World Journal of Transplantation最新文献

{"title":"Safety and efficacy of Kaffes intraductal self-expanding metal stents in the management of post-liver transplant anastomotic strictures","authors":"Chee Lim, Jonathan Ng, Babak Sarraf, R. Vaughan, M. Efthymiou, L. Zorron Cheng Tao Pu, S. Chandran","doi":"10.5500/wjt.v14.i2.91081","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5500/wjt.v14.i2.91081","url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND\u0000 Endoscopic management is the first-line therapy for post-liver-transplant anastomotic strictures. Although the optimal duration of treatment with plastic stents has been reported to be 8-12 months, data on safety and duration for metal stents in this setting is scarce. Due to limited access to endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) during the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic in our centre, there was a change in practice towards increased usage and length-of-stay of the Kaffes biliary intraductal self-expanding stent in patients with suitable anatomy. This was mainly due to the theoretical benefit of Kaffes stents allowing for longer indwelling periods compared to the traditional plastic stents.\u0000 AIM\u0000 To compare the safety and efficacy profile of different stenting durations using Kaffes stents.\u0000 METHODS\u0000 Adult liver transplant recipients aged 18 years and above who underwent ERCP were retrospectively identified during a 10-year period through a database query. Unplanned admissions post-Kaffes stent insertion were identified manually through electronic and scanned medical records. The main outcome was the incidence of complications when stents were left indwelling for 3 months vs 6 months. Stent efficacy was calculated via rates of stricture recurrence between patients that had stenting courses for ≤ 120 d or > 120 d.\u0000 RESULTS\u0000 During the study period, a total of 66 ERCPs with Kaffes insertion were performed in 54 patients throughout their stenting course. In 33 ERCPs, the stent was removed or exchanged on a 3-month interval. No pancreatitis, perforations or deaths occurred. Minor post-ERCP complications were similar between the 3-month (abdominal pain and intraductal migration) and 6-month (abdominal pain, septic shower and embedded stent) groups - 6.1% vs 9.1% respectively, P = 0.40. All strictures resolved at the end of the stenting course, but the stenting course was variable from 3 to 22 months. The recurrence rate for stenting courses lasting for up to 120 d was 71.4% and 21.4% for stenting courses of 121 d or over (P = 0.03). There were 28 patients that were treated with a single ERCP with Kaffes, 21 with removal after 120 d and 7 within 120 d. There was a significant improvement in stricture recurrence when the Kaffes was removed after 120 d when a single ERCP was used for the entire stenting course (71.0% vs 10.0%, P = 0.01).\u0000 CONCLUSION\u0000 Utilising a single Kaffes intraductal fully-covered metal stent for at least 4 months is safe and efficacious for the management of post-transplant anastomotic strictures.","PeriodicalId":506536,"journal":{"name":"World Journal of Transplantation","volume":"23 12","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-06-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141334878","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Impact of COVID-19 on liver transplant recipients: A nationwide cohort study evaluating hospitalization, transplant rejection, and inpatient mortality","authors":"Faisal Inayat, Pratik Patel, H. Ali, Arslan Afzal, Hamza Tahir, Ahtshamullah Chaudhry, Rizwan Ishtiaq, A. Rehman, Kishan Darji, Muhammad Sohaib Afzal, Gul Nawaz, Alexa Giammarino, Sanjaya K. Satapathy","doi":"10.5500/wjt.v14.i2.90866","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5500/wjt.v14.i2.90866","url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND\u0000 The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has posed a major public health concern worldwide. Patients with comorbid conditions are at risk of adverse outcomes following COVID-19. Solid organ transplant recipients with concurrent immunosuppression and comorbidities are more susceptible to a severe COVID-19 infection. It could lead to higher rates of inpatient complications and mortality in this patient population. However, studies on COVID-19 outcomes in liver transplant (LT) recipients have yielded inconsistent findings.\u0000 AIM\u0000 To evaluate the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on hospital-related outcomes among LT recipients in the United States.\u0000 METHODS\u0000 We conducted a retrospective cohort study using the 2019–2020 National Inpatient Sample database. Patients with primary LT hospitalizations and a secondary COVID-19 diagnosis were identified using the International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision coding system. The primary outcomes included trends in LT hospitalizations before and during the COVID-19 pandemic. Secondary outcomes included comparative trends in inpatient mortality and transplant rejection in LT recipients.\u0000 RESULTS\u0000 A total of 15720 hospitalized LT recipients were included. Approximately 0.8% of patients had a secondary diagnosis of COVID-19 infection. In both cohorts, the median admission age was 57 years. The linear trends for LT hospitalizations did not differ significantly before and during the pandemic (P = 0.84). The frequency of in-hospital mortality for LT recipients increased from 1.7% to 4.4% between January 2019 and December 2020. Compared to the pre-pandemic period, a higher association was noted between LT recipients and in-hospital mortality during the pandemic, with an odds ratio (OR) of 1.69 [95% confidence interval (CI): 1.55-1.84), P < 0.001]. The frequency of transplant rejections among hospitalized LT recipients increased from 0.2% to 3.6% between January 2019 and December 2020. LT hospitalizations during the COVID-19 pandemic had a higher association with transplant rejection than before the pandemic [OR: 1.53 (95%CI: 1.26-1.85), P < 0.001].\u0000 CONCLUSION\u0000 The hospitalization rates for LT recipients were comparable before and during the pandemic. Inpatient mortality and transplant rejection rates for hospitalized LT recipients were increased during the COVID-19 pandemic.","PeriodicalId":506536,"journal":{"name":"World Journal of Transplantation","volume":"25 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-06-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141334943","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Portal vein arterialization in 25 liver transplant recipients: A Latin American single-center experience","authors":"Nicolas Andres Cortes-Mejia, Diana Fernanda Bejarano-Ramirez, J. J. Guerra-Londoño, Diego Rymel Trivino-Alvarez, Raquel Tabares-Mesa, Alonso Vera-Torres","doi":"10.5500/wjt.v14.i2.92528","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5500/wjt.v14.i2.92528","url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND\u0000 Portal vein arterialization (PVA) has been used in liver transplantation (LT) to maximize oxygen delivery when arterial circulation is compromised or has been used as an alternative reperfusion technique for complex portal vein thrombosis (PVT). The effect of PVA on portal perfusion and primary graft dysfunction (PGD) has not been assessed.\u0000 AIM\u0000 To examine the outcomes of patients who required PVA in correlation with their LT procedure.\u0000 METHODS\u0000 All patients receiving PVA and LT at the Fundacion Santa Fe de Bogota between 2011 and 2022 were analyzed. To account for the time-sensitive effects of graft perfusion, patients were classified into two groups: prereperfusion (pre-PVA), if the arterioportal anastomosis was performed before graft revascularization, and postreperfusion (post-PVA), if PVA was performed afterward. The pre-PVA rationale contemplated poor portal hemodynamics, severe vascular steal, or PVT. Post-PVA was considered if graft hypoperfusion became evident. Conservative interventions were attempted before PVA.\u0000 RESULTS\u0000 A total of 25 cases were identified: 15 before and 10 after graft reperfusion. Pre-PVA patients were more affected by diabetes, decompensated cirrhosis, impaired portal vein (PV) hemodynamics, and PVT. PGD was less common after pre-PVA (20.0% vs 60.0%) (P = 0.041). Those who developed PGD had a smaller increase in PV velocity (25.00 cm/s vs 73.42 cm/s) (P = 0.036) and flow (1.31 L/min vs 3.34 L/min) (P = 0.136) after arterialization. Nine patients required PVA closure (median time: 62 d). Pre-PVA and non-PGD cases had better survival rates than their counterparts (56.09 months vs 22.77 months and 54.15 months vs 31.91 months, respectively).\u0000 CONCLUSION\u0000 This is the largest report presenting PVA in LT. Results suggest that pre-PVA provides better graft perfusion than post-PVA. Graft hyperperfusion could play a protective role against PGD.","PeriodicalId":506536,"journal":{"name":"World Journal of Transplantation","volume":"24 8","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-06-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141334871","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Hyperacute experimental model of rat lung transplantation using a coronary shunt cannula","authors":"M. Takata, Yusuke Tanaka, Daisuke Saito, Shuhei Yoshida, Isao Matsumoto","doi":"10.5500/wjt.v14.i2.92137","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5500/wjt.v14.i2.92137","url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND\u0000 Lung transplantation is a well-established treatment of end-stage lung disease. A rodent model is an inexpensive way to collect biological data from a living model after lung transplantation. However, mastering the surgical technique takes time owing to the small organ size.\u0000 AIM\u0000 To conduct rat lung transplantation using a shunt cannula (SC) or modified cannula (MC) and assess their efficacy.\u0000 METHODS\u0000 Rat lung transplantation was performed in 11 animals in the SC group and 12 in the MC group. We devised a method of rat lung transplantation using a coronary SC for coronary artery bypass surgery as an anastomosis of pulmonary arteriovenous vessels and bronchioles. The same surgeon performed all surgical procedures in the donor and recipient rats without using a magnifying glass. The success rate of lung transplantation, operating time, and PaO2 values were compared after 2-h reperfusion after transplantation.\u0000 RESULTS\u0000 Ten and 12 lungs were successfully transplanted in the SC and MC groups, respectively. In the SC group, one animal had cardiac arrest within 1 h after reperfusion owing to bleeding during pulmonary vein anastomosis. The operating time for the removal of the heart-lung block from the donor and preparation of the left lung graft was 26.8 ± 2.3 and 25.7 ± 1.3 min in the SC and MC groups, respectively (P = 0.21). The time required for left lung transplantation in the recipients was 37.5 ± 2.8 min and 35.9 ± 1.4 min in the SC and MC groups, respectively (P = 0.12). PaO2 values at 2 h after reperfusion were 456.2 ± 25.5 and 461.2 ± 21.5 mmHg in the SC and MC groups, respectively (P = 0.63), without difference between the groups.\u0000 CONCLUSION\u0000 A hyperacute rat lung transplantation model using a coronary SC was created using a simple technique. The MC was inexpensive, easy to prepare, and simple to operate.","PeriodicalId":506536,"journal":{"name":"World Journal of Transplantation","volume":"35 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-06-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141334984","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Transarterial embolization is an acceptable bridging therapy to hepatocellular carcinoma prior to liver transplantation","authors":"G. Lazzarotto-da-Silva, L. Scaffaro, M. Farenzena, Lucas Prediger, R. K. Silva, F. Feier, T. Grezzana-Filho, Pablo D Rodrigues, Alexandre de Araujo, M. Álvares-da-Silva, Roberta C Marchiori, C. Kruel, M. Chedid","doi":"10.5500/wjt.v14.i2.90571","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5500/wjt.v14.i2.90571","url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND\u0000 Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is an aggressive malignant neoplasm that requires liver transplantation (LT). Despite patients with HCC being prioritized by most organ allocation systems worldwide, they still have to wait for long periods. Locoregional therapies (LRTs) are employed as bridging therapies in patients with HCC awaiting LT. Although largely used in the past, transarterial embolization (TAE) has been replaced by transarterial chemoembolization (TACE). However, the superiority of TACE over TAE has not been consistently shown in the literature.\u0000 AIM\u0000 To compare the outcomes of TACE and TAE in patients with HCC awaiting LT.\u0000 METHODS\u0000 All consecutive patients with HCC awaiting LT between 2011 and 2020 at a single center were included. All patients underwent LRT with either TACE or TAE. Some patients also underwent percutaneous ethanol injection (PEI), concomitantly or in different treatment sessions. The choice of LRT for each HCC nodule was determined by a multidisciplinary consensus. The primary outcome was waitlist dropout due to tumor progression, and the secondary outcome was the occurrence of adverse events. In the subset of patients who underwent LT, complete pathological response and post-transplant recurrence-free survival were also assessed.\u0000 RESULTS\u0000 Twelve (18.5%) patients in the TACE group (only TACE and TACE + PEI; n = 65) and 3 (7.9%) patients in the TAE group (only TAE and TAE + PEI; n = 38) dropped out of the waitlist due to tumor progression (P log-rank test = 0.29). Adverse events occurred in 8 (12.3%) and 2 (5.3%) patients in the TACE and TAE groups, respectively (P = 0.316). Forty-eight (73.8%) of the 65 patients in the TACE group and 29 (76.3%) of the 38 patients in the TAE group underwent LT (P = 0.818). Among these patients, complete pathological response was detected in 7 (14.6%) and 9 (31%) patients in the TACE and TAE groups, respectively (P = 0.145). Post-LT, HCC recurred in 9 (18.8%) and 4 (13.8%) patients in the TACE and TAE groups, respectively (P = 0.756). Posttransplant recurrence-free survival was similar between the groups (P log-rank test = 0.71).\u0000 CONCLUSION\u0000 Dropout rates and posttransplant recurrence-free survival of TAE were similar to those of TACE in patients with HCC. Our study reinforces the hypothesis that TACE is not superior to TAE as a bridging therapy to LT in patients with HCC.","PeriodicalId":506536,"journal":{"name":"World Journal of Transplantation","volume":"27 11","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-06-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141334927","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Controversies regarding transplantation of mesenchymal stem cells","authors":"T. Velikova, Tereza Dekova, Dimitrina Miteva","doi":"10.5500/wjt.v14.i2.90554","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5500/wjt.v14.i2.90554","url":null,"abstract":"Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) have tantalized regenerative medicine with their therapeutic potential, yet a cloud of controversies looms over their clinical transplantation. This comprehensive review navigates the intricate landscape of MSC controversies, drawing upon 15 years of clinical experience and research. We delve into the fundamental properties of MSCs, exploring their unique immunomodulatory capabilities and surface markers. The heart of our inquiry lies in the controversial applications of MSC transplantation, including the perennial debate between autologous and allogeneic sources, concerns about efficacy, and lingering safety apprehensions. Moreover, we unravel the enigmatic mechanisms surrounding MSC transplantation, such as homing, integration, and the delicate balance between differentiation and paracrine effects. We also assess the current status of clinical trials and the ever-evolving regulatory landscape. As we peer into the future, we examine emerging trends, envisioning personalized medicine and innovative delivery methods. Our review provides a balanced and informed perspective on the controversies, offering readers a clear understanding of the complexities, challenges, and potential solutions in MSC transplantation.","PeriodicalId":506536,"journal":{"name":"World Journal of Transplantation","volume":"19 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-06-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141334885","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Sarcopenic obesity in patients awaiting liver transplant: Unique challenges for nutritional recommendations","authors":"Darya M. Herscovici, Katherine M Cooper, A. Colletta, Michelle Rightmyer, A. Shingina, Lauren D. Feld","doi":"10.5500/wjt.v14.i2.90202","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5500/wjt.v14.i2.90202","url":null,"abstract":"Sarcopenic obesity increases the risk of mortality in patients with liver disease awaiting liver transplantation and in the post-transplant period. Nutrition recommendations for individuals with sarcopenia differ from recommendations for patients with obesity or sarcopenic obesity. While these nutrition guidelines have been established in non-cirrhotic patients, established guidelines for liver transplant candidates with sarcopenic obesity are lacking. In this paper, we review existing literature on sarcopenic obesity in patients with chronic liver disease and address opportunities to improve nutritional counseling in patients awaiting liver transplantation.","PeriodicalId":506536,"journal":{"name":"World Journal of Transplantation","volume":"31 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-06-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141334870","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Frequency of and reasons behind non-listing in adult patients referred for liver transplantation: Results from a retrospective study","authors":"M. Biolato, Luca Miele, G. Marrone, C. Tarli, Antonio Liguori, R. Calia, Giovanni Addolorato, Salvatore Agnes, Antonio Gasbarrini, Maurizio Pompili, A. Grieco","doi":"10.5500/wjt.v14.i2.92376","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5500/wjt.v14.i2.92376","url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND\u0000 Few studies have evaluated the frequency of and the reasons behind the refusal of listing liver transplantation candidates.\u0000 AIM\u0000 To assess the ineligibility rate for liver transplantation and its motivations.\u0000 METHODS\u0000 A single-center retrospective study was conducted on adult patients which entailed a formal multidisciplinary assessment for liver transplantation eligibility. The predictors for listing were evaluated using multivariable logistic regression.\u0000 RESULTS\u0000 In our center, 314 patients underwent multidisciplinary work-up before liver transplantation enlisting over a three-year period. The most frequent reasons for transplant evaluation were decompensated cirrhosis (51.6%) and hepatocellular carcinoma (35.7%). The non-listing rate was 53.8% and the transplant rate was 34.4% for the whole cohort. Two hundred and five motivations for ineligibility were collected. The most common contraindications were psychological (9.3%), cardiovascular (6.8%), and surgical (5.9%). Inappropriate or premature referral accounted for 76 (37.1%) cases. On multivariable analysis, a referral from another hospital (OR: 2.113; 95%CI: 1.259–3.548) served as an independent predictor of non-listing.\u0000 CONCLUSION\u0000 A non-listing decision occurred in half of our cohort and was based on an inappropriate or premature referral in one case out of three. The referral from another hospital was taken as a strong predictor of non-listing.","PeriodicalId":506536,"journal":{"name":"World Journal of Transplantation","volume":"20 8","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-06-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141334806","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Impact of payment source, referral site, and place of residence on outcomes after allogeneic transplantation in Mexico","authors":"A. Gómez-De León, Yesica A. López-Mora, Valeria García-Zárate, Ana Varela-Constantino, S. U. Villegas-De Leon, Xitlaly J González-Leal, Raúl del Toro-Mijares, A. C. Rodríguez-Zúñiga, Juan F Barrios-Ruiz, Víctor Mingura-Ledezma, P. Colunga-Pedraza, O. Cantú-Rodríguez, C. H. Gutiérrez-Aguirre, L. Tarín-Arzaga, E. Gonzalez-Lopez, D. Gómez‐Almaguer","doi":"10.5500/wjt.v14.i2.91052","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5500/wjt.v14.i2.91052","url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND\u0000 The impact of social determinants of health in allogeneic transplant recipients in low- and middle-income countries is poorly described. This observational study analyzes the impact of place of residence, referring institution, and transplant cost coverage (out-of-pocket vs government-funded vs private insurance) on outcomes after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (alloHSCT) in two of Mexico's largest public and private institutions.\u0000 AIM\u0000 To evaluate the impact of social determinants of health and their relationship with outcomes among allogeneic transplant recipients in Mexico.\u0000 METHODS\u0000 In this retrospective cohort study, we included adolescents and adults ≥ 16 years who received a matched sibling or haploidentical transplant from 2015-2022. Participants were selected without regard to their diagnosis and were sourced from both a private clinic and a public University Hospital in Mexico. Three payment groups were compared: Out-of-pocket (OOP), private insurance, and a federal Universal healthcare program “Seguro Popular”. Outcomes were compared between referred and institution-diagnosed patients, and between residents of Nuevo Leon and out-of-state. Primary outcomes included overall survival (OS), categorized by residence, referral, and payment source. Secondary outcomes encompassed early mortality, event-free-survival, graft-versus-host-relapse-free survival, and non-relapse-mortality (NRM). Statistical analyses employed appropriate tests, Kaplan-Meier method, and Cox proportional hazard regression modeling. Statistical software included SPSS and R with tidycmprsk library.\u0000 RESULTS\u0000 Our primary outcome was overall survival. We included 287 patients, n = 164 who lived out of state (57.1%), and n = 129 referred from another institution (44.9%). The most frequent payment source was OOP (n = 139, 48.4%), followed by private insurance (n = 75, 26.1%) and universal coverage (n = 73, 25.4%). No differences in OS, event-free-survival, NRM, or graft-versus-host-relapse-free survival were observed for patients diagnosed locally vs in another institution, nor patients who lived in-state vs out-of-state. Patients who covered transplant costs through private insurance had the best outcomes with improved OS (median not reached) and 2-year cumulative incidence of NRM of 14% than patients who covered costs OOP (Median OS and 2-year NRM of 32%) or through a universal healthcare program active during the study period (OS and 2-year NRM of 19%) (P = 0.024 and P = 0.002, respectively). In a multivariate analysis, payment source and disease risk index were the only factors associated with overall survival.\u0000 CONCLUSION\u0000 In this Latin-American multicenter study, the site of residence or referral for alloHSCT did not impact outcomes. However, access to healthcare coverage for alloHSCT was associated with improved OS and reduced NRM.","PeriodicalId":506536,"journal":{"name":"World Journal of Transplantation","volume":"43 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-06-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141334836","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Critical considerations for the management of acute abdomen in transplant patients","authors":"E. Pavlidis, Georgios Katsanos, Athanasios Kofinas, Georgios Tsoulfas, Ioannis N Galanis, Theodoros E Pavlidis","doi":"10.5500/wjt.v14.i2.93944","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5500/wjt.v14.i2.93944","url":null,"abstract":"The number of solid organ transplantations performed annually is increasing and are increasing in the following order: Kidney, liver, heart, lung, pancreas, small bowel, and uterine transplants. However, the outcomes of transplants are improving (organ survival > 90% after the 1st year). Therefore, there is a high probability that a general surgeon will be faced with the management of a transplant patient with acute abdomen. Surgical problems in immunocompromised patients may not only include graft-related problems but also nongraft-related problems. The perioperative regulation of immunosuppression, the treatment of accompanying problems of immunosuppression, the administration of cortisol and, above all, the realization of a rapidly deteriorating situation and the accurate evaluation and interpretation of clinical manifestations are particularly important in these patients. The perioperative assessment and preparation includes evaluation of the patient’s cardiovascular system and determining if the patient has hypertension or suppression of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis, or if the patient has had any coagulation mechanism abnormalities or thromboembolic episodes. Immunosuppression in transplant patients is associated with the use of calcineurin inhibitors, corticosteroids, and antiproliferation agents. Many times, the clinical picture is atypical, resulting in delays in diagnosis and treatment and leading to increased morbidity and mortality. Multidetector computed tomography is of utmost importance for early diagnosis and management. Transplant recipients are prone to infections, especially specific infections caused by cytomegalovirus and Clostridium difficile , and they are predisposed to intraoperative or postoperative complications that require great care and vigilance. It is necessary to follow evidence-based therapeutic protocols. Thus, it is required that the clinician choose the correct therapeutic plan for the patient (conservative, emergency open surgery or minimally invasive surgery, including laparoscopic or even robotic surgery).","PeriodicalId":506536,"journal":{"name":"World Journal of Transplantation","volume":"21 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-06-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141334802","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}