doi":"10.1097/AJP.0000000000001246","DOIUrl":"10.1097/AJP.0000000000001246","url":null,"abstract":"Objectives: Noncancer chronic pain is a clinical challenge because pharmacological treatment often fails to relieve pain. Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is a treatment that could have the potential for pain relief and improvement in quality of life. However, there is a lack of clinical trials evaluating the effects of tDCS on the pain system. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the effect of 5 days of anodal tDCS treatment on the pain system in patients with chronic noncancer pain using quantitative sensory testing and quality of life questionnaires: (1) Brief Pain Inventory-short form, (2) European Organization for Research and Treatment of Life Questionnaire-C30, and (3) Hospital Anxiety Depression Scale.Methods: Eleven patients with noncancer chronic pain (51 ± 13.6 y old, 5M) participated in the study. Anodal tDCS was applied for 5 consecutive days, followed by sham stimulation after a washout period of at least 2 weeks. Pressure pain thresholds and pain tolerance thresholds (PTT) were assessed in different body regions on days 1 and 5.Results: Anodal tDCS appeared to maintain PTT at C5 (clavicle) on day 5, but sham stimulation decreased PTT ( P = 0.007). In addition, anodal tDCS increased PTT compared with sham at day 5 at Th10 ventral dermatomes ( P = 0.014). Both anodal and sham tDCS decreased the Brief Pain Inventory-short form total and interference scores, and the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Life Questionnaire-C30 fatigue score, but no interaction effect was observed.Conclusion: This study adds to the evidence in the literature that tDCS may be a potential therapeutic tool for the management of noncancer chronic pain.","PeriodicalId":50678,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Journal of Pain","volume":" ","pages":"625-634"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142300071","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Comparison of Cognitive Functions Between Individuals With Chronic Low Back Pain With High and Low Pain Catastrophizing and Pain-free Controls: A Cross-sectional Study. 健康对照组与慢性腰背痛患者的认知功能比较（疼痛灾难化程度高低）：横断面研究

IF 2.6 3区医学

Clinical Journal of Pain Pub Date : 2024-11-01 DOI: 10.1097/AJP.0000000000001244

Fatemeh Bakhshi Feleh, Razieh Mofateh, Neda Orakifar, Soroush Lohrasbi

{"title":"Comparison of Cognitive Functions Between Individuals With Chronic Low Back Pain With High and Low Pain Catastrophizing and Pain-free Controls: A Cross-sectional Study.","authors":"Fatemeh Bakhshi Feleh, Razieh Mofateh, Neda Orakifar, Soroush Lohrasbi","doi":"10.1097/AJP.0000000000001244","DOIUrl":"10.1097/AJP.0000000000001244","url":null,"abstract":"Objectives: Researchers suggested that the interruptive effects of chronic pain on cognitive functions may be modulated by the level of pain catastrophizing (PC). However, in individuals with chronic low back pain (CLBP), domains of cognitive function that may be affected by the level of PC remain largely unclear. Therefore, this study aimed to compare cognitive functions between individuals with CLBP with high and low PC and pain-free controls.Materials and methods: This cross-sectional study examined cognitive functions of 42 individuals with CLBP and 21 pain-free controls. The PC scale was used to stratify participants with CLBP into high and low PC. Participants performed 5 cognitive tests from the Cambridge Neuropsychological Test Automated Battery, namely 5-choice reaction time, rapid visual processing, spatial working memory, attention switching task, and stop signal task.Results: The statistical analyses revealed that compared with individuals with CLBP with low PC and pain-free controls, individuals with high PC demonstrated greater values of the between errors ( P =0.01), reaction latency ( P <0.001), and stop signal reaction time variables ( P =0.004, 0.003, respectively) but lower values of probability of hit ( P =0.02, 0.01, respectively), A' ( P =0.01, <0.001, respectively), and percent correct trials variables ( P =0.002, <0.001, respectively).Discussion: The results of the current study showed deficits in sustained attention, working memory, cognitive flexibility, and inhibitory control in individuals with CLBP with high PC. From a clinical perspective, therapeutic interventions targeting PC should be considered to decrease catastrophic thinking about pain in individuals with CLBP. Additional research is warranted to explore cognitive functioning as an outcome of these interventions in individuals with CLBP.","PeriodicalId":50678,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Journal of Pain","volume":" ","pages":"646-654"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142300066","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Pediatric Neural Changes to Physical and Emotional Pain After Intensive Interdisciplinary Pain Treatment: A Pilot Study. 跨学科疼痛强化治疗后儿科神经对身体和情感疼痛的变化：试点研究。

IF 2.6 3区医学

Clinical Journal of Pain Pub Date : 2024-11-01 DOI: 10.1097/AJP.0000000000001237

Rebecca J Lepping, Cara M Hoffart, Amanda S Bruce, Jasmine M Taylor, Neil J Mardis, Seung-Lark Lim, Dustin P Wallace

{"title":"Pediatric Neural Changes to Physical and Emotional Pain After Intensive Interdisciplinary Pain Treatment: A Pilot Study.","authors":"Rebecca J Lepping, Cara M Hoffart, Amanda S Bruce, Jasmine M Taylor, Neil J Mardis, Seung-Lark Lim, Dustin P Wallace","doi":"10.1097/AJP.0000000000001237","DOIUrl":"10.1097/AJP.0000000000001237","url":null,"abstract":"Objective: Brain areas activated during pain can contribute to enhancing or reducing the pain experience, showing a potential connection between chronic pain and the neural response to pain in adolescents and youth.Methods: This study examined changes in brain activation associated with experiencing physical pain and observing physical and emotional pain in others by using functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) before and after intensive interdisciplinary pain treatment (IIPT). Eighteen youths (age 14 to 18) with widespread chronic pain completed fMRI testing before and after IIPT to assess changes in brain activation in response to physical and emotional pain.Results: Broadly, brain activation changes were observed in frontal, somatosensory, and limbic regions. These changes may suggest improvements in descending pain modulation via thalamus and caudate, and the different pattern of brain activation after treatment suggests potentially better discrimination between physical and emotional pain. Brain activation changes were also correlated with improvements in clinical outcomes of catastrophizing (reduced activation in right caudate, right mid-cingulate, and postcentral gyrus) and pain-related disability (increased activation in precentral gyrus, left hippocampus, right middle occipital cortex, and left superior frontal gyrus).Discussion: These changes could indicate that reduced brain protective responses to pain were associated with treatment-related improvements. This pilot study highlights the need for larger trials designed to better understand the brain mechanisms involved in pediatric widespread pain treatment.","PeriodicalId":50678,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Journal of Pain","volume":"40 11","pages":"665-672"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142607478","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Preoperative Bilateral External Oblique Intercostal Plus Rectus Sheath Block for Postoperative Pain Management Following Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: A Noninferior Double-Blind Placebo-Controlled Trial. 用于腹腔镜胆囊切除术后疼痛控制的术前双侧肋间外斜肌加直肠鞘阻滞：一项非劣效性双盲安慰剂对照试验。

IF 2.6 3区医学

Clinical Journal of Pain Pub Date : 2024-10-01 DOI: 10.1097/AJP.0000000000001235

Ke Mo, Weirong Kong, Jiaxin Chen, Shuhua Zhao, Qianqian Zhu

{"title":"Preoperative Bilateral External Oblique Intercostal Plus Rectus Sheath Block for Postoperative Pain Management Following Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: A Noninferior Double-Blind Placebo-Controlled Trial.","authors":"Ke Mo, Weirong Kong, Jiaxin Chen, Shuhua Zhao, Qianqian Zhu","doi":"10.1097/AJP.0000000000001235","DOIUrl":"10.1097/AJP.0000000000001235","url":null,"abstract":"Objectives: The transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block has proven efficacy and is an important component of multimodal analgesia in laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC). The external oblique intercostal (EOI) block can provide a dermatomal sensory blockade of T6 to T10 using an anterior axillary line injection. The bilateral rectus sheath (RS) block can significantly reduce early postoperative pain caused by umbilical or periumbilical incisions. The current study aimed to compare the analgesic efficacies of ultrasound-guided subcostal TAP (UG-TAP) combined with the RS block and ultrasound-guided EOI (UG-EOI) combined with the RS block for LC.Methods: Patients were randomly assigned to TAP or EOI group. Patients in TAP group received UG-TAP combined with an RS block. Patients in EOI group received UG-EOI combined with an RS block. The primary outcome was postoperative 24-hour sufentanil consumption.Results: A total of 49 patients were included in the final analysis. The postoperative 24-hour sufentanil consumption in the EOI group was significantly lower than that in the TAP group (9.79±10.22 vs. 18.67±12.58 µg; P [noninferiority] <0.01; noninferiority confirmed). Fewer patients in the EOI versus TAP group had a numerical rating score of >3 during motion. Furthermore, the mean postoperative 48-hour sufentanil consumption was lower in the EOI versus TAP group (11.54±11.70 vs. 23.04±17.10 µg; P =0.01). The mean postoperative 24-hour Quality of Recovery-15 score was higher in the EOI versus TAP group (135.21±4.40 vs. 131.91±5.11; P =0.02).Discussion: These findings suggest that UG-EOI combined with an RS block was superior to UG-TAP combined with an RS block for postoperative pain management in patients undergoing LC.","PeriodicalId":50678,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Journal of Pain","volume":" ","pages":"601-606"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141794029","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Response to "Competing Narratives: Moving the Field Forward on Spinal Cord Stimulation". 对 "相互竞争的叙述：推动脊髓刺激领域的发展"。

IF 2.6 3区医学

Clinical Journal of Pain Pub Date : 2024-09-01 DOI: 10.1097/AJP.0000000000001232

Sam Eldabe, Sarah Nevitt, Anthony Bentley, Nagy A Mekhail, Christopher Gilligan, Bart Billet, Peter S Staats, Michelle Maden, Nicole Soliday, Angela Leitner, Rui V Duarte

引用次数: 0

Mitigating Persistent Symptoms Following Rehabilitation in Musculoskeletal Disorders: A Scoping Review on After-discharge Strategies. 缓解肌肉骨骼疾病康复后的持续症状：出院后策略范围综述》。

IF 2.6 3区医学

Clinical Journal of Pain Pub Date : 2024-09-01 DOI: 10.1097/AJP.0000000000001230

Frédérique Dupuis, Jean-Sébastien Roy, Anthony Lachance, Arielle Tougas, Martine Gagnon, Pascale Marier-Deschênes, Anne Marie Pinard, Hugo Massé-Alarie

{"title":"Mitigating Persistent Symptoms Following Rehabilitation in Musculoskeletal Disorders: A Scoping Review on After-discharge Strategies.","authors":"Frédérique Dupuis, Jean-Sébastien Roy, Anthony Lachance, Arielle Tougas, Martine Gagnon, Pascale Marier-Deschênes, Anne Marie Pinard, Hugo Massé-Alarie","doi":"10.1097/AJP.0000000000001230","DOIUrl":"10.1097/AJP.0000000000001230","url":null,"abstract":"Background: The majority of patients with musculoskeletal pain (62% to 64%) achieve their treatment goals upon completing rehabilitation. However, a high re-consultation rate after discharge is frequently reported. Numerous authors have recognized the necessity of secondary prevention programs (after-discharge strategy) to ensure that the gains are maintained or further pursued after the completion of a rehabilitation program. Little is known about the different strategies currently in use, and a detailed review of the existing strategies is needed for future integration into the healthcare systems.Objective: This review systematically scopes and synthesizes the after-discharge strategies reported in the literature following rehabilitation for individuals experiencing musculoskeletal pain.Methods: Four databases (OVID MEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Sciences, and OVID PsycInfo) were screened from their inception until May 4, 2023. Literature search, screening, and extraction were performed according to the PRISMA extension for scoping review guidelines.Results: Different after-discharge strategies were identified and grouped into 2 main categories: (1) in-person and (2) remote strategies. In-person strategies included (1.1) in-person booster sessions and (1.2) the use of existing community programs after discharge. Remote strategies included remote strategies that (2.1) involve a health care professional service or (2.2) strategies that do not involve any health care professional service.Discussion: We identified various after-discharge strategies designed to sustain gains and improve patients' self-management skills following the completion of a rehabilitation program. The existence of numerous promising strategies suggests their potential suitability for various contexts.","PeriodicalId":50678,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Journal of Pain","volume":" ","pages":"542-556"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141447435","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Assessing the Evidence for Erector Spinae Plane Block in Spine Surgery. 回复：评估脊柱手术中脊柱前凸平面阻滞的证据。

IF 2.6 3区医学

Clinical Journal of Pain Pub Date : 2024-09-01 DOI: 10.1097/AJP.0000000000001228

Qing Peng, Liang Zhang

引用次数: 0