转诊接受肝移植的成年患者未被列入名单的频率和原因:一项回顾性研究的结果

M. Biolato, Luca Miele, G. Marrone, C. Tarli, Antonio Liguori, R. Calia, Giovanni Addolorato, Salvatore Agnes, Antonio Gasbarrini, Maurizio Pompili, A. Grieco
{"title":"转诊接受肝移植的成年患者未被列入名单的频率和原因:一项回顾性研究的结果","authors":"M. Biolato, Luca Miele, G. Marrone, C. Tarli, Antonio Liguori, R. Calia, Giovanni Addolorato, Salvatore Agnes, Antonio Gasbarrini, Maurizio Pompili, A. Grieco","doi":"10.5500/wjt.v14.i2.92376","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND\n Few studies have evaluated the frequency of and the reasons behind the refusal of listing liver transplantation candidates.\n AIM\n To assess the ineligibility rate for liver transplantation and its motivations.\n METHODS\n A single-center retrospective study was conducted on adult patients which entailed a formal multidisciplinary assessment for liver transplantation eligibility. The predictors for listing were evaluated using multivariable logistic regression.\n RESULTS\n In our center, 314 patients underwent multidisciplinary work-up before liver transplantation enlisting over a three-year period. The most frequent reasons for transplant evaluation were decompensated cirrhosis (51.6%) and hepatocellular carcinoma (35.7%). The non-listing rate was 53.8% and the transplant rate was 34.4% for the whole cohort. Two hundred and five motivations for ineligibility were collected. The most common contraindications were psychological (9.3%), cardiovascular (6.8%), and surgical (5.9%). Inappropriate or premature referral accounted for 76 (37.1%) cases. On multivariable analysis, a referral from another hospital (OR: 2.113; 95%CI: 1.259–3.548) served as an independent predictor of non-listing.\n CONCLUSION\n A non-listing decision occurred in half of our cohort and was based on an inappropriate or premature referral in one case out of three. The referral from another hospital was taken as a strong predictor of non-listing.","PeriodicalId":506536,"journal":{"name":"World Journal of Transplantation","volume":"20 8","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Frequency of and reasons behind non-listing in adult patients referred for liver transplantation: Results from a retrospective study\",\"authors\":\"M. Biolato, Luca Miele, G. Marrone, C. Tarli, Antonio Liguori, R. Calia, Giovanni Addolorato, Salvatore Agnes, Antonio Gasbarrini, Maurizio Pompili, A. Grieco\",\"doi\":\"10.5500/wjt.v14.i2.92376\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"BACKGROUND\\n Few studies have evaluated the frequency of and the reasons behind the refusal of listing liver transplantation candidates.\\n AIM\\n To assess the ineligibility rate for liver transplantation and its motivations.\\n METHODS\\n A single-center retrospective study was conducted on adult patients which entailed a formal multidisciplinary assessment for liver transplantation eligibility. The predictors for listing were evaluated using multivariable logistic regression.\\n RESULTS\\n In our center, 314 patients underwent multidisciplinary work-up before liver transplantation enlisting over a three-year period. The most frequent reasons for transplant evaluation were decompensated cirrhosis (51.6%) and hepatocellular carcinoma (35.7%). The non-listing rate was 53.8% and the transplant rate was 34.4% for the whole cohort. Two hundred and five motivations for ineligibility were collected. The most common contraindications were psychological (9.3%), cardiovascular (6.8%), and surgical (5.9%). Inappropriate or premature referral accounted for 76 (37.1%) cases. On multivariable analysis, a referral from another hospital (OR: 2.113; 95%CI: 1.259–3.548) served as an independent predictor of non-listing.\\n CONCLUSION\\n A non-listing decision occurred in half of our cohort and was based on an inappropriate or premature referral in one case out of three. The referral from another hospital was taken as a strong predictor of non-listing.\",\"PeriodicalId\":506536,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"World Journal of Transplantation\",\"volume\":\"20 8\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"World Journal of Transplantation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5500/wjt.v14.i2.92376\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World Journal of Transplantation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5500/wjt.v14.i2.92376","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景很少有研究对肝移植候选者拒绝列名的频率及其原因进行评估。目的 评估肝移植不合格率及其原因。方法 对成年患者进行了一项单中心回顾性研究,该研究需要对肝移植资格进行正式的多学科评估。采用多变量逻辑回归法对列入名单的预测因素进行了评估。结果 在我们中心,314 名患者在三年内接受了肝移植前的多学科检查。最常见的移植评估原因是失代偿性肝硬化(51.6%)和肝细胞癌(35.7%)。在整个群体中,未入选率为 53.8%,移植率为 34.4%。共收集了 25 种不符合条件的动机。最常见的禁忌症是心理(9.3%)、心血管(6.8%)和手术(5.9%)。不适当或过早转诊占 76 例(37.1%)。在多变量分析中,从其他医院转诊(OR:2.113;95%CI:1.259-3.548)是不列入名单的独立预测因素。结论 在我们的队列中,有一半的病例未被列入名单,其中三分之二的病例是由于转诊不当或转诊时间过早。从其他医院转诊是未列入名单的一个重要预测因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Frequency of and reasons behind non-listing in adult patients referred for liver transplantation: Results from a retrospective study
BACKGROUND Few studies have evaluated the frequency of and the reasons behind the refusal of listing liver transplantation candidates. AIM To assess the ineligibility rate for liver transplantation and its motivations. METHODS A single-center retrospective study was conducted on adult patients which entailed a formal multidisciplinary assessment for liver transplantation eligibility. The predictors for listing were evaluated using multivariable logistic regression. RESULTS In our center, 314 patients underwent multidisciplinary work-up before liver transplantation enlisting over a three-year period. The most frequent reasons for transplant evaluation were decompensated cirrhosis (51.6%) and hepatocellular carcinoma (35.7%). The non-listing rate was 53.8% and the transplant rate was 34.4% for the whole cohort. Two hundred and five motivations for ineligibility were collected. The most common contraindications were psychological (9.3%), cardiovascular (6.8%), and surgical (5.9%). Inappropriate or premature referral accounted for 76 (37.1%) cases. On multivariable analysis, a referral from another hospital (OR: 2.113; 95%CI: 1.259–3.548) served as an independent predictor of non-listing. CONCLUSION A non-listing decision occurred in half of our cohort and was based on an inappropriate or premature referral in one case out of three. The referral from another hospital was taken as a strong predictor of non-listing.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信