Tianyi Wang, Rachel Bergmans, Alexa Minc, John Krieger, Richard E Harris, Henry H Lai, J Quentin Clemens, Steven E Harte, Chelsea Kaplan, David A Williams, Bruce Naliboff, Robert Gallop, Sara Till, Andrew Schrepf
{"title":"泌尿系统慢性盆腔疼痛综合征患者的高影响慢性疼痛队列:回顾性MAPP研究网络研究。","authors":"Tianyi Wang, Rachel Bergmans, Alexa Minc, John Krieger, Richard E Harris, Henry H Lai, J Quentin Clemens, Steven E Harte, Chelsea Kaplan, David A Williams, Bruce Naliboff, Robert Gallop, Sara Till, Andrew Schrepf","doi":"10.1097/AJP.0000000000001275","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>An emerging concept in the chronic pain literature, high-impact chronic pain (HICP), refers to pain that occurs very frequently and results in major disruption of daily life. Previous epidemiologic investigations have noted that lower educational attainment, age, and race appear to be associated with the frequency of HICP, but condition-specific investigations of HICP have been less common.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Here we investigate HICP status and its clinical/demographic correlates in the Multidisciplinary Approach to the Study of Chronic Pelvic Pain Research Network symptom pattern study.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Participants were 476 urologic pelvic pain syndrome (UCPPS) patients, 64% of whom were female. Of these, 22% were classified as having HICP based on responses to several questions about pain interference in daily life. We confirmed that African American individuals and those with lower educational attainment were more likely to experience HICP (both P <0.05). In addition, those with HICP demonstrated much greater levels of disability, genitourinary pain, urinary symptoms, widespread pain, and pelvic floor tenderness and were more likely to experience pain in response to consuming standardized amounts of water (all P <0.05). Binary logistics regression showed that genitourinary pain, widespread pain, and race were the strongest predictors of pain in multivariate models. Furthermore, HICP status was associated with more self-reported health care utilization over the subsequent 18 months ( P <0.05).</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>These findings suggest that HICP affects more than 1 of 5 UCPPS patients, with significant associated morbidity. Demographic and clinical characteristics associated with HICP may be useful for identifying at-risk UCPPS patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":50678,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Journal of Pain","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"High-impact Chronic Pain in a Cohort of Urologic Chronic Pelvic Pain Syndrome Patients: A Retrospective MAPP Research Network Study.\",\"authors\":\"Tianyi Wang, Rachel Bergmans, Alexa Minc, John Krieger, Richard E Harris, Henry H Lai, J Quentin Clemens, Steven E Harte, Chelsea Kaplan, David A Williams, Bruce Naliboff, Robert Gallop, Sara Till, Andrew Schrepf\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/AJP.0000000000001275\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>An emerging concept in the chronic pain literature, high-impact chronic pain (HICP), refers to pain that occurs very frequently and results in major disruption of daily life. Previous epidemiologic investigations have noted that lower educational attainment, age, and race appear to be associated with the frequency of HICP, but condition-specific investigations of HICP have been less common.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Here we investigate HICP status and its clinical/demographic correlates in the Multidisciplinary Approach to the Study of Chronic Pelvic Pain Research Network symptom pattern study.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Participants were 476 urologic pelvic pain syndrome (UCPPS) patients, 64% of whom were female. Of these, 22% were classified as having HICP based on responses to several questions about pain interference in daily life. We confirmed that African American individuals and those with lower educational attainment were more likely to experience HICP (both P <0.05). In addition, those with HICP demonstrated much greater levels of disability, genitourinary pain, urinary symptoms, widespread pain, and pelvic floor tenderness and were more likely to experience pain in response to consuming standardized amounts of water (all P <0.05). Binary logistics regression showed that genitourinary pain, widespread pain, and race were the strongest predictors of pain in multivariate models. Furthermore, HICP status was associated with more self-reported health care utilization over the subsequent 18 months ( P <0.05).</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>These findings suggest that HICP affects more than 1 of 5 UCPPS patients, with significant associated morbidity. Demographic and clinical characteristics associated with HICP may be useful for identifying at-risk UCPPS patients.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50678,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Journal of Pain\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Journal of Pain\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/AJP.0000000000001275\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ANESTHESIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Journal of Pain","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/AJP.0000000000001275","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
High-impact Chronic Pain in a Cohort of Urologic Chronic Pelvic Pain Syndrome Patients: A Retrospective MAPP Research Network Study.
Objectives: An emerging concept in the chronic pain literature, high-impact chronic pain (HICP), refers to pain that occurs very frequently and results in major disruption of daily life. Previous epidemiologic investigations have noted that lower educational attainment, age, and race appear to be associated with the frequency of HICP, but condition-specific investigations of HICP have been less common.
Materials and methods: Here we investigate HICP status and its clinical/demographic correlates in the Multidisciplinary Approach to the Study of Chronic Pelvic Pain Research Network symptom pattern study.
Results: Participants were 476 urologic pelvic pain syndrome (UCPPS) patients, 64% of whom were female. Of these, 22% were classified as having HICP based on responses to several questions about pain interference in daily life. We confirmed that African American individuals and those with lower educational attainment were more likely to experience HICP (both P <0.05). In addition, those with HICP demonstrated much greater levels of disability, genitourinary pain, urinary symptoms, widespread pain, and pelvic floor tenderness and were more likely to experience pain in response to consuming standardized amounts of water (all P <0.05). Binary logistics regression showed that genitourinary pain, widespread pain, and race were the strongest predictors of pain in multivariate models. Furthermore, HICP status was associated with more self-reported health care utilization over the subsequent 18 months ( P <0.05).
Discussion: These findings suggest that HICP affects more than 1 of 5 UCPPS patients, with significant associated morbidity. Demographic and clinical characteristics associated with HICP may be useful for identifying at-risk UCPPS patients.
期刊介绍:
The Clinical Journal of Pain explores all aspects of pain and its effective treatment, bringing readers the insights of leading anesthesiologists, surgeons, internists, neurologists, orthopedists, psychiatrists and psychologists, clinical pharmacologists, and rehabilitation medicine specialists. This peer-reviewed journal presents timely and thought-provoking articles on clinical dilemmas in pain management; valuable diagnostic procedures; promising new pharmacological, surgical, and other therapeutic modalities; psychosocial dimensions of pain; and ethical issues of concern to all medical professionals. The journal also publishes Special Topic issues on subjects of particular relevance to the practice of pain medicine.